NY Post Story on Hunter Biden quickly unraveling.

Status
Not open for further replies.
you are a sad sorry lost soul,,,

but please continue,,,
This is exactly what I mean. If you had a case to make, you’d be doing so. But you’re running away from the Shokin business and avoiding discussion of some supposed China corruption that no one really has any idea about.

Like Trump, you avoid specifics. Specifics are dangerous because they’re able to be disproven. Ambiguity is far more powerful.
HEY DUMBASS!!!

I'm not a prosecutor,,,

and do try and keep your TDS in check when hes not being discussed,,,

Im well aware. Prosecutors actually know what they’re talking about. You don’t. Trump doesn’t.
 
you are a sad sorry lost soul,,,

but please continue,,,
This is exactly what I mean. If you had a case to make, you’d be doing so. But you’re running away from the Shokin business and avoiding discussion of some supposed China corruption that no one really has any idea about.

Like Trump, you avoid specifics. Specifics are dangerous because they’re able to be disproven. Ambiguity is far more powerful.
HEY DUMBASS!!!

I'm not a prosecutor,,,

and do try and keep your TDS in check when hes not being discussed,,,

Im well aware. Prosecutors actually know what they’re talking about. You don’t. Trump doesn’t.
your TDS is shining through again,,,,
 
We are discussing if Joe or Bug Guy turned a blind eye to this or if he knew and got kick backs. Either way the optics are bad. People aren’t voting for Biden. They are voting against Trump but if they see Biden as a corrupt politician they will just stay home
yes, the strategy has always been to do anything to avoid talking about Trump, his record or his agenda.

Because if he does that, it’s over.
Again, you make opinions sound like facts. Trump has a loyal base as you can gauge by his rallies. Obama did too. McCain and Romney didn’t. People voting for Trump love him and those voting against him hate him. Those who don’t care will stay home and Biden doesn’t have a loyal fan base like Sanders did. Could cost him.
 
The OP is full of shit.

This story has legs and it's getting worse for the bidens.

I don't like the emphasis on the child porn. That is Hunter's issue.

Joe letting his son sell influence is something else.

The problem with the child porn, from Dementia Joe's perspective, is that it indicates the very real possibility that foreign governments have blackmail material they could use against him if he won the White House.
 
ALL Rudy Giuliani stories quickly unravel. Looks Donnie and his creepy sidekick are colluding with Russian spies again. You know, the same sort of thing that got Donnie impeached. Another day, another bogus scam that no one with a brain will take seriously.

EK92O-mUUAAuO2X.jpg
 
I told you this Hunter Biden story was garbage.

“The New York Post’s front-page article about Hunter Biden on Wednesday was written mostly by a staff reporter who refused to put his name on it, two Post employees said.

Bruce Golding, a reporter at the Rupert Murdoch-owned tabloid since 2007, did not allow his byline to be used because he had concerns over the article’s credibility, the two Post employees said, speaking on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation.

Coming late in a heated presidential campaign, the article suggested that Joseph R. Biden Jr. had used his position to enrich his son Hunter when he was vice president. The Post based the story on photos and documents the paper said it had taken from the hard drive of a laptop purportedly belonging to Hunter Biden.

Many Post staff members questioned whether the paper had done enough to verify the authenticity of the hard drive’s contents, said five people with knowledge of the tabloid’s inner workings. Staff members also had concerns about the reliability of its sources and its timing, the people said”.


*************

Let me put this in plain English for Trumpist simpletons: The Reporter did not want to have his name used in the by-line because he knew this story about Hunter Biden was a lie.

Only friggin idiots would consider Steve Bannon, a man now being prosecuted for fraud, and Rudy Guiliani, a known Russian useful idiot, credible sources.




Never having had a similar experience......I was wondering how it feels to be revealed as a total imbecile......could you enlighten?


