Broken Wing
VIP Member
- Oct 4, 2020
- 236
- 221
- 73
I am opposed to either side expanding and packing the court. We need a term limit. For the supreme court, and congress.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
Here is the difference between Dimwingers and Republicans. Republicans put Constitutionalists on the SC, Dimwingers put activist judges who like to legislate from the bench.With the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the nomination of a polar opposite replacement, only one response that makes any sense: Expand the Supreme Court. The only real question is by how much. There are other responses that can do some good — perhaps even more good. But without court expansion, the existing court can, and almost certainly will, strike them down.
Yes, some call it an extreme step. But there’s a more extreme step: Simply ignore the court’s decisions — as some Republicans argued in the 1850s, in response to the Dred Scott decision. More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses. As Boston College law professor Kent Greenfield tweeted on Sept. 21:
Yes, some call it an extreme step. But there’s a more extreme step: Simply ignore the court’s decisions — as some Republicans argued in the 1850s, in response to the Dred Scott decision. More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
"Pack" the Supreme Court? It's the only way to save democracy
There are many ways to reduce the destructive political power of the Supreme Court. They all start with more seatswww.salon.com
The pipe dream of a Christian theocracy, with unfettered capitalism, is about to run up on a snag.
More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
You obviously don't know what advise and consent means, Dummy. Barry wasn't denied his pick. He made it.More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
Again, I don't care about advise and consent. You lost that argument when you denied Obama his pick. Unless I've been asleep, he was to serve until January, 2017. So it's irrelevant. McConnell set the standard. You don't get to alter the standard just because it's your guy in the Oval Office.
Here is the difference between Dimwingers and Republicans. Republicans put Constitutionalists on the SC, Dimwingers put activist judges who like to legislate from the bench.With the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the nomination of a polar opposite replacement, only one response that makes any sense: Expand the Supreme Court. The only real question is by how much. There are other responses that can do some good — perhaps even more good. But without court expansion, the existing court can, and almost certainly will, strike them down.
Yes, some call it an extreme step. But there’s a more extreme step: Simply ignore the court’s decisions — as some Republicans argued in the 1850s, in response to the Dred Scott decision. More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses. As Boston College law professor Kent Greenfield tweeted on Sept. 21:
Yes, some call it an extreme step. But there’s a more extreme step: Simply ignore the court’s decisions — as some Republicans argued in the 1850s, in response to the Dred Scott decision. More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
"Pack" the Supreme Court? It's the only way to save democracy
There are many ways to reduce the destructive political power of the Supreme Court. They all start with more seatswww.salon.com
The pipe dream of a Christian theocracy, with unfettered capitalism, is about to run up on a snag.
That's why you are so butthurt over a far left activist being replaced by someone who will follow the Constitution when making rulings.
Dimwingers can't have the SC follow the Constitution, hence this PACK THE COURT WITH LIBTARDS dumbassery.
I am opposed to either side expanding and packing the court. We need a term limit. For the supreme court, and congress.
You obviously don't know what advise and consent means, Dummy. Barry wasn't denied his pick. He made it.More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
Again, I don't care about advise and consent. You lost that argument when you denied Obama his pick. Unless I've been asleep, he was to serve until January, 2017. So it's irrelevant. McConnell set the standard. You don't get to alter the standard just because it's your guy in the Oval Office.
Numerous SC justices have been confirmed during an election year. Just so happens it was when the WH and Sen were controlled by the same party. You need a history lesson, Tardboi..
You obviously don't know what advise and consent means, Dummy. Barry wasn't denied his pick. He made it.More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
Again, I don't care about advise and consent. You lost that argument when you denied Obama his pick. Unless I've been asleep, he was to serve until January, 2017. So it's irrelevant. McConnell set the standard. You don't get to alter the standard just because it's your guy in the Oval Office.
Numerous SC justices have been confirmed during an election year. Just so happens it was when the WH and Sen were controlled by the same party. You need a history lesson, Tardboi..
Not the first time a nominee from a Prez from the opposing party wasn't confirmed during an election year. Like I said, you need a history lesson, Tardboi.You obviously don't know what advise and consent means, Dummy. Barry wasn't denied his pick. He made it.More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
Again, I don't care about advise and consent. You lost that argument when you denied Obama his pick. Unless I've been asleep, he was to serve until January, 2017. So it's irrelevant. McConnell set the standard. You don't get to alter the standard just because it's your guy in the Oval Office.
Numerous SC justices have been confirmed during an election year. Just so happens it was when the WH and Sen were controlled by the same party. You need a history lesson, Tardboi..
The Senate refused to consider his nominee and even vote on it.
Again, not the point. Don't care who was confirmed in an election year. The Senate majority leader set the standard.
You lost the high ground on this argument.
