Nobody Wants To Be Associated With These Insurrectionists...

[Kondor3]

YOU are associated with these insurrectionists...........


View attachment 445419

View attachment 445420

THOSE rioters were not breaching the Capitol of the United States and assaulting Congress in pursuit of its Constitutional duties.

Apples and Oranges, loser.

Besides... you right-wingers held political power at the time of those riots and you didn't do $hit.

It happened ON your watch and YOU failed to properly control the situation.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Not Corporate America, not anyone.

Texas man fired from his job after being arrested for storming the Capitol

A man from San Antonio, Texas, is out of job after he was identified in photos posted to social media partaking in the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, KENS5 reports. Matthew Carl Mazzocco, 37, was arrested Sunday afternoon and has been charged been with knowingly entering or remaining in a...

www.rawstory.com

I'd imagine even those w/their own businesses might end up having to close-up shop due to their treachery.

#SMH

Exactly as the Nazis and their Brown shirts made sure that Hitler got in.......

 

[MarcATL]

WRONG AGAIN, Marc:

• "Hate Speech," by the legal definition is something said out of malice, prejudice or bigotry. That is entirely sujective, like stupidly calling some crimes "hate crimes." There is no way of knowing the intent or motives of a person based solely on their words or actions much less the criminalization of them. If a person robs a store or murders an individual, it is still robbery or murder regardless of motivation. Calling it a "hate crime" or "hate speech" is merely a leftwing attempt at social engineering and cannot be shown to have had ONE IOTA of change in eliminating bad behavior.
• It is pure liberal folly to presuppose that you, I or anyone can know what "incited" the feelings, emotions or actions of another purely from observing the OUTCOME. If I have a fight with my wife then go out and wreck my car, you have no way of knowing it was over the argument and not over my failure to maintain the car or my distraction at looking at a pretty girl or fiddling with the radio knob. All you know is that a car was wrecked.
• It is the pinnacle of arrogance to suggest you have any gauge on the mental acuity or the mental deficiency of another person purely from what you read on the internet. The best psychiatrists and human behavior specialists cannot predict who will go out and commit a crime or serial murder, etc., EVEN WITH CLOSE OBSERVATION and personal interview.

Your failure to recognize these simple truths makes YOU, if anything, the more likely dangerous person you seek to find in others, by your mere ignorance of your own bad actions springing out of the best intentions.

It doesn't pass me that you didn't cite a source. However, according to Wikipedia...

Hate speech is defined by the Cambridge Dictionary as "public speech that expresses hate or encourages violence towards a person or group based on something such as race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation".[1] Hate speech is "usually thought to include communications of animosity or disparagement of an individual or a group on account of a group characteristic such as race, colour, national origin, sex, disability, religion, or sexual orientation".[2]

Hate speech - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The posted quote was from the 1st paragraph. Which coincides w/what I originally posted w/o looking up the term.

 

[Nostra]

YOU are associated with these insurrectionists...........


View attachment 445419

View attachment 445420

THOSE rioters were not breaching the Capitol of the United States and assaulting Congress in pursuit of its Constitutional duties.

Apples and Oranges, loser.

Besides... you right-wingers held political power at the time of those riots and you didn't do $hit.

It happened ON your watch and YOU failed to properly control the situation.

Yeah, just ruining the lives of working families..............ya know, black folks, middle class families...........the people the fuckstick Dimwingers claim they support.

And it happened on the watch of Dimwinger Governors and Mayors in Minny, Seattle, and Portland, Dumbass.

Next?

 

[BertramN]

Not Corporate America, not anyone.

Texas man fired from his job after being arrested for storming the Capitol

A man from San Antonio, Texas, is out of job after he was identified in photos posted to social media partaking in the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, KENS5 reports. Matthew Carl Mazzocco, 37, was arrested Sunday afternoon and has been charged been with knowingly entering or remaining in a...

www.rawstory.com

I'd imagine even those w/their own businesses might end up having to close-up shop due to their treachery.

#SMH

That will depend on the location.

If the twice impeached former weasel-in-chief's loyal Nazis represent an adequate percentage of population in the area, city, or town, they will continue to patronize locally owned Nazi businesses. With them as customers, it's possible the Nazi owned business could survive.

