No, Progressivism Is Not In The Lineage Of The Abolitionists

[Doc7505]

No, Progressivism Is Not In The Lineage Of The Abolitionists ​

No, progressivism is not in the lineage of the abolitionists

One of the larger myths of progressivism is that they are heralds of liberalism. In order to justify this, they have had to do two things: ...

progressingamerica.blogspot.com

22 Apr 2021

"One of the larger myths of progressivism is that they are heralds of liberalism. In order to justify this, they have had to do two things: (both of which, sadly, have been successful)

1) Paint the picture of Enlightenment > Founders(Liberals) > Abolitionists > Feminists > Progressives​

2) The hijacking of the word liberal​

In order to justify their own existence, progressives have sent out their historians over the last several decades to manufacture this concept of progress and tie it all together in a very disorderly and quite frankly, convoluted way."


Comment:
Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies, "far and wide have written and written it from day one. The Declaration sucks. The Founders suck. We gotta stop worshipping the word.(The Constitution) We need more activist government, we need more social control, we need more assaults on the markets, we need more regulation."
PM/DSA Democrat Commies do not want to discuss their own history. I want to discuss their history.
The forerunners of modern Progessives were slave owners and creators of the KKK, because there are always large numbers of people who will drift whichever way the wind is blowing.
Progressivism is a revival of slavery. Only, instead of a few owning slaves, all will be owned by the state and looked upon as wage slaves.
With regard to workers, they are regarded by PM/DSA Democrats as “wage slaves” when working for private enterprise, just as Southern slaveowners and Marx said. Thus the creation of Blue Plantation Cities and the ghtteos within.
They coordinate with this economic ordering of society, as sociological. Just as the Dred Scot decision said American was founded in racism, so do Democrats.
In contrast, Lincoln, in his Cooper Union address, said the Founders (at least the majority of them) viewed freedom and equality as the ideal. His cited many instances in which the Founders had opportunity to express themselves on the subject, such as the passage of the Northwest Ordinance. He could have (but didn’t) list the “Freedom Cases” that preceded Dred Scot, including in particular those that had reached the Supreme Court. Lincoln said Dred Scot was wrongly decided and that we would work peacefully to overrule that decision through the long process of replacing justices on the Supreme Court. But, sadly, that was not how we overturned Dred Scot. It would take a Civil War.
It is time to re-dedicate ourselves to the founding principles of this country: that all men ARE ALL created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.

 

[my2¢]

Says who?

 

[Darkwind]

Says who?

Every thinking, non-indoctrinated, individual.

 

[my2¢]

Every thinking, non-indoctrinated, individual.

Just seems to me like another one of those copy-and-past posts that requires and exhibits little of that quality.

 

[Darkwind]

Every thinking, non-indoctrinated, individual.

Just seems to me like another one of those copy-and-past posts that requires and exhibits little of that quality.

Details and explains about 99.994% of all posts here.

 

[themirrorthief]

No, Progressivism Is Not In The Lineage Of The Abolitionists ​

No, progressivism is not in the lineage of the abolitionists

One of the larger myths of progressivism is that they are heralds of liberalism. In order to justify this, they have had to do two things: ...

progressingamerica.blogspot.com

22 Apr 2021

"One of the larger myths of progressivism is that they are heralds of liberalism. In order to justify this, they have had to do two things: (both of which, sadly, have been successful)

1) Paint the picture of Enlightenment > Founders(Liberals) > Abolitionists > Feminists > Progressives​

2) The hijacking of the word liberal​

In order to justify their own existence, progressives have sent out their historians over the last several decades to manufacture this concept of progress and tie it all together in a very disorderly and quite frankly, convoluted way."


Comment:
Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies, "far and wide have written and written it from day one. The Declaration sucks. The Founders suck. We gotta stop worshipping the word.(The Constitution) We need more activist government, we need more social control, we need more assaults on the markets, we need more regulation."
PM/DSA Democrat Commies do not want to discuss their own history. I want to discuss their history.
The forerunners of modern Progessives were slave owners and creators of the KKK, because there are always large numbers of people who will drift whichever way the wind is blowing.
Progressivism is a revival of slavery. Only, instead of a few owning slaves, all will be owned by the state and looked upon as wage slaves.
With regard to workers, they are regarded by PM/DSA Democrats as “wage slaves” when working for private enterprise, just as Southern slaveowners and Marx said. Thus the creation of Blue Plantation Cities and the ghtteos within.
They coordinate with this economic ordering of society, as sociological. Just as the Dred Scot decision said American was founded in racism, so do Democrats.
In contrast, Lincoln, in his Cooper Union address, said the Founders (at least the majority of them) viewed freedom and equality as the ideal. His cited many instances in which the Founders had opportunity to express themselves on the subject, such as the passage of the Northwest Ordinance. He could have (but didn’t) list the “Freedom Cases” that preceded Dred Scot, including in particular those that had reached the Supreme Court. Lincoln said Dred Scot was wrongly decided and that we would work peacefully to overrule that decision through the long process of replacing justices on the Supreme Court. But, sadly, that was not how we overturned Dred Scot. It would take a Civil War.
It is time to re-dedicate ourselves to the founding principles of this country: that all men ARE ALL created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.

abolish folk used the bible as their guide during their movement...no doubt they would be considered right wing nutjobs now by the brain dead woke crowd