Oregon will allow homeless individuals to pitch tents on public land......

[Dekster]

Sorry but if you are sleeping at your parents house, you are not "homeless" by my standard just because you are an adult without a place of your own.

I never said that. But it sounds like there are over 100 gay-ass city cops running a heavy beat morning, swing, and graveyard shifts, who need to be forced, compelled, and coerced to get off the property.

Several state, including California, have expanded their definition of homeless to include people living with others when they are not an owner, lease holder, or payer of the household bills. It has conflated the problem of what counts as being really "homeless".

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I am fine with them in parks, but not in the middle of the damn sidewalk. You can have compassion and common sense at the same time.

Not in leftist run areas. Where have you been living?

in a place where there isn't much homelessness except under contrived definitions

LOL

Lucky you

 

[blackhawk]

This is the government the voters of Oregon elected I feel for the people who didn't vote for this but you get what you elect.

 

[skye]

I am fine with them in parks, but not in the middle of the damn sidewalk. You can have compassion and common sense at the same time.

The parks? why the parks? so now you will not be able to take your dogs for a walk, or people can not take their children to play ???

NO WAY. f**k that.

 

[Godboy]

All towns and cities should build tent areas. Imagine how many working folk would live in tents so ad not to have a mortgage or pay rent. Money saved means some loser landlord doesn't find renters.

Youre a stupid fucking moron. Thats the dumbest shit ive heard in awhile. Shut the fuck up you idiot.

 

[Godboy]

All towns and cities should build tent areas. Imagine how many working folk would live in tents so ad not to have a mortgage or pay rent. Money saved means some loser landlord doesn't find renters.

Yes, though when the Cynic says it would be a fine place to raise your kids, he is precisely right, no joke. Encampments don’t have to be placed on vacant ghetto lots, and apparatus of the future will definitely be more sophisticated than tents.

The child growing up will feel less threatened to constantly experience this “alternate village” where even some type of vetting is not out of the question. They can pay a small rent as they go along, and since the structures are their own, they can leave if and when a landlord tweaks for some reason, because there will be more than a few of these. The camper should also be afforded some privacy from other human pathologies as they deal with their own problems, because the violence of government-funded religious shelters, for example, relies on this type of mixing so that they can poetize themselves As “doing the lord’s work.” Thus, rentals should be intelligently partitioned, with the flexibility to move to another location if one confronts a funky individual they do not like.

Youre a stupid asshole too. I sure hope you dont have kids. If you do, they must have been molested by a dozen people by now.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

in a place where there isn't much homelessness except under contrived definitions

Wherever people are living, that is by definition their home — I'm assuming citizens or legal residents rather than illegal aliens.

Owning a tent doesn’t constitute real estate.
A homeless addict is, in fact, a homeless addict.

There are parks where it is perfectly acceptable for people to pitch tents and camp out, but then guns are banned and there's a crowd that shows up with needles and syringes, and people are O.D.'ed in the middle of the night, and never wake up in the morning. Bodies are rolled up tent and sleeping bag and all, hauled off in an old jalopy or hatch back sedan or station wagon, and never seen again.

When does a mobile home stop being a home?

When it gets its wheels.

 

[Dekster]

I am fine with them in parks, but not in the middle of the damn sidewalk. You can have compassion and common sense at the same time.

The parks? why the parks? so now you will not be able to take your dogs for a walk, or people can not take their children to play ???

NO WAY. f**k that.

Nobody wants to be stepping in your dog's shit either

 

[skye]

I am fine with them in parks, but not in the middle of the damn sidewalk. You can have compassion and common sense at the same time.

The parks? why the parks? so now you will not be able to take your dogs for a walk, or people can not take their children to play ???

NO WAY. f**k that.

Nobody wants to be stepping in your dog's shit either

I have a better idea than the park, why don't you let them stay in your home?

That'd be fine and dandy with me.