(Only a weasel would throw the insurgents he sent to the Capitol to attempt his coup, under the bus by blaming them for everything, AND saying they should be severely punished.)

.

 

[BertramN]

Hey asshole.

Half of that garbage wasn't even in America. The one with water was from Katrina...what 15 years ago?

The RWNJs learned much about lying from their weasel-in-chief and FOX Noise.

(Only a weasel would throw the insurgents he sent to the Capitol to attempt his coup, under the bus by blaming them for everything, AND saying they should be severely punished.)


.

 

[9thIDdoc]

YOU are associated with these insurrectionists...........


View attachment 445419

View attachment 445420

THOSE rioters were not breaching the Capitol of the United States and assaulting Congress in pursuit of its Constitutional duties.

Apples and Oranges, loser.

Besides... you right-wingers held political power at the time of those riots and you didn't do $hit.

It happened ON your watch and YOU failed to properly control the situation.

Really? Exactly which Congress members were assaulted. Any? Comparing riots to riots is apples and oranges? Might just as well admit your hypocrisy, your attempt at propaganda sucks.

 

[toobfreak]

WRONG AGAIN, Marc:

• "Hate Speech," by the legal definition is something said out of malice, prejudice or bigotry. That is entirely sujective, like stupidly calling some crimes "hate crimes." There is no way of knowing the intent or motives of a person based solely on their words or actions much less the criminalization of them. If a person robs a store or murders an individual, it is still robbery or murder regardless of motivation. Calling it a "hate crime" or "hate speech" is merely a leftwing attempt at social engineering and cannot be shown to have had ONE IOTA of change in eliminating bad behavior.
• It is pure liberal folly to presuppose that you, I or anyone can know what "incited" the feelings, emotions or actions of another purely from observing the OUTCOME. If I have a fight with my wife then go out and wreck my car, you have no way of knowing it was over the argument and not over my failure to maintain the car or my distraction at looking at a pretty girl or fiddling with the radio knob. All you know is that a car was wrecked.
• It is the pinnacle of arrogance to suggest you have any gauge on the mental acuity or the mental deficiency of another person purely from what you read on the internet. The best psychiatrists and human behavior specialists cannot predict who will go out and commit a crime or serial murder, etc., EVEN WITH CLOSE OBSERVATION and personal interview.

Your failure to recognize these simple truths makes YOU, if anything, the more likely dangerous person you seek to find in others, by your mere ignorance of your own bad actions springing out of the best intentions.

It doesn't pass me that you didn't cite a source. However, according to Wikipedia...

Hate speech is defined by the Cambridge Dictionary as "public speech that expresses hate or encourages violence towards a person or group based on something such as race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation".[1] Hate speech is "usually thought to include communications of animosity or disparagement of an individual or a group on account of a group characteristic such as race, colour, national origin, sex, disability, religion, or sexual orientation".[2]

Hate speech - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The posted quote was from the 1st paragraph. Which coincides w/what I originally posted w/o looking up the term.

Once again Marc, YOU said the speech incited hate which no one can determine themselves. Cambridge says it EXPRESSES hate which again is purely subjective and person-dependent. If I say I don't like the taste of something or hate a TV show, was that hate speech? Is anything expressing anger or displeasure then hate speech? They go on to say it "encourages violence," again a pure subjective nebulous term subject to wide interpretation impossible to determine along any absolute plane. How do I know any statement "encouraged" violence?

So again you prove my point that there can be no hate speech especially in a society built upon FREEDOM of speech! It is a social device of the left inflicted to control thought and behavior, and for once I gave you the benefit of appealing to your logic and common sense which you totally failed. One does not need a "citation" for logic and common sense, nor do I recognize some internet "dictionary" as a vetted source for legal and philosophical definitions. But hey, I gave you a shot for once to prove your sagaciousness.

 

[sparky]

I'm all for any insurrectionist, or insurrectionism

In fact, maybe it;s high time

None of them represent you/me/us

~S~

You either are a domestic terrorist...or support domestic terrorism

Until i'm swingin' for you, then i'm a patriot

~S~