Pelosi not invited to Stimulus Bill signing

[Polishprince]

That’s the Class Act President we have... our government is being run by a bunch of emotional children. WTF is going on?!

So the waste of space, that had nothing to do with a relief bill, isn't inviting the only leader in Washington that decided what was going to be in it?

That's rich.

Sorry, the Senate decided what was going to be in it as well. The witch tried to stuff it full of pork, and the Senate told her to take it out.

My understanding is that virtually nothing she wanted got into the final bill.

I'm sure they had to give her something, just nothing near the laundry list she first presented.

Which witch tried to stuff it full of pork? McConnell? Because there was plenty of from both sides in it but you lunatics are incapable of recognizing your own. Harbor dredging? Sunscreen?

A lot of important stuff got in.

• Vastly expanded unemployment benefits through June for anyone who’s lost income due to COVID-19.
• $100 billion for hospitals.
• A change in the “checks for everyone” program to insure that low-income workers get the full $1,200.
• Removal of a provision that would have excluded nonprofits that receive Medicaid funding from the small-business grants.
• Barring the president, Vice President, cabinet heads and members of Congress and their families from getting aid.
• Oversight on the corporate lending facility.
• $150 billion for state and local governments.
• $25 billion for food stamps.
• $30 billion for schools.
• Suspend federal student loan payments through Sept. 30 with no accrual of interest on those loans.

These are not Republican agendas, they are US agendas. They are all related to the damage of COVID-19.

Those were what the Democrats were fighting to get in to the bill. Not the Republicans. What you criticized Pelosi for.

Some of what went in to the bill was part of the Republican Agenda, for instance language prohibiting Planned Parenthood from getting any money.

PP has nothing to do with this virus.

If people are maintaining their "social distancing" they shouldn't need the services of Planned Parenthood anyhow.

 

[Coyote]

That’s the Class Act President we have... our government is being run by a bunch of emotional children. WTF is going on?!

So the waste of space, that had nothing to do with a relief bill, isn't inviting the only leader in Washington that decided what was going to be in it?

That's rich.

Sorry, the Senate decided what was going to be in it as well. The witch tried to stuff it full of pork, and the Senate told her to take it out.

My understanding is that virtually nothing she wanted got into the final bill.

I'm sure they had to give her something, just nothing near the laundry list she first presented.

Which witch tried to stuff it full of pork? McConnell? Because there was plenty of from both sides in it but you lunatics are incapable of recognizing your own. Harbor dredging? Sunscreen?

A lot of important stuff got in.

• Vastly expanded unemployment benefits through June for anyone who’s lost income due to COVID-19.
• $100 billion for hospitals.
• A change in the “checks for everyone” program to insure that low-income workers get the full $1,200.
• Removal of a provision that would have excluded nonprofits that receive Medicaid funding from the small-business grants.
• Barring the president, Vice President, cabinet heads and members of Congress and their families from getting aid.
• Oversight on the corporate lending facility.
• $150 billion for state and local governments.
• $25 billion for food stamps.
• $30 billion for schools.
• Suspend federal student loan payments through Sept. 30 with no accrual of interest on those loans.

These are not Republican agendas, they are US agendas. They are all related to the damage of COVID-19.

Those were what the Democrats were fighting to get in to the bill. Not the Republicans. What you criticized Pelosi for.

Some of what went in to the bill was part of the Republican Agenda, for instance language prohibiting Planned Parenthood from getting any money.

PP has nothing to do with this virus.

If people are maintaining their "social distancing" they shouldn't need the services of Planned Parenthood anyhow.

That's ridiculous. People still need doctors. Couples still have sex. Frankly, your same argument could apply to airlines.

 

[Nostra]

That’s the Class Act President we have... our government is being run by a bunch of emotional children. WTF is going on?!

So the waste of space, that had nothing to do with a relief bill, isn't inviting the only leader in Washington that decided what was going to be in it?

That's rich.

Sorry, the Senate decided what was going to be in it as well. The witch tried to stuff it full of pork, and the Senate told her to take it out.

My understanding is that virtually nothing she wanted got into the final bill.

I'm sure they had to give her something, just nothing near the laundry list she first presented.

