Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That’s exactly what the pro abortionists say. Exactly...Is the child conceived of rape less innocent than any other?Getting raped isn’t a choice. Becoming a murderer of innocents is...I don't think getting raped is a choice and also why want a rape baby born it will inherit the fucked up DNA of it's rapists father, probably will not be normal and when an adult probably become a criminal and who knows perhaps a rapist itself. No better to abort and flush that defective DNA down the toilet. We should be wanting NORMAL healthy babys with good DNA.
We have to get detached from emotion in these circumstances, this is very different from Abortion on Demand, this is very different from abortion in killing for convenience because allowing a baby to be born would fuck up the womans lifestyle, that is in my opinion murder, butchering of the most innocent.
The situation of rape and removing a rapists baby to prevent total psychological collapse of the woman should not be in same level as the above.
Forget about the baby, WHAT about the girl and/or woman or don't you give a shit about her?
Why would you object to aborting the children of violent rape when the woman has been traumatized for years?A baby, is a baby... No baby is responsible for the circumstances of its conception. Nor is it guilty of another’s crimes. Most certainly not deserving of execution. And that is exactly what abortion is. Who is the greater villain; the rapist, or the murderer of innocent children?...aborting a rape baby is not murder in my opinion.
"aborting a rape baby is not murder in my opinion"....
A baby, is a baby... No baby is responsible for the circumstances of its conception. Nor is it guilty of another’s crimes. Most certainly not deserving of execution. And that is exactly what abortion is. Who is the greater villain; the rapist, or the murderer of innocent children?[
Why do you want a girl and/or women who already traumatised from being raped why do you want her more traumatised by forcing her to 24/7 carry for nine months and then give birth to her rapists baby?
She was a captive. Her rapist forced her to have these children. Is the trauma different depending on who was doing the forcing.Why not? Was Jaycee Dugard not forced to have not one but two children of violent rape? Was she not forced to be further traumatized by having to raise and care for these children? Now those children have to live with the knowledge that they are the products of violent rape. Aborting these children is the first step in their mother's recovery. The father was a monster. The children are likewise monsters. If these would be the reasons for aborting them as babies, nothing has changed. Do it now.Then you agree, those two children of rape should have been aborted when they were found at ages 11 and 15. Then their mother could have healed.But DESTROYING a girl and/or womans life is the answer? FORCING a girl and/or woman to carry and give birth to a rapists baby is the ultimate cruelty, FORCING them to live in their mind 24/7 for NINE MONTHS that to them the monster in their stomach is their because they were raped and they will think of that baby as a monster because it's biological father is a monster. This is a very complex issue involving many levels of psychological issues, the health including the mental health of the girl and/or woman comes first and aborting a rape baby is not murder in my opinion, aborting a rape baby is the first part of assisting the girl and/or woman to recovery.
Also WHO would want to be born and grow up to find they were a rape baby? Would YOU want to know YOU were the product of rape? No, guaranteed to fuck ANYONE up.
Huh? They do not abort 11 and 15 years in age.
Who force Jaycee Dugard to have those children? Judges force her or who?
At the very least, the children should have been taken away so the poor woman could heal.
Every woman who promotes, or gets an abortion formulates their own exception. So the only points of real contention aren’t actually abortion itself. But rather where to draw the line for everyone...That’s exactly what the pro abortionists say. Exactly...Is the child conceived of rape less innocent than any other?Getting raped isn’t a choice. Becoming a murderer of innocents is...
We have to get detached from emotion in these circumstances, this is very different from Abortion on Demand, this is very different from abortion in killing for convenience because allowing a baby to be born would fuck up the womans lifestyle, that is in my opinion murder, butchering of the most innocent.
The situation of rape and removing a rapists baby to prevent total psychological collapse of the woman should not be in same level as the above.
Forget about the baby, WHAT about the girl and/or woman or don't you give a shit about her?
I am not Pro-Abortion I have been very consistent about this since I joined this forum that I am Anti-Abortion with the exception for rape, incest and where the life of the mother is in danger.