You obviously don't know what advise and consent means, Dummy. Barry wasn't denied his pick. He made it.More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
Again, I don't care about advise and consent. You lost that argument when you denied Obama his pick. Unless I've been asleep, he was to serve until January, 2017. So it's irrelevant. McConnell set the standard. You don't get to alter the standard just because it's your guy in the Oval Office.
Numerous SC justices have been confirmed during an election year. Just so happens it was when the WH and Sen were controlled by the same party. You need a history lesson, Tardboi..
Exactly. advise and consent doesnt mean accuse a perfectly suitable judge of gang rape. Liberals are fucked in the head.
There was ZERO evidence against Kavanaugh, Tardboi.You obviously don't know what advise and consent means, Dummy. Barry wasn't denied his pick. He made it.More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
Again, I don't care about advise and consent. You lost that argument when you denied Obama his pick. Unless I've been asleep, he was to serve until January, 2017. So it's irrelevant. McConnell set the standard. You don't get to alter the standard just because it's your guy in the Oval Office.
Numerous SC justices have been confirmed during an election year. Just so happens it was when the WH and Sen were controlled by the same party. You need a history lesson, Tardboi..
Exactly. advise and consent doesnt mean accuse a perfectly suitable judge of gang rape. Liberals are fucked in the head.
Kavanaugh was a scumbag. Like Thomas before him. The only people fucked in the head are the people that supported these nominees (and yes, I'll give Biden a minus for that).
Did you hear anyone making the same allegations against Neil Gorsuch?
Not the first time a nominee from a Prez from the opposing party wasn't confirmed during an election year. Like I said, you need a history lesson, Tardboi.You obviously don't know what advise and consent means, Dummy. Barry wasn't denied his pick. He made it.More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
Again, I don't care about advise and consent. You lost that argument when you denied Obama his pick. Unless I've been asleep, he was to serve until January, 2017. So it's irrelevant. McConnell set the standard. You don't get to alter the standard just because it's your guy in the Oval Office.
Numerous SC justices have been confirmed during an election year. Just so happens it was when the WH and Sen were controlled by the same party. You need a history lesson, Tardboi..
The Senate refused to consider his nominee and even vote on it.
Again, not the point. Don't care who was confirmed in an election year. The Senate majority leader set the standard.
You lost the high ground on this argument.
Repeat after me: Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
Barrett isn't an illegitimate pick you raveing lunatic.Not the first time a nominee from a Prez from the opposing party wasn't confirmed during an election year. Like I said, you need a history lesson, Tardboi.You obviously don't know what advise and consent means, Dummy. Barry wasn't denied his pick. He made it.More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
Again, I don't care about advise and consent. You lost that argument when you denied Obama his pick. Unless I've been asleep, he was to serve until January, 2017. So it's irrelevant. McConnell set the standard. You don't get to alter the standard just because it's your guy in the Oval Office.
Numerous SC justices have been confirmed during an election year. Just so happens it was when the WH and Sen were controlled by the same party. You need a history lesson, Tardboi..
The Senate refused to consider his nominee and even vote on it.
Again, not the point. Don't care who was confirmed in an election year. The Senate majority leader set the standard.
You lost the high ground on this argument.
Repeat after me: Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
Again nothing to do with it. See Mitch for the standard.
ACB=>Illegitimate pick in that case. If Trump wins, she's in. Easy.
Be careful what you dance for here. If Biden wins and Democrats take control of the Senate, an expanded and packed court is exactly what you may get.
Given what we know conservatives would like to impose on the masses, I wouldn't necessarily have a problem with that.
There was ZERO evidence against Kavanaugh, Tardboi.You obviously don't know what advise and consent means, Dummy. Barry wasn't denied his pick. He made it.More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
Again, I don't care about advise and consent. You lost that argument when you denied Obama his pick. Unless I've been asleep, he was to serve until January, 2017. So it's irrelevant. McConnell set the standard. You don't get to alter the standard just because it's your guy in the Oval Office.
Numerous SC justices have been confirmed during an election year. Just so happens it was when the WH and Sen were controlled by the same party. You need a history lesson, Tardboi..
Exactly. advise and consent doesnt mean accuse a perfectly suitable judge of gang rape. Liberals are fucked in the head.
Kavanaugh was a scumbag. Like Thomas before him. The only people fucked in the head are the people that supported these nominees (and yes, I'll give Biden a minus for that).
Did you hear anyone making the same allegations against Neil Gorsuch?
None.
Such as? Lets see the evidence.There was ZERO evidence against Kavanaugh, Tardboi.You obviously don't know what advise and consent means, Dummy. Barry wasn't denied his pick. He made it.More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
Again, I don't care about advise and consent. You lost that argument when you denied Obama his pick. Unless I've been asleep, he was to serve until January, 2017. So it's irrelevant. McConnell set the standard. You don't get to alter the standard just because it's your guy in the Oval Office.
