Rand Paul Expresses Concerns About Election Integrity in 2020

[JimBowie1958]

Rand Paul is such a timid soul when it comes to expressing dissent, though I am not sure why.

But he comes out for review of the 2020 voteon Twitter.

Sen. Paul Calls Out 'Anomalies in Vote Counts,' Big Tech

Count Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., as an election "statistical anomaly" skeptic and one wary of big tech censorship of conservative voices.

www.newsmax.com

Paul noted President Donald Trump's "margin of 'defeat'" was covered by overnight "data dumps" in four key battleground states.​

Paul tweeted:​

"Interesting . . . Trump margin of “defeat” in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM. Statistical anomaly? Fraud? Look at the evidence and decide for yourself.(That is, if Big Tech allows u to read this) Anomalies in Vote Counts; https://votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020"​

On cue, Twitter slapped a "this claim about election fraud is disputed."​

Twitter has been using that to reject Republican attempts to contest the presidential election results amid evidence of illegal votes, including from those who are deceased, unconstitutional election law changes forced by courts and Democrat officials against the will of the state legislatures and questions about election voting systems.​

The voting anomalies outlined by the report linked to by Paul are:​

"An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump" ​

According to the data study:​

"In particular, we are able to quantify the extent of compliance with this property and discover that, of the 8,954 vote updates used in the analysis, these four decisive updates were the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 7th most anomalous updates in the entire data set. Not only does each of these vote updates not follow the generally observed pattern, but the anomalous behavior of these updates is particularly extreme. That is, these vote updates are outliers of the outliers."​

Yeah, nothing to see here folks, just some patriotic Dimbocraps stealing votes!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Likely because he’s wrong – including now.

 

[Norman]

Likely because he’s wrong – including now.

What a brilliant rebuttal!

But he is not wrong, the list of anomalies is almost endless at this point. And he can read...

Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020

A Quantitative Analysis of Decisive Vote Updates in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia on and after Election Night

votepatternanalysis.substack.com

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Rand Paul is such a timid soul when it comes to expressing dissent, though I am not sure why.

But he comes out for review of the 2020 voteon Twitter.

Sen. Paul Calls Out 'Anomalies in Vote Counts,' Big Tech

Count Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., as an election "statistical anomaly" skeptic and one wary of big tech censorship of conservative voices.

www.newsmax.com

Paul noted President Donald Trump's "margin of 'defeat'" was covered by overnight "data dumps" in four key battleground states.​

Paul tweeted:​

"Interesting . . . Trump margin of “defeat” in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM. Statistical anomaly? Fraud? Look at the evidence and decide for yourself.(That is, if Big Tech allows u to read this) Anomalies in Vote Counts; Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020"​

On cue, Twitter slapped a "this claim about election fraud is disputed."​

Twitter has been using that to reject Republican attempts to contest the presidential election results amid evidence of illegal votes, including from those who are deceased, unconstitutional election law changes forced by courts and Democrat officials against the will of the state legislatures and questions about election voting systems.​

The voting anomalies outlined by the report linked to by Paul are:​

"An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump" ​

According to the data study:​

"In particular, we are able to quantify the extent of compliance with this property and discover that, of the 8,954 vote updates used in the analysis, these four decisive updates were the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 7th most anomalous updates in the entire data set. Not only does each of these vote updates not follow the generally observed pattern, but the anomalous behavior of these updates is particularly extreme. That is, these vote updates are outliers of the outliers."​

Yeah, nothing to see here folks, just some patriotic Dimbocraps stealing votes!

 

[Claudette]

He's oh so right. This was a fraudulent election and anyone with a working brain cell can see it. That lets the lefty loons out.

 

[schmidlap]

Rand Paul is such a timid soul when it comes to expressing dissent, though I am not sure why.

He can be a crackpot, one that can ignore the overwhelming consensus of cybersecurity experts, Republican governors and secretaries of state, county clerks, vote tabulators, auditors, and judges throughout the land that desperate claims intended to damage the democratic process in furtherance of a transparent, self-serving agenda are without merit.

Randy can suck up to the nutjob media if that gives him pleasure, but it is of no import for the real world.

 

[busybee01]

Rand Paul is such a timid soul when it comes to expressing dissent, though I am not sure why.

But he comes out for review of the 2020 voteon Twitter.

Sen. Paul Calls Out 'Anomalies in Vote Counts,' Big Tech

Count Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., as an election "statistical anomaly" skeptic and one wary of big tech censorship of conservative voices.

www.newsmax.com

Paul noted President Donald Trump's "margin of 'defeat'" was covered by overnight "data dumps" in four key battleground states.​

Paul tweeted:​

"Interesting . . . Trump margin of “defeat” in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM. Statistical anomaly? Fraud? Look at the evidence and decide for yourself.(That is, if Big Tech allows u to read this) Anomalies in Vote Counts; Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020"​

On cue, Twitter slapped a "this claim about election fraud is disputed."​

Twitter has been using that to reject Republican attempts to contest the presidential election results amid evidence of illegal votes, including from those who are deceased, unconstitutional election law changes forced by courts and Democrat officials against the will of the state legislatures and questions about election voting systems.​

The voting anomalies outlined by the report linked to by Paul are:​

"An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump" ​

According to the data study:​

"In particular, we are able to quantify the extent of compliance with this property and discover that, of the 8,954 vote updates used in the analysis, these four decisive updates were the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 7th most anomalous updates in the entire data set. Not only does each of these vote updates not follow the generally observed pattern, but the anomalous behavior of these updates is particularly extreme. That is, these vote updates are outliers of the outliers."​

Yeah, nothing to see here folks, just some patriotic Dimbocraps stealing votes!

That data dump was mail-in ballots being processed by law. There was no vote stealing. You Nazi thugs are trying to steal a election.

 

[schmidlap]

That data dump was mail-in ballots being processed by law. There was no vote stealing. You Nazi thugs are trying to steal a election.

A fanatical cult will try to steal an election, of course, but it is the damage they inflict upon the nation and democracy itself in the process that is of the upmost concern.

Still, the validation of the election by cybersecurity experts, Republican governors, secretaries of state, county clerks, poll supervisor, tabulators, auditors, Trump-appointed judges, and even his lickspittle Attorney General, is ample justification to hold firm in the belief of truth, justice, and the American way.

"Phooey! They all conspire against my Master!"​