Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel

[P F Tinmore]

Article V
1. The Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the international boundary between the Lebanon and Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, March 23, 1949
------------------------------
Article V
Where the existing truce lines run along the international boundary between Syria and Palestine, the Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the boundary line.

The Avalon Project : Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949
----------------------------
the Armistice Demarcation Line set forth in Article VI of this Agreement except as provided in Article III of this Agreement; and elsewhere shall not violate the international frontier

2. The area thus demilitarized shall be as follows: From a point on the Egypt-Palestine frontier

4. The road Taba-Qouseima-Auja shall not be employed by any military forces whatsoever for the purpose of entering Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Egyptian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, February 24, 1949
----------------------------------
4. The establishment of an armistice between the armed forces of the two Parties is accepted as an indispensable step toward the liquidation of armed conflict and the restoration of peace in Palestine.

5. This Agreement is signed in quintuplicate, of which one copy shall be retained by each Party, two copies communicated to the Secretary-General of the United Nations for transmission to the Security Council and to the United Nations Conciliation Commission on Palestine, and one copy to the United Nations Acting Mediator on Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949
--------------------------------
In 1949 Palestine's international borders were still there. Palestine was still there even though it was divided into three areas of occupation.

BTW, Boundary and international border do not mean the same thing. Get your facts straight....

Balderdash!

Link?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Article V
1. The Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the international boundary between the Lebanon and Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, March 23, 1949
------------------------------
Article V
Where the existing truce lines run along the international boundary between Syria and Palestine, the Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the boundary line.

The Avalon Project : Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949
----------------------------
the Armistice Demarcation Line set forth in Article VI of this Agreement except as provided in Article III of this Agreement; and elsewhere shall not violate the international frontier

2. The area thus demilitarized shall be as follows: From a point on the Egypt-Palestine frontier

4. The road Taba-Qouseima-Auja shall not be employed by any military forces whatsoever for the purpose of entering Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Egyptian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, February 24, 1949
----------------------------------
4. The establishment of an armistice between the armed forces of the two Parties is accepted as an indispensable step toward the liquidation of armed conflict and the restoration of peace in Palestine.

5. This Agreement is signed in quintuplicate, of which one copy shall be retained by each Party, two copies communicated to the Secretary-General of the United Nations for transmission to the Security Council and to the United Nations Conciliation Commission on Palestine, and one copy to the United Nations Acting Mediator on Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949
--------------------------------
In 1949 Palestine's international borders were still there. Palestine was still there even though it was divided into three areas of occupation.

1) Where in ANYWHERE in your links does it say: Palestine's international recognized borders are so and so"

2) Got a link that shows Palestine was divided into three areas of occupation???

I posted the links to the armistice agreements. Show me one word of difference between the occupation by Jordan, the occupation by Egypt, and the occupation by Israel. All three were inside Palestine's international borders and were not defined by any borders.

Link?

On 15 July when the Israeli Army expelled the population of Wadi Fukin after the village had been transferred to the Israeli-occupied area under the terms of the Armistice Agreement

1949 Armistice Agreements - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[toastman]

BTW Tinmore

Article V
1. The Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the international boundary between the Lebanon and Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, March 23, 1949
------------------------------
Article V
Where the existing truce lines run along the international boundary between Syria and Palestine, the Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the boundary line.

The Avalon Project : Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949
----------------------------
the Armistice Demarcation Line set forth in Article VI of this Agreement except as provided in Article III of this Agreement; and elsewhere shall not violate the international frontier

2. The area thus demilitarized shall be as follows: From a point on the Egypt-Palestine frontier

4. The road Taba-Qouseima-Auja shall not be employed by any military forces whatsoever for the purpose of entering Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Egyptian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, February 24, 1949
----------------------------------
4. The establishment of an armistice between the armed forces of the two Parties is accepted as an indispensable step toward the liquidation of armed conflict and the restoration of peace in Palestine.

5. This Agreement is signed in quintuplicate, of which one copy shall be retained by each Party, two copies communicated to the Secretary-General of the United Nations for transmission to the Security Council and to the United Nations Conciliation Commission on Palestine, and one copy to the United Nations Acting Mediator on Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949
--------------------------------
In 1949 Palestine's international borders were still there. Palestine was still there even though it was divided into three areas of occupation.

1) Where in ANYWHERE in your links does it say: Palestine's international recognized borders are so and so"

2) Got a link that shows Palestine was divided into three areas of occupation???

I posted the links to the armistice agreements. Show me one word of difference between the occupation by Jordan, the occupation by Egypt, and the occupation by Israel. All three were inside Palestine's international borders and were not defined by any borders.

