Paris knife attack in police station kills at least 4 officers

And the dead would be more if a gun was used obviously. Or should we start arming our military with knives?

Knee jerk response. You have no proof more deaths would have occurred. Depends on many variables.

Still, in true gun grabber fashion, you REFUSE to address the REAL problem.
So we should save money and arm our military with knives cause they are just as deadly?

Knives are much more deadly in close urban situations, but just not in long range confrontations.
For example, the death toll of ancient wars before firearms, was much higher than later wars with firearms.
Almost 80 thousand people died instantly when nukes were dropped on a city.....tens of thousands more died from the after effects months later.....

What medieval weapon can kill that many people that instantly??

The atomic bombs were not at all "instant".
It took many years to make the first 2, hours to fly them to location, etc.
And it was a surprise attack on a civilian population.
After learning what a nuclear attack was like, early warning systems, shelters, etc. make it impossible for similar death rates.

Lots of battles had over a million on each side, and they could easily kill more than 80,000 in minutes with edged weapons.
Still waiting for you to answer my question.......tens of thousands died instantly -- from weapons made in the 40's -- how much destruction do you think nukes would cause now??

Especially when it won't be just one side using it
 
Paris knife attack in police station kills at least 4 officers, injures others, assailant shot dead: officials
Paris knife attack in police station kills at least 4 officers, injures others, assailant shot dead: officials

The anti gun lobby insists only guns can kill multiple people.

These were POLICE OFFICERS.

How many gun control laws would it have taken to save these people?

As always, the focus should not be on controlling guns......but rather on dealing with societal issues that are at the ROOT of violence
And the dead would be more if a gun was used obviously. Or should we start arming our military with knives?


Gilroy shooting with a rifle and magazine....3 killed....you moron.

It isn't the weapon, it is the location and the ability of the people to respond to the attack.....
 
And the dead would be more if a gun was used obviously. Or should we start arming our military with knives?

Knee jerk response. You have no proof more deaths would have occurred. Depends on many variables.

Still, in true gun grabber fashion, you REFUSE to address the REAL problem.
So we should save money and arm our military with knives cause they are just as deadly?


Total mass public shootings in 2018... 12. Total killed... 93.

Each and every year knives are used to murder over 1,515 people.

You just don't know what you are talking about.
 
according to article knife man and murderer hasn't been identified by name yet . Would anyone like to make a guess who the murderer is ???
A muslim immigrant most likely....

But the French are a bunch of wimps, they won't round up all of the muslims and deport them
He worked there. Who knows.
---------------------------------------------------- yeah , important thing to me are the personal details on the murderer . Everything else that media and YOU guys and 'authorities' like to hide is the important stuff to me especially because YOU guys like to hide those details Brian . So what if he worked there Brian ??
 
Wow. Reading this article they have a huge problem on their hands over there.
Paris knife attack: Four officers dead in Paris police HQ stabbing

Yeah, right?

Like Left Bangers claiming we have a "Yuge Mass gun shooting problem" when actually it's a VERY small number :rolleyes:


Yes....70=80% of actual gun murder victims are criminals...of the rest, a good many are the friends and family of the criminals, with a tiny number being innocent citizens.......
 
yeah , looks like the STABBER of French police is a recent Convert to 'islam' according to 'REUTERS' News agency .
 
Last edited:
Knee jerk response. You have no proof more deaths would have occurred. Depends on many variables.

Still, in true gun grabber fashion, you REFUSE to address the REAL problem.
So we should save money and arm our military with knives cause they are just as deadly?

Knives are much more deadly in close urban situations, but just not in long range confrontations.
For example, the death toll of ancient wars before firearms, was much higher than later wars with firearms.
Almost 80 thousand people died instantly when nukes were dropped on a city.....tens of thousands more died from the after effects months later.....

What medieval weapon can kill that many people that instantly??

The atomic bombs were not at all "instant".
It took many years to make the first 2, hours to fly them to location, etc.
And it was a surprise attack on a civilian population.
After learning what a nuclear attack was like, early warning systems, shelters, etc. make it impossible for similar death rates.

