Real Science…Not Darwin

Darwinian evolution is not science its nothing but tax payer funded religious dogma. Its taught as fact but in reality its an unprovable theory as there is no LAW OF EVOLUTION as taught in our school systems.

As far a census opinion meaning something.......some on this board declare that every important man of science has historically supported human evolution as being a scientific fact......Indeed human evolution (within species) is a fact of nature. Man was created with the ability to evolve/adapt............if not, mankind would've became extinct when he 1st came into contact with the common cold virus or when he first encountered some drastic climate/weather change.

But there is a distinct difference between "horizontal evolution" which is a fact of science that demonstrates evolution within SPECIES and "vertical evolution" as taught by the Darwinian Quacks as a fact ......evolution of a vertical nature or the teaching that man has evolved from a different species. They do this, muddy the waters, they present examples of evolution within species and declare.........see, facts, and then go off on a tangent narrative and claim this proves Vertical Evolution, evolution outside of species....by calling MUTATION as a reality that creates new species........but in reality MUTATION is the deformed entity of a completely healthy DNA example....mutation never adds onto a DNA, mutation takes away perfection and leaves deformity behind in its wake.

They will show different states of animalistic type characteristics of supposed different stages of human evolution.....when in reality the fossils found represent.....the remains of isolated pockets of humanity that attempted to survive via incestuous reproduction. The fossils found are nothing but examples of deformed or mutated HUMANS as the DNA proves.

They attempt to declare, "See the great resemblance between normal DNA and these sub humans?" Of course the DNA is close........but there is always something missing.....that which is missing is the reason for the deformity.

You will never see a Darwinist promote this possibility because it defeats their basic tenet of life having evolved randomly from NON LIVING MATTER.

There is a huge list of great men of science that dismisses Darwinian teaching as quackery. There are many of these men of science that actually believe in the God of Creation. 1. Joseph Lister........the father of antiseptic surgical practice
2. Louis Pasteur who debunked the atheistic claim of "spontaneous generation of life from non living matter".

3. Isaac Newton......who believed in gravity, calculus and the Bible. 4. Johann Kepler astronomy. 5. Robert Boyle Chemistry.
6. Georges Cuvier Paleontology. 7. Charles Baggage computer science. ............more great men of science that had a census opinion of accepting creationism over Darwinism?

Charles Maxwell, Michael Faraday, Ambrose Fleming....the list goes on and on........in fact up to 50% of the scientific community is beginning to drastically question Darwinian quackery.

Again.........anyone, SHOW ME THE LAW OF EVOUTION. If not simply accept your place as being a member of a religious cult as anything can be made into a religion and its nothing short of worshiping to read some of the quackery presented as scientific evidence.

When they go off on this tangent teaching, claiming its SCIENCE.....notice the words ALWAYS used in these supposed Scientific opinions. They use words such as, "points to", "suggests" "most likely" "could it be", etc. Real scientific Terms ;)
 
Last edited:
Darwinian evolution is not science its nothing but tax payer funded religious dogma. Its taught as fact but in reality its an unprovable theory as there is no LAW OF EVOLUTION as taught in our school systems.

As far a census opinion meaning something.......some on this board declare that every important man of science has historically supported human evolution as being a scientific fact......Indeed human evolution (within species) is a fact of nature. Man was created with the ability to evolve/adapt............if not, mankind would've became extinct when he 1st came into contact with the common cold virus or when he first encountered some drastic climate/weather change.

But there is a distinct difference between "horizontal evolution" which is a fact of science that demonstrates evolution within SPECIES and "vertical evolution" as taught by the Darwinian Quacks as a fact ......evolution of a vertical nature or the teaching that man has evolved from a different species. They do this, muddy the waters, they present examples of evolution within species and declare.........see, facts, and then go off on a tangent narrative and claim this proves Vertical Evolution, evolution outside of species....by calling MUTATION as a reality that creates new species........but in reality MUTATION is the deformed entity of a completely healthy DNA example....mutation never adds onto a DNA, mutation takes away perfection and leaves deformity behind in its wake.