Link?

On 15 July when the Israeli Army expelled the population of Wadi Fukin after the village had been transferred to the Israeli-occupied area under the terms of the Armistice Agreement​

​

1949 Armistice Agreements - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I asked you for a link, and your response is to ask me for one? That’s pathetic , even for you !!

 

[toastman]

BTW Tinmore , you have yet to post ANYTHING even remotely close to prove that Palestine had or has international borders. Know why you can’t find them? because they don’t exist!!

 

[Hollie]

Reading through the article it’s clear that Rashida Tlaib is just clueless.


Rashida Tlaib Wants US Treasury To Fund Coronavirus Recovery With Universal Basic Income For All, Including Illegals

Rashida Tlaib Wants US Treasury To Fund Coronavirus Recovery With Universal Basic Income For All, Including Illegals

Rashida Tlaib proposed a plan that would have the U.S. treasury essentially provide a universal basic income (UBI) for every person in American until the coronavirus crisis ends.

dailycaller.com

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ Hollie, et al,

This is a political trick. To be honest, I've seen many politicians use this same sort of trickery.

Reading through the article it’s clear that Rashida Tlaib is just clueless.
Rashida Tlaib Wants US Treasury To Fund Coronavirus Recovery With Universal Basic Income For All, Including Illegals

(COMMENT)

The Member of Congress does not really care if her idea floats or not. It is all about the caring and sympathetic political face that she shows to her constituents.


Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Hollie]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ Hollie, et al,

This is a political trick. To be honest, I've seen many politicians use this same sort of trickery.

Reading through the article it’s clear that Rashida Tlaib is just clueless.
Rashida Tlaib Wants US Treasury To Fund Coronavirus Recovery With Universal Basic Income For All, Including Illegals

(COMMENT)

The Member of Congress does not really care if her idea floats or not. It is all about the caring and sympathetic political face that she shows to her constituents.


Most Respectfully,
R

I generally agree. Although I think it runs deeper. My opinion is that Rashida Tlaib was pandering to an audience she hoped would notice. I also have a suspicion that she would prefer to see the US weak and hobbled by massive debt thus calming her emotional requirement that Trump, the Senate and the US in general is evil and corrupt.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, toastman, et al,

Yes, this is another Arab Palestinian sleight of hand.

Article V
1. The Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the international boundary between the Lebanon and Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, March 23, 1949
------------------------------
Article V
Where the existing truce lines run along the international boundary between Syria and Palestine, the Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the boundary line.

The Avalon Project : Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949

BTW, Boundary and international border do not mean the same thing. Get your facts straight....

(COMMENT)

When the Armistice says: "shall follow the boundary line" - it is using the boundary line as a surveyor's geographic reference and not a political statement.

While the 1948 War of Independence is still an open question between Israel and Syria, as far as it is practically concerned, the standing agreement between Israel and Lebanon is:

A/54/914 • S/2000/564 • 12 June 2000

Letter dated 12 June 2000 from the Permanent Representative of Lebanon to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General
​

II. Report of the Secretary-General of 22 May 2000 (S/2000/460)​

Paragraph 13 of the report states that “the international boundary between Israel and Lebanon was established pursuant to the 1923 Agreement between France and Great Britain ...”, that “this line was reaffirmed in the Israeli-Lebanese General Armistice Agreement signed on 23 March 1949” and that “subsequently there were several modifications mutually agreed by Israel and Lebanon.”​

The Letter of Agreement also treats the Armistice Lines as both a historical reference in time and demarcation that has been modified several times and is no longer the legal or agreed upon internationally recognized boundary of Lebanon.

Half-Truths are as bad as false and misleading information that is deliberately intended to deceive the discussion participants.


Most Respectfully,
R

 

[member]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, toastman, et al,

Yes, this is another Arab Palestinian sleight of hand.

Article V
1. The Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the international boundary between the Lebanon and Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, March 23, 1949
------------------------------
Article V
Where the existing truce lines run along the international boundary between Syria and Palestine, the Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the boundary line.

The Avalon Project : Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949

BTW, Boundary and international border do not mean the same thing. Get your facts straight....

(COMMENT)

When the Armistice says: "shall follow the boundary line" - it is using the boundary line as a surveyor's geographic reference and not a political statement.