Which witch tried to stuff it full of pork? McConnell? Because there was plenty of from both sides in it but you lunatics are incapable of recognizing your own. Harbor dredging? Sunscreen?

A lot of important stuff got in.

• Vastly expanded unemployment benefits through June for anyone who’s lost income due to COVID-19.
• $100 billion for hospitals.
• A change in the “checks for everyone” program to insure that low-income workers get the full $1,200.
• Removal of a provision that would have excluded nonprofits that receive Medicaid funding from the small-business grants.
• Barring the president, Vice President, cabinet heads and members of Congress and their families from getting aid.
• Oversight on the corporate lending facility.
• $150 billion for state and local governments.
• $25 billion for food stamps.
• $30 billion for schools.
• Suspend federal student loan payments through Sept. 30 with no accrual of interest on those loans.

These are not Republican agendas, they are US agendas. They are all related to the damage of COVID-19.

Those were what the Democrats were fighting to get in to the bill. Not the Republicans. What you criticized Pelosi for.

Some of what went in to the bill was part of the Republican Agenda, for instance language prohibiting Planned Parenthood from getting any money.

Why would Planned Unparenthood need money in a Chinese Virus bailout bill?

 

[BS Filter]

That’s the Class Act President we have... our government is being run by a bunch of emotional children. WTF is going on?!

So the waste of space, that had nothing to do with a relief bill, isn't inviting the only leader in Washington that decided what was going to be in it?

That's rich.

Sorry, the Senate decided what was going to be in it as well. The witch tried to stuff it full of pork, and the Senate told her to take it out.

My understanding is that virtually nothing she wanted got into the final bill.

I'm sure they had to give her something, just nothing near the laundry list she first presented.

Which witch tried to stuff it full of pork? McConnell? Because there was plenty of from both sides in it but you lunatics are incapable of recognizing your own. Harbor dredging? Sunscreen?

A lot of important stuff got in.

• Vastly expanded unemployment benefits through June for anyone who’s lost income due to COVID-19.
• $100 billion for hospitals.
• A change in the “checks for everyone” program to insure that low-income workers get the full $1,200.
• Removal of a provision that would have excluded nonprofits that receive Medicaid funding from the small-business grants.
• Barring the president, Vice President, cabinet heads and members of Congress and their families from getting aid.
• Oversight on the corporate lending facility.
• $150 billion for state and local governments.
• $25 billion for food stamps.
• $30 billion for schools.
• Suspend federal student loan payments through Sept. 30 with no accrual of interest on those loans.

These are not Republican agendas, they are US agendas. They are all related to the damage of COVID-19.

Those were what the Democrats were fighting to get in to the bill. Not the Republicans. What you criticized Pelosi for.

Some of what went in to the bill was part of the Republican Agenda, for instance language prohibiting Planned Parenthood from getting any money.

PP has nothing to do with this virus.

So why was it inserted into the bill?

You can't be this stupid. Democrats had an opportunity to get what they wanted. You know that.

 

[Coyote]

That’s the Class Act President we have... our government is being run by a bunch of emotional children. WTF is going on?!

So the waste of space, that had nothing to do with a relief bill, isn't inviting the only leader in Washington that decided what was going to be in it?

That's rich.

Sorry, the Senate decided what was going to be in it as well. The witch tried to stuff it full of pork, and the Senate told her to take it out.

My understanding is that virtually nothing she wanted got into the final bill.

I'm sure they had to give her something, just nothing near the laundry list she first presented.

Which witch tried to stuff it full of pork? McConnell? Because there was plenty of from both sides in it but you lunatics are incapable of recognizing your own. Harbor dredging? Sunscreen?

A lot of important stuff got in.

• Vastly expanded unemployment benefits through June for anyone who’s lost income due to COVID-19.
• $100 billion for hospitals.
• A change in the “checks for everyone” program to insure that low-income workers get the full $1,200.
• Removal of a provision that would have excluded nonprofits that receive Medicaid funding from the small-business grants.
• Barring the president, Vice President, cabinet heads and members of Congress and their families from getting aid.
• Oversight on the corporate lending facility.
• $150 billion for state and local governments.
• $25 billion for food stamps.
• $30 billion for schools.
• Suspend federal student loan payments through Sept. 30 with no accrual of interest on those loans.

