What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Not Good: Obama Administration Illegally Withholding Hillary Clinton's Benghazi Documents

Steve_McGarrett

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Messages
19,272
Reaction score
4,360
Points
280

Luddly Neddite

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
63,904
Reaction score
9,941
Points
2,040
Notice that the OP conveniently left out the reason for Gowdy's lie.

Gowdy intends to withhold her testimony until the documents are produced, leaving a large cloud looming in place over Clinton’s 2016 presidential ambitions.



:bsflag:
 

RetiredGySgt

Diamond Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
49,828
Reaction score
11,762
Points
2,040
Location
North Carolina
Notice that the OP conveniently left out the reason for Gowdy's lie.

Gowdy intends to withhold her testimony until the documents are produced, leaving a large cloud looming in place over Clinton’s 2016 presidential ambitions.



:bsflag:
No lie, the President is withholding the documents. Why would you interview a person with out the records to keep them honest on what they did and did not do?
 

IcebergSlim

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2013
Messages
10,886
Reaction score
9,139
Points
2,255
Not good for Hillary that is if she decides to run for president. Like Obama sealing his true birth records and college admissions, Hillary's Benghazi documents are being withheld to prevent full disclosure on her involvement. It's time for these documents to be released.

Trey Gowdy Obama Admin Withholding Clinton s Benghazi Documents - Conservatives4Palin



F...ing cretin....


In fact, several weeks before you made those public statements, your staff had already interviewed Mr. Maxwell, but they did not include, invite, or even notify Democratic Members or staff. Mr. Maxwell apparently identified for your staff a second witness that he claimed was present during this document review at the State Department. Mr. Maxwell identified this person as someone who could corroborate his allegations and someone he believes is credible.


Then, on October 16 -- one day before you appeared on Fox News -- your staff interviewed this second witness, again without including Democrats. However, this second witness did not substantiate Mr. Maxwell's claims. To the contrary, he did not recall having been in the document review session Mr. Maxwell described, and he said he was never instructed to flag information in documents that might be unfavorable to the Department. He further reported that he never engaged or was aware of any destruction of documents.


I did not discover any of this information from you or your staff but from the witnesses themselves. When my staff inquired with your staff about what they learned from the witness identified by Mr. Maxwell, your staff stated that he had worked at the State Department during the relevant time period. Beyond that, however, they reported: "we learned nothing else of note in our discussion, so we don't plan to conduct any additional follow-up."


I am sure you understand -- as a former prosecutor -- that evaluating the credibility of witnesses and their allegations depends on whether the information they provide can be corroborated. Although your staff stated that they learned nothing "of note," in fact they learned that this claim was not substantiated by a key witness. If our goal is the truth and not a preconceived political narrative, these interviews should have been conducted jointly, with both Democrats and Republicans present.

Congressman Blows A Hole In Attkisson s Benghazi Documents Bombshell Blog Media Matters for America
 
R

rdean

Guest
What is it the right wing expects to find? Too bad they weren't as interested in Mitt's tax returns.
 

Luddly Neddite

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
63,904
Reaction score
9,941
Points
2,040
Notice that the OP conveniently left out the reason for Gowdy's lie.

Gowdy intends to withhold her testimony until the documents are produced, leaving a large cloud looming in place over Clinton’s 2016 presidential ambitions.



:bsflag:
No lie, the President is withholding the documents. Why would you interview a person with out the records to keep them honest on what they did and did not do?


Nothing has been withheld by Clinton or Obama.

The Republicans are desperate because they don't have a candidate who can win the general.

1493184_762242550464279_7363878222370003935_n_zps2c553eed.jpg
 

Syriusly

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2014
Messages
54,852
Reaction score
7,133
Points
1,840
Like Obama sealing his true birth records and college admissions, Hillary's Benghazi documents]

Stevie got one thing finally right.

Benghazi is just the same thing as the Birther idiocy.
 
OP
Steve_McGarrett

Steve_McGarrett

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Messages
19,272
Reaction score
4,360
Points
280
Notice that the OP conveniently left out the reason for Gowdy's lie.

Gowdy intends to withhold her testimony until the documents are produced, leaving a large cloud looming in place over Clinton’s 2016 presidential ambitions.



:bsflag:
No lie, the President is withholding the documents. Why would you interview a person with out the records to keep them honest on what they did and did not do?


Nothing has been withheld by Clinton or Obama.

