Obama wants more taxes, more spending

Does this man not get it? We dont need more taxes. We need less taxes. The economy sucks, growth is anemic, wages are stagnant. Why? Uncompetitive tax structure combined with over regulation. Now he wants to double down on stupid, taxing profits made outside this country to fund "infrastructure projects", like payoffs to unions and the like, Im sure. Only good news is it has zero chance of going anywhere.
Obama targets foreign profits with tax proposal Republicans skeptical - Yahoo Finance
I believe we should end the capital gains distinction whenever wages for labor doesn't outpace inflation.
That literally makes no sense.
Are you on something?
 
country-distribution-2012.png

Defense spending has shrunk as a percentage of the budget to the lowest since before WW2.

Now why isn't the rest of the world bankrupting themselves with their military spending? We just have to many military contractors needing to make billions of dollars. Welfare for the military contractors. Isn't that nice.

Right on cue the far left drones and their wanting to cut only the military..

Why not starve the beast when it comes to social spending for the wealthiest instead of the right, only wanting to end social spending for the least wealthy?

There is no common offense clause nor any general warfare clause; only the right doesn't seem to be able to understand the difference between, not only a welfare-State and a warfare-State, but they also don't seem to be able to understand the difference between the common Defense and the common Offense--only one of those clauses is in our supreme law of the land.
 
country-distribution-2012.png

Defense spending has shrunk as a percentage of the budget to the lowest since before WW2.

Now why isn't the rest of the world bankrupting themselves with their military spending? We just have to many military contractors needing to make billions of dollars. Welfare for the military contractors. Isn't that nice.

Right on cue the far left drones and their wanting to cut only the military..

Why not starve the beast when it comes to social spending for the wealthiest instead of the right, only wanting to end social spending for the least wealthy?

There is no common offense clause nor any general warfare clause; only the right doesn't seem to be able to understand the difference between, not only a welfare-State and a warfare-State, but they also don't seem to be able to understand the difference between the common Defense and the common Offense--only one of those clauses is in our supreme law of the land.
That totally fails to consider the left-right paradigm in the context of left brain cognitive function when viewed from feminist/crypto Hegellian suppositions.
 
country-distribution-2012.png

Defense spending has shrunk as a percentage of the budget to the lowest since before WW2.



Now why isn't the rest of the world bankrupting themselves with their military spending? We just have to many military contractors needing to make billions of dollars. Welfare for the military contractors. Isn't that nice.

Right on cue the far left drones and their wanting to cut only the military..




A right wing idiot who supports welfare for the wealthy.
Hey, where in the COTUS does it say HOW MUCH we had to spend on DEFENSE?

And of course Koshy thinks that there are no other countries that have an obligation to provide for the defense of their country. Right Koshy?

Great Britain doesn't defend itself. Right Koshy? France? China?

Koshy how come China doesn't spend 39% of it's GDP on the military? How's come koshy?
How's come we spend 30% more of a huge GDP number when China, also with a huge GDP number spends 9%?

I know. Republican socialism for the ultra wealthy. And China doesn't have a bunch of fucked up Republicans. Nor does GB. Or France. Lucky them.

Hey koshy. maybe we should spend 50% of our money on defense/offense. YOU good with that number? 50%?

Maybe 75% would make us "safer". Fuck it, lets spend 95% on the military. Then we will be the most broke, safest country anywhere. You good with that idea koshy. You scared widdle bitch you.
 
That totally fails to consider the left-right paradigm in the context of left brain cognitive function when viewed from feminist/crypto Hegellian suppositions.



Hey look what the rabbit barfed up. More nonsense.
 
country-distribution-2012.png

Defense spending has shrunk as a percentage of the budget to the lowest since before WW2.



Now why isn't the rest of the world bankrupting themselves with their military spending? We just have to many military contractors needing to make billions of dollars. Welfare for the military contractors. Isn't that nice.

Right on cue the far left drones and their wanting to cut only the military..




A right wing idiot who supports welfare for the wealthy.
Hey, where in the COTUS does it say HOW MUCH we had to spend on DEFENSE?

And of course Koshy thinks that there are no other countries that have an obligation to provide for the defense of their country. Right Koshy?

Great Britain doesn't defend itself. Right Koshy? France? China?

Koshy how come China doesn't spend 39% of it's GDP on the military? How's come koshy?
How's come we spend 30% more of a huge GDP number when China, also with a huge GDP number spends 9%?

I know. Republican socialism for the ultra wealthy. And China doesn't have a bunch of fucked up Republicans. Nor does GB. Or France. Lucky them.

Hey koshy. maybe we should spend 50% of our money on defense/offense. YOU good with that number? 50%?

Maybe 75% would make us "safer". Fuck it, lets spend 95% on the military. Then we will be the most broke, safest country anywhere. You good with that idea koshy. You scared widdle bitch you.