These are not Republican agendas, they are US agendas. They are all related to the damage of COVID-19.

Those were what the Democrats were fighting to get in to the bill. Not the Republicans. What you criticized Pelosi for.

Some of what went in to the bill was part of the Republican Agenda, for instance language prohibiting Planned Parenthood from getting any money.

PP has nothing to do with this virus.

So why was it inserted into the bill?

You can't be this stupid. Democrats had an opportunity to get what they wanted. You know that.

So why was it inserted into the bill?

 

[BS Filter]

That’s the Class Act President we have... our government is being run by a bunch of emotional children. WTF is going on?!

So the waste of space, that had nothing to do with a relief bill, isn't inviting the only leader in Washington that decided what was going to be in it?

That's rich.

Sorry, the Senate decided what was going to be in it as well. The witch tried to stuff it full of pork, and the Senate told her to take it out.

My understanding is that virtually nothing she wanted got into the final bill.

I'm sure they had to give her something, just nothing near the laundry list she first presented.

Which witch tried to stuff it full of pork? McConnell? Because there was plenty of from both sides in it but you lunatics are incapable of recognizing your own. Harbor dredging? Sunscreen?

A lot of important stuff got in.

• Vastly expanded unemployment benefits through June for anyone who’s lost income due to COVID-19.
• $100 billion for hospitals.
• A change in the “checks for everyone” program to insure that low-income workers get the full $1,200.
• Removal of a provision that would have excluded nonprofits that receive Medicaid funding from the small-business grants.
• Barring the president, Vice President, cabinet heads and members of Congress and their families from getting aid.
• Oversight on the corporate lending facility.
• $150 billion for state and local governments.
• $25 billion for food stamps.
• $30 billion for schools.
• Suspend federal student loan payments through Sept. 30 with no accrual of interest on those loans.

These are not Republican agendas, they are US agendas. They are all related to the damage of COVID-19.

Those were what the Democrats were fighting to get in to the bill. Not the Republicans. What you criticized Pelosi for.

Some of what went in to the bill was part of the Republican Agenda, for instance language prohibiting Planned Parenthood from getting any money.

PP has nothing to do with this virus.

So why was it inserted into the bill?

You can't be this stupid. Democrats had an opportunity to get what they wanted. You know that.

So why was it inserted into the bill?

I just told you. That was the only way to get PP funded. The Democrat votes were needed to pass the stimulus, so Democrats knew they could get what they wanted. This is the part where you play dumb, huh.

 

[Canon Shooter]

I’ve never voted democrat. But I will next election. A steaming turd would be better than what we currently have

Would you concern yourself with the background/history of the Democrat, or would you vote for him just because he's not Trump?

Would you? Or would you vote for Trump regardless?

That's not how this works.

I asked you a question. If you expect me to answer your, you should answer mine first.

If you're too scared to answer mine, that's perfectly fine. Just have the balls to admit it...

Sure. I can answer it.

I would concern myself with the background and positions of the candidate. In fact that is one reason I voted for Obama. I vote for someone who's positions most closely match mine, and who's integrity and character is at least not totally off the board.

And that brings us to Trump. Zero policy positions in common. And a horrible character and background. None of the Dems running in the primaries come close to that bad in terms of character. The main issue I had with many is - too far to the left. But, it might help to rebalance things. Any of them would have my vote over Trump. In fact there are other Republicans who I would have loved to see run that I could have voted for (Colin Powell).

Now your turn. Or will you run away?

I run from nothing.

If someone on the Democratic side comes along and has ideals which align with mine, they could get my vote.

Could.

They would need to align with mine on the topics of the 2nd Amendment and illegal immigration. If they don't, they won't get my vote. Right now, no one on the left shares my views on that.

Trump, on the other hand, does. I don't really care that he's a crass buffoon. I don't care that he said "pussy" back in the 80's or that his airline went bankrupt. Honestly, I couldn't care less than I already do, simply because I understand that there are a myriad of factor which go into a business failing. Flatheads on the left just say "It's because of Trump", and that's just not true.

