Only good thing about marxism taking over is how all of these useful idiots will be shot. Everyone we argue with, civil rights leaders etc

[Theowl32]

Heed the warnings from the people who escaped or have participated in it.

The left among many others will be suffering the eternal punishment for your treachery.

I genuinely fear for you who don't heed the clear warnings.

Won't be feeling sorry for any of you spoiled, dirty, no good, useful idiots for being so weak minded that you actually curse the very land that people from these marxist paradises to get here.

Damn all of you brainwashed fools.

 

[MarcATL]

The Nazis were not socialist nor were they liberals, nor were they communist nor were they Republicans..

They were rightwing and authoritarian.

Exactly what the GOP is today.

You'd be in big big trouble if you didn't suck up to the guy above you. Just like in the Trump Regime.

 

[Turtlesoup]

It's gonna happen. The 0nly good news.

It's what the Nazi head ups did as well------socialists do tend to kill one off within a few years as they grasp for power and money.

The Nazis were not socialist nor were they liberals, nor were they communist nor were they Republicans..

We've explained this to you little children repeatedly, Moon. The nazis were the German SOCIALIST PARTY---its in their name. They rose to power promising free chit and using street thugs to terrorize the citizens while burning down cities too.

They did coopt the name but were nothing like socialist, Marxist, etc, they never promised anyone anything for free, you had to work and were required to work...

Thats a lie--------------they offered free school, free food, guaranteed jobs, free entertainment, welfare and much more.

Yah, the capitalists always promised the Blacks in Africa free school, free food, guaranteed jobs, and welfare when loaded them onto the slave ships to southern plantations.

Capitalists? Try CATHOLICS and apparently Jews and oh yeah mostly Muslims involved.. but regardless, what point are you trying to make? Oh that all capitalists are evil despite capitalism being the only long term proven system to get people out of poverty.

Capitalism is about profits, not getting people out of poverty.
Capitalism deliberately wants to create as much poverty as possible, by taking from as many people as possible, and concentrating the wealth in the hands of the ruling elite.

Religion was not the cause of slavery, greed was.
And that is the root of capitalism.

Capitalism can produce some benefits, like technology, but is negative in the long run.
This planet could have supported a happy primitive life style indefinitely.
But by getting greedy, we destroy the happy primitive life style, force everyone to become employed by strangers, so that they can afford the basics like rent, that should normally be free to primitives.
The level of technology we are producing will destroy the planet for human habitation in less than a thousand years.
We are using ancient fossilized solar energy and will run out of that in less than 300 years.
What will be left will be massively polluted and barren.

Yes capitalism is about profits and strangely enough has gotten more people out of poverty than any other systems

Capitalism does not want to create poverty it simply wants people left to their own devices to make a profit. Despite this more people have been lifted out of poverty than any government plan or ideology has ever done.

Capitalismm is an overall positive in the long run.

There is no happy primitive lifestyle

All primitive life styles are relatively happy.
If they were not, then they all would have jumped at the chance to join the invading capitalist and technological society.
But instead they not only always fight it, but hide from it or try to escape it.
It has always brought negative results, and the primitive were always happier without it.
The American natives for example.
But also true in Hawaii, Polynesia, Australia, Africa, China, etc.
There are still people willing to go to hotile and remote places like Alaska, just to get away from the capitalist rat race.
All normal people prefer primitive over hostile capitalist technology.

No primitive lifestyle is happy.

If they were you would be throwing away the computer you are using and walking out into the woods or desert naked to fend for yourself.

It has always brought positive results.

No one prefers the primitive and capitalism is anything but hostile. Those going to Alaska are dmeanding capitalism and technology go with them. No one fought against capitalism they fought against invaders and then embraced capitalism whole heartedly even if resenting being conquered.

Nonsense.
Everyone prefers primitivism, but capitalists have made it so no one can afford primitivism any more.
Do you know how much it costs for a wooded area or a deserted island?
Almost no one can afford even the taxes on that any more.

No going Alaska is demanding capitalism or technology go with them.
They are trying to get away from both.
They want to rely on the natural resource of the primitive there, like lots of animals for food and wood for heat.

Horseshit. No one prefers primitivism and those who claim to want it are proven liars because they never embrace it.

you do not want it or you would not be on the internet and anyone can afford it as it requires NOTHING. a primitive owns nothing and buys no land.

All going to Alaska demand technology and capitalism go with them they demand grocery stores and heated homes and running water in their homes etc.

No one is going there to simply live off of the land

The Unibomber?

 

[Soupnazi630]

It's gonna happen. The 0nly good news.

It's what the Nazi head ups did as well------socialists do tend to kill one off within a few years as they grasp for power and money.

The Nazis were not socialist nor were they liberals, nor were they communist nor were they Republicans..

We've explained this to you little children repeatedly, Moon. The nazis were the German SOCIALIST PARTY---its in their name. They rose to power promising free chit and using street thugs to terrorize the citizens while burning down cities too.

They did coopt the name but were nothing like socialist, Marxist, etc, they never promised anyone anything for free, you had to work and were required to work...

Thats a lie--------------they offered free school, free food, guaranteed jobs, free entertainment, welfare and much more.

Yah, the capitalists always promised the Blacks in Africa free school, free food, guaranteed jobs, and welfare when loaded them onto the slave ships to southern plantations.

Capitalists? Try CATHOLICS and apparently Jews and oh yeah mostly Muslims involved.. but regardless, what point are you trying to make? Oh that all capitalists are evil despite capitalism being the only long term proven system to get people out of poverty.

Capitalism is about profits, not getting people out of poverty.
Capitalism deliberately wants to create as much poverty as possible, by taking from as many people as possible, and concentrating the wealth in the hands of the ruling elite.

