What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Nord Stream 2 has appeared to have stopped leaking

HereWeGoAgain

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
80,885
Reaction score
30,416
Points
2,280
Location
Fuck Y'all I'm From Texas!
What are you talking about right now? Lol. The question is who else would have a motive to do that. I just answered the question. Ukraine or anti-Russian terrorists from around the world.

Are ya stupid?
You know exactly what we're talking about.
There are several countries that would benefit from destroying the gas lines.
The US being one,and the Ukraine being another.
If the Ukraine did it it would be a great way of embroiling the US into the war even more than they are now.
Hell the russians may have pulled a false flag for all we know.
Who ever did it they'd need some skills in diving and underwater demolition.
 

Damaged Eagle

Behind blue eyes
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
20,614
Reaction score
30,526
Points
2,445
Location
I have hours, only lonely
You’re obviously trying to imply Biden did this. Of course, the reason why you are being so subtle is because you know how ridiculous it would be to say out loud. Why would Biden do this? What would he get out of it? You have no idea. You have no idea how to answer those questions. Tucker Carlson said it so naturally you believe it 100% because you can’t think for yourself.

1664663880517.png


Biden said he could and would stop the Nord Stream gas flow.

What other conclusion should we make?

*****SMILE*****


:)
 

Jim H - VA USA

Plutonium Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2020
Messages
4,837
Reaction score
5,606
Points
1,938
With all the false flags we experience these days it makes it even harder to figure out who's responsible.
Yeah, there is that too.

Right now, the US, Russia, and other nations are putting together their intelligence narratives on the subject. We will probably see some proof offered by various nations in the not-to-distant future.

Here is what Russia says so far....

"seen the U.S. warships’ activities at the very site of the Russian infrastructure disruption just the day before. Or noticed drones and helicopters fly over there. Or observed U.S. Navy exercises with underwater explosives that have been conducted in the same area some time ago. Finally, they should have recalled the promises made by President Biden to "bring an end" to the Nord Stream 2 project."

(Russian State-owned news)
 

shockedcanadian

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
19,081
Reaction score
17,340
Points
2,405
This is an informative non-paritsan article on the subject.


US and Ukraine have the most to benefit. Finland and the Baltics are two other candidates, as discussed in the article.

Poof. There went Russia's leverage over Europe this Winter.

Of course, U.S and Ukraine would be the initial prime suspects. I've watched enough First 48 and other crime shows to know though that the first instinct is often wrong, in some cases in these shows it's almost inconceivable that someone else could be the killer, but often this indeed the case and often the person you wouldn't suspect (with unusual motives).

Let's think more broadly about this, could Saudi Arabia benefit from a pipelines destruction? We know Germanies Chancellor visited recently with the intent of buying oil. How about Iran who have issues with the U.S and would love to derail their relationship? Especially as they have domestic problems.

Then there is Putin, it would seem absurd that he would do this to himself, precisely why he might do so knowing that eyes would be on the U.S and Ukraine. Hell, even a wealthy tree hugger could pay some professionals a couple of million to pull it off.

As I said, the prime suspects are what they are and it's easy to assume they would be involved, but there are other possibilities and they should't be dismissed outright.
 

Jim H - VA USA

Plutonium Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2020
Messages
4,837
Reaction score
5,606
Points
1,938
Has the Biden administration officially blamed Russia for blowing up their own shit?
Nope. The narrative is that we do not know, and an investigation is ongoing and Biden actually said we were going to send in divers - I wonder if that is true or if it was another case of Biden going off teleprompter.
 

Admiral Rockwell Tory

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,410
Reaction score
12,023
Points
2,220
Location
Sitting down in front of my computer

Looks like they were able to shut off the source and stop the leak from the sabotage, but repair is going to be rough.

This really worked out in the favor of the US. WOW! Very lucky and convenient for the US!
There was no source dumbass! What you saw was the pressurization in the closed off pipeline. They predicted it would bleed off by the weekend when it was discovered. Why are you always so late to the party and ignorant of the topics you like to pontificate about?
 

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
29,315
Reaction score
9,507
Points
910
Location
Colorado
Are ya stupid?
You know exactly what we're talking about.
There are several countries that would benefit from destroying the gas lines.
The US being one,and the Ukraine being another.
If the Ukraine did it it would be a great way of embroiling the US into the war even more than they are now.
Hell the russians may have pulled a false flag for all we know.
Who ever did it they'd need some skills in diving and underwater demolition.
Lol dude all you’re doing right now is summarizing my point.
 