They will show different states of animalistic type characteristics of supposed different stages of human evolution.....when in reality the fossils found represent.....the remains of isolated pockets of humanity that attempted to survive via incestuous reproduction. The fossils found are nothing but examples of deformed or mutated HUMANS as the DNA proves.

They attempt to declare, "See the great resemblance between normal DNA and these sub humans?" Of course the DNA is close........but there is always something missing.....that which is missing is the reason for the deformity.

You will never see a Darwinist promote this possibility because it defeats their basic tenet of life having evolved randomly from NON LIVING MATTER.

There is a huge list of great men of science that dismisses Darwinian teaching as quackery. There are many of these men of science that actually believe in the God of Creation. 1. Joseph Lister........the father of antiseptic surgical practice
2. Louis Pasteur who debunked the atheistic claim of "spontaneous generation of life from non living matter".

3. Isaac Newton......who believed in gravity, calculus and the Bible. 4. Johann Kepler astronomy. 5. Robert Boyle Chemistry.
6. Georges Cuvier Paleontology. 7. Charles Baggage computer science. ............more great men of science that had a census opinion of accepting creationism over Darwinism?

Charles Maxwell, Michael Faraday, Ambrose Fleming....the list goes on and on........in fact up to 50% of the scientific community is beginning to drastically question Darwinian quackery.

Again.........anyone, SHOW ME THE LAW OF EVOUTION. If not simply accept your place as being a member of a religious cult as anything can be made into a religion and its nothing short of worshiping to read some of the quackery presented as scientific evidence.

When they go off on this tangent teaching, claiming its SCIENCE.....notice the words ALWAYS used in these supposed Scientific opinions. They use words such as, "points to", "suggests" "most likely" "could it be", etc. Real scientific Terms ;)

In science ... it's never enough to say something is wrong, we must also say what is correct ... what alternative theory do you present and how are you demonstrating it? ...

Darwin took a step, and made good money ... his book is still in print ... but generally we use the Modern Synthesis as our framework today ... is there a better framework for research, communications and products? ... something that better explains COVID-03 ...

2CH4 --> C2H6 + H2 ... simple collisions ... the rest of evolution follows quite naturally ... throw in a little ammonia and PRESTO ... we have Glycine ... every time we try ... or do I have to explain to you why carbon is the third most abundant element in the universe? ...
 
In science ... it's never enough to say something is wrong, we must also say what is correct ... what alternative theory do you present and how are you demonstrating it? ...

Darwin took a step, and made good money ... his book is still in print ... but generally we use the Modern Synthesis as our framework today ... is there a better framework for research, communications and products? ... something that better explains COVID-03 ...

2CH4 --> C2H6 + H2 ... simple collisions ... the rest of evolution follows quite naturally ... throw in a little ammonia and PRESTO ... we have Glycine ... every time we try ... or do I have to explain to you why carbon is the third most abundant element in the universe? ...
Can you spell D E F L E C T I O N? So you are endorsing DARWINIAN CULTISM because of the money made in book sales? And you throw in a few parroted Chem equations to feign intelligence?

Do you know what the best selling and most printed book of ALL TIME is? Its nice to see you endorse "creationism", as the Holy Bible is the best selling work of literature in world history. If book sales is the your source of calibrating truth. Thus..........on one hand according to the Darwinian Cultists.....you can't believe everything in print......yet that's all you have in support of YOUR RELIGIONOUS DOGMA? How well Darwin has been peddled as truth? ;)

The Holy Bible in all its print form has sold more than 5 billion copies and has a constant annual sale estimated to be around 100 Million copies.

As stated previously.........why do all those who support Darwinism as a theory.........present nothing but SUBJECTIVE RHETORICAL BS as evidence? As demonstrated.........book sales do not calibrate truth........its the objective content of those books that calibrate truth.

Regardless of how many consensus opinions exist that favor DARWIN..........there still is no "LAW" of evolution demonstrated to be a FACT of SCIENCE. In fact every time the basic tenet of natural evolution (life arising from dead matter.....aka., Spontaneous Generation of life from nothing).......that Theory has been rejected by the scientific method.