Bring me a Democrat who's running for President who wants to legitimately combat illegal immigration and doesn't want to give them driver licenses or college educations, and that person could get my vote. Bring me a Democrat who's running for President who understands that more gun laws will do nothing to combat gun violence, and who's more interested in taking guns from criminals instead of law abiding citizens, and that person could get my vote...

 

[Meister]

When Pelousy's main goal has been to remove the President from office, I wouldn't have invited her either.

I would like Trump to throw a party for Pelosi....and not invite her. That's my PAB kicking in.

 

[Coyote]

I’ve never voted democrat. But I will next election. A steaming turd would be better than what we currently have

Would you concern yourself with the background/history of the Democrat, or would you vote for him just because he's not Trump?

Would you? Or would you vote for Trump regardless?

That's not how this works.

I asked you a question. If you expect me to answer your, you should answer mine first.

If you're too scared to answer mine, that's perfectly fine. Just have the balls to admit it...

Sure. I can answer it.

I would concern myself with the background and positions of the candidate. In fact that is one reason I voted for Obama. I vote for someone who's positions most closely match mine, and who's integrity and character is at least not totally off the board.

And that brings us to Trump. Zero policy positions in common. And a horrible character and background. None of the Dems running in the primaries come close to that bad in terms of character. The main issue I had with many is - too far to the left. But, it might help to rebalance things. Any of them would have my vote over Trump. In fact there are other Republicans who I would have loved to see run that I could have voted for (Colin Powell).

Now your turn. Or will you run away?

I run from nothing.

If someone on the Democratic side comes along and has ideals which align with mine, they could get my vote.

Could.

In the above, we aren't so different. There are some Republicans who I could have voted for. It all depends on how they align with me on what I consider important.

They would need to align with mine on the topics of the 2nd Amendment and illegal immigration. If they don't, they won't get my vote. Right now, no one on the left shares my views on that.

Trump, on the other hand, does. I don't really care that he's a crass buffoon. I don't care that he said "pussy" back in the 80's or that his airline went bankrupt. Honestly, I couldn't care less than I already do, simply because I understand that there are a myriad of factor which go into a business failing. Flatheads on the left just say "It's because of Trump", and that's just not true.

To me....I care to a degree. When flatheads on the right say "he is a successful businessman therefor he will be a great president" - I question the claim. If someone filed for bankruptcy once, that's understandable, but when it's 6 times, that is a red flag. I don't care so much about infidelity, or occasional crudity - but someone who is so thin skinned that he punches down at every perceived slight, who openly refers to colleagues with insulting nicknames, who promotes conspiracy theories and lies, constantly, even about inconsequential things....it's that character package that is a deal breaker for me in addition to the policy positions. Frankly - if he ran on the left, and lined up with all my positions - I still could not vote for him. Sometimes character can be so bad, it overrules everything else.

Bring me a Democrat who's running for President who wants to legitimately combat illegal immigration and doesn't want to give them driver licenses or college educations, and that person could get my vote. Bring me a Democrat who's running for President who understands that more gun laws will do nothing to combat gun violence, and who's more interested in taking guns from criminals instead of law abiding citizens, and that person could get my vote...

I can understand that. I hold passionate beliefs on certain things as well.

 

[BS Filter]

I’ve never voted democrat. But I will next election. A steaming turd would be better than what we currently have

Would you concern yourself with the background/history of the Democrat, or would you vote for him just because he's not Trump?

Would you? Or would you vote for Trump regardless?

That's not how this works.

I asked you a question. If you expect me to answer your, you should answer mine first.

If you're too scared to answer mine, that's perfectly fine. Just have the balls to admit it...

Sure. I can answer it.

I would concern myself with the background and positions of the candidate. In fact that is one reason I voted for Obama. I vote for someone who's positions most closely match mine, and who's integrity and character is at least not totally off the board.

And that brings us to Trump. Zero policy positions in common. And a horrible character and background. None of the Dems running in the primaries come close to that bad in terms of character. The main issue I had with many is - too far to the left. But, it might help to rebalance things. Any of them would have my vote over Trump. In fact there are other Republicans who I would have loved to see run that I could have voted for (Colin Powell).

Now your turn. Or will you run away?

