Reagan adviser to GOP: ' rather stupid and not very well read'

guno

Gold Member
Mar 18, 2014
21,553
4,894
290
NYC and NC
He really ripped them a new on what reagan would have thought.

a very big difference what a conservative use to be an what the "tea party" is now





Ed Schultz then asked if it is that conservatives and CPAC attendees just do not know their history.

"Well, I guess they have completely forgotten about George W. Bush whom they defended to the heavens when he was in office," Bruce Bartlett said. "But yes, they are really rather stupid and not very well read. To them Reagan is a distant figure in history."

Reagan adviser to GOP They are really rather stupid and not very well read
 
Last edited:
Dam, someone has their panties in a wad about the TP movement. What is it that you fear? Same disdain that they had against those from the Bible Belt that believed in Christ. Is it because they are no longer content and willing to sit back and let the government screw them 7 days a week, or that simply you have all the answers and can't stand opposition?
 
Dam, someone has their panties in a wad about the TP movement. What is it that you fear? Same disdain that they had against those from the Bible Belt that believed in Christ. Is it because they are no longer content and willing to sit back and let the government screw them 7 days a week, or that simply you have all the answers and can't stand opposition?
Is there anything they don't have their panties in a wad about? ANYTHING at all?
 
He really ripped them a new on what reagan would have thought.

a very big difference what a conservative use to be an what the "tea party" is now





Ed Schultz then asked if it is that conservatives and CPAC attendees just do not know their history.

"Well, I guess they have completely forgotten about George W. Bush whom they defended to the heavens when he was in office," Bruce Bartlett said. "But yes, they are really rather stupid and not very well read. To them Reagan is a distant figure in history."

Reagan adviser to GOP They are really rather stupid and not very well read

 
Why is it we never her Democrats criticising other Democrats? Could it be they lack any honesty and integrity at all?
 
Look in the mirror! LOL:argue:

Dam, someone has their panties in a wad about the TP movement. What is it that you fear? Same disdain that they had against those from the Bible Belt that believed in Christ. Is it because they are no longer content and willing to sit back and let the government screw them 7 days a week, or that simply you have all the answers and can't stand opposition?
Is there anything they don't have their panties in a wad about? ANYTHING at all?
 
He really ripped them a new on what reagan would have thought.

a very big difference what a conservative use to be an what the "tea party" is now





Ed Schultz then asked if it is that conservatives and CPAC attendees just do not know their history.

"Well, I guess they have completely forgotten about George W. Bush whom they defended to the heavens when he was in office," Bruce Bartlett said. "But yes, they are really rather stupid and not very well read. To them Reagan is a distant figure in history."

Reagan adviser to GOP They are really rather stupid and not very well read

Of course Batsht assclown - Reagan was a far left nutjob like you..

ROFL

You know, it's a bit early to try and completely rewrite history. Too many of us lived through Reagan and know you filthy fucks are telling absurd lies...
 
Living through the reagan administration was the worst ever for the USA.


He really ripped them a new on what reagan would have thought.

a very big difference what a conservative use to be an what the "tea party" is now





Ed Schultz then asked if it is that conservatives and CPAC attendees just do not know their history.

"Well, I guess they have completely forgotten about George W. Bush whom they defended to the heavens when he was in office," Bruce Bartlett said. "But yes, they are really rather stupid and not very well read. To them Reagan is a distant figure in history."

Reagan adviser to GOP They are really rather stupid and not very well read

Of course Batsht assclown - Reagan was a far left nutjob like you..

ROFL

You know, it's a bit early to try and completely rewrite history. Too many of us lived through Reagan and know you filthy fucks are telling absurd lies...
 
He really ripped them a new on what reagan would have thought.

a very big difference what a conservative use to be an what the "tea party" is now





Ed Schultz then asked if it is that conservatives and CPAC attendees just do not know their history.

"Well, I guess they have completely forgotten about George W. Bush whom they defended to the heavens when he was in office," Bruce Bartlett said. "But yes, they are really rather stupid and not very well read. To them Reagan is a distant figure in history."

Reagan adviser to GOP They are really rather stupid and not very well read
they are a bunch of mouth-breathers ever since the last conservative intellectual passed-on a year or so back (Buckley).
 
Look in the mirror! LOL:argue:

Dam, someone has their panties in a wad about the TP movement. What is it that you fear? Same disdain that they had against those from the Bible Belt that believed in Christ. Is it because they are no longer content and willing to sit back and let the government screw them 7 days a week, or that simply you have all the answers and can't stand opposition?
Is there anything they don't have their panties in a wad about? ANYTHING at all?
What? To see you staring over my shoulder?
 
they are a bunch of mouth-breathers ever since the last conservative intellectual passed-on a year or so back (Buckley).

Funny thing, virtually every conservative on the board vastly outshines the leftist brain trust of you, Batshit, and TruthMatters..

But whatchagunnado? :dunno:

What I am going to do is say,,,,, you are wrong!
Each side has their own questionable thinkers and Rubber Room regulars.
 

Forum List

Back
Top