Science Method: The use of empirical evidence that can be OBSERVED, REPEATED, with consistency of experimentation. Mr. Pasteur demonstrated (just as the Scriptures declare..........life can only be reproduced naturally within species). Life can only exist as produced from pre-existing life within the same species.

Every time there has been an experiment attempting to generate life from dead matter........Science has rejected that experiment as being false.

Yet.....there has never been a single experiment using the scientific method that has rejected CREATIONISM. Which came first the chicken or the egg........logic and reason dictates that first there must be a chicken to lay the egg.....and where did that first chicken come from...........NOTHING as the Darwinist would declare? Reality: All of life on earth has in common one element............CARBON. So is it surprising in the least that all life shares in some extent a common DNA signature? Water and Carbon........both needed for life to exist. Yet to hear the Darwinist speak..........C02 is a poison to all life on earth.

And its still the DOGMA of DARWIN that is claimed as TRUTH by the cultists. Cultists so fanatic they refuse to accept opposing theories. Science never runs from debate....it embraces it.
 
Last edited:
In science ... it's never enough to say something is wrong, we must also say what is correct ... what alternative theory do you present and how are you demonstrating it? ...

Darwin took a step, and made good money ... his book is still in print ... but generally we use the Modern Synthesis as our framework today ... is there a better framework for research, communications and products? ... something that better explains COVID-03 ...

2CH4 --> C2H6 + H2 ... simple collisions ... the rest of evolution follows quite naturally ... throw in a little ammonia and PRESTO ... we have Glycine ... every time we try ... or do I have to explain to you why carbon is the third most abundant element in the universe? ...
How dare you trigger Clyde, using "Real scientific Terms" like that. Shame on you. Please continue..
 
Darwinian evolution is not science its nothing but tax payer funded religious dogma. Its taught as fact but in reality its an unprovable theory as there is no LAW OF EVOLUTION as taught in our school systems.

As far a census opinion meaning something.......some on this board declare that every important man of science has historically supported human evolution as being a scientific fact......Indeed human evolution (within species) is a fact of nature. Man was created with the ability to evolve/adapt............if not, mankind would've became extinct when he 1st came into contact with the common cold virus or when he first encountered some drastic climate/weather change.

But there is a distinct difference between "horizontal evolution" which is a fact of science that demonstrates evolution within SPECIES and "vertical evolution" as taught by the Darwinian Quacks as a fact ......evolution of a vertical nature or the teaching that man has evolved from a different species. They do this, muddy the waters, they present examples of evolution within species and declare.........see, facts, and then go off on a tangent narrative and claim this proves Vertical Evolution, evolution outside of species....by calling MUTATION as a reality that creates new species........but in reality MUTATION is the deformed entity of a completely healthy DNA example....mutation never adds onto a DNA, mutation takes away perfection and leaves deformity behind in its wake.

They will show different states of animalistic type characteristics of supposed different stages of human evolution.....when in reality the fossils found represent.....the remains of isolated pockets of humanity that attempted to survive via incestuous reproduction. The fossils found are nothing but examples of deformed or mutated HUMANS as the DNA proves.

They attempt to declare, "See the great resemblance between normal DNA and these sub humans?" Of course the DNA is close........but there is always something missing.....that which is missing is the reason for the deformity.

You will never see a Darwinist promote this possibility because it defeats their basic tenet of life having evolved randomly from NON LIVING MATTER.

There is a huge list of great men of science that dismisses Darwinian teaching as quackery. There are many of these men of science that actually believe in the God of Creation. 1. Joseph Lister........the father of antiseptic surgical practice
2. Louis Pasteur who debunked the atheistic claim of "spontaneous generation of life from non living matter".

3. Isaac Newton......who believed in gravity, calculus and the Bible. 4. Johann Kepler astronomy. 5. Robert Boyle Chemistry.
6. Georges Cuvier Paleontology. 7. Charles Baggage computer science. ............more great men of science that had a census opinion of accepting creationism over Darwinism?

Charles Maxwell, Michael Faraday, Ambrose Fleming....the list goes on and on........in fact up to 50% of the scientific community is beginning to drastically question Darwinian quackery.

