Newsom: California could permanently mail ballots to all voters

shockedcanadian

Diamond Member
Aug 6, 2012
27,897
24,701
2,405
Would this create a permanent Democrat Party victory? How silly of the GOP to allow the door to open. Maybe lowering the voting age will be in the future too?

I'd done some reading online, China, Russia and others, don't even really seem that interested in who will win, other than, enjoying the "chaos that will follow when half the country won't support the decision". Maybe this method will get rid of those pesky disputes...


SAN FRANCISCO — Gov. Gavin Newsom raised the possibility Tuesday that California could permanently move to its pandemic-driven approach of mailing all voters a ballot after the state saw record early turnout for the November election.

Before Tuesday's polls opened, more than 12 million California voters had submitted ballots, over half of those registered in the state. The state moved to an all-mail system in an attempt to deter crowds from polling places during Covid-19.


"We’ll discuss that with the Legislature, but I think making voting easier, providing more choice and more opportunity is fabulous," Newsom said in an Election Day get-out-the-vote stop at Manny’s, a Mission District hot spot. With so many California voters already having cast ballots, Newsom spent his morning texting hundreds of individual voters in the critical swing
 
The big problem with Mail In Ballots is that there is no identification of the person who cast the ballot.
This allows for mass voter fraud.
This a clear voting rights violation.
The citizens of Mail In Ballot states should sue for their Voting Rights.
The Democrats are creating permanent one party states.
 
California is becoming desperate as they slide ever closer to total insolvency! Eventually the federal government will have to remove the elected officials @ all levels of government & "install" federal government appointed fiscally responsible professional business people to think for, manage & pen the laws for Californians to get them once again in sync with the rest of the republic. This is the price to be paid when a states constituency allows thenselves to be duped into the cult of communalism through incrementalism.
 
While they're at it, just send a ballot to all of Mexico's addresses too, and be done with it.

More tent cities to come. :popcorn:
 
The big problem with Mail In Ballots is that there is no identification of the person who cast the ballot.
This allows for mass voter fraud.
This a clear voting rights violation.
The citizens of Mail In Ballot states should sue for their Voting Rights.
The Democrats are creating permanent one party states.

Utah does that. They're a Republican state.
 
The big problem with Mail In Ballots is that there is no identification of the person who cast the ballot.
This allows for mass voter fraud.
This a clear voting rights violation.
The citizens of Mail In Ballot states should sue for their Voting Rights.
The Democrats are creating permanent one party states.

Utah does that. They're a Republican state.
no problem, no mail in ballots regardless of party
 
The big problem with Mail In Ballots is that there is no identification of the person who cast the ballot.
This allows for mass voter fraud.
This a clear voting rights violation.
The citizens of Mail In Ballot states should sue for their Voting Rights.
The Democrats are creating permanent one party states.

Utah does that. They're a Republican state.
no problem, no mail in ballots regardless of party

They've been doing it for years.

It's a state issue.

And, frankly, it works well. I don't think it preferences one party over another.
 
The big problem with Mail In Ballots is that there is no identification of the person who cast the ballot.
This allows for mass voter fraud.
This a clear voting rights violation.
The citizens of Mail In Ballot states should sue for their Voting Rights.
The Democrats are creating permanent one party states.

Utah does that. They're a Republican state.
no problem, no mail in ballots regardless of party

They've been doing it for years.

It's a state issue.

And, frankly, it works well. I don't think it preferences one party over another.
How do they identify who cast the ballot?
 
The big problem with Mail In Ballots is that there is no identification of the person who cast the ballot.
This allows for mass voter fraud.
This a clear voting rights violation.
The citizens of Mail In Ballot states should sue for their Voting Rights.
The Democrats are creating permanent one party states.

Utah does that. They're a Republican state.
no problem, no mail in ballots regardless of party

They've been doing it for years.

It's a state issue.

And, frankly, it works well. I don't think it preferences one party over another.
How do they identify who cast the ballot?
Signature match and each ballot has a unique barcode.

 
How do they identify who cast the ballot?

The envelope is numbered and assigned to the registered voter ... the voter must sign the outer envelope, that has the ID number on it ... the signatures must match the one on file in the elections office ... once the envelope has been approved, it's opened and the ballet stacked up ready for machine counting ...

In all cases in Oregon ... 32 conservative counties vote Republican ... 4 liberal counties vote Democrat ... easy peasy ... there's never been enough fraud to change any election ...

But if your state is made of money, go ahead and raise taxes some more and have your election anyway you want it ... bigger government is always better ...
 
The big problem with Mail In Ballots is that there is no identification of the person who cast the ballot.
This allows for mass voter fraud.
This a clear voting rights violation.
The citizens of Mail In Ballot states should sue for their Voting Rights.
The Democrats are creating permanent one party states.

Utah does that. They're a Republican state.
no problem, no mail in ballots regardless of party

They've been doing it for years.

It's a state issue.

And, frankly, it works well. I don't think it preferences one party over another.
How do they identify who cast the ballot?
Signature match and each ballot has a unique barcode.

but that doesn't identify who cast the ballot and who sent it in
 
How do they identify who cast the ballot?

The envelope is numbered and assigned to the registered voter ... the voter must sign the outer envelope, that has the ID number on it ... the signatures must match the one on file in the elections office ... once the envelope has been approved, it's opened and the ballet stacked up ready for machine counting ...

In all cases in Oregon ... 32 conservative counties vote Republican ... 4 liberal counties vote Democrat ... easy peasy ... there's never been enough fraud to change any election ...

But if your state is made of money, go ahead and raise taxes some more and have your election anyway you want it ... bigger government is always better ...
But how do you know who really signed the ballot, are the people who count the ballots forged signature experts?
 
But how do you know who really signed the ballot, are the people who count the ballots forged signature experts?

Exactly the way they do at the polling station ... one must sign in, the clerk checks the signature on file, then hands the ballot to the voter as they enter the station ...

Have you ever voted yet, or will 2024 be your first? ...
 

Forum List

Back
Top