While the 1948 War of Independence is still an open question between Israel and Syria, as far as it is practically concerned, the standing agreement between Israel and Lebanon is:

A/54/914 • S/2000/564 • 12 June 2000

Letter dated 12 June 2000 from the Permanent Representative of Lebanon to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General​

​

II. Report of the Secretary-General of 22 May 2000 (S/2000/460)​

Paragraph 13 of the report states that “the international boundary between Israel and Lebanon was established pursuant to the 1923 Agreement between France and Great Britain ...”, that “this line was reaffirmed in the Israeli-Lebanese General Armistice Agreement signed on 23 March 1949” and that “subsequently there were several modifications mutually agreed by Israel and Lebanon.”​

The Letter of Agreement also treats the Armistice Lines as both a historical reference in time and demarcation that has been modified several times and is no longer the legal or agreed upon internationally recognized boundary of Lebanon.

Half-Truths are as bad as false and misleading information that is deliberately intended to deceive the discussion participants.


Most Respectfully,
R

This new format….(which wasn't like this the other day) i’m all …discombobulated….





I could imagine how they feel then…

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, toastman, et al,

Yes, this is another Arab Palestinian sleight of hand.

Article V
1. The Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the international boundary between the Lebanon and Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, March 23, 1949
------------------------------
Article V
Where the existing truce lines run along the international boundary between Syria and Palestine, the Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the boundary line.

The Avalon Project : Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949

BTW, Boundary and international border do not mean the same thing. Get your facts straight....

(COMMENT)

When the Armistice says: "shall follow the boundary line" - it is using the boundary line as a surveyor's geographic reference and not a political statement.

While the 1948 War of Independence is still an open question between Israel and Syria, as far as it is practically concerned, the standing agreement between Israel and Lebanon is:

A/54/914 • S/2000/564 • 12 June 2000

Letter dated 12 June 2000 from the Permanent Representative of Lebanon to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General​

​

II. Report of the Secretary-General of 22 May 2000 (S/2000/460)​

Paragraph 13 of the report states that “the international boundary between Israel and Lebanon was established pursuant to the 1923 Agreement between France and Great Britain ...”, that “this line was reaffirmed in the Israeli-Lebanese General Armistice Agreement signed on 23 March 1949” and that “subsequently there were several modifications mutually agreed by Israel and Lebanon.”​

The Letter of Agreement also treats the Armistice Lines as both a historical reference in time and demarcation that has been modified several times and is no longer the legal or agreed upon internationally recognized boundary of Lebanon.

Half-Truths are as bad as false and misleading information that is deliberately intended to deceive the discussion participants.


Most Respectfully,
R

Paragraph 13 of the report states that “the international boundary between Israel and Lebanon was established pursuant to the 1923 Agreement between France and Great Britain

Indeed, and that agreement said the international boundary between Lebanon and Palestine.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, toastman, et al,

I still think you missed it.

BLUF: In no way do these documents establish a self-governing institution necessary to form a nation. It is an agreement between two Allied Powers.

Paragraph 13 of the report states that “the international boundary between Israel and Lebanon was established pursuant to the 1923 Agreement between France and Great Britain

Indeed, and that agreement said the international boundary between Lebanon and Palestine.

(COMMENT)

The 1923 Agreement was between BRITISH and FRENCH Governments; and, NOT involving any Arab Authority or Representative. Essentially it modified the demarcation Line between Zone "A" and Zone "B" of the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916. The 1923 Agreement was better known as the Paulet–Newcombe Agreement (1923) which defined the common boundaries of the various Mandates involving the British and French.

Don't mince the wording. Today, all of these various agreements, a century later, have been superseded by something else.


Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, toastman, et al,

I still think you missed it.

BLUF: In no way do these documents establish a self-governing institution necessary to form a nation. It is an agreement between two Allied Powers.

Paragraph 13 of the report states that “the international boundary between Israel and Lebanon was established pursuant to the 1923 Agreement between France and Great Britain

Indeed, and that agreement said the international boundary between Lebanon and Palestine.

(COMMENT)

The 1923 Agreement was between BRITISH and FRENCH Governments; and, NOT involving any Arab Authority or Representative. Essentially it modified the demarcation Line between Zone "A" and Zone "B" of the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916. The 1923 Agreement was better known as the Paulet–Newcombe Agreement (1923) which defined the common boundaries of the various Mandates involving the British and French.

Don't mince the wording. Today, all of these various agreements, a century later, have been superseded by something else.


Most Respectfully,
R

Don't mince the wording. Today, all of these various agreements, a century later, have been superseded by something else.

You can supersede international borders?

Link?

 

[Shusha]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, toastman, et al,

I still think you missed it.

BLUF: In no way do these documents establish a self-governing institution necessary to form a nation. It is an agreement between two Allied Powers.

Paragraph 13 of the report states that “the international boundary between Israel and Lebanon was established pursuant to the 1923 Agreement between France and Great Britain

Indeed, and that agreement said the international boundary between Lebanon and Palestine.