Again.........anyone, SHOW ME THE LAW OF EVOUTION. If not simply accept your place as being a member of a religious cult as anything can be made into a religion and its nothing short of worshiping to read some of the quackery presented as scientific evidence.

When they go off on this tangent teaching, claiming its SCIENCE.....notice the words ALWAYS used in these supposed Scientific opinions. They use words such as, "points to", "suggests" "most likely" "could it be", etc. Real scientific Terms ;)
People who would fail 6th grade science quizzes should not be posting in this section.
 
Can you spell D E F L E C T I O N? So you are endorsing DARWINIAN CULTISM because of the money made in book sales? And you throw in a few parroted Chem equations to feign intelligence?

Do you know what the best selling and most printed book of ALL TIME is? Its nice to see you endorse "creationism", as the Holy Bible is the best selling work of literature in world history. If book sales is the your source of calibrating truth. Thus..........on one hand according to the Darwinian Cultists.....you can't believe everything in print......yet that's all you have in support of YOUR RELIGIONOUS DOGMA? How well Darwin has been peddled as truth? ;)

The Holy Bible in all its print form has sold more than 5 billion copies and has a constant annual sale estimated to be around 100 Million copies.

As stated previously.........why do all those who support Darwinism as a theory.........present nothing but SUBJECTIVE RHETORICAL BS as evidence? As demonstrated.........book sales do not calibrate truth........its the objective content of those books that calibrate truth.

Regardless of how many consensus opinions exist that favor DARWIN..........there still is no "LAW" of evolution demonstrated to be a FACT of SCIENCE. In fact every time the basic tenet of natural evolution (life arising from dead matter.....aka., Spontaneous Generation of life from nothing).......that Theory has been rejected by the scientific method.

Science Method: The use of empirical evidence that can be OBSERVED, REPEATED, with consistency of experimentation. Mr. Pasteur demonstrated (just as the Scriptures declare..........life can only be reproduced naturally within species). Life can only exist as produced from pre-existing life within the same species.

Every time there has been an experiment attempting to generate life from dead matter........Science has rejected that experiment as being false.

Yet.....there has never been a single experiment using the scientific method that has rejected CREATIONISM. Which came first the chicken or the egg........logic and reason dictates that first there must be a chicken to lay the egg.....and where did that first chicken come from...........NOTHING as the Darwinist would declare? Reality: All of life on earth has in common one element............CARBON. So is it surprising in the least that all life shares in some extent a common DNA signature? Water and Carbon........both needed for life to exist. Yet to hear the Darwinist speak..........C02 is a poison to all life on earth.

And its still the DOGMA of DARWIN that is claimed as TRUTH by the cultists. Cultists so fanatic they refuse to accept opposing theories. Science never runs from debate....it embraces it.

You seem oblivious to the fact that Darwinism was rejected as philosophy 100 years ago ... when the Modern Synthesis was developed ...

But thank you for the ad hominum attacks ... you admit my logic is infallible and have my person to discredit ...

Just curious ... how are you reconciling you posts with Christ's beatitude "Blessed are the peacemakers"? ... seems to me you are mongering war, forming divisions, separating us into "your camp" and "the enemy camp" ... as Satan divided Adam from God ... as Satan divided Cain from Abel ... as Satan divides science and religion ... just seems to me you delight in setting stumbling blocks in front of other as to prevent them from seeking salvation through Christ ... some would say that's a sin ...

All of life on earth has in common one element............CARBON

You forgot Hydrogen, Oxygen, Nitrogen ... even Phosphorus ... how on Earth could you forget Phosphorus ... just a nitpick ... reduced carbon ... ever heard of photosynthesis, it's not in the Bible, therefore it's not Creationism ... unless you're adding material to the Bible willy-nilly ... [shrugs shoulders] ... some would say that's a sure sign of the false prophet ... so tell us, just how flat is the Earth? ...

"Love your brother as you love yourself" ... self-loathing is a sin ... just saying ...
 
You seem oblivious to the fact that Darwinism was rejected as philosophy 100 years ago ... when the Modern Synthesis was developed ...

But thank you for the ad hominum attacks ... you admit my logic is infallible and have my person to discredit ...

