Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,826
- 350
Typical Dems. Hillary is against the second amendment and, like many libs, would probably outright ban guns for the public if they could have their way. The second amendment is under attack and Hillary recently began an answer to a question on it by saying "IF it is a constitutional right...."
California Dem politicians exempted themselves from their own gun-control laws. They also made laws that allow them to avoid having to pay taxes on a large chunk of their income. Higher taxes are only good for other people. They tried to exempt themselves from having to pay speeding tickets if caught by the speed cameras and they didn't think they should have to pay for toll roads. Those are for the little people.
Of course, congress is exempt from Obamacare and many other laws. They can engage in insider trading. They love making tons of laws to control the public but they hate the thought of having to obey those laws themselves. As they say, when a cook refuses to eat their own food, you know it's poison.
What this tells us is that they think the laws they make are unfair. Why else would they constantly ensure that they don't have to abide by them?
"The California state Senate voted 28-8 Wednesday to exempt itself from the pointless gun-control laws that apply to the rest of the populace. Legislators apparently think they alone are worthy to pack heat on the streets for personal protection, and the masses ought to wait until the police arrive.
This is just one of many bills Golden State politicians used this legislative session to set themselves apart from the little people, the ones who pay their inflated salaries. Annual compensation for legislators averages about $140,000, not counting luxurious perks such as taxpayer-funded cars and free gasoline. By comparison, the average Californian earns $50,000 a year, and the unemployment rate is 11.9 percent - far above the national average. Exact salaries for state assemblymen and senators are obscured by the use of a "per diem" payment scheme that shelters a significant chunk of income from taxation.
Attempts by a handful of reformers to require politicians to provide a full annual disclosure of the benefits received from the public treasury have been rebuffed. Currently, government officials must file a statement of economic interests revealing income from any source other than a local, state or federal government agency. Gifts worth more than $50 also must be disclosed, but lawmakers rejected a bill that would have prohibited acceptance of concert and sporting event tickets, gift cards, spa treatments, golf outings and other benefits from lobbyists trying to buy votes.
Bills of this nature never meet an honest fate in which roll-call votes put members on the record as favoring or opposing each idea. Instead, reform measures are held in committee to die quietly as legislative deadlines pass. As of last week, it’s effectively impossible for a bill to become law if it hasn’t already passed in at least one of the chambers.
Such a silent death sentence was imposed on a bill that would have eliminated the practice of allowing select public employees to avoid paying red-light-camera tickets and escape any consequence for using toll roads without paying. The current system grants free rides to politicians, court workers, police officers, city council members, social workers, meter maids and their spouses. The bill failed even after a compromise amendment deleted the requirement to pay red-light-camera tickets.
The arrogance of the political class is certainly not limited to California. Federal law prohibits private companies from pestering the public with unwanted telemarketing calls from businesses, but Congress exempted "political organizations" - i.e., themselves - from its provisions. In Sacramento, an attempt failed to establish a special Do Not Call list for people who don’t want to listen to automated calls from California pols."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/6/one-law-for-us-another-for-you/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=mattkibbe
California Dem politicians exempted themselves from their own gun-control laws. They also made laws that allow them to avoid having to pay taxes on a large chunk of their income. Higher taxes are only good for other people. They tried to exempt themselves from having to pay speeding tickets if caught by the speed cameras and they didn't think they should have to pay for toll roads. Those are for the little people.
Of course, congress is exempt from Obamacare and many other laws. They can engage in insider trading. They love making tons of laws to control the public but they hate the thought of having to obey those laws themselves. As they say, when a cook refuses to eat their own food, you know it's poison.
What this tells us is that they think the laws they make are unfair. Why else would they constantly ensure that they don't have to abide by them?
"The California state Senate voted 28-8 Wednesday to exempt itself from the pointless gun-control laws that apply to the rest of the populace. Legislators apparently think they alone are worthy to pack heat on the streets for personal protection, and the masses ought to wait until the police arrive.
This is just one of many bills Golden State politicians used this legislative session to set themselves apart from the little people, the ones who pay their inflated salaries. Annual compensation for legislators averages about $140,000, not counting luxurious perks such as taxpayer-funded cars and free gasoline. By comparison, the average Californian earns $50,000 a year, and the unemployment rate is 11.9 percent - far above the national average. Exact salaries for state assemblymen and senators are obscured by the use of a "per diem" payment scheme that shelters a significant chunk of income from taxation.
Attempts by a handful of reformers to require politicians to provide a full annual disclosure of the benefits received from the public treasury have been rebuffed. Currently, government officials must file a statement of economic interests revealing income from any source other than a local, state or federal government agency. Gifts worth more than $50 also must be disclosed, but lawmakers rejected a bill that would have prohibited acceptance of concert and sporting event tickets, gift cards, spa treatments, golf outings and other benefits from lobbyists trying to buy votes.
Bills of this nature never meet an honest fate in which roll-call votes put members on the record as favoring or opposing each idea. Instead, reform measures are held in committee to die quietly as legislative deadlines pass. As of last week, it’s effectively impossible for a bill to become law if it hasn’t already passed in at least one of the chambers.
Such a silent death sentence was imposed on a bill that would have eliminated the practice of allowing select public employees to avoid paying red-light-camera tickets and escape any consequence for using toll roads without paying. The current system grants free rides to politicians, court workers, police officers, city council members, social workers, meter maids and their spouses. The bill failed even after a compromise amendment deleted the requirement to pay red-light-camera tickets.
The arrogance of the political class is certainly not limited to California. Federal law prohibits private companies from pestering the public with unwanted telemarketing calls from businesses, but Congress exempted "political organizations" - i.e., themselves - from its provisions. In Sacramento, an attempt failed to establish a special Do Not Call list for people who don’t want to listen to automated calls from California pols."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/6/one-law-for-us-another-for-you/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=mattkibbe
