- Aug 4, 2009
- 280,963
- 140,108
- 2,300
Your presumption is laughably stupid and uninformed.Choose whether or not you should spread your diseases?
What choice do you think you get when it comes to spreading germs?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your presumption is laughably stupid and uninformed.Choose whether or not you should spread your diseases?
Do you think wearing a mask guarantees you are placing a road block in front of all covid virus'?What choice do you think you get when it comes to spreading germs?
Do you think wearing a mask guarantees you are placing a road block in front of all covid virus'?What choice do you think you get when it comes to spreading germs?
Fauci doesn't think that. Why do you?
A face mask is like a cyclone fence to a microscopic covid virus. And a covid virus is like a baby squirrel, comparatively speaking.
So how many squirrels are unable to pass in and out of that fence?
It's a fair argument except it would lead to people having to prove they have had the vaccine. If a business doesn't want people in who have not how otherwise do they accomplish that other than make all wear a mask?
No you wouldn't....
The people who want the vaccine can get it.
The rest of us just take the same risks we always did. If you're so immuno compromised you're worried about the rona....Anything could kill you there will never be enough vaccinations
If those who don't want people in to their business without being vaccinated, how do they accomplish this?
You can't
We have medical privacy laws
Only places you can ask for vaccination proof it school and employment. Domestically there is no way to do it. Pretty much only enforced for children
And these are experimental vaccines no one would be obligated to take it even to fight off a plague much lesa a cold
They can't even ask. It's an experimental drug under EUA.
Is that the same authority as when interacting with an angry cop? Is that the type of authority you're encouraging us not to submit to?Because masks represent unquestioned and senseless submission to authority.
The same reasons why quislings like you love them.
It's a fair argument except it would lead to people having to prove they have had the vaccine. If a business doesn't want people in who have not how otherwise do they accomplish that other than make all wear a mask?
No you wouldn't....
The people who want the vaccine can get it.
The rest of us just take the same risks we always did. If you're so immuno compromised you're worried about the rona....Anything could kill you there will never be enough vaccinations
If those who don't want people in to their business without being vaccinated, how do they accomplish this?
You can't
We have medical privacy laws
Only places you can ask for vaccination proof it school and employment. Domestically there is no way to do it. Pretty much only enforced for children
And these are experimental vaccines no one would be obligated to take it even to fight off a plague much lesa a cold
So for those concerned, masks it will be.
Masks don't change your risk profile at all
Which is why we don't use them and they will not be legally enforceable mandates
They increase risk of lung infection as well
The law is about to come down hard on you crazy rona fucks. When asked to provide evidence you're not going to have any....
Those who want to wear a mask should not be prevented from doing so.Because masks represent unquestioned and senseless submission to authority.Why the FUK is Rand Paul such a whiny little bitch about masks?
The same reasons why quislings like you love them.
There is no possibility that there are people who simply want to take precautions to keep a virus from spreading?
Would sneezing into your sleeve also simply be a submission to authority?
Those who don't want to wear a mask should not be prevented.
Let us all choose.
Why the FUK is Rand Paul such a whiny little bitch about masks?
I don't think he is desperate to be president. . . I think you are just intelligent enough to pick out one of the most sane, responsible folks in that slimy town, and confuse it with a desire for power.At least Paul is consistent at being an idiot.
He is quite desperate to be president. There are things I agree with him on but I'll not vote for anyone this desperate to be president.
He is one of the few that wants to take the car keys away from the maddeningly irresponsible crowd. . . and you call that desperate?
. . . all those idiots need a babysitter.
View attachment 482795
Sure he is (like your imaginary characterization of Rand Paul).He's like Ayn Rand, pisses and moans about everything until he needs it. Then it's okay for him, but no one else.
I don't think he is desperate to be president. . . I think you are just intelligent enough to pick out one of the most sane, responsible folks in that slimy town, and confuse it with a desire for power.At least Paul is consistent at being an idiot.
He is quite desperate to be president. There are things I agree with him on but I'll not vote for anyone this desperate to be president.
He is one of the few that wants to take the car keys away from the maddeningly irresponsible crowd. . . and you call that desperate?
. . . all those idiots need a babysitter.
View attachment 482795
Trump made Paul look foolish in the debates. I believe it was where Trump won. When asked if you would support a candidate even if you disagreed with their policies would you, Paul answered yes. Trump answered no. It was one of the things I give Trump props for.
Paul and Christie were usually next to each other on the stage and they agreed on very little. How do you support someone that you don't agree on hardly anything about? You do so to appease the masters so they will let you be president. Except it backfired that time.