I run from nothing.

If someone on the Democratic side comes along and has ideals which align with mine, they could get my vote.

Could.

In the above, we aren't so different. There are some Republicans who I could have voted for. It all depends on how they align with me on what I consider important.

They would need to align with mine on the topics of the 2nd Amendment and illegal immigration. If they don't, they won't get my vote. Right now, no one on the left shares my views on that.

Trump, on the other hand, does. I don't really care that he's a crass buffoon. I don't care that he said "pussy" back in the 80's or that his airline went bankrupt. Honestly, I couldn't care less than I already do, simply because I understand that there are a myriad of factor which go into a business failing. Flatheads on the left just say "It's because of Trump", and that's just not true.

To me....I care to a degree. When flatheads on the right say "he is a successful businessman therefor he will be a great president" - I question the claim. If someone filed for bankruptcy once, that's understandable, but when it's 6 times, that is a red flag. I don't care so much about infidelity, or occasional crudity - but someone who is so thin skinned that he punches down at every perceived slight, who openly refers to colleagues with insulting nicknames, who promotes conspiracy theories and lies, constantly, even about inconsequential things....it's that character package that is a deal breaker for me in addition to the policy positions. Frankly - if he ran on the left, and lined up with all my positions - I still could not vote for him. Sometimes character can be so bad, it overrules everything else.

Bring me a Democrat who's running for President who wants to legitimately combat illegal immigration and doesn't want to give them driver licenses or college educations, and that person could get my vote. Bring me a Democrat who's running for President who understands that more gun laws will do nothing to combat gun violence, and who's more interested in taking guns from criminals instead of law abiding citizens, and that person could get my vote...

I can understand that. I hold passionate beliefs on certain things as well.

Why is funding for PP important during a virus epidemic?

 

[Papageorgio]

Both parties slammed the stimulus package with tons of needless spending and pork. I think both parties should have set their agendas aside for the good of the country. They couldn’t and that is why it didn’t get passed until later in the week. Of course the partisans sides with their party on the supposed needs of our country but are happy they got their pork and upset the other side got their pork. America loses once again.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

To me....I care to a degree. When flatheads on the right say "he is a successful businessman therefor he will be a great president" - I question the claim. If someone filed for bankruptcy once, that's understandable, but when it's 6 times, that is a red flag. I don't care so much about infidelity, or occasional crudity - but someone who is so thin skinned that he punches down at every perceived slight, who openly refers to colleagues with insulting nicknames, who promotes conspiracy theories and lies, constantly, even about inconsequential things....it's that character package that is a deal breaker for me in addition to the policy positions. Frankly - if he ran on the left, and lined up with all my positions - I still could not vote for him. Sometimes character can be so bad, it overrules everything else.

For one, Trump's businesses (not Trump) filed bankruptcy four times. Given the fact he's owned or operated over 500 business in his life, that's a pretty successful record.

The problem with people like you voting is that you vote for a representative the same way you vote for an American Idol contestant. The President of the United States is not a personality contest. It's the highest position in the world. What you need to be doing is looking at their ability to do the job, which for Trump, has been pretty good; especially given the fact he's never held a political office before.

 

[BS Filter]

To me....I care to a degree. When flatheads on the right say "he is a successful businessman therefor he will be a great president" - I question the claim. If someone filed for bankruptcy once, that's understandable, but when it's 6 times, that is a red flag. I don't care so much about infidelity, or occasional crudity - but someone who is so thin skinned that he punches down at every perceived slight, who openly refers to colleagues with insulting nicknames, who promotes conspiracy theories and lies, constantly, even about inconsequential things....it's that character package that is a deal breaker for me in addition to the policy positions. Frankly - if he ran on the left, and lined up with all my positions - I still could not vote for him. Sometimes character can be so bad, it overrules everything else.

For one, Trump's businesses (not Trump) filed bankruptcy four times. Given the fact he's owned or operated over 500 business in his life, that's a pretty successful record.

The problem with people like you voting is that you vote for a representative the same way you vote for an American Idol contestant. The President of the United States is not a personality contest. It's the highest position in the world. What you need to be doing is looking at their ability to do the job, which for Trump, has been pretty good; especially given the fact he's never held a political office before.

