Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Please tell the truth.I get that it is your job to promote lies, but still.
The computer went directly from the possession of the repair shop owner to the FBI. It was never in the hands of "various dubious characters".Your claiming to know what Democrats might say aside, you cannot provide documentation that it has been established that none of the content of this citizen's computer was falsified during the time it was in the possession of various dubious characters.
You do realize that Bush was going off Clinton's intel? But then again they are best friends. Sorry.Frankly, in 2002 the unreliable information from the CIA used in the talking points was cherry picked from unvetted raw intel by the Bush/Cheney team and was not the product of CIA annalists.
In 2016 they said " The USIC and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) assess that it would be extremely difficult for someone, including a nation-state actor, to alter actual ballot counts or election results by cyber attack or intrusion.
Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security | Homeland Security
The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations.www.dhs.gov
The FBI has the original computer. It would be child's play for them to determine if it had been tampered with. There also seem to be multiple copies of the hard drive in circulation. Comparing them with the original STILL installed in the computer would put any reasonable suspicions of tampering to rest.A private American citizen, with no aspirations to political office, owned a computer, at least some of the content of which may have been subsequently altered while in the possession of others with a political agenda.
John Paul MacIsaac, a Trumper who had taken possession of citizen Biden's computer and allegedly provided a copy of its content to Trumper Giuliani's attorney, said, he “saw a lot of photos” — but “did not see a lot of photos that are being reported to [have been] seen.”
It has child porn on it, I understand your pretense.Please tell the truth.
I have accurately cited documented reality that you don't like.
I make no pretenses to know the content of Citizen Biden's laptop computer or the validity of its alleged content.
Apparently, you have seen the content of the laptop and authenticated it as being Citizen Biden's.It has child porn on it, I understand your pretense.
Evidently Hunter is not a good enough source, you did say reputable.Apparently, you have seen the content of the laptop and authenticated it as being Citizen Biden's.
I have not, and await authentication by a reputable source.
He's now ADMITTING it's his laptop and trying to get charges placed against anyone releasing the information on it. If it wasn't his and the information on it hadn't belonged to him, he wouldn't be trying to block the publication of the information. If someone has a computer that they claim was mine and it wasn't, I, 1) wouldn't care if the published any information that was on it and 2) I certainly wouldn't have any legal right to block the release of the information or have anyone who released the information punished by the government.Apparently, you have seen the content of the laptop and authenticated it as being Citizen Biden's.
I have not, and await authentication by a reputable source.
Apparently, you have seen the content of the laptop and authenticated it as being Citizen Biden's.
I have not, and await authentication by a reputable source.
The FBI has the original computer. It would be child's play for them to determine if it had been tampered with. There also seem to be multiple copies of the hard drive in circulation. Comparing them with the original STILL installed in the computer would put any reasonable suspicions of tampering to rest.
So you're telling me it's okay to have child porn on your computer? If you're a citizen Biden? That's a yes or no question.Apparently, you have seen the content of the laptop and authenticated it as being Citizen Biden's.
I have not, and await authentication by a reputable source.
They are questions dumbass.They are not questions.
They are proclaimations that Hunter never admitted what he admitted. You want us to “discuss” that which is ludicrous
Any post that has “deep state” I’m it’s first sentence can be safely ignored as insaneThe Deep State is pervasive everywhere and runs dark and persistent. It pushes almost all the policies and initiatives that thinking Americans, Patriots, all but the hard core left deplore and in my opinion is the single biggest threat to real Americans, America and all that America could be.
In reality it was Morning Joe's wife's dad who started the whole mess, under Carter...It's all connected.You do realize that Bush was going off Clinton's intel? But then again they are best friends. Sorry.
Well if that's true, I'm pretty sure anybody who isn't aware that there is a 'deep state' is most likely close to brain dead.Any post that has “deep state” I’m it’s first sentence can be safely ignored as insane
First you always keep in mind that intelligence agents are spies. Spies lie for a living so it is second nature for a spy to lie If asked a question.Over FIFTY "senior intelligence officials" put their name on a statement that claimed the laptop was "Russian disinformation". How did so much of our intelligence apparatus, at such high levels, screw this up so badly?
This makes me worry deeply about our national security. What else are these people wrong about?
View attachment 753080
If you are laboring under the delusion that Citizen Biden confirmed all the current content of a laptop he once owned, you have been fed a falsehood.Evidently Hunter is not a good enough source, you did say reputable.