Just curious ... how are you reconciling you posts with Christ's beatitude "Blessed are the peacemakers"? ... seems to me you are mongering war, forming divisions, separating us into "your camp" and "the enemy camp" ... as Satan divided Adam from God ... as Satan divided Cain from Abel ... as Satan divides science and religion ... just seems to me you delight in setting stumbling blocks in front of other as to prevent them from seeking salvation through Christ ... some would say that's a sin ...

All of life on earth has in common one element............CARBON

You forgot Hydrogen, Oxygen, Nitrogen ... even Phosphorus ... how on Earth could you forget Phosphorus ... just a nitpick ... reduced carbon ... ever heard of photosynthesis, it's not in the Bible, therefore it's not Creationism ... unless you're adding material to the Bible willy-nilly ... [shrugs shoulders] ... some would say that's a sure sign of the false prophet ... so tell us, just how flat is the Earth? ...

"Love your brother as you love yourself" ... self-loathing is a sin ... just saying ...

"FOR DO I NOW PERSUADE MEN, OR GOD? OR DO I SEEK TO PLEASE MEN? FOR IF I YET PLEASED MEN, I SHOULD NOT BE THE SERVANT OF CHRIST." -- Gal. 1:10.


LMAO.........you attack someone quoting from scripture and charge them with the same thing you just engaged....ad hominem attacks. (its ok for you.....but do as I say, not as I do? :dunno:) You omit the scriptures that command all deceit be exposed while defending the word of God? If the bible is untrue in any part then it cast doubts on entire work of books.

It claims to be God's own words (2 Peter1:21). It claims to complete (2 Tim. 3:16-17). If the creation account in Genesis (as charged by those who endorse EVOLUTION) ..... if found untrue then everyone that refers to that account as truth is either a FOOL OR A LIAR. Basically you are calling the Lord Jesus Christ, David and those appointed Apostle fools and a liars.

David, Jesus, Paul and Peter all quote from the creation account found in Genesis.

Basic Christian teachings are based in part upon the creation accounting found in Genesis. Jesus' explanation for divorce (Matt. 19:4-6). Paul's explanation concerning the rights of women in leadership rolls. (1 Tim. 2:12-15).

Key Christian Doctrine would be absent if EVOLUTION were accepted in any form.......(theory based upon philosophy (which it is not taught in our schools its taught as FACT) Especially Genesis 1-3. Man has a soul that's unique to this reality. The fact that men were created without sin yet fell into sin via free will choices in being made in the Image of God, having the authority to direct his own fate. The Omnipotence, Omnipresence, and Omniscience of God. Man's need for salvation.

The Bible teaches about creationism. It refutes atheism (as I do). It refutes pantheism (as I do), God transcends the created (something evolutionists attempt to lie about). It refutes polytheism (as I do). It refutes materialism (as I do). It refutes Dualism (the theory that reality consists of 2 opposing forces) ....(as I do). It refutes HUMANISM (as I do) as God is the ultimate CAUSE of everything (something the evolutionist can't disprove.....thus the ad hominem attacks.

And lastly the Bible's account of Genesis refutes EVOLUTION itself. (as I do).

What? I should make nice and agree with you JUST TO GET ALONE even when you are teaching lies and dismissing the Holy Scriptures as LORE? Really? Is that what the scriptures declare?
 
"FOR DO I NOW PERSUADE MEN, OR GOD? OR DO I SEEK TO PLEASE MEN? FOR IF I YET PLEASED MEN, I SHOULD NOT BE THE SERVANT OF CHRIST." -- Gal. 1:10.


LMAO.........you attack someone quoting from scripture and charge them with the same thing you just engaged....ad hominem attacks. (its ok for you.....but do as I say, not as I do? :dunno:) You omit the scriptures that command all deceit be exposed while defending the word of God? If the bible is untrue in any part then it cast doubts on entire work of books.

It claims to be God's own words (2 Peter1:21). It claims to complete (2 Tim. 3:16-17). If the creation account in Genesis (as charged by those who endorse EVOLUTION) ..... if found untrue then everyone that refers to that account as truth is either a FOOL OR A LIAR. Basically you are calling the Lord Jesus Christ, David and those appointed Apostle fools and a liars.