Every woman who promotes, or gets an abortion formulates their own exception. So the only points of real contention aren’t actually abortion itself. But rather where to draw the line for everyone...That’s exactly what the pro abortionists say. Exactly...Is the child conceived of rape less innocent than any other?We have to get detached from emotion in these circumstances, this is very different from Abortion on Demand, this is very different from abortion in killing for convenience because allowing a baby to be born would fuck up the womans lifestyle, that is in my opinion murder, butchering of the most innocent.
The situation of rape and removing a rapists baby to prevent total psychological collapse of the woman should not be in same level as the above.
Forget about the baby, WHAT about the girl and/or woman or don't you give a shit about her?
I am not Pro-Abortion I have been very consistent about this since I joined this forum that I am Anti-Abortion with the exception for rape, incest and where the life of the mother is in danger.
Yes. Still the children of violent rape.Why would you object to aborting the children of violent rape when the woman has been traumatized for years?A baby, is a baby... No baby is responsible for the circumstances of its conception. Nor is it guilty of another’s crimes. Most certainly not deserving of execution. And that is exactly what abortion is. Who is the greater villain; the rapist, or the murderer of innocent children?
"aborting a rape baby is not murder in my opinion"....
A baby, is a baby... No baby is responsible for the circumstances of its conception. Nor is it guilty of another’s crimes. Most certainly not deserving of execution. And that is exactly what abortion is. Who is the greater villain; the rapist, or the murderer of innocent children?[
Why do you want a girl and/or women who already traumatised from being raped why do you want her more traumatised by forcing her to 24/7 carry for nine months and then give birth to her rapists baby?
Is this the 11 year old and 15 year old?
I am pro abortion. Democrats should always be encouraged to abort their children.That’s exactly what the pro abortionists say. Exactly...Is the child conceived of rape less innocent than any other?Getting raped isn’t a choice. Becoming a murderer of innocents is...
We have to get detached from emotion in these circumstances, this is very different from Abortion on Demand, this is very different from abortion in killing for convenience because allowing a baby to be born would fuck up the womans lifestyle, that is in my opinion murder, butchering of the most innocent.
The situation of rape and removing a rapists baby to prevent total psychological collapse of the woman should not be in same level as the above.
Forget about the baby, WHAT about the girl and/or woman or don't you give a shit about her?
I am not Pro-Abortion I have been very consistent about this since I joined this forum that I am Anti-Abortion with the exception for rape, incest and where the life of the mother is in danger.
Right. I understand where you want to draw the line. But there are millions more women out there with their own desires, who want the line drawn else where. So the choice isn’t really about “abortion”; it’s more about who is allowed to kill a child, and who isn’t...Every woman who promotes, or gets an abortion formulates their own exception. So the only points of real contention aren’t actually abortion itself. But rather where to draw the line for everyone...That’s exactly what the pro abortionists say. Exactly...Is the child conceived of rape less innocent than any other?
Forget about the baby, WHAT about the girl and/or woman or don't you give a shit about her?
I am not Pro-Abortion I have been very consistent about this since I joined this forum that I am Anti-Abortion with the exception for rape, incest and where the life of the mother is in danger.
No not talking about formulating different exceptions, talking about specific exceptions of rape, incest and where the life of the mother is in danger. Okay so say the woman is pregnant and that by continuing the pregnancy it means she is going to die, but if given an abortion she lives, what happens then you allow the woman to die because you do not want abortion in that situation?
Yes. Still the children of violent rape.Why would you object to aborting the children of violent rape when the woman has been traumatized for years?
"aborting a rape baby is not murder in my opinion"....
A baby, is a baby... No baby is responsible for the circumstances of its conception. Nor is it guilty of another’s crimes. Most certainly not deserving of execution. And that is exactly what abortion is. Who is the greater villain; the rapist, or the murderer of innocent children?[
Why do you want a girl and/or women who already traumatised from being raped why do you want her more traumatised by forcing her to 24/7 carry for nine months and then give birth to her rapists baby?