The Republicans are desperate because they don't have a candidate who can win the general.

1493184_762242550464279_7363878222370003935_n_zps2c553eed.jpg
Not true at all. Sarah Palin will clean Hillary's clock in tbe general election like she did those two governors she beat in Alaska.
 

Luddly Neddite

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
63,904
Reaction score
9,941
Points
2,040
Notice that the OP conveniently left out the reason for Gowdy's lie.

Gowdy intends to withhold her testimony until the documents are produced, leaving a large cloud looming in place over Clinton’s 2016 presidential ambitions.



:bsflag:
No lie, the President is withholding the documents. Why would you interview a person with out the records to keep them honest on what they did and did not do?


Nothing has been withheld by Clinton or Obama.

The Republicans are desperate because they don't have a candidate who can win the general.

1493184_762242550464279_7363878222370003935_n_zps2c553eed.jpg
Not true at all. Sarah Palin will clean Hillary's clock in tbe general election like she did those two governors she beat in Alaska.


Oh yeah, I forgot about how she carried John McCain to victory ...

You're dumb as a stick, Steve. If $arah didn't quit, she was fired from every single job she's ever had. She has yet to accomplish one thing from start to finish. Nothing.
 

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
62,696
Reaction score
20,664
Points
2,250
Location
In a Republic, actually
All the desperate right has is the phony Benghazi scandal; they clearly have no sound, viable policy proposals of their own.
 

depotoo

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
40,707
Reaction score
13,395
Points
2,280
Media matters? Really?
Not good for Hillary that is if she decides to run for president. Like Obama sealing his true birth records and college admissions, Hillary's Benghazi documents are being withheld to prevent full disclosure on her involvement. It's time for these documents to be released.

Trey Gowdy Obama Admin Withholding Clinton s Benghazi Documents - Conservatives4Palin



F...ing cretin....


In fact, several weeks before you made those public statements, your staff had already interviewed Mr. Maxwell, but they did not include, invite, or even notify Democratic Members or staff. Mr. Maxwell apparently identified for your staff a second witness that he claimed was present during this document review at the State Department. Mr. Maxwell identified this person as someone who could corroborate his allegations and someone he believes is credible.


Then, on October 16 -- one day before you appeared on Fox News -- your staff interviewed this second witness, again without including Democrats. However, this second witness did not substantiate Mr. Maxwell's claims. To the contrary, he did not recall having been in the document review session Mr. Maxwell described, and he said he was never instructed to flag information in documents that might be unfavorable to the Department. He further reported that he never engaged or was aware of any destruction of documents.


I did not discover any of this information from you or your staff but from the witnesses themselves. When my staff inquired with your staff about what they learned from the witness identified by Mr. Maxwell, your staff stated that he had worked at the State Department during the relevant time period. Beyond that, however, they reported: "we learned nothing else of note in our discussion, so we don't plan to conduct any additional follow-up."


I am sure you understand -- as a former prosecutor -- that evaluating the credibility of witnesses and their allegations depends on whether the information they provide can be corroborated. Although your staff stated that they learned nothing "of note," in fact they learned that this claim was not substantiated by a key witness. If our goal is the truth and not a preconceived political narrative, these interviews should have been conducted jointly, with both Democrats and Republicans present.

Congressman Blows A Hole In Attkisson s Benghazi Documents Bombshell Blog Media Matters for America
 

depotoo

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
40,707
Reaction score
13,395
Points
2,280
You are such a liar.
4 yrs as councilwoman
6 yrs as a mayor
Panel Ethics Commissioner of Alaska's Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
Director of Excellence in Public Service
Interstate Oil & Gas Compact Commission
Notice that the OP conveniently left out the reason for Gowdy's lie.

Gowdy intends to withhold her testimony until the documents are produced, leaving a large cloud looming in place over Clinton’s 2016 presidential ambitions.



:bsflag:
No lie, the President is withholding the documents. Why would you interview a person with out the records to keep them honest on what they did and did not do?


Nothing has been withheld by Clinton or Obama.

The Republicans are desperate because they don't have a candidate who can win the general.

1493184_762242550464279_7363878222370003935_n_zps2c553eed.jpg
Not true at all. Sarah Palin will clean Hillary's clock in tbe general election like she did those two governors she beat in Alaska.


Oh yeah, I forgot about how she carried John McCain to victory ...

