- May 9, 2010
- Reaction score
Strangely enough, if I went out and wrote an article about how I think I should be called pro choice because I oppose the government telling people what to drink and eat everyone on the left would laugh.
HARD-LINE conservatives have gone to new extremes lately in opposing abortion. Last week, Richard Mourdock, the Tea Party-backed Republican Senate candidate in Indiana, declared during a debate that he was against abortion even in the event of rape because after much thought he came to realize that life is that gift from God. And even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen. That came on the heels of the Tea Party-backed Republican Representative Joe Walsh of Illinois saying after a recent debate that he opposed abortion even in cases where the life of the mother is in danger, because with modern technology and science, you cant find one instance in which a woman would not survive without an abortion. Health of the mother has become a tool for abortions anytime, for any reason, Walsh said. That came in the wake of the Senate hopeful in Missouri, Representative Todd Akin, remarking that pregnancy as a result of legitimate rape is rare because the female body has ways to try and shut that whole thing down.
These were not slips of the tongue. These are the authentic voices of an ever-more-assertive far-right Republican base that is intent on using uncompromising positions on abortion to not only unseat more centrist Republicans Mourdock defeated the moderate Republican Senator Richard Lugar of Indiana in the primary but to overturn the mainstream consensus in America on this issue. That consensus says that those who choose to oppose abortion in their own lives for reasons of faith or philosophy should be respected, but those women who want to make a different personal choice over what happens with their own bodies should be respected, and have the legal protection to do so, as well.
But judging from the unscientific borderline crazy statements opposing abortion that were hearing lately, there is reason to believe that this delicate balance could be threatened if Mitt Romney and Representative Paul Ryan, and their even more extreme allies, get elected. So to those who want to protect a womans right to control what happens with her own body, let me offer just one piece of advice: to name something is to own it. If you can name an issue, you can own the issue. And we must stop letting Republicans name themselves pro-life and Democrats as pro-choice. It is a huge distortion.
In my world, you dont get to call yourself pro-life and be against common-sense gun control like banning public access to the kind of semiautomatic assault rifle, designed for warfare, that was used recently in a Colorado theater. You dont get to call yourself pro-life and want to shut down the Environmental Protection Agency, which ensures clean air and clean water, prevents childhood asthma, preserves biodiversity and combats climate change that could disrupt every life on the planet. You dont get to call yourself pro-life and oppose programs like Head Start that provide basic education, health and nutrition for the most disadvantaged children. You can call yourself a pro-conception-to-birth, indifferent-to-life conservative. I will never refer to someone who pickets Planned Parenthood but lobbies against common-sense gun laws as pro-life.