Is this the 11 year old and 15 year old?
Right. I understand where you want to draw the line. But there are millions more women out there with their own desires, who want the line drawn else where. So the choice isn’t really about “abortion”; it’s more about who is allowed to kill a child, and who isn’t...Every woman who promotes, or gets an abortion formulates their own exception. So the only points of real contention aren’t actually abortion itself. But rather where to draw the line for everyone...That’s exactly what the pro abortionists say. Exactly...Forget about the baby, WHAT about the girl and/or woman or don't you give a shit about her?
I am not Pro-Abortion I have been very consistent about this since I joined this forum that I am Anti-Abortion with the exception for rape, incest and where the life of the mother is in danger.
No not talking about formulating different exceptions, talking about specific exceptions of rape, incest and where the life of the mother is in danger. Okay so say the woman is pregnant and that by continuing the pregnancy it means she is going to die, but if given an abortion she lives, what happens then you allow the woman to die because you do not want abortion in that situation?
In the event of life threatening complications to the mother? That’s a very different animal. That is a scenario that plays out in many different ways in life. Where a person has to make a sacrifice. The old good of the many, at the cost of the few debate. The “Who do you save”, question...
That is a quandary, wholly separate from the killing of a child where no one else will die if you don’t. Many parents would willingly die instead of their child. Some might choose otherwise. That’s a decision, that person will have to make if that time comes. And they will have to either live, or die with the decision they’ve made.
That is where you would prefer the line to be drawn. Other people would like the line drawn elsewhere. So the dispute isn’t over abortion itself. It’s over the circumstances society should allow it.Right. I understand where you want to draw the line. But there are millions more women out there with their own desires, who want the line drawn else where. So the choice isn’t really about “abortion”; it’s more about who is allowed to kill a child, and who isn’t...Every woman who promotes, or gets an abortion formulates their own exception. So the only points of real contention aren’t actually abortion itself. But rather where to draw the line for everyone...That’s exactly what the pro abortionists say. Exactly...
I am not Pro-Abortion I have been very consistent about this since I joined this forum that I am Anti-Abortion with the exception for rape, incest and where the life of the mother is in danger.
No not talking about formulating different exceptions, talking about specific exceptions of rape, incest and where the life of the mother is in danger. Okay so say the woman is pregnant and that by continuing the pregnancy it means she is going to die, but if given an abortion she lives, what happens then you allow the woman to die because you do not want abortion in that situation?
In the event of life threatening complications to the mother? That’s a very different animal. That is a scenario that plays out in many different ways in life. Where a person has to make a sacrifice. The old good of the many, at the cost of the few debate. The “Who do you save”, question...
That is a quandary, wholly separate from the killing of a child where no one else will die if you don’t. Many parents would willingly die instead of their child. Some might choose otherwise. That’s a decision, that person will have to make if that time comes. And they will have to either live, or die with the decision they’ve made.
You do not draw the line else where, you have a law that states the specific line and that would be that abortion is ONLY allowed in the cases of rape, incest and where the life of the mother is in danger.
The other situation to allow the mother AND the baby to die, why say the mother also has to die, she can live and hopefully go on to have more children that do not have the In Utero complication that to allow to live means she dies also.
I would die in place of ALL my five kidlets, but they already born, if on one complications and Mr. Lucy told okay if the baby is born then I also die what do you think Mr. Lucy would tell the doctor to allow everyone to die? No.
Bob girls and women who have been raped have suffered trauma already, then to FORCE them to suffer the psychological trauma of carrying a RAPE baby this is NOT compassionate it is cruel and fanatical. Abortion should be illegal EXCEPT in the case of rape, incest and where the life of the mother is in danger.
Also WHO would want to be born and grow up to find they were a rape baby? Would YOU want to know YOU were the product of rape? No, guaranteed to f••• ANYONE up.