I don't think he is desperate to be president. . . I think you are just intelligent enough to pick out one of the most sane, responsible folks in that slimy town, and confuse it with a desire for power.At least Paul is consistent at being an idiot.
He is quite desperate to be president. There are things I agree with him on but I'll not vote for anyone this desperate to be president.
He is one of the few that wants to take the car keys away from the maddeningly irresponsible crowd. . . and you call that desperate?
. . . all those idiots need a babysitter.
View attachment 482795
Trump made Paul look foolish in the debates. I believe it was where Trump won. When asked if you would support a candidate even if you disagreed with their policies would you, Paul answered yes. Trump answered no. It was one of the things I give Trump props for.
Paul and Christie were usually next to each other on the stage and they agreed on very little. How do you support someone that you don't agree on hardly anything about? You do so to appease the masters so they will let you be president. Except it backfired that time.
Honestly, I can't believe you.
SO now you fault Paul for telling the truth and congratulate Trump for telling the people what they want to hear, regardless of whether it is the truth?
. . . ah well, given your stance on a myriad of issues?
. . . I supposed I should not be at all surprised, should I?
Evidently notWhy the FUK is Rand Paul such a whiny little bitch about masks?
Because he understands science in a way you never will, you fascist twat.
Because masks represent unquestioned and senseless submission to authority.Why the FUK is Rand Paul such a whiny little bitch about masks?
The same reasons why quislings like you love them.
Why are Conservatives such whiny little bitches?
Its just a mask. Children don’t whine as much as Conservatives
They work. People around the world accept that they work.
Why are Conservatives such douchebags?
I don't think he is desperate to be president. . . I think you are just intelligent enough to pick out one of the most sane, responsible folks in that slimy town, and confuse it with a desire for power.At least Paul is consistent at being an idiot.
He is quite desperate to be president. There are things I agree with him on but I'll not vote for anyone this desperate to be president.
He is one of the few that wants to take the car keys away from the maddeningly irresponsible crowd. . . and you call that desperate?
. . . all those idiots need a babysitter.
View attachment 482795
Trump made Paul look foolish in the debates. I believe it was where Trump won. When asked if you would support a candidate even if you disagreed with their policies would you, Paul answered yes. Trump answered no. It was one of the things I give Trump props for.
Paul and Christie were usually next to each other on the stage and they agreed on very little. How do you support someone that you don't agree on hardly anything about? You do so to appease the masters so they will let you be president. Except it backfired that time.
Honestly, I can't believe you.
SO now you fault Paul for telling the truth and congratulate Trump for telling the people what they want to hear, regardless of whether it is the truth?
. . . ah well, given your stance on a myriad of issues?
. . . I supposed I should not be at all surprised, should I?
What people wanted to hear? I spoke for myself. I believe that is where he won the election.
I don't think he is desperate to be president. . . I think you are just intelligent enough to pick out one of the most sane, responsible folks in that slimy town, and confuse it with a desire for power.At least Paul is consistent at being an idiot.
He is quite desperate to be president. There are things I agree with him on but I'll not vote for anyone this desperate to be president.
He is one of the few that wants to take the car keys away from the maddeningly irresponsible crowd. . . and you call that desperate?
. . . all those idiots need a babysitter.
View attachment 482795
Trump made Paul look foolish in the debates. I believe it was where Trump won. When asked if you would support a candidate even if you disagreed with their policies would you, Paul answered yes. Trump answered no. It was one of the things I give Trump props for.
Paul and Christie were usually next to each other on the stage and they agreed on very little. How do you support someone that you don't agree on hardly anything about? You do so to appease the masters so they will let you be president. Except it backfired that time.
Honestly, I can't believe you.
SO now you fault Paul for telling the truth and congratulate Trump for telling the people what they want to hear, regardless of whether it is the truth?
. . . ah well, given your stance on a myriad of issues?
. . . I supposed I should not be at all surprised, should I?
What people wanted to hear? I spoke for myself. I believe that is where he won the election.
You stated, "He is quite desperate to be president."
Now? If that were indeed what motivated his statements, and his behavior, he would be telling folks what they WANT to hear, not what they NEED to hear. Sometimes, politicians DO support folks that hold views that we do not, it is called coalition building.
. . . and yet, you launch into a digression where you compare him unfavorably to Trump, where, for the last four, five years, you have been bitching about Trump's demagoguery, and somehow want me to believe, NOW, of all times, that Trump is the better medicine for the Republic than Paul?
I don't think he is desperate to be president. . . I think you are just intelligent enough to pick out one of the most sane, responsible folks in that slimy town, and confuse it with a desire for power.At least Paul is consistent at being an idiot.