 

[badger2]

Venice Beach is the site of new roustings of the homeless:

11 Jul 2021 Venice Beach Homeless Move Onto Sand

Venice Beach homeless move onto sand when rousted during boardwalk cleanup

City officials in Los Angeles are working to reclaim the world-famous 2-mile boardwalk in Venice Beach that has been commandeered by hundreds of homeless people, but efforts appear to be doomed as thousands more are living on streets within walking distance.

news.yahoo.com

 

[badger2]

Venice Beach is the site of recent roustings of the homeless:

11 Jul 2021 Venice Beach Homeless Move Onto Sand

Venice Beach homeless move onto sand when rousted during boardwalk cleanup

City officials in Los Angeles are working to reclaim the world-famous 2-mile boardwalk in Venice Beach that has been commandeered by hundreds of homeless people, but efforts appear to be doomed as thousands more are living on streets within walking distance.

news.yahoo.com

 

[initforme]

Well if one is working a job that pays low so one can't afford any type of hosing where is one supposed to live? $12 per hour isn't going to put a roof over ones head.

 

[initforme]

Heck $20 per hour isn't going to make rent possible

 

[bodecea]

Undoubtedly turning that public land into a sewer, BUT DON'T YOU DARE PUT UP A MONUMENT TO GOD'S GOOD WORK, OR TO MEMORIALIZE OUR FALLEN WAR DEAD!!!

Oregon communities must rewrite local rules to allow Oregonians to sit, lie, sleep and keep warm and dry on public property in most circumstances.

House Bill 3115, which passed the Senate on Wednesday afternoon and is en route to Gov. Kate Brown’s desk, is a response to a 2018 landmark homelessness case that impacted most Western states with an intent to better support individuals experiencing homelessness.

While local governments should already be following rules set forth by the case known as Martin v. Boise, the bill, written at the behest of House Speaker Tina Kotek, forces cities to officially change any ordinance language still on the books to be in line with the court decision.

In its ruling, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said governments cannot criminalize conduct that is unavoidable as a result of experiencing homelessness. To punish a homeless individual for sleeping outside when there aren’t enough shelter beds would be comparable to punishing that individual for the fact that they are homeless, a consequence the court described as cruel and unusual.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at bendbulletin.com ...

When you enable a person experiencing misery, you become complicit in that misery. The left shut down the sanatoriums which resulted in people with mental health issues being left to die a slow, miserable death on the streets

Been to Hawaii in the last 25 years?

 

[badger2]

This is why future assemblages must vet the organisms. They sidestep any discipline of shelters (which come with their own set of pathologies) so they can ingest their habits with impunity.

 

[badger2]

Undoubtedly turning that public land into a sewer, BUT DON'T YOU DARE PUT UP A MONUMENT TO GOD'S GOOD WORK, OR TO MEMORIALIZE OUR FALLEN WAR DEAD!!!

Oregon communities must rewrite local rules to allow Oregonians to sit, lie, sleep and keep warm and dry on public property in most circumstances.

House Bill 3115, which passed the Senate on Wednesday afternoon and is en route to Gov. Kate Brown’s desk, is a response to a 2018 landmark homelessness case that impacted most Western states with an intent to better support individuals experiencing homelessness.

While local governments should already be following rules set forth by the case known as Martin v. Boise, the bill, written at the behest of House Speaker Tina Kotek, forces cities to officially change any ordinance language still on the books to be in line with the court decision.

In its ruling, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said governments cannot criminalize conduct that is unavoidable as a result of experiencing homelessness. To punish a homeless individual for sleeping outside when there aren’t enough shelter beds would be comparable to punishing that individual for the fact that they are homeless, a consequence the court described as cruel and unusual.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at bendbulletin.com ...

When you enable a person experiencing misery, you become complicit in that misery. The left shut down the sanatoriums which resulted in people with mental health issues being left to die a slow, miserable death on the streets

Been to Hawaii in the last 25 years?

Not buying it as there have been planty of theologians that secretly masturbate along with god while both hover over the battlefield and (watch [italics]) the carnage. (See USMB homeless vets thread.)

 

[Quasar44]

The Purge
During my time in Portland the downtown was amazing and teaming with life
Now it’s like the movie , “ the Road”