Annie
Diamond Member
- Nov 22, 2003
- 50,848
- 4,828
- 1,790
Not a moment too soon:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/30/AR2005123000538.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/30/AR2005123000538.html
Justice Department Probing Domestic Spying Leak
By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 30, 2005; 12:45 PM
The Justice Department has opened an investigation into the disclosure of classified information about a domestic surveillance program authorized by President Bush after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, officials said today.
Justice prosecutors will examine whether classified information was unlawfully disclosed to the New York Times, which reported two weeks ago that the National Security Agency had been conducting electronic surveillance on U.S. citizens and residents without court-approved warrants.
The probe is the latest in a series of controversial investigations into leaks of classified information during the Bush administration, including the disclosure of a CIA agent's identity that has resulted in criminal charges against former vice presidential adviser I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.
The Justice Department has also opened a probe into whether classified information was illegally disclosed to The Washington Post, which reported on a network of secret CIA prisons in Eastern Europe and elsewhere.
The disclosure of the domestic spying program by the NSA, which is normally confined to overseas operations, has setoff a firestorm of criticism from civil liberties advocates and prompted plans for hearings on Capitol Hill. The secret program has also angered some judges on a special court that is supposed to oversee clandestine surveillance within the United States, including one who submitted his resignation.
In an unusual step, Bush has publicly acknowledged the program's existence, has described details of its operation and has argued that the initiative is legal in a time of war.
The Times has said it held a story on the program for a year after the administration argued its disclosure would harm national security. Additional reporting was done before the story was published, the newspaper has said.