I'd rather have a flawed President that puts citizens first than a smooth talking phoney liar like Obama.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

To me....I care to a degree. When flatheads on the right say "he is a successful businessman therefor he will be a great president" - I question the claim. If someone filed for bankruptcy once, that's understandable, but when it's 6 times, that is a red flag. I don't care so much about infidelity, or occasional crudity - but someone who is so thin skinned that he punches down at every perceived slight, who openly refers to colleagues with insulting nicknames, who promotes conspiracy theories and lies, constantly, even about inconsequential things....it's that character package that is a deal breaker for me in addition to the policy positions. Frankly - if he ran on the left, and lined up with all my positions - I still could not vote for him. Sometimes character can be so bad, it overrules everything else.

For one, Trump's businesses (not Trump) filed bankruptcy four times. Given the fact he's owned or operated over 500 business in his life, that's a pretty successful record.

The problem with people like you voting is that you vote for a representative the same way you vote for an American Idol contestant. The President of the United States is not a personality contest. It's the highest position in the world. What you need to be doing is looking at their ability to do the job, which for Trump, has been pretty good; especially given the fact he's never held a political office before.

I'd rather have a flawed President that puts citizens first than a smooth talking phoney liar like Obama.

People use that level of judgment when voting for a representative, and then wonder why the country is screwed up. I vote for a person who's going to do a good job. I vote for a person that's aligned with my values. I don't care if their hair isn't combed right, if they wear unusual attire, or if they don't smile much.

The President is my employee, and I don't hire somebody based on their attitude or politeness. Anybody that would run a company that way would be out of business in a couple of years.

 

[JustAGuy1]

That’s the Class Act President we have... our government is being run by a bunch of emotional children. WTF is going on?!

So the waste of space, that had nothing to do with a relief bill, isn't inviting the only leader in Washington that decided what was going to be in it?

That's rich.

Sorry, the Senate decided what was going to be in it as well. The witch tried to stuff it full of pork, and the Senate told her to take it out.

My understanding is that virtually nothing she wanted got into the final bill.

I'm sure they had to give her something, just nothing near the laundry list she first presented.

Which witch tried to stuff it full of pork? McConnell? Because there was plenty of from both sides in it but you lunatics are incapable of recognizing your own. Harbor dredging? Sunscreen?

A lot of important stuff got in.

• Vastly expanded unemployment benefits through June for anyone who’s lost income due to COVID-19.
• $100 billion for hospitals.
• A change in the “checks for everyone” program to insure that low-income workers get the full $1,200.
• Removal of a provision that would have excluded nonprofits that receive Medicaid funding from the small-business grants.
• Barring the president, Vice President, cabinet heads and members of Congress and their families from getting aid.
• Oversight on the corporate lending facility.
• $150 billion for state and local governments.
• $25 billion for food stamps.
• $30 billion for schools.
• Suspend federal student loan payments through Sept. 30 with no accrual of interest on those loans.

These are not Republican agendas, they are US agendas. They are all related to the damage of COVID-19.

Those were what the Democrats were fighting to get in to the bill. Not the Republicans. What you criticized Pelosi for.

Some of what went in to the bill was part of the Republican Agenda, for instance language prohibiting Planned Parenthood from getting any money.

PP has nothing to do with this virus.

So why was it inserted into the bill?

You can't be this stupid. Democrats had an opportunity to get what they wanted. You know that.

So why was it inserted into the bill?

Because people like you and Nancy value your ability to kill "fetuses" more than you do saving people from this virus

 

[Canon Shooter]

To me....I care to a degree. When flatheads on the right say "he is a successful businessman therefor he will be a great president" - I question the claim. If someone filed for bankruptcy once, that's understandable, but when it's 6 times, that is a red flag.

First, flatheads exist only within the Democratic party.

Second, I would also question the claim. But I would further question the assertion made by pretty much everyone on the left I've ever discussed it with bankruptcies mean he'd be a bad President.

Third, someone filing for bankruptcy does not mean they're a poor businessman. Consider his Atlantic City casinos. Many on the left love to point to those as proof positive that he's a shitty businessman. They ignore, however, the fact that many other casinos went belly up because the economy went to shit.