He is quite desperate to be president. There are things I agree with him on but I'll not vote for anyone this desperate to be president.
He is one of the few that wants to take the car keys away from the maddeningly irresponsible crowd. . . and you call that desperate?
. . . all those idiots need a babysitter.
View attachment 482795
Trump made Paul look foolish in the debates. I believe it was where Trump won. When asked if you would support a candidate even if you disagreed with their policies would you, Paul answered yes. Trump answered no. It was one of the things I give Trump props for.
Paul and Christie were usually next to each other on the stage and they agreed on very little. How do you support someone that you don't agree on hardly anything about? You do so to appease the masters so they will let you be president. Except it backfired that time.
Honestly, I can't believe you.
SO now you fault Paul for telling the truth and congratulate Trump for telling the people what they want to hear, regardless of whether it is the truth?
. . . ah well, given your stance on a myriad of issues?
. . . I supposed I should not be at all surprised, should I?
What people wanted to hear? I spoke for myself. I believe that is where he won the election.
You stated, "He is quite desperate to be president."
Now? If that were indeed what motivated his statements, and his behavior, he would be telling folks what they WANT to hear, not what they NEED to hear. Sometimes, politicians DO support folks that hold views that we do not, it is called coalition building.
. . . and yet, you launch into a digression where you compare him unfavorably to Trump, where, for the last four, five years, you have been bitching about Trump's demagoguery, and somehow want me to believe, NOW, of all times, that Trump is the better medicine for the Republic than Paul?
I compared this act as unfavorable to Trump's. We should note, I have never supported Trump nor have I voted for him. That does not mean I have to pick positions based upon how it affects one's politics. I thought it good that he said he wouldn't support a candidate regardless of their positions. Why should anyone agree to support someone where they do not agree with what they support?
I don't think he is desperate to be president. . . I think you are just intelligent enough to pick out one of the most sane, responsible folks in that slimy town, and confuse it with a desire for power.At least Paul is consistent at being an idiot.
He is quite desperate to be president. There are things I agree with him on but I'll not vote for anyone this desperate to be president.
He is one of the few that wants to take the car keys away from the maddeningly irresponsible crowd. . . and you call that desperate?
. . . all those idiots need a babysitter.
View attachment 482795
Trump made Paul look foolish in the debates. I believe it was where Trump won. When asked if you would support a candidate even if you disagreed with their policies would you, Paul answered yes. Trump answered no. It was one of the things I give Trump props for.
Paul and Christie were usually next to each other on the stage and they agreed on very little. How do you support someone that you don't agree on hardly anything about? You do so to appease the masters so they will let you be president. Except it backfired that time.
Honestly, I can't believe you.
SO now you fault Paul for telling the truth and congratulate Trump for telling the people what they want to hear, regardless of whether it is the truth?
. . . ah well, given your stance on a myriad of issues?
. . . I supposed I should not be at all surprised, should I?
What people wanted to hear? I spoke for myself. I believe that is where he won the election.
You stated, "He is quite desperate to be president."
Now? If that were indeed what motivated his statements, and his behavior, he would be telling folks what they WANT to hear, not what they NEED to hear. Sometimes, politicians DO support folks that hold views that we do not, it is called coalition building.
. . . and yet, you launch into a digression where you compare him unfavorably to Trump, where, for the last four, five years, you have been bitching about Trump's demagoguery, and somehow want me to believe, NOW, of all times, that Trump is the better medicine for the Republic than Paul?
I compared this act as unfavorable to Trump's. We should note, I have never supported Trump nor have I voted for him. That does not mean I have to pick positions based upon how it affects one's politics. I thought it good that he said he wouldn't support a candidate regardless of their positions. Why should anyone agree to support someone where they do not agree with what they support?
In order to get something from them that you want. Duh.
Here is a good example;
The original Hyde Amendment was passed in 1976 on September 30 by the House of Representatives with a 312–93 vote to override the veto of a funding bill for the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW).[4][5][6][7] It was named for its chief sponsor, Republican Congressman Henry Hyde of Illinois.[3]
Hyde Amendment - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
If you are a leftist big government type, certainly you would be against the Hyde Amendment. . . OTH? IF it meant that moderates or moderate right folks would release fund for the Department of Health and Human Services? Then you compromise.
There are lots and lots of other examples of compromise in government. None too recent, as that sort of governing, compromise & incrementalism, has been frowned on in the age of Obama and Trump.
A lot like yourself . So I guess you got a lot in common . Voting R next time?At least Paul is consistent at being an idiot.