Jim H - VA USA

Plutonium Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2020
Messages
4,837
Reaction score
5,606
Points
1,938
Of course, U.S and Ukraine would be the initial prime suspects. I've watched enough First 48 and other crime shows to know though that the first instinct is often wrong, in some cases in these shows it's almost inconceivable that someone else could be the killer, but often this indeed the case and often the person you wouldn't suspect (with unusual motives).

Let's think more broadly about this, could Saudi Arabia benefit from a pipelines destruction? We know Germanies Chancellor visited recently with the intent of buying oil. How about Iran who have issues with the U.S and would love to derail their relationship? Especially as they have domestic problems.

Then there is Putin, it would seem absurd that he would do this to himself, precisely why he might do so knowing that eyes would be on the U.S and Ukraine. Hell, even a wealthy tree hugger could pay some professionals a couple of million to pull it off.

As I said, the prime suspects are what they are and it's easy to assume they would be involved, but there are other possibilities and they should't be dismissed outright.

Agreed. But Blinken is out celebrating the US's record LNG exports to Europe and the "tremendous opportunity" the destruction of the pipelines provides Europe to become independent of Russian energy and the boom to renewables.

It's a little suspicious, as Europe could have moved away from Russia without such violence (explosions).

Then with BIden's prior announcement to "end the pipelines" even though he has no legal means to do so, it kind of looks like the US's plans are falling right into place, just as announced.
 
OP
ColonelAngus

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
43,794
Reaction score
39,155
Points
3,615
Nope. The narrative is that we do not know, and an investigation is ongoing and Biden actually said we were going to send in divers - I wonder if that is true or if it was another case of Biden going off teleprompter.

It would make more sense that we would send in unmanned submergable drones first. Not divers immediately.

So we are officially denying any involvement?

Sure. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Last edited:

HereWeGoAgain

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2010
Messages
80,885
Reaction score
30,416
Points
2,280
Location
Fuck Y'all I'm From Texas!
Yeah, there is that too.

Right now, the US, Russia, and other nations are putting together their intelligence narratives on the subject. We will probably see some proof offered by various nations in the not-to-distant future.

Here is what Russia says so far....

"seen the U.S. warships’ activities at the very site of the Russian infrastructure disruption just the day before. Or noticed drones and helicopters fly over there. Or observed U.S. Navy exercises with underwater explosives that have been conducted in the same area some time ago. Finally, they should have recalled the promises made by President Biden to "bring an end" to the Nord Stream 2 project."

(Russian State-owned news)

Yeah,there were also reports of russian military on sight.
Just being an average citizen with no way of verifying the truth I dont think we'll ever learn the truth.
 

Admiral Rockwell Tory

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,410
Reaction score
12,023
Points
2,220
Location
Sitting down in front of my computer
We have assets in the Baltic.

Who is to say we didnt just fire some torpedos from a sub at the pipelines?

You dumb cult fucks who claimed a Navy Seal would have to swim to the bottom of the Baltic are LITERALLY fucking retarded.

Torpedoes don't attack pipelines, dumbass! How would you target it?

The water is also not deep enough for one of our attack subs! The water is only 262 feet deep and the length of the sub is 370-460 feet long for the Virginia class. It would have no ability to maneuver.
 

Jim H - VA USA

Plutonium Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2020
Messages
4,837
Reaction score
5,606
Points
1,938
Torpedoes don't attack pipelines, dumbass! How would you target it?

The water is also not deep enough for one of our attack subs! The water is only 262 feet deep and the length of the sub is 370-460 feet long for the Virginia class. It would have no ability to maneuver.
Come on Admiral.

While unmanned underwater drones are more likely, surely submarines can come into port, and even maneuver in the Baltic sea near the pipelines, dontcha think?

And if we can target a person in a car with a missile, and not kill the person next to them, surely we can figure out a way to target a pipeline with a special torpedo, don't you think?
 

Muhammed

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
28,893
Reaction score
15,129
Points
1,415
Location
North Coast, USA

💲 Amazon Deals 💲

New Topics

Forum List

Top