David, Jesus, Paul and Peter all quote from the creation account found in Genesis.

Basic Christian teachings are based in part upon the creation accounting found in Genesis. Jesus' explanation for divorce (Matt. 19:4-6). Paul's explanation concerning the rights of women in leadership rolls. (1 Tim. 2:12-15).

Key Christian Doctrine would be absent if EVOLUTION were accepted in any form.......(theory based upon philosophy (which it is not taught in our schools its taught as FACT) Especially Genesis 1-3. Man has a soul that's unique to this reality. The fact that men were created without sin yet fell into sin via free will choices in being made in the Image of God, having the authority to direct his own fate. The Omnipotence, Omnipresence, and Omniscience of God. Man's need for salvation.

The Bible teaches about creationism. It refutes atheism (as I do). It refutes pantheism (as I do), God transcends the created (something evolutionists attempt to lie about). It refutes polytheism (as I do). It refutes materialism (as I do). It refutes Dualism (the theory that reality consists of 2 opposing forces) ....(as I do). It refutes HUMANISM (as I do) as God is the ultimate CAUSE of everything (something the evolutionist can't disprove.....thus the ad hominem attacks.

And lastly the Bible's account of Genesis refutes EVOLUTION itself. (as I do).

What? I should make nice and agree with you JUST TO GET ALONE even when you are teaching lies and dismissing the Holy Scriptures as LORE? Really? Is that what the scriptures declare?

You didn't answer my question ... how are you reconciling your posts with Christ's beatitude "Blessed are the peacemakers"? ... phaw, you'll never answer, which is an answer in itself ...

You're really uptight about this ... do you feel the same way about the periodic table of elements? ... that's another scientific framework that the Bible refutes ... how about astronomy, there's an entire science focused on discrediting the Bible in every way ... no problems with that? ... so why is evolution such a bug-a-boo with you? ...

The heathen are going to do what they do ... heathen things ... we as Christians are to forgive them, "they know not what they are doing" ... and treat them with kindness, as Christ Himself showed us ... even to those who were nailing Him to the cross ... He taught us to leave worldly matters to the worldly, "our delight is in the Law of the Lord" ... I find no Spiritual mischief if the heathen want to divide plants into 10 or so Phyla (evolution) ... I do see where that is more useful than Genesis 1:29: 1) Herbs that bear seed, 2) Trees that fruit after their own kind and 3) everything else is unclean (can not be eaten, can not be used as clothing, hell, can not even be touched except to kill) ...

Alas, most all the food in our grocery stores are of the third type ... frankenfoods ... eww ... so much for trusting the heathen eh? ... you're on your own if you get your organic foods from them filthy filthy hippies ...

As far as ad hominum attacks ... I didn't say you are a warmonger, I say you seem to be ... as your brother in Christ, I am responsible to help you get the Good Lord's word out ... maybe you might want to consider reworking your rhetoric, try to tone down the aggressiveness over the internet ... seriously, when has yelling and screaming ever worked to change people's minds in Real Life™? ...
 
"FOR DO I NOW PERSUADE MEN, OR GOD? OR DO I SEEK TO PLEASE MEN? FOR IF I YET PLEASED MEN, I SHOULD NOT BE THE SERVANT OF CHRIST." -- Gal. 1:10.


LMAO.........you attack someone quoting from scripture and charge them with the same thing you just engaged....ad hominem attacks. (its ok for you.....but do as I say, not as I do? :dunno:) You omit the scriptures that command all deceit be exposed while defending the word of God? If the bible is untrue in any part then it cast doubts on entire work of books.

It claims to be God's own words (2 Peter1:21). It claims to complete (2 Tim. 3:16-17). If the creation account in Genesis (as charged by those who endorse EVOLUTION) ..... if found untrue then everyone that refers to that account as truth is either a FOOL OR A LIAR. Basically you are calling the Lord Jesus Christ, David and those appointed Apostle fools and a liars.

David, Jesus, Paul and Peter all quote from the creation account found in Genesis.

