Non Aggression Principles For Other Races Towards Ones Own Race And Non Violence Principles For Within Ones Own Race

Monk-Eye

Gold Member
Feb 3, 2018
3,227
790
140
" Non Aggression Principles For Other Races Towards Ones Own Race And Non Violence Principles Within Ones Own Race "

* Hypocrisy Or Not Hypocrisy ? *

* Racist Or Not Racist ? *
 
" Non Aggression Principles For Other Races Towards Ones Own Race And Non Violence Principles Within Ones Own Race "

* Hypocrisy Or Not Hypocrisy ? *

* Racist Or Not Racist ? *
What the fk are you talking about ? Put the crack pipe down
 
" Agreement Of Terminology To Clarify Ambiguities "

* Technical Definition Of The Question *

History has provided a non aggression principles camp and a non violence principle camp .

By definition , violence is illegitimate aggression , and self defense is legitimate aggression , which presupposes that not all aggression is illegitimate .

Alternatively , non aggression supposes that all aggression is illegitimate .

* Acronym Of Same Cause Taking A Nap *

In truth , the non aggression principles camp includes a mind set common among staunch libertarians of " due knot : do not touch me or my property ! " ; no less , those pundits of non aggression principles met with fecundry to include a formal definition for violence , as aggression was the term to represent illegitimate aggression , that eventually drove them into madness and exhaustive slumber .

* Draw Wing Conclusions *

Now , is the query in the opening post more clear to understand ?

Consider where race " one " demands that a standard of non aggression principles be expected from race " other " towards race " one " , which is in effect making race " one " sacrosanct from aggression by race " other " , even , in a system which expects that not all aggression is illegitimate .

Consider where race " one " demands that a standard of non violence principles be expected within its own race " one " , while also expecting a standard of non aggression principles for race " other " against race " one " .

Consider where race " one " decides to ignore a standard of non violence principles towards race " other " , or where race " other " is expected to not assert legitimate aggression to promote its own self ownership ( free roam , free association , progeny ) and self determination ( private property , willful intents - contracts ) elements of individualism .
 
Last edited:
" Work Per Unit Time Equals Power "

* Non Aggression Principles For Other Races Towards Ones Own Race And Non Violence Principles Within Ones Own Race *

What the fk are you talking about ? Put the crack pipe down
There are weighs of deprogramming deceptive themes .

* Hypocrisy Or Not Hypocrisy ? *


* Racist Or Not Racist ? *
 
" Providing Clues To The OP Title "

* Fixing A Theory Conceived By Those Taking A Nap *

defense is not aggression.
Your statement is not correct ; the correct statement is that self defense against violence is not illegitimate aggression or that it is legitimate aggression .

A correct application of language as related with non-aggression principles is that any aggression is illegitimate , even for self defense , such that non aggression principles would be equivalent with pacifism .

The non aggression principle theorists were taking a nap when it was conceived .
 
...
defense is not aggression.
Your statement is not correct ; the correct statement is that self defense against violence is not illegitimate aggression or that it is legitimate aggression .

A correct application of language as related with non-aggression principles is that any aggression is illegitimate , even for self defense , such that non aggression principles would be equivalent with pacifism .

The non aggression principle theorists were taking a nap when it was conceived .

You should try not to play at being a pretentious douche while also high on crack. Bad combo.
 
" Thanks For Promoting This Thread "

* Head Up Ass Gurgling Bubbles *

You should try not to play at being a pretentious douche while also high on crack. Bad combo.
That your penchant is as a critic , whom levies contrarian scat for any post , buys into and defends the vapid stupidity of language application in the contemporary lexicon for non aggression principles , which fails to the point of requiring pity for the idiots who perpetuate it , which persists only because a pretentious bandwagon of fools cannot admit the mistake to rectify it , is the only indication of douches on crack .
 
" Thanks For Promoting This Thread "

* Head Up Ass Gurgling Bubbles *

You should try not to play at being a pretentious douche while also high on crack. Bad combo.
That your penchant is as a critic , whom levies contrarian scat for any post , buys into and defends the vapid stupidity of language application in the contemporary lexicon for non aggression principles , which fails to the point of requiring pity for the idiots who perpetuate it , which persists only because a pretentious bandwagon of fools cannot admit the mistake to rectify it , is the only indication of douches on crack .

:lmao:
You are trying so hard, but it just makes you look like more of a fool.
:lmao:
 
" Practicing Idiocy And Failing To Accept Reality "

* Categorical More On *

:lmao:You are trying so hard, but it just makes you look like more of a fool.:lmao:
Just as the correct frequency is needed for electrons to jump energy level to the next shell , there is not the least bit of strain or effort on my part in explaining the obvious and necessary consistency of language .

A premise that any aggression is illegitimate was mistaking dreamt up by a half wit with shit for understanding of the english language and ignorantly exercising circular reasoning with the mentality of a whimpering imbecile that is emphatically espousing a delusional utopia where everyone must be pacifists .

On the other hand , you are looking more and more like a neophyte , trolling , witless , buffoon .
 

Forum List

Back
Top