(COMMENT)

The 1923 Agreement was between BRITISH and FRENCH Governments; and, NOT involving any Arab Authority or Representative. Essentially it modified the demarcation Line between Zone "A" and Zone "B" of the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916. The 1923 Agreement was better known as the Paulet–Newcombe Agreement (1923) which defined the common boundaries of the various Mandates involving the British and French.

Don't mince the wording. Today, all of these various agreements, a century later, have been superseded by something else.


Most Respectfully,
R

Don't mince the wording. Today, all of these various agreements, a century later, have been superseded by something else.

You can supersede international borders?

Link?

Here's a list of 138 international borders which have changed since WWI.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Article V
1. The Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the international boundary between the Lebanon and Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, March 23, 1949
------------------------------
Article V
Where the existing truce lines run along the international boundary between Syria and Palestine, the Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the boundary line.

The Avalon Project : Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949
----------------------------
the Armistice Demarcation Line set forth in Article VI of this Agreement except as provided in Article III of this Agreement; and elsewhere shall not violate the international frontier

2. The area thus demilitarized shall be as follows: From a point on the Egypt-Palestine frontier

4. The road Taba-Qouseima-Auja shall not be employed by any military forces whatsoever for the purpose of entering Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Egyptian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, February 24, 1949
----------------------------------
4. The establishment of an armistice between the armed forces of the two Parties is accepted as an indispensable step toward the liquidation of armed conflict and the restoration of peace in Palestine.

5. This Agreement is signed in quintuplicate, of which one copy shall be retained by each Party, two copies communicated to the Secretary-General of the United Nations for transmission to the Security Council and to the United Nations Conciliation Commission on Palestine, and one copy to the United Nations Acting Mediator on Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949
--------------------------------
In 1949 Palestine's international borders were still there. Palestine was still there even though it was divided into three areas of occupation.

BTW, Boundary and international border do not mean the same thing. Get your facts straight....

Balderdash!

Link?

How many Palestinians signed that agreement?
How many Israelis?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Article V
1. The Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the international boundary between the Lebanon and Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, March 23, 1949
------------------------------
Article V
Where the existing truce lines run along the international boundary between Syria and Palestine, the Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the boundary line.

The Avalon Project : Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949
----------------------------
the Armistice Demarcation Line set forth in Article VI of this Agreement except as provided in Article III of this Agreement; and elsewhere shall not violate the international frontier

2. The area thus demilitarized shall be as follows: From a point on the Egypt-Palestine frontier

4. The road Taba-Qouseima-Auja shall not be employed by any military forces whatsoever for the purpose of entering Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Egyptian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, February 24, 1949
----------------------------------
4. The establishment of an armistice between the armed forces of the two Parties is accepted as an indispensable step toward the liquidation of armed conflict and the restoration of peace in Palestine.

5. This Agreement is signed in quintuplicate, of which one copy shall be retained by each Party, two copies communicated to the Secretary-General of the United Nations for transmission to the Security Council and to the United Nations Conciliation Commission on Palestine, and one copy to the United Nations Acting Mediator on Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949
--------------------------------
In 1949 Palestine's international borders were still there. Palestine was still there even though it was divided into three areas of occupation.

BTW, Boundary and international border do not mean the same thing. Get your facts straight....

Balderdash!

Link?

View attachment 315257

How many Palestinians signed that agreement?
How many Israelis?

Palestine was not at war.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Article V
1. The Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the international boundary between the Lebanon and Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, March 23, 1949
------------------------------
Article V
Where the existing truce lines run along the international boundary between Syria and Palestine, the Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the boundary line.

The Avalon Project : Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949
----------------------------
the Armistice Demarcation Line set forth in Article VI of this Agreement except as provided in Article III of this Agreement; and elsewhere shall not violate the international frontier

2. The area thus demilitarized shall be as follows: From a point on the Egypt-Palestine frontier

4. The road Taba-Qouseima-Auja shall not be employed by any military forces whatsoever for the purpose of entering Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Egyptian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, February 24, 1949
----------------------------------
4. The establishment of an armistice between the armed forces of the two Parties is accepted as an indispensable step toward the liquidation of armed conflict and the restoration of peace in Palestine.

5. This Agreement is signed in quintuplicate, of which one copy shall be retained by each Party, two copies communicated to the Secretary-General of the United Nations for transmission to the Security Council and to the United Nations Conciliation Commission on Palestine, and one copy to the United Nations Acting Mediator on Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949
--------------------------------
In 1949 Palestine's international borders were still there. Palestine was still there even though it was divided into three areas of occupation.