Basic Christian teachings are based in part upon the creation accounting found in Genesis. Jesus' explanation for divorce (Matt. 19:4-6). Paul's explanation concerning the rights of women in leadership rolls. (1 Tim. 2:12-15).

Key Christian Doctrine would be absent if EVOLUTION were accepted in any form.......(theory based upon philosophy (which it is not taught in our schools its taught as FACT) Especially Genesis 1-3. Man has a soul that's unique to this reality. The fact that men were created without sin yet fell into sin via free will choices in being made in the Image of God, having the authority to direct his own fate. The Omnipotence, Omnipresence, and Omniscience of God. Man's need for salvation.

The Bible teaches about creationism. It refutes atheism (as I do). It refutes pantheism (as I do), God transcends the created (something evolutionists attempt to lie about). It refutes polytheism (as I do). It refutes materialism (as I do). It refutes Dualism (the theory that reality consists of 2 opposing forces) ....(as I do). It refutes HUMANISM (as I do) as God is the ultimate CAUSE of everything (something the evolutionist can't disprove.....thus the ad hominem attacks.

And lastly the Bible's account of Genesis refutes EVOLUTION itself. (as I do).

What? I should make nice and agree with you JUST TO GET ALONE even when you are teaching lies and dismissing the Holy Scriptures as LORE? Really? Is that what the scriptures declare?
I'm not clear why you believe that bibles refute anything. The Bibles are utterly terrible as an accurate rendering of history. If some perceived value is placed on the bibles as a science text, it becomes valueless when people find errors in it, as people invariably do.

There is a common problem that is seen in the Science and Technology forum; religionists use sound-bytes (bible verses) ion frantic efforts to denigrate science Yes, understanding evolution and science will take some effort on your part. Is it worth it? Absolutely. You will learn that evolution is as much a fact as gravity. Moreover, science is not a philosophy as is religion. Philosophies are not constructed from experimentation or evidence. Science is!
 
It appears that Darwinian evolution has become a hot topic….the supporters of same are becoming rabid: it must mean that the truth is getting to them. At the very least this thread will provide an understanding of the terms needed in the debate.



1.There is the saying that apples to so very many government school graduates: "There are those who don't know, and don't know that they don't know.” Lots of ‘em were exposed in several recent discussions of the weakness of Darwin’s Theory, where there were comments like this:

Evolution is a fact.” Science Believers

And this…

Evolution [Darwin’s Theory] is a fact and is the basis of all of biology. The theory of evolution is the most robust, well supported scientific theory in the history of mankind.The Pretense Called Evolution


And this winner:

“Back long ago there was only species of human, now we have Whites, Blacks, Abos, Asians... that came from evolution.The Most Famous Fakes In Science



2. Either these geniuses never learned any science….or they learned exactly what the Left’s schools wanted them to ‘learn.’ This thread will teach the meaning of terms without which there can be no discussion of Darwin: evolution, species, microevolution and macroevolution.




3. Evolution means inheritable change over time. It means new species. Most important for the discussion of evolution is that it is not synonymous with Darwin’s theory. That hypothesis is simply one of a score of ideas to explain the diversity of life. The word ‘fact’ means that it is proven, not in dispute. Darwin’s particular version of explanation is not only not proven, not a fact, but it has been disproven in terms of the fossil record, the value of mutations, the belief in a common ancestor for all present life, and observation of vertebrate embryos (Haeckel’s diagram). A study of primary articles testing all sorts of theories, leads to the conclusion that no theory to explain diversity has ever panned out as far as empirical proof. No one has produced, or seen, new species evolved.

Again: no current explanation answers the question….yet government school grads come away with the very opposite belief.


4. “Before going further we should note the obvious: if a poll were taken of all the scientists in the world, the great majority would say they believed Darwinism to be true. But scientists, like everybody else, base most of their opinions on the word of other people. Of the great majority who accept Darwinism, most (though not all) do so based on authority. Also, and unfortunately, too often criticisms have been dismissed by the scientific community for fear of giving ammunition to creationists. It is ironic that in the name of protecting science, trenchant scientific criticism of natural selection has been brushed aside.”
Michael Behe



5. The reason to take this debate seriously is that Darwin’s theory is foisted on students, and the easily led, as a proven fact by the establishment’s school system, by neo-Marxists in academia, by atheists, and lies are told in support of this theory.