Once the far left shows that are running on a narrative that is not connected to reality. But then again you were bought with illegal slave labor to support all of Obama's illegal wars..

The far left can not understand the irony of such propagdna posts..
 
That turd brain Hussein Obama wants a $4 trillion federal spending bill. In order to raise that kind of money out of this dismal economy Hussein wants to raise taxes on Americans and put our children further in debt. After all $18 trillion in debt is not near enough.

$4 trillion is more than the GNP of all but a handful of the riches counties on earth.

Hussein wants to make sure all the illegal aliens get their food stamps, the welfare queens get their cell phone, the shrimp get their treadmill studies, the Solyndra bosses get their bonuses, the greedy unions get their payoffs, the Israelis get their billions, and of course the illiterate Blacks that didn't learn anything in high school will be given an affirmative action community college degree.

The really sad thing is that this Republican Congress will give Obama almost everything he wants. They are too chickenshit to tell the asshole no.
 
Here's my one step plan.

1. Grow the economy to increase tax revenues to fund government investment and debt reduction. Repeat step 1.
 
Here's my one step plan.

1. Grow the economy to increase tax revenues to fund government investment and debt reduction. Repeat step 1.
Oh. Magawd. How come now one else has ever thought of that?

And you would grow the economy...how?

Your post is a throwaway phrase with zero substance.
 
The Republicans are mad because Obama isn't increasing spending or the debt the way they would increase spending and the debt.
 
Here's my one step plan.

1. Grow the economy to increase tax revenues to fund government investment and debt reduction. Repeat step 1.
Oh. Magawd. How come now one else has ever thought of that?

And you would grow the economy...how?

Your post is a throwaway phrase with zero substance.

Please don't run for office or apply for a government job, we don't need people like you making decisions.
 
Here's my one step plan.

1. Grow the economy to increase tax revenues to fund government investment and debt reduction. Repeat step 1.
Oh. Magawd. How come now one else has ever thought of that?

And you would grow the economy...how?

Your post is a throwaway phrase with zero substance.

Please don't run for office or apply for a government job, we don't need people like you making decisions.
I take it you have no actual plan for growing the economy.
 
Obama wants to redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor. This makes Republicans mad. They are worried they will be seen as hating poor people, but the Republican Congress and George Bush showed us that Republicans absolutely love poor people.

After all, they made so many of them!
 
Obama doesn't know how to create wealth. So he just wants to move it around.

Republicans are unable to discern between natural and unnatural concentrations of wealth, and so they see no problem with the current unnatural concentrations of wealth.

The American people only give Congress an 18% approval rating, and yet they return 98 percent of them to office in every election. How can you give more than 50 percent of the vote to a group you hate 82% of the time?!?!

We are a nation of retards.
 
Obama doesn't know how to create wealth. So he just wants to move it around.

Republicans are unable to discern between natural and unnatural concentrations of wealth, and so they see no problem with the current unnatural concentrations of wealth.

The American people only give Congress an 18% approval rating, and yet they return 98 percent of them to office in every election. How can you give more than 50 percent of the vote to a group you hate 82% of the time?!?!

We are a nation of retards.

Speak for yourself....

Natural vs. unnatural? Wealth has become concentrated because we've flooded Wall St. with a gazillion $$.. who'd' people think was going to get rich? Welfare recipients? The middle class?
 
Natural vs. unnatural? Wealth has become concentrated because we've flooded Wall St. with a gazillion $$.. who'd' people think was going to get rich?



Does that mean you don't care if the real real REAL rich get taxed more?
I could give a shit if they get taxed more. But yours and mines politics are not the same.
 
Natural vs. unnatural?

You see? Some people can't discern the difference. Like yourself.

If you invent a better mousetrap, or a better mp3 player, the world will beat a path to your door. That is a natural concentration of wealth.

If you buy Congress so they will give you a special carve-out in the tax code, that is an unnatural concentration of wealth. If you buy Congress so they will write rules and regulations whose hidden purpose is to make it harder for upstarts with better business models than yours to break into the industry, that is an unnatural concentration of wealth.

Unnatural concentrations of wealth are what the Founders called a "violation of natural rights", and they are a perversion of capitalism.

Carry on.
 
Wealth has become concentrated because we've flooded Wall St. with a gazillion $$..
Wealth has become concentrated on Wall Street because Congress has legalized fraud or turns a blind eye to it. Congress is owned by Wall Street.

Pick any Representative or Senator. Look up their top five campaign donors. I guarantee you there will be at least one financial sector donor on that list.

An R or a D after their name makes no difference.
 
$1.2 trillion in government handouts in our tax code, right now.

That's $1.2 trillion PER YEAR.

It would not take a genius to not only balance the budget, but to come up with a surplus, if we eliminated that $1.2 trillion in handouts.
 

Forum List

Back
Top