BTW, Boundary and international border do not mean the same thing. Get your facts straight....

Balderdash!

Link?

View attachment 315257

How many Palestinians signed that agreement?
How many Israelis?

Palestine was not at war.

So who signed the agreement? Got a list?

 

[Hollie]

Article V
1. The Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the international boundary between the Lebanon and Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, March 23, 1949
------------------------------
Article V
Where the existing truce lines run along the international boundary between Syria and Palestine, the Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the boundary line.

The Avalon Project : Israeli-Syrian General Armistice Agreement, July 20, 1949
----------------------------
the Armistice Demarcation Line set forth in Article VI of this Agreement except as provided in Article III of this Agreement; and elsewhere shall not violate the international frontier

2. The area thus demilitarized shall be as follows: From a point on the Egypt-Palestine frontier

4. The road Taba-Qouseima-Auja shall not be employed by any military forces whatsoever for the purpose of entering Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Egyptian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, February 24, 1949
----------------------------------
4. The establishment of an armistice between the armed forces of the two Parties is accepted as an indispensable step toward the liquidation of armed conflict and the restoration of peace in Palestine.

5. This Agreement is signed in quintuplicate, of which one copy shall be retained by each Party, two copies communicated to the Secretary-General of the United Nations for transmission to the Security Council and to the United Nations Conciliation Commission on Palestine, and one copy to the United Nations Acting Mediator on Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949
--------------------------------
In 1949 Palestine's international borders were still there. Palestine was still there even though it was divided into three areas of occupation.

BTW, Boundary and international border do not mean the same thing. Get your facts straight....

Balderdash!

Link?

View attachment 315257

How many Palestinians signed that agreement?
How many Israelis?

Palestine was not at war.

You proceed under the false premise that the loosely defined territory called Palestine was something more than a loosely defined territory.

 

[Hollie]

I sure wish she would leave matters of government and economics to those who understand those matters.

Tlaib wants to hand out debit cards during coronavirus, mint trillion-dollar coins to cover cost

Tlaib's proposal would give $2,000 initially and then $1,000 per month to every person in the United States until the coronavirus threat passes.

www.foxnews.com

The plan, outlined on Tlaib's website, would send a debit card with $2,000 pre-loaded on it to every person in the U.S. and reload it with $1,000 every month "until one year after the end of the Coronavirus crisis."

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Oh, for heaven's sake. War is a generalized term.

"International humanitarian law distinguishes two types of armed conflicts, namely: ​

​

◈ International armed conflicts (IAC), opposing two or more States, ​

​

◈ Non-international armed conflicts (NIAC), between governmental forces and non-governmental armed groups, or between such groups only. IHL treaty law also establishes a distinction between: ​

​

✦ NIAC in Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 (GCIV) ​

​

✦ NIAC in Article 1 of Additional Protocol II."​

Palestine was not at war.

(COMMENT)

The term "war" can generalize and encompass all these meanings (making no distinction from one of the others) in a non-legal environment.

Even a blind man with a seeing-eye dog (service dog) can tell you that there is a conflict between:

◈ Factions of different Arab Palestinian Political Groups -​

​

◈ Various factions of Arab Palestinian Groups and the Israelis -​

So, IF you are going to make such a trivial complaint about the use of the adjective "war" to describe the status and environment of the concerned territory, THEN what is the correct terminology that should be used?

And I will not hold you down to which factions fall in what category: Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters.


Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Oh, for heaven's sake. War is a generalized term.

"International humanitarian law distinguishes two types of armed conflicts, namely: ​

​

◈ International armed conflicts (IAC), opposing two or more States, ​

​

◈ Non-international armed conflicts (NIAC), between governmental forces and non-governmental armed groups, or between such groups only. IHL treaty law also establishes a distinction between: ​

​

✦ NIAC in Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 (GCIV) ​

​

✦ NIAC in Article 1 of Additional Protocol II."​

Palestine was not at war.

(COMMENT)

The term "war" can generalize and encompass all these meanings (making no distinction from one of the others) in a non-legal environment.

Even a blind man with a seeing-eye dog (service dog) can tell you that there is a conflict between:

◈ Factions of different Arab Palestinian Political Groups -​

​

◈ Various factions of Arab Palestinian Groups and the Israelis -​

So, IF you are going to make such a trivial complaint about the use of the adjective "war" to describe the status and environment of the concerned territory, THEN what is the correct terminology that should be used?

And I will not hold you down to which factions fall in what category: Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters.


Most Respectfully,
R

What kind of "war" is it when a foreign supported settler colonial project attacks unarmed civilians?