You're dumb as a stick, Steve. If $arah didn't quit, she was fired from every single job she's ever had. She has yet to accomplish one thing from start to finish. Nothing.
 

The VOR

Gold Member
Joined
May 8, 2011
Messages
8,823
Reaction score
1,719
Points
280
Notice that the OP conveniently left out the reason for Gowdy's lie.

Gowdy intends to withhold her testimony until the documents are produced, leaving a large cloud looming in place over Clinton’s 2016 presidential ambitions.



:bsflag:
No lie, the President is withholding the documents. Why would you interview a person with out the records to keep them honest on what they did and did not do?


Nothing has been withheld by Clinton or Obama.

The Republicans are desperate because they don't have a candidate who can win the general.

1493184_762242550464279_7363878222370003935_n_zps2c553eed.jpg
Not true at all. Sarah Palin will clean Hillary's clock in tbe general election like she did those two governors she beat in Alaska.


Oh yeah, I forgot about how she carried John McCain to victory ...

You're dumb as a stick, Steve. If $arah didn't quit, she was fired from every single job she's ever had. She has yet to accomplish one thing from start to finish. Nothing.
It still amazes me that McCain was foolish enough to have that idiot run on the ticket with him. I guess the bottom line was that he listened to all of the people advising him telling him, get a chick, any chick, to run with you.

Can you just imagine if he had won, died while in office and that nitwit Palin became president?
 
OP
Steve_McGarrett

Steve_McGarrett

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Messages
19,272
Reaction score
4,360
Points
280
Notice that the OP conveniently left out the reason for Gowdy's lie.

Gowdy intends to withhold her testimony until the documents are produced, leaving a large cloud looming in place over Clinton’s 2016 presidential ambitions.



:bsflag:
No lie, the President is withholding the documents. Why would you interview a person with out the records to keep them honest on what they did and did not do?


Nothing has been withheld by Clinton or Obama.

The Republicans are desperate because they don't have a candidate who can win the general.

1493184_762242550464279_7363878222370003935_n_zps2c553eed.jpg
Not true at all. Sarah Palin will clean Hillary's clock in tbe general election like she did those two governors she beat in Alaska.


Oh yeah, I forgot about how she carried John McCain to victory ...

You're dumb as a stick, Steve. If $arah didn't quit, she was fired from every single job she's ever had. She has yet to accomplish one thing from start to finish. Nothing.
It still amazes me that McCain was foolish enough to have that idiot run on the ticket with him. I guess the bottom line was that he listened to all of the people advising him telling him, get a chick, any chick, to run with you.

Can you just imagine if he had won, died while in office and that nitwit Palin became president?
Palin had more governing accomplishments than McCain, Biden and zero executive experience Obama combined. She had a 93% approval rating as governor when picked.
 

depotoo

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
40,707
Reaction score
13,395
Points
2,280
Not only that she was known for fighting corruption in both parties, thus her high approval rating
No lie, the President is withholding the documents. Why would you interview a person with out the records to keep them honest on what they did and did not do?


Nothing has been withheld by Clinton or Obama.

The Republicans are desperate because they don't have a candidate who can win the general.

1493184_762242550464279_7363878222370003935_n_zps2c553eed.jpg
Not true at all. Sarah Palin will clean Hillary's clock in tbe general election like she did those two governors she beat in Alaska.


Oh yeah, I forgot about how she carried John McCain to victory ...

You're dumb as a stick, Steve. If $arah didn't quit, she was fired from every single job she's ever had. She has yet to accomplish one thing from start to finish. Nothing.
It still amazes me that McCain was foolish enough to have that idiot run on the ticket with him. I guess the bottom line was that he listened to all of the people advising him telling him, get a chick, any chick, to run with you.

Can you just imagine if he had won, died while in office and that nitwit Palin became president?
Palin had more governing accomplishments than McCain, Biden and zero executive experience Obama combined. She had a 93% approval rating as governor when picked.
 

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
95,708
Reaction score
14,671
Points
2,220
Location
Native America
Well, at least Sarah apparently satisfied Glen Rice.
 
OP
Steve_McGarrett

Steve_McGarrett

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Messages
19,272
Reaction score
4,360
Points
280
It never happened Injun.
 

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
95,708
Reaction score
14,671
Points
2,220
Location
Native America

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
95,708
Reaction score
14,671
Points
2,220
Location
Native America
1150x647
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$166.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top