Religion was not the cause of slavery, greed was.
And that is the root of capitalism.

Capitalism can produce some benefits, like technology, but is negative in the long run.
This planet could have supported a happy primitive life style indefinitely.
But by getting greedy, we destroy the happy primitive life style, force everyone to become employed by strangers, so that they can afford the basics like rent, that should normally be free to primitives.
The level of technology we are producing will destroy the planet for human habitation in less than a thousand years.
We are using ancient fossilized solar energy and will run out of that in less than 300 years.
What will be left will be massively polluted and barren.

Yes capitalism is about profits and strangely enough has gotten more people out of poverty than any other systems

Capitalism does not want to create poverty it simply wants people left to their own devices to make a profit. Despite this more people have been lifted out of poverty than any government plan or ideology has ever done.

Capitalismm is an overall positive in the long run.

There is no happy primitive lifestyle

All primitive life styles are relatively happy.
If they were not, then they all would have jumped at the chance to join the invading capitalist and technological society.
But instead they not only always fight it, but hide from it or try to escape it.
It has always brought negative results, and the primitive were always happier without it.
The American natives for example.
But also true in Hawaii, Polynesia, Australia, Africa, China, etc.
There are still people willing to go to hotile and remote places like Alaska, just to get away from the capitalist rat race.
All normal people prefer primitive over hostile capitalist technology.

No primitive lifestyle is happy.

If they were you would be throwing away the computer you are using and walking out into the woods or desert naked to fend for yourself.

It has always brought positive results.

No one prefers the primitive and capitalism is anything but hostile. Those going to Alaska are dmeanding capitalism and technology go with them. No one fought against capitalism they fought against invaders and then embraced capitalism whole heartedly even if resenting being conquered.

Nonsense.
Everyone prefers primitivism, but capitalists have made it so no one can afford primitivism any more.
Do you know how much it costs for a wooded area or a deserted island?
Almost no one can afford even the taxes on that any more.

No going Alaska is demanding capitalism or technology go with them.
They are trying to get away from both.
They want to rely on the natural resource of the primitive there, like lots of animals for food and wood for heat.

Horseshit. No one prefers primitivism and those who claim to want it are proven liars because they never embrace it.

you do not want it or you would not be on the internet and anyone can afford it as it requires NOTHING. a primitive owns nothing and buys no land.

All going to Alaska demand technology and capitalism go with them they demand grocery stores and heated homes and running water in their homes etc.

No one is going there to simply live off of the land

The Unibomber?

You mean Unabomber?

What about him?

 

[Osiris-ODS]

It's gonna happen. The 0nly good news.

He's former KGB. Are you buying into this crap?

What, do you mean? Research what he is referring to in regards to marxist take overs everywhere.

Cuba
Nicaragua
China
Vietnam
Russia
East Germany

Don't believe it? Think it is all robin hood fairy land unicorns and rainbows?
No American has tried to ESCAPE the "tyranny" of the horrific free market that has 7 Elevens and Burger Kings.
Sure as hell the other way around. Boy, marxism must be just great.
Just great. Be ready to starve. That's how they will elminate most of us.
Cow farts global warmjng. Get ready. You and all of us will get what we all deserve.
Get ready. Be ready for gnashing of teeth and wailing.

Wrong.
All the countries you list, Cuba, Nicaragua, China, Vietnam, Russia, and East Germany were never remotely Marxist.
Russia started a revolution in 1917 with some Marxist ideology, but Stalin took over and wiped out any Marxists.
So no country has ever been remotely Marxist.
We have no idea if Marxism could work, because it has never been tried.
What Stalin created was State Capitalism.
There was nothing remotely collective, cooperative, or communal about Stalinism.
For any government to be collective, cooperative, or communal, it has to be democratic, local, and with equality.
What Stalin installed was authoritarian, central, and with a wealthy ruling elite.
That is the exact opposite.

Yes they were marxist.

Marxism has been repeatedly tried and always succeeded in estasblishing dictatorships of the proletariate which is what Stalin did they only failed to reach the utopian stateless period of development which Marx predicted.

There is nothing remotely collective cooperative or communal about marxism either.

Wrong.
Stalin was an anti-Marxist and killed all the Marxists like Trotsky.
Why else would he kill Marxists unless he was anti-Marxist?

Marx promoted an ideology that would require no state.
For that to happen, everyone would have to be satisfied with it and want to support it willingly.
Has anyone ever suggested a state anything remotely like that?
Of course not.
So then no one has ever remotely supported or suggested a Marxist state except some Russian idealists who were killed before they could start implementing anything.
If you don't think Marxism requires things to be collective, cooperative, and communal, then you know nothing about Marx, communism, socialism, Anarchism, or just about any political theory.

Like the socialists of the time----different factions within the communist party vying for power and money---infighting one another. Think of it as the primaries but where open murder and locking up your opponents was better tolerated and expected. Like what Hilliary does now--just hides it more.

A real Marxist would not be trying to just benefit themselves, so then would not be needing or using force.
Marxism is about attempting to end coercive methods, so would not need or use coercive methods.

Even Marx knew populations as a whole are prone to coersion and that people in general lust power and tend to be compelled by greed. Hence, his skepticism that a truly voluntary collectivist society could ever exist in application. And it never has, and never will.

 

[mamooth]

We've explained this to you little children repeatedly, Moon. The nazis were the German SOCIALIST PARTY---

So according to your dumb theory, the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" is a democratic republic, just like the USA.

Sweet Jeebus, you're one stupid fascist. And you're assuming that normal people are as stupid as you are. That's not the case.