Record set Arctic Sea Ice

elektra

Platinum Member
Dec 1, 2013
23,177
10,634
915
Temecula California
What more can I say. Those in Oregon look out their window and cry the climate has changed. We try to tell them, it is just weather. But they have no science. Just tears.


During the first sixteen days of September, Arctic sea ice extent increased by a record amount.

Extent is up 27% since this date last year.

There has been no trend in minimum sea ice extent over the past fifteen years.

Sea ice extent in the western Arctic is higher than 40 years ago.

ice.jpg
 
What more can I say. Those in Oregon look out their window and cry the climate has changed. We try to tell them, it is just weather. But they have no science. Just tears.


During the first sixteen days of September, Arctic sea ice extent increased by a record amount.

Extent is up 27% since this date last year.

There has been no trend in minimum sea ice extent over the past fifteen years.

Sea ice extent in the western Arctic is higher than 40 years ago.

View attachment 571020
LOL Any more silly lies to post? Here are the facts;

1638595001903.png

 
??????

I just stated and found the facts that show sea ice growth set a record. Your graph confirms that fact. Notice your last piece of data that was plotted, it is going up, that is growth.

Thanks Old Crock for adding fact to my OP, sea ice growth is setting records.
Did you also notice that his BS graph was an annual graph attached to a link with a "one-day lag" He's got old rocks in his head.
 
Meanwhile, back in the real world, Arctic sea ice levels are a little higher than the last few years, but still way below the 1980s average. Or the 1990s average. Or the 2000s average. They're tracking right along the 2010s average now.

The deniers are doing that thing they do so often, where they spin a small short-term variability blip as a long-term trend. Misrepresenting the data like that is one of the few tactics they have left.
 
Did you also notice that his BS graph was an annual graph attached to a link with a "one-day lag" He's got old rocks in his head.
Did you notice that was a comparison of ice levels for November for the last 30 years. A record increase in overall ice levels would have been back up to 11.5 million square kilometers. By the way, one day lag is for the interpretation of the data from the satellites. Hardly affects the monthly number of the extent of the ice coverage.
 
Meanwhile, back in the real world, Arctic sea ice levels are a little higher than the last few years, but still way below the 1980s average. Or the 1990s average. Or the 2000s average. They're tracking right along the 2010s average now.

The deniers are doing that thing they do so often, where they spin a small short-term variability blip as a long-term trend. Misrepresenting the data like that is one of the few tactics they have left.
That's because climate fluctuations and environmental uncertainty are hallmarks of our bipolar glaciated world.
 
Solar variability and orbital forcings coupled with albedo of the northern hemisphere have driven all climate fluctuations and environmental uncertainty over the last 3 million years because the planet is uniquely configured for bipolar glaciation and the planet's temperature is at the threshhold for extensive northern hemisphere glaciation. Wake the fuck up.
 

Forum List

Back
Top