No charges for Ohio Trooper who masturbated with boy to "teach him about sex"

Delta4Embassy

Gold Member
Dec 12, 2013
25,744
3,043
280
Earth
Trooper gives sex lesson | Sandusky Register

"Trooper Ricky Vitte Jr. acknowledged to his wife that he watched porn with the boy five years ago and both Vitte and the boy masturbated together, according to a report by O'Connell.

Vitte later told his wife he was attempting to teach the boy about sex, the report said.

Vitte said a dresser blocked his and the boy's views of each other as they both masturbated, according to the report, which also alleges there were two sexual encounters of that nature involving Vitte and the boy.

"Rick's reasoning is the fact that he did not want (the boy) to feel pressured on feeling the need to have to have sex with someone, when he can fix those needs by masturbating to porn," O'Connell wrote after an interview with Vitte's wife."

much more at link.

This guy was no saint and has a history of violence against his girlfriends, and their children. Issue aside, what's puzzling is why no charges would be filed. Article put this well,

"It's not clear why Stierwalt would preemptively decline to file charges. Generally it is incumbent on the suspect to present his own defense, rather than the prosecutor providing a defense for him. Stierwalt did not respond to written questions the Register emailed him, asking about these and other issues."

As I recall, I never needed anyone to 'teach me about sex' by masturbating with me. It kinda came naturally. So I'm not sure I buy the whole wanting to teach explanation. Given the guy's violent history, such innocent intentions don't make much sense.
 
The guy makes it sound like that was the only way that the boy could learn about such a thing when there were other ways tell him about it. Forgive me if this is a dumb question, but what would the guy have been charged with if any charges had been pressed.

God bless you and the boy always!!!

Holly
 
Funny, I don't believe in sex with children and I don't believe in killing children.

But right wingers seem very extreme. They are outraged a fully grown man will masturbate with a seventeen year old boy but will make a hero out of a fully grown man chasing down and shooting a 17 year old dead who had no gun. Only Skittles and Ice Tea. Odd, to say the least.
 
Funny, I don't believe in sex with children and I don't believe in killing children.

But right wingers seem very extreme. They are outraged a fully grown man will masturbate with a seventeen year old boy but will make a hero out of a fully grown man chasing down and shooting a 17 year old dead who had no gun. Only Skittles and Ice Tea. Odd, to say the least.

Incidents (happened twice) occured 5 years ago. Boy may be 17 now but happened when he was 12.
 
Funny, I don't believe in sex with children and I don't believe in killing children.

But right wingers seem very extreme. They are outraged a fully grown man will masturbate with a seventeen year old boy but will make a hero out of a fully grown man chasing down and shooting a 17 year old dead who had no gun. Only Skittles and Ice Tea. Odd, to say the least.

Incidents (happened twice) occured 5 years ago. Boy may be 17 now but happened when he was 12.

Once, here in the Chicago Tribune, they printed two articles side by side. The titles were something like this:

17 year old boy sexually abused by man

Two 17 year old men rape college co-ed

Turned out the 17 year old was involved in consensual sex with a 21 year old.

If a 17 year old get's his stuff touched by another dude, he's a "child". But if he rapes a woman, he's a "man".

Beating off with a 12 year old means you are a pedophile. It's only a matter of time before it goes further.

On the other hand, the parents of that 12 year old are also responsible. They should have told their kid not to have sex with adults. And if they did, and the kid did it anyway, then that kid's problems are just beginning.

Seems it's possible there's plenty of blame to go around.
 
Funny, I don't believe in sex with children and I don't believe in killing children.

But right wingers seem very extreme. They are outraged a fully grown man will masturbate with a seventeen year old boy but will make a hero out of a fully grown man chasing down and shooting a 17 year old dead who had no gun. Only Skittles and Ice Tea. Odd, to say the least.

lol, back to telling your worn out stupid lies again.

BTW, wasnt GZ a Democrat? Oh, yeah, that is right he was.

Still, he is innocent and did the right thing protecting himself as he tried to protect his neighbors from a robbery ring.
 
Funny, I don't believe in sex with children and I don't believe in killing children.

But right wingers seem very extreme. They are outraged a fully grown man will masturbate with a seventeen year old boy but will make a hero out of a fully grown man chasing down and shooting a 17 year old dead who had no gun. Only Skittles and Ice Tea. Odd, to say the least.

but will make a hero out of a fully grown man chasing down and shooting a 17 year old dead who had no gun. Only Skittles and Ice Tea. Odd, to say the least

When did this happen?

I for one would be sick to my stomach if anyone in this country did such a thing!
To chase someone for no reason,to kill someone because they had a bag of candy and a soft drink.

This needs to be looked into. :eusa_whistle:
 
Wait a friggin second....
The "kid" was 17 years old that needed to be taught how to masturbate?

This is beyond GAY!

This is Super Gay!
 
Funny, I don't believe in sex with children and I don't believe in killing children.

But right wingers seem very extreme. They are outraged a fully grown man will masturbate with a seventeen year old boy but will make a hero out of a fully grown man chasing down and shooting a 17 year old dead who had no gun. Only Skittles and Ice Tea. Odd, to say the least.

lol, back to telling your worn out stupid lies again.