This alone should make every person of integrity furious! And curious….’why would lies be necessary whether the theory is true or not?’

What makes advancing it so important?

Why not tell the truth? To whom or to what would the truth be......dangerous, or damaging????
 
Defining species is problematic. Some of them use oxygen and others do not. The evolution of oxygen metabolism on Earth links to the origin of life on Earth. There is plenty of oxygen in the Universe existing as water.
 
You say scripture.. I say a work of bad fiction.
You can "say" what you want...........there is nothing new under the son, an "antichrist" will always be an "antichrist". I simply defend the truth. You are free to accept or reject the God of Creation, you can freely decide to choose between good and evil.

Simply because you reject the truth does not mean that you will not be judged by that which you reject......The Word of God.

You see.........YOU do not get a choice of judgment, God has no respect of person.......the same justice applies to all. Just like "ignorance" is no excuse under the laws of men, so you are without excuse when you waste the precious gifts of life and grace and feign ignorance concerning God when the evidence of His existence is clearly seen around you via the things which are made by THE WORD.

"Thinking themselves to be wise........THEY BECAME FOOLS, WHEN THEY REJECTED GOD, and began worship the things that are made instead of the Creator of those things, things like wealth, power, greed, money......making pagan idols of such." -- Romans 1:22


"He who rejects Me (Christ), and does not receive My words, has that which judges him........THE WORD that I have spoken will judge him in the last day (the day of judgement)." -- John 12:48

"For as many who have sinned without the law, will also perish without the law..........the day when God will judge the secrets of of men by Jesus Christ, according to my gospel." -- Romans 2:12-19

"And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and books were opened (your book of fiction :abgg2q.jpg:)........and the dead were judged, according to their works, by the things which were written in books." -- Rev. 20:12
 
You can "say" what you want...........there is nothing new under the son, an "antichrist" will always be an "antichrist". I simply defend the truth. You are free to accept or reject the God of Creation, you can freely decide to choose between good and evil.

Simply because you reject the truth does not mean that you will not be judged by that which you reject......The Word of God.

You see.........YOU do not get a choice of judgment, God has no respect of person.......the same justice applies to all. Just like "ignorance" is no excuse under the laws of men, so you are without excuse when you waste the precious gifts of life and grace and feign ignorance concerning God when the evidence of His existence is clearly seen around you via the things which are made by THE WORD.

"Thinking themselves to be wise........THEY BECAME FOOLS, WHEN THEY REJECTED GOD, and began worship the things that are made instead of the Creator of those things, things like wealth, power, greed, money......making pagan idols of such." -- Romans 1:22


"He who rejects Me (Christ), and does not receive My words, has that which judges him........THE WORD that I have spoken will judge him in the last day (the day of judgement)." -- John 12:48

"For as many who have sinned without the law, will also perish without the law..........the day when God will judge the secrets of of men by Jesus Christ, according to my gospel." -- Romans 2:12-19

"And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and books were opened (your book of fiction :abgg2q.jpg:)........and the dead were judged, according to their works, by the things which were written in books." -- Rev. 20:12
 
I prefer to use Applied Science to conclude the truth.........There is a Super(ior) Natural (to nature) Cause of this physical plane of reality as governed by the Applied Laws of Physics. Why? Because the basic laws of physics demonstrate the fact that nature cannot explain its own existence via an application of the Science of Physics.

Faith not only includes an emotionally based response to believing in God........but it also involves an "intellectual" response in accepting facts in evidence. The laws of causality and the laws of thermodynamics demonstrate that Nothing can create itself from nothing. When you begin with nothing, nothing is all that will ever exist within the confines of physical reality that is governed by unimpeachable laws.
 
you can freely decide to choose between good and evil.

I did ...

Anonymous-engraving-of-the-burning-at-the-stake-of-Anne-Hendrick-condemned-for_Q640.jpg
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top