New Congresswomen Lauren Bohbert Says New Bill Makes Gays and Transvestites Supreme to Everyone Else

equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.

So you don't know what the actual outcomes would be. You're not cognizant of the outrageous violations of First-Amendment liberties and property rights this legislation portends, or cognizant of the judicial shitstorm that would arise if it were passed by the Senate and signed into law?

That's what I thought.

You hear the word equal and get a weepy, snot-stained hankey feeling. Hot damn, leftist politicians love useful idiots like you!

But, then, you in all likelihood are a rank narcissist or sociopath, so you wouldn't give a damn about the violation of others' natural rights anyway.

After all, you're a leftist, aren't you? You're a statist bootlick of collectivist, mobocratic rule, right?
They said the same stupid shit about civil rights for blacks. Same bullshit, different target. People who hate have to hate. It's just a mattter of what you