Numerous SC justices have been confirmed during an election year. Just so happens it was when the WH and Sen were controlled by the same party. You need a history lesson, Tardboi..
Exactly. advise and consent doesnt mean accuse a perfectly suitable judge of gang rape. Liberals are fucked in the head.
Kavanaugh was a scumbag. Like Thomas before him. The only people fucked in the head are the people that supported these nominees (and yes, I'll give Biden a minus for that).
Did you hear anyone making the same allegations against Neil Gorsuch?
None.
There was LOTS, true believer. The guy was a complete scumbag.
Hey, did you ever ask yourself, why didn't Trump nominate ACB then instead of a guy his handlers told him was going to be an issue?
Birds of a feather? Smidge bit of misogyny?
Such as? Lets see the evidence.There was ZERO evidence against Kavanaugh, Tardboi.You obviously don't know what advise and consent means, Dummy. Barry wasn't denied his pick. He made it.More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
Again, I don't care about advise and consent. You lost that argument when you denied Obama his pick. Unless I've been asleep, he was to serve until January, 2017. So it's irrelevant. McConnell set the standard. You don't get to alter the standard just because it's your guy in the Oval Office.
Numerous SC justices have been confirmed during an election year. Just so happens it was when the WH and Sen were controlled by the same party. You need a history lesson, Tardboi..
Exactly. advise and consent doesnt mean accuse a perfectly suitable judge of gang rape. Liberals are fucked in the head.
Kavanaugh was a scumbag. Like Thomas before him. The only people fucked in the head are the people that supported these nominees (and yes, I'll give Biden a minus for that).
Did you hear anyone making the same allegations against Neil Gorsuch?
None.
There was LOTS, true believer. The guy was a complete scumbag.
Hey, did you ever ask yourself, why didn't Trump nominate ACB then instead of a guy his handlers told him was going to be an issue?
Birds of a feather? Smidge bit of misogyny?
The weirdo lady didn't know where it happened, or even what year. And her two supposed "witnesses" contradicted her story. Plus, she was caught in multiple lies.
Only a single digit IQ fuckwit like you would buy her story.
Such as? Lets see the evidence.There was ZERO evidence against Kavanaugh, Tardboi.You obviously don't know what advise and consent means, Dummy. Barry wasn't denied his pick. He made it.More to the point, this is an extreme situation that demands extreme responses.
What is extreme about it?
Democrats think Trump being elected is extreme and requires an extreme response.
YOU LOST! Deal with it.
Ginsberg died...it happens...now she needs to be replaced...so what is extreme? The leftists aren't getting their way?
So you need to "justify" your extreme responses by calling a normal situation "extreme"?
Yes, she should be replaced. After the election. If Trump wins, ACB gets confirmed and I'll have no issue with that. If Trump loses, Biden gets to nominate his own judge. McConnell set this standard. I don't give two shits if Trump is an incumbent. There is still a possibility of a new President being selected. The people deserve a say in the matter.
"The people deserve a say in the matter."
You are absolutely right. And they do and did have a say in the matter....They elected Donald J Trump as their President ( Yes he is the President and you should probably get over it already) for 4 years....not 3 years and 9 months....4 years. Their choice for 4 years...not 3 years and 9 months....has made his choice for the next Supreme Court Justice. The people also had their say in the Senate for a term of 6 years, one third of which ends January 2021....Not November 2020. Now, their advise and consent to the next Supreme Court Justice will be made doing the peoples will.
Again, I don't care about advise and consent. You lost that argument when you denied Obama his pick. Unless I've been asleep, he was to serve until January, 2017. So it's irrelevant. McConnell set the standard. You don't get to alter the standard just because it's your guy in the Oval Office.
Numerous SC justices have been confirmed during an election year. Just so happens it was when the WH and Sen were controlled by the same party. You need a history lesson, Tardboi..
Exactly. advise and consent doesnt mean accuse a perfectly suitable judge of gang rape. Liberals are fucked in the head.
Kavanaugh was a scumbag. Like Thomas before him. The only people fucked in the head are the people that supported these nominees (and yes, I'll give Biden a minus for that).
Did you hear anyone making the same allegations against Neil Gorsuch?
None.
There was LOTS, true believer. The guy was a complete scumbag.
Hey, did you ever ask yourself, why didn't Trump nominate ACB then instead of a guy his handlers told him was going to be an issue?
Birds of a feather? Smidge bit of misogyny?
The weirdo lady didn't know where it happened, or even what year. And her two supposed "witnesses" contradicted her story. Plus, she was caught in multiple lies.
Only a single digit IQ fuckwit like you would buy her story.