Lots of battles had over a million on each side, and they could easily kill more than 80,000 in minutes with edged weapons.
Still waiting for you to answer my question.......tens of thousands died instantly -- from weapons made in the 40's -- how much destruction do you think nukes would cause now??

Especially when it won't be just one side using it
----------------------------------------- I think that those 'nuked' by the USA in the 40s were ENEMIES that woulda killed my Dad and Uncles if they hadn't been Nuked Biff . Today , the death toll of both sides or more sides lobbing Nukes would be YUGE . Especially for All people living in big cities which in my opinion the big cities would be the NUKES Targets Biff .
 
There's enough nukes to cover every square inch of the USA, Russia and China.
The fallout and nuclear winter would kill off everyone and everything that wasn't killed instantly. Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD).
It would set life on Earth back hundreds of thousands of years
 
yeah , looks like the STABBER of French police is a recent Convert to 'islam' according to 'REUTERS' News agency .

“But, but, but, that doesn’t mean he was radicalized”. That’s what they are saying.

It’s also being called a criminal act, not a terror attack. Unbelievable how they continue to bury their heads in the sand.
 
Paris knife attack in police station kills at least 4 officers, injures others, assailant shot dead: officials
Paris knife attack in police station kills at least 4 officers, injures others, assailant shot dead: officials

The anti gun lobby insists only guns can kill multiple people.

These were POLICE OFFICERS.

How many gun control laws would it have taken to save these people?

As always, the focus should not be on controlling guns......but rather on dealing with societal issues that are at the ROOT of violence
And the dead would be more if a gun was used obviously. Or should we start arming our military with knives?
Lol
You’re delusional, Political correctness has made you fucking retarded
 
You know what dumb gun grabbers are forgetting when comparing knives to guns that's a really big deal?

KNIVES are FULLY automatic and NEVER need reloading. (They NEVER jam either)

;)
 
Oh....and bullets are FAR more sanitary......
I mean, would you want some sicko stabbing God knows who all over town, then stabbing you with the SAME knife, without sanitizing it first???

ewwwwwwww !!!!
 
Knee jerk response. You have no proof more deaths would have occurred. Depends on many variables.

Still, in true gun grabber fashion, you REFUSE to address the REAL problem.
So we should save money and arm our military with knives cause they are just as deadly?

Knives are much more deadly in close urban situations, but just not in long range confrontations.
For example, the death toll of ancient wars before firearms, was much higher than later wars with firearms.
Almost 80 thousand people died instantly when nukes were dropped on a city.....tens of thousands more died from the after effects months later.....

What medieval weapon can kill that many people that instantly??

The atomic bombs were not at all "instant".
It took many years to make the first 2, hours to fly them to location, etc.
And it was a surprise attack on a civilian population.
After learning what a nuclear attack was like, early warning systems, shelters, etc. make it impossible for similar death rates.

Lots of battles had over a million on each side, and they could easily kill more than 80,000 in minutes with edged weapons.
Still waiting for you to answer my question.......tens of thousands died instantly -- from weapons made in the 40's -- how much destruction do you think nukes would cause now??

Especially when it won't be just one side using it

I still have to figure out what you mean and what relevance it has to anything?
The bigger/powerful the weapon, the more difficult to use because of more detection, deterrent, and defense systems.
The point of an edged weapon is that it is silent, instant, and undetectable by anyone not in the exact same location.
So then it can be repeated like a serial killer, forever, with any detection, deterrent, or defense.
If someone like Kim Jong Un were to fire a dozen nuclear or thermo nuclear missiles at us, likely there would be no casualities in the US at all because we would shoot them down. It is only Kim Jong Un who would likely be the casualty.
 
You know what dumb gun grabbers are forgetting when comparing knives to guns that's a really big deal?

KNIVES are FULLY automatic and NEVER need reloading. (They NEVER jam either)

;)

Not only are they automatic, but they have a built in silencer.
 

Forum List

Back
Top