"Hunter Biden allegedly demanded laptop back a day before story broke via an attorney; repair shop owner shows email"
 
ALL Rudy Giuliani stories quickly unravel. Looks Donnie and his creepy sidekick are colluding with Russian spies again. You know, the same sort of thing that got Donnie impeached. Another day, another bogus scam that no one with a brain will take seriously.

EK92O-mUUAAuO2X.jpg


One thing wrong, well.............the biggest thing wrong with the talking points you have been fed is the fact our Intel Agencies say this has nothing to do with Russia.

Please ask your handlers for updated talking points. Thanks in advance.
 
We are discussing if Joe or Bug Guy turned a blind eye to this or if he knew and got kick backs. Either way the optics are bad. People aren’t voting for Biden. They are voting against Trump but if they see Biden as a corrupt politician they will just stay home
yes, the strategy has always been to do anything to avoid talking about Trump, his record or his agenda.

Because if he does that, it’s over.
Your strategy is to avoid talking about Biden's criminal conduct. Your theory that Biden doesn't have to explain taking bribes from foriegn governments couldn't be more idiotic. According to you and Biden, he doesn't have to tell the voters what he plans to do, and he doesn't have to explain his criminal record. That's a great gig for a politician if you can get it. Only an imbecile would vote for such a piece of shit.
 
I told you this Hunter Biden story was garbage.

“The New York Post’s front-page article about Hunter Biden on Wednesday was written mostly by a staff reporter who refused to put his name on it, two Post employees said.

Bruce Golding, a reporter at the Rupert Murdoch-owned tabloid since 2007, did not allow his byline to be used because he had concerns over the article’s credibility, the two Post employees said, speaking on the condition of anonymity out of fear of retaliation.

Coming late in a heated presidential campaign, the article suggested that Joseph R. Biden Jr. had used his position to enrich his son Hunter when he was vice president. The Post based the story on photos and documents the paper said it had taken from the hard drive of a laptop purportedly belonging to Hunter Biden.

Many Post staff members questioned whether the paper had done enough to verify the authenticity of the hard drive’s contents, said five people with knowledge of the tabloid’s inner workings. Staff members also had concerns about the reliability of its sources and its timing, the people said”.


*************

Let me put this in plain English for Trumpist simpletons: The Reporter did not want to have his name used in the by-line because he knew this story about Hunter Biden was a lie.

Only friggin idiots would consider Steve Bannon, a man now being prosecuted for fraud, and Rudy Guiliani, a known Russian useful idiot, credible sources.




Never having had a similar experience......I was wondering how it feels to be revealed as a total imbecile......could you enlighten?


"Hunter Biden allegedly demanded laptop back a day before story broke via an attorney; repair shop owner shows email"
calvin-and-hobbes-rofl.jpg
 
Your strategy is to avoid talking about Biden's criminal conduct. Your theory that Biden doesn't have to explain taking bribes from foriegn government's couldn't be more idiotic. He doesn't have to tell the voters what he plans to do, and he doesn't have to explain his record. That's a great gig for a politician if you can get it. Only an imbecile would vote for such a piece of shit.
Why would I talk about a bribe that doesn’t exist?
 
Your strategy is to avoid talking about Biden's criminal conduct. Your theory that Biden doesn't have to explain taking bribes from foriegn government's couldn't be more idiotic. He doesn't have to tell the voters what he plans to do, and he doesn't have to explain his record. That's a great gig for a politician if you can get it. Only an imbecile would vote for such a piece of shit.
Why would I talk about a bribe that doesn’t exist?
You talked about "overwhelming evidence" that doesn't exist. :abgg2q.jpg:
 
Your strategy is to avoid talking about Biden's criminal conduct. Your theory that Biden doesn't have to explain taking bribes from foriegn government's couldn't be more idiotic. He doesn't have to tell the voters what he plans to do, and he doesn't have to explain his record. That's a great gig for a politician if you can get it. Only an imbecile would vote for such a piece of shit.
Why would I talk about a bribe that doesn’t exist?
It's cleary documented, you witless baboon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top