Lastly, Trump filed for bankruptcy four times under Chapter 11. That's actually the intelligent approach when a business is having a difficult time. I don't wan a stupid President, but it appears (unshockingly, really) that the left does.

Also, Trump has had over 500 companies. Four of them have filed for bankruptcy. That's less than 1%. Who else do you know has built 500 successful companies?

I don't care so much about infidelity, or occasional crudity - but someone who is so thin skinned that he punches down at every perceived slight, who openly refers to colleagues with insulting nicknames, who promotes conspiracy theories and lies, constantly, even about inconsequential things....it's that character package that is a deal breaker for me in addition to the policy positions.

Well, suffice it to say, American voters were pretty clearly sick and tired of having a President who would sit back and take whatever was hurled at him. We finally have a President with balls.

Frankly - if he ran on the left, and lined up with all my positions - I still could not vote for him. Sometimes character can be so bad, it overrules everything else

So you would, instead, vote for someone with whom you disagree with on everything simply because Trump calls people names?

I'm sorry, but that's the most unintelligent approach I can imagine...

 

[BluesLegend]

Why would Planned Unparenthood need money in a Chinese Virus bailout bill?

Well you see here's what happened...eh...well its like this...(calls liberal talking points hotline) Okay so here's the deal, Trump

 

[Slade3200]

Why on earth? Easy, because he is the president and she is the head of a major political party and speaker of the house. That’s why. You grow the fuck up and act like a leader. The old “she did it first so I can do it now” Line expired in grade school. You obviously didn’t get the memo

She's also the leader of the major political party which has been spewing lies about him for years, which has wasted untold millions of taxpayer dollars investigating things which never happened, and which tried to remove him from office over a fucking phone call.

He IS acting like a leader. Those who elected him (and I'm guessing you're not one of them) are finally happy to have a leader who doesn't take any bullshit and who couldn't be pretentious if he tried. You fuck with him, he'll fuck with you. That's how real life works. Pelosi now has a better understanding of what she can expect with the time she has left as SOTH while Trump is President.

You reap what you sow, and Pelosi has all but guaranteed that she'll be on the outside of all the good things that happen from here on out. She deserves to be left out in the cold.

Her political capital has been spent...

This is were we disagree. He is the president of the United States. Not the president of the Republicans or the president of just those who elected him. The “you fuck with him he’ll fuck with you” argument is exactly why he acts like a child and not a leader.

Funny, I don't remember any topic that you started when Piglosi, ShoeMaker or Schiff Face insulted or snubbed the President, and you constantly tell us you're a moderate and not a leftist or TDS victim.

I said plenty about Pelosi ripping up that speech... and even if I didn’t and I was a total hypocrite that wouldn’t matter in the least unless you want to use somebody else’s hypocrisy to justify your own. Is that what you’re doing?

What I'm doing is calling you out for being a fraud. You are either a Democrat/ leftist, or a person with TDS. Either way, you are not impartial which is why you started this topic and never started one against Piglosi or the other commies.

So what? Who cares what I think? It makes zero difference to the discussion. Either you think my statements are right or wrong and they can be discussed at face value. My personal feelings or my history of who I support and don’t support have nothing to do with it. That’s a diversion tactic

Well that's why we come here: to relay how we all think. If Trump is everything bad in your mind, at least be honest about it. If you hate Republicans no matter what they do, then don't tell everybody you're a centrist who has no side.

I'm a conservative Republican. I'm proud of it, I make no bones about it. Even without that proclamation, it's clear in what I write. Does that mean I will stick up for the Republican party and representatives no matter what? Of course not. But I will stick up for them when people like you attack them, and try to act like your side is totally innocent.

I don’t think anybody is “everything bad”. I used to be a trump fan and was thoroughly entertained by him... I just think he is a shitty president who makes me feel embarrassed to be an American with the way he represents us. I would love to vote republican. I am an entrepreneur who likes the idea of low taxes and small gov over big gov. I’d love it if the Republican Party and it’s leaders would do a decent job in representing those values while still displaying strong moral character for human rights. Unfortunately both political parties are corrupt and doing a garbage job. so that’s how I “feel” but again... to try and dismiss Trumps actions because the person critiquing the actions may be a hypocrite... well that’s just a weak diversionary argument IMO

So you vote Democrat because you support small government and low taxes?

