Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you actually think those Rassmussen numbers are accurate? Have you ever checked them against reality? They are absolutely nothing more than the propaganda wing of the right side of the RNC. Do YOU actually believe Trump and Clinton are running EVEN among WOMEN? Does that actually seem POSSIBLE to you?
Face it, no one cares except the Democrats who see their plans for Airstrip One crumbling away, and have no other mud to throw.
White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™
LOL!!! Since 9/26 Clinton has gone from a 55% chance of winning to 82% and that ain't locker room talk or Twitter jabber; that's scientific polling.Face it, no one cares except the Democrats who see their plans for Airstrip One crumbling away, and have no other mud to throw.
White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™
Do you actually think those Rassmussen numbers are accurate? Have you ever checked them against reality?
I guess if people don't care about Hillary's corruption, which actually affects the nation, they don't care about rap lyrics.
LOL!!! Since 9/26 Clinton has gone from a 55% chance of winning to 82% and that ain't locker room talk or Twitter jabber; that's scientific polling.Face it, no one cares except the Democrats who see their plans for Airstrip One crumbling away, and have no other mud to throw.
White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#plus
Do you actually think those Rassmussen numbers are accurate? Have you ever checked them against reality?
Please provide your reality that I may check them.
The Trump BirdI guess if people don't care about Hillary's corruption, which actually affects the nation, they don't care about rap lyrics.
Considering this is a presidential election and not a scene from 8 Mile, I'd prefer to focus on Trump's corruption/not qualified to be president because he's kind of stupid rather than whatever it is you are trying to make a point about.
Nate Silver does repeat the experiment and Hillary wins 82% of the time!Yes and the US shoreline should now be in Paw Paw WV according to your decades-long science. The first rule of science is to repeat the experiment.Since 9/26 Clinton has gone from a 55% chance of winning to 82% and that ain't locker room talk or Twitter jabber; that's scientific polling. http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#plus
The Trump BirdI guess if people don't care about Hillary's corruption, which actually affects the nation, they don't care about rap lyrics.
Considering this is a presidential election and not a scene from 8 Mile, I'd prefer to focus on Trump's corruption/not qualified to be president because he's kind of stupid rather than whatever it is you are trying to make a point about.
LOL!!! Since 9/26 Clinton has gone from a 55% chance of winning to 82% and that ain't locker room talk or Twitter jabber; that's scientific polling.Face it, no one cares except the Democrats who see their plans for Airstrip One crumbling away, and have no other mud to throw.
White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#plus
Yes and the US shoreline should now be in Paw Paw WV according to your decades-long science.
The first rule of science is to repeat the experiment.
Putting a bad rug on a bald eagle?!?! How is that making America great again?The Trump Bird
Face it, no one cares except the Democrats who see their plans for Airstrip One crumbling away, and have no other mud to throw.
White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™
Putting a bad rug on a bald eagle?!?! How is that making America great again?The Trump Bird
Do you actually think those Rassmussen numbers are accurate? Have you ever checked them against reality?
Please provide your reality that I may check them.
Rasmussen sucks, until they prove their track record they are garbage.
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytime...best-and-worst-in-the-2012-presidential-race/
Several polling firms got notably poor results, on the other hand. For the second consecutive election — the same was true in 2010 — Rasmussen Reports polls had a statistical bias toward Republicans, overestimating Mr. Romney’s performance by about four percentage points, on average. Polls by American Research Group and Mason-Dixon also largely missed the mark. Mason-Dixon might be given a pass since it has a decent track record over the longer term, while American Research Group has long been unreliable.
