NY Post Story on Hunter Biden quickly unraveling.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just said it exists.
It doesn't exist. That's the lie.
Sigh....I saw it on YouTube. If it doesn’t exist it’s mislabeled. But I ll End this debate as I am bored and you’re a freaking moron.

Biden could have had Shokin removed quietly if it were as you say for Democracy. He did it publicly and loudly. Why? So that any future prosecutor would know to leave Burisma alone. It was an overt power move done to protect his sons money train.


I cannot Prove it as it’s my opinion but I 100% believe this is why he did it and the way he did it. You disagree. Fine. Listen to the Stefanik video and see what comes out.
You lied and can't admit it. Now you're running away because you're "bored".

Coward.
 
WTF? Did not ask you to care. I asked You to give an opinion and you cannot even do that. You lost another debate. What a dink you are.
I'm staying on topic liar. I don't care about your kid's basketball team.

Hard to lose a debate when you don't actually refute anything I've argued.
 
I just said it exists.
It doesn't exist. That's the lie.
Sigh....I saw it on YouTube. If it doesn’t exist it’s mislabeled. But I ll End this debate as I am bored and you’re a freaking moron.

Biden could have had Shokin removed quietly if it were as you say for Democracy. He did it publicly and loudly. Why? So that any future prosecutor would know to leave Burisma alone. It was an overt power move done to protect his sons money train.


I cannot Prove it as it’s my opinion but I 100% believe this is why he did it and the way he did it. You disagree. Fine. Listen to the Stefanik video and see what comes out.
You lied and can't admit it. Now you're running away because you're "bored".

Coward.
Show the lie. You lie. I never said I d post the video. Find that post. Do it. Or is it another minor mistake?
 
WTF? Did not ask you to care. I asked You to give an opinion and you cannot even do that. You lost another debate. What a dink you are.
I'm staying on topic liar. I don't care about your kid's basketball team.

Hard to lose a debate when you don't actually refute anything I've argued.
This relates to the topic. You just cannot answer the question because you have some disorder. You’re mentally ill.
 
sure it does,,,,
And now we’ve reached the point where you stop making an argument but refuse to admit it.
admit what???
that you will make any excuse to defend a democrats criminal behavior no matter how crazy it sounds or how much it goes against all known information???
If it were criminal you’d be able to explain why. You attempted to come up with an explanation which wasn’t hard to debunk. You had no rebuttal.

I’ll try to explain it one more time:
I have a cellphone. There’s emails on my cellphone. I want to get a new cellphone. I don’t want people to see the emails on my cellphone. I wipe my old cell phone. Since all my emails are on a server, I didn’t lose any data. Now I don’t have to worry about anyone reading me emails from my old cellphone.

Since no data was lost, it’s not illegal like you claimed.




I have done that many times with a new phone through the years.

I can't believe that you have to explain it to that person but it is a trump follower. They don't have many working brain cells.
 
sure it does,,,,
And now we’ve reached the point where you stop making an argument but refuse to admit it.
admit what???
that you will make any excuse to defend a democrats criminal behavior no matter how crazy it sounds or how much it goes against all known information???
If it were criminal you’d be able to explain why. You attempted to come up with an explanation which wasn’t hard to debunk. You had no rebuttal.

I’ll try to explain it one more time:
I have a cellphone. There’s emails on my cellphone. I want to get a new cellphone. I don’t want people to see the emails on my cellphone. I wipe my old cell phone. Since all my emails are on a server, I didn’t lose any data. Now I don’t have to worry about anyone reading me emails from my old cellphone.

Since no data was lost, it’s not illegal like you claimed.




I have done that many times with a new phone through the years.

I can't believe that you have to explain it to that person but it is a trump follower. They don't have many working brain cells.
We aren’t cowards who our people on ignore.
 
I just said it exists.
It doesn't exist. That's the lie.
Sigh....I saw it on YouTube. If it doesn’t exist it’s mislabeled. But I ll End this debate as I am bored and you’re a freaking moron.

Biden could have had Shokin removed quietly if it were as you say for Democracy. He did it publicly and loudly. Why? So that any future prosecutor would know to leave Burisma alone. It was an overt power move done to protect his sons money train.


I cannot Prove it as it’s my opinion but I 100% believe this is why he did it and the way he did it. You disagree. Fine. Listen to the Stefanik video and see what comes out.
You lied and can't admit it. Now you're running away because you're "bored".

Coward.
Show the lie. You lie. I never said I d post the video. Find that post. Do it. Or is it another minor mistake?
You said Nunes grilled Kent. He didn’t. That’s the lie.

I think I’ve said this like 4-5 times now. There’s only one explanation for why you don’t get it and that’s because you know you lied and aren’t man enough to admit it.
 
what about name recognition??????????????
Name recognition, dude. His last name was Biden. It gives Burisma a little more credibility to say that their board has someone named Biden on it.
The emails prove you are an idiot.
It doesn’t take emails to prove that he is an idiot. He has painted himself into a corner with his subpar debating skills and is now hiding like Biden.
so you mean that they put Biden on the board of the most corrupt company in the Ukraine so that when Biden was trying to eradicate corruption he could not do it because the company had his name on it for credibility?
 