BTW, wasnt GZ a Democrat? Oh, yeah, that is right he was.

Still, he is innocent and did the right thing protecting himself as he tried to protect his neighbors from a robbery ring.

That's what he says..

But it seems GZ has a problem with the truth.

And it also seems that its you folks that made him a hero.

Us?

We think he is a woman beating racist kid murdering wannabe cop.

Oh.

NOW I see why he's a right wing hero! :eusa_whistle:
 
Hmmmm

Looks like Sallow had a response....
Can't read it since he is on my ignore list.
I'm sure it was very insightful though... :tongue:
 
But right wingers seem very extreme. They are outraged a fully grown man will masturbate with a seventeen year old boy but will make a hero out of a fully grown man chasing down and shooting a 17 year old dead who had no gun. Only Skittles and Ice Tea. Odd, to say the least.
Only rdean could morph this into a political issue. ... :cuckoo:

I am sure that most Dem's are just as outraged at this State Trooper's sick behavior. .. :eusa_hand:
 
Hell I had a neighbor everyone in the hood called "Uncle Bob"
He helped all the kids in that regard.
But we were all like 10 or 11 so we needed a little help at that age.
But at 17.....

That's a little odd..
 
But right wingers seem very extreme. They are outraged a fully grown man will masturbate with a seventeen year old boy but will make a hero out of a fully grown man chasing down and shooting a 17 year old dead who had no gun. Only Skittles and Ice Tea. Odd, to say the least.
Only rdean could morph this into a political issue. ... :cuckoo:

I am sure that most Dem's are just as outraged at this State Trooper's sick behavior. .. :eusa_hand:

Yeah...How did deanie go from two guys jacking off to some weird ass story of some guy
chasing down a kid and shooting and killing him because he had candy and a soft drink...
That's just bizarre....A strange story at best.
 
So how old was this boy when it happened? 12 or 17.

It's also ironic that this happened in a county named Sandusky. Remember Jerry Sandusky?
 
Trooper gives sex lesson | Sandusky Register

"Trooper Ricky Vitte Jr. acknowledged to his wife that he watched porn with the boy five years ago and both Vitte and the boy masturbated together, according to a report by O'Connell.

Vitte later told his wife he was attempting to teach the boy about sex, the report said.

Vitte said a dresser blocked his and the boy's views of each other as they both masturbated, according to the report, which also alleges there were two sexual encounters of that nature involving Vitte and the boy.

"Rick's reasoning is the fact that he did not want (the boy) to feel pressured on feeling the need to have to have sex with someone, when he can fix those needs by masturbating to porn," O'Connell wrote after an interview with Vitte's wife."

much more at link.

This guy was no saint and has a history of violence against his girlfriends, and their children. Issue aside, what's puzzling is why no charges would be filed. Article put this well,

"It's not clear why Stierwalt would preemptively decline to file charges. Generally it is incumbent on the suspect to present his own defense, rather than the prosecutor providing a defense for him. Stierwalt did not respond to written questions the Register emailed him, asking about these and other issues."

As I recall, I never needed anyone to 'teach me about sex' by masturbating with me. It kinda came naturally. So I'm not sure I buy the whole wanting to teach explanation. Given the guy's violent history, such innocent intentions don't make much sense.

Guy must read the "Focus on the Family" newsletters.
 
Trooper gives sex lesson | Sandusky Register

"Trooper Ricky Vitte Jr. acknowledged to his wife that he watched porn with the boy five years ago and both Vitte and the boy masturbated together, according to a report by O'Connell.

Vitte later told his wife he was attempting to teach the boy about sex, the report said.

Vitte said a dresser blocked his and the boy's views of each other as they both masturbated, according to the report, which also alleges there were two sexual encounters of that nature involving Vitte and the boy.

"Rick's reasoning is the fact that he did not want (the boy) to feel pressured on feeling the need to have to have sex with someone, when he can fix those needs by masturbating to porn," O'Connell wrote after an interview with Vitte's wife."

much more at link.

This guy was no saint and has a history of violence against his girlfriends, and their children. Issue aside, what's puzzling is why no charges would be filed. Article put this well,

"It's not clear why Stierwalt would preemptively decline to file charges. Generally it is incumbent on the suspect to present his own defense, rather than the prosecutor providing a defense for him. Stierwalt did not respond to written questions the Register emailed him, asking about these and other issues."

As I recall, I never needed anyone to 'teach me about sex' by masturbating with me. It kinda came naturally. So I'm not sure I buy the whole wanting to teach explanation. Given the guy's violent history, such innocent intentions don't make much sense.

Why not just tell the kid It's OK to masterbate if you think he's feeling pressured. Doing it with him is fucked up.
 
Funny, I don't believe in sex with children and I don't believe in killing children.

But right wingers seem very extreme. They are outraged a fully grown man will masturbate with a seventeen year old boy but will make a hero out of a fully grown man chasing down and shooting a 17 year old dead who had no gun. Only Skittles and Ice Tea. Odd, to say the least.

And, they idolize an adult man who preaches that men should get themselves 14 year old girls.

What a sad thing it is that some do not value children as much as they do fetuses.
 

Forum List

Back
Top