Who are you trying to kid?

I’ve never voted democrat. But I will next election. A steaming turd would be better than what we currently have

You never voted Democrat? Yeah, right. Are you saying you voted Commie? That would be redundant, however.

Are you saying you know how I vote?

dipshit

 

[bripat9643]

Both parties slammed the stimulus package with tons of needless spending and pork. I think both parties should have set their agendas aside for the good of the country. They couldn’t and that is why it didn’t get passed until later in the week. Of course the partisans sides with their party on the supposed needs of our country but are happy they got their pork and upset the other side got their pork. America loses once again.

Not true. Democrats are responsible for the vast majority of the pork.

 

[bripat9643]

Why on earth? Easy, because he is the president and she is the head of a major political party and speaker of the house. That’s why. You grow the fuck up and act like a leader. The old “she did it first so I can do it now” Line expired in grade school. You obviously didn’t get the memo

She's also the leader of the major political party which has been spewing lies about him for years, which has wasted untold millions of taxpayer dollars investigating things which never happened, and which tried to remove him from office over a fucking phone call.

He IS acting like a leader. Those who elected him (and I'm guessing you're not one of them) are finally happy to have a leader who doesn't take any bullshit and who couldn't be pretentious if he tried. You fuck with him, he'll fuck with you. That's how real life works. Pelosi now has a better understanding of what she can expect with the time she has left as SOTH while Trump is President.

You reap what you sow, and Pelosi has all but guaranteed that she'll be on the outside of all the good things that happen from here on out. She deserves to be left out in the cold.

Her political capital has been spent...

This is were we disagree. He is the president of the United States. Not the president of the Republicans or the president of just those who elected him. The “you fuck with him he’ll fuck with you” argument is exactly why he acts like a child and not a leader.

Funny, I don't remember any topic that you started when Piglosi, ShoeMaker or Schiff Face insulted or snubbed the President, and you constantly tell us you're a moderate and not a leftist or TDS victim.

I said plenty about Pelosi ripping up that speech... and even if I didn’t and I was a total hypocrite that wouldn’t matter in the least unless you want to use somebody else’s hypocrisy to justify your own. Is that what you’re doing?

What I'm doing is calling you out for being a fraud. You are either a Democrat/ leftist, or a person with TDS. Either way, you are not impartial which is why you started this topic and never started one against Piglosi or the other commies.

So what? Who cares what I think? It makes zero difference to the discussion. Either you think my statements are right or wrong and they can be discussed at face value. My personal feelings or my history of who I support and don’t support have nothing to do with it. That’s a diversion tactic

Well that's why we come here: to relay how we all think. If Trump is everything bad in your mind, at least be honest about it. If you hate Republicans no matter what they do, then don't tell everybody you're a centrist who has no side.

I'm a conservative Republican. I'm proud of it, I make no bones about it. Even without that proclamation, it's clear in what I write. Does that mean I will stick up for the Republican party and representatives no matter what? Of course not. But I will stick up for them when people like you attack them, and try to act like your side is totally innocent.

I don’t think anybody is “everything bad”. I used to be a trump fan and was thoroughly entertained by him... I just think he is a shitty president who makes me feel embarrassed to be an American with the way he represents us. I would love to vote republican. I am an entrepreneur who likes the idea of low taxes and small gov over big gov. I’d love it if the Republican Party and it’s leaders would do a decent job in representing those values while still displaying strong moral character for human rights. Unfortunately both political parties are corrupt and doing a garbage job. so that’s how I “feel” but again... to try and dismiss Trumps actions because the person critiquing the actions may be a hypocrite... well that’s just a weak diversionary argument IMO

So you vote Democrat because you support small government and low taxes?

Who are you trying to kid?

I’ve never voted democrat. But I will next election. A steaming turd would be better than what we currently have

You never voted Democrat? Yeah, right. Are you saying you voted Commie? That would be redundant, however.

Are you saying you know how I vote?

dipshit

I know you never voted for a Republican Senator, Congressman or President.