So now it doesn't even matter if they are doctors, anyone that isn't a left-wing ideologue is discredited in your pin-head idiocy.its OK you wouldnt understand anyway,,,
oh i understand all right........... do you?
Republicans Call on Right-Wing Doctors for Help
May 20, 2020 ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican political operatives are recruiting “extremely pro-Trump” doctors to go on television to prescribe reviving the U.S. economy as quickly as possible, without meeting safety benchmarks proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to slow the spread of the new coronavirus.
The plan was discussed in a May 11 conference call with a senior staffer for the Trump reelection campaign organized by CNP Action, an affiliate of the Republican-aligned Council for National Policy. A leaked recording of the hourlong call was provided to The Associated Press by the Center for Media and Democracy, a progressive watchdog group.
[...]
Republicans Call on Right-Wing Doctors for Help
So much for being the party of science.
lol... drs can be quacks.
Yeah... but so can forum posters who discredit people without cause.
If you have evidence they were all quacks, that's fine. Let's hear it. I'm all for considering evidence.
But if your idea of evidence is "They didn't agree with us, so they are quacks"... that makes you the quack. Unless you have some real reason to consider everyone on that list a quack, the only clear quack is you.
noooooooooooo - they aren't disagreeing with *me* silly trumpanzee.
they are disagreeing with the VAST majority of medical professionals & scientists world wide.
so there's THAT.
How close were the predictions of deaths from the experts? Didn’t CDC predict over 2 million deaths in the US? How did those experts fair? Just because they are experts, doesn’t mean they are always right. If that were true, we’d still be blood letting.
ummm.... them thar 2 million deaths were the worst case scenario ... now understand this ...
if we did absolutely NOTHING & went full tilt ignorance of the known scientific mitigation factors.
everything we are doing, sans a vaccine , is slowing the virus so our health care system doesn't collapse.
So how long do we stay at home? Until the vaccine? The fact is we will not ever be rid of this virus, like all viruses once they are here, they are here.
oh - by all means, please go rub elbows with yer fellow ignoramus'.
So you have no answer, no tolerance for differing opinions so you go back to bigoted insults.
Who said I was rubbing elbows with anyone? Other than work, I’m home, with my wife enjoying life. Our governor has allowed us to open up with restaurants, salons, and other places opening, however I’m not one for crowds. The governor sees the importance of both keeping the virus contained and allowing people to get back to life.
So, again, how long do you think we should stay at home? Until there is a vaccine? Another six months? A year? Two months? You must have an answer as you seem to think we are moving to quickly now.
^ 'Our governor has allowed us to open up with restaurants, salons, and other places opening, however I’m not one for crowds. The governor sees the importance of both keeping the virus contained and allowing people to get back to life.'
us too.
'So, again, how long do you think we should stay at home? Until there is a vaccine? Another six months? A year? Two months? You must have an answer as you seem to think we are moving to quickly now.'
i think mitigation among the thinking bi ped states is the way to go & all 50 should be doing so. slowly - methodically - & not opening up everything all at once is not the way to go. i've maintained that from the start.
i also think testing is the key. EVERYONE needs to get tested - for the antibodies - to see who can get back to work, with masks & gloves & sani wipes - that will protect us all.
that's donny's job & he has failed miserably at it. i never said to keep everything shut until god knows when. you have poor reading comp skills to say the least. sounds like we agree, so jump off jack - you seem to be looking for an argument where there simply isn't any. as for rubbing elbows - i don't really care what you do one way or the other... just don't ignore the safety precautions.
I have worked in an office since the outbreak three days a week. We have no contact with others, other than the delivery people and seven co-workers. I don’t use the mask and I’m within six feet of them a half dozen times a day. Other than that we are home the rest of the time. When we watch the news we wear our masks, to limit exposer to the political figures.
Coronavirus
Published 4 days ago
Wearing a surgical mask can reduce coronavirus transmission by up to 75 percent, study says
By David Aaro | Fox News
Wearing a surgical mask can reduce coronavirus transmission by up to 75 percent, study says
Sure... surgical masks.
You are not wearing a surgical mask, unless you are in a hospital. 99% of the masks you see out in public, are not surgical masks.
The normal masks most are wearing, do nothing to stop the spread of Corona, according to research.
Corona is the common flu, anything written about it is a lie.
Governments kill you, not Corona
Read here.
Governements kill Covid-19 patients and increase worldwide mortality rate
The scheme is pretty simple and applied by the most of countries with insane lockdowns 1. Hospitals become more money for Covid-19 patients, so they have a 'nice' reason to cheat diagnose 2. Many Corona patients are obliged to receive mechanical lung ventilation 3. The devices tear and destroy...
www.usmessageboard.com