The OP is full of shit.

This story has legs and it's getting worse for the bidens.

I don't like the emphasis on the child porn. That is Hunter's issue.

Joe letting his son sell influence is something else.
 
I just said it exists.
It doesn't exist. That's the lie.
Sigh....I saw it on YouTube. If it doesn’t exist it’s mislabeled. But I ll End this debate as I am bored and you’re a freaking moron.

Biden could have had Shokin removed quietly if it were as you say for Democracy. He did it publicly and loudly. Why? So that any future prosecutor would know to leave Burisma alone. It was an overt power move done to protect his sons money train.


I cannot Prove it as it’s my opinion but I 100% believe this is why he did it and the way he did it. You disagree. Fine. Listen to the Stefanik video and see what comes out.
You lied and can't admit it. Now you're running away because you're "bored".

Coward.
Show the lie. You lie. I never said I d post the video. Find that post. Do it. Or is it another minor mistake?
You said Nunes grilled Kent. He didn’t. That’s the lie.

I think I’ve said this like 4-5 times now. There’s only one explanation for why you don’t get it and that’s because you know you lied and aren’t man enough to admit it.
what was the lie ?
 
The OP is full of shit.

This story has legs and it's getting worse for the bidens.

I don't like the emphasis on the child porn. That is Hunter's issue.

Joe letting his son sell influence is something else.
Why do you think that Joe was letting his son sell influence rather than encouraging his son to sell influence for the payday that they could both enjoy and apparently did both enjoy?
 
The OP is full of shit.

This story has legs and it's getting worse for the bidens.

I don't like the emphasis on the child porn. That is Hunter's issue.

Joe letting his son sell influence is something else.
Why do you think that Joe was letting his son sell influence rather than encouraging his son to sell influence for the payday that they could both enjoy and apparently did both enjoy?

I realize that there is a difference and I frankly didn't specify one over the other.

So I can't really answer your question.
 
The OP is full of shit.

This story has legs and it's getting worse for the bidens.

I don't like the emphasis on the child porn. That is Hunter's issue.

Joe letting his son sell influence is something else.
Why do you think that Joe was letting his son sell influence rather than encouraging his son to sell influence for the payday that they could both enjoy and apparently did both enjoy?

I realize that there is a difference and I frankly didn't specify one over the other.

So I can't really answer your question.
So you are saying that you don’t know whether Joe Biden was letting his son or encouraging his son to sell influence?
 
Nope not this time you don't you slippery swamp creatures. This story has multiple avenues of verification lolol!

 
The OP is full of shit.

This story has legs and it's getting worse for the bidens.

I don't like the emphasis on the child porn. That is Hunter's issue.

Joe letting his son sell influence is something else.
Why do you think that Joe was letting his son sell influence rather than encouraging his son to sell influence for the payday that they could both enjoy and apparently did both enjoy?

I realize that there is a difference and I frankly didn't specify one over the other.

So I can't really answer your question.
So you are saying that you don’t know whether Joe Biden was letting his son or encouraging his son to sell influence?

At this point, yes.
 
Nope not this time you don't you slippery swamp creatures. This story has multiple avenues of verification lolol!

Yes multiple avenues of verification such as Hunter Biden’s attorney calling up and asking for the hard drive that belonged to Hunter Biden or Hunter Biden‘s signature on the receipt for the computer left at the repair shop. You can bet that if one of the creeps at MS NBC could prove the attorney never called or the signature was fake they would be all over it in a heartbeat but guess what?
 
I mean high level that are presidential possibilities. HRC, WJC, Clinton, etc. low level no one cares. Scooter Libby? Lol
HRC is Hilary Clinton, WJC is Bill Clinton. Who are you referring to by the third Clinton?

Dennis Hastert was the Speaker, that's third in line for the presidency. It doesn't go a lot higher than that.


The DoJ tried to go after John Edwards but the case fell apart for a bunch of reasons, not the last of which was that the donors who were directing the funds to his mistress were like in their 90s and when it came to the trial they had passed. I will note that this investigation started under the Bush administration but Obama kept the prosecutor in place for two and a half years to allow this to run it's course and in fact this was overseen and approved by Obama's appointed assistant AG.

As for Clinton or Cheney, maybe you should consider the possibility that there isn't anything to prosecute them over.
Btw they have receipts with Bidens name and signature on them from the computer store. Roh roh. In the past 30 yrs can you name one prominent politician who has been jailed? The 3rd Clinton is their corrupt foundation. Pay for Play.

BULLSHIT. I will give you a thumbs down here right here on your race.

Clinton Foundation is open for audit. Trump Foundation was ordered to shut it down and paid $2 millions for fraud. What part of your ignorant lies don’t you understand?
You almost got it. The Trump Foundation was distributing assets and shutting down when the NYAG got a court order keeping it open so they could do their little witch hunt.
The difference is the. Clintons are democrats.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top