Rabbis forced the Romans to crucify Jesus

The story itself is not even 2,000 years old.
It don't have to be I order for it to be believed....The story has been told undoubtedly a 1000 different ways before it made it into the Bible.....The Discourse was in reference to Israel and not the church.....
 
Revelation completes the narrative. Christ came. Anyone who thinks his coming should have been corporeal is just ignorant. The Bible says no such thing.
It says he will fly down from the sky and initiate an eternity of peace and tranquility between all people.
 
You can't explain it, yet you have an opinion on it.

That's brilliant.
Please elaborate where you have demonstrated any knowledge of the NT.
I notice you won't admit that you comment on something you have never read.
 
Jesus never said he was the son of G-d. He was Jewish and that idea is antithetical to Judaism.
 
The Jewish religion has a temple?
You were the one who said “cult of the temple.” And of course the Jewish religion has temples. Ever hear of the First and Second Temple? And in today’s world, there are Jewish temples all over the place. Mostly Reform.
 
You were the one who said “cult of the temple.” And of course the Jewish religion has temples. Ever hear of the First and Second Temple? And in today’s world, there are Jewish temples all over the place. Mostly Reform.
The ancient Israelites we're a cult of temple. Their veneration and devotion were toward a particular object.

Why must you inject yourself into their narrative? You're not mentioned in the Bible.

And when you call people antisemites who say not one single word about your Talmudic or rabbinic Judaism, you're just pissing in the wind.
 

Forum List

Back
Top