I posted the Updated Trenberth Chart, then posted the updated NASA numbers (Links were provided) yet you get angry that I did that.
Whenever you get triggered this massively, it means that I should simply return to whatever it was that triggered you, whatever it is you're trying so hard to run from. So I will.
For reasons that you won't explain, you've declared that comparing incoming solar radiation to a change in backradiation between two different revisions of a study is conclusive proof of ... something.
What it means, you won't say. Why it means anything, you won't say. You've just declared that it all means you win somehow. Yeah, sure thing.
Third Time I am asking you this question you keep avoiding.
For the third time, I'll point out the question is flawed, making any rational answer impossible. To demonstrate that, I keep asking you to answer it. The fact that you can't answer your own question proves that I'm right, that you're spouting nonsense.
Instead of playing gotcha games, why not to what I do? State a point clearly, directly, and calmly, and then back it up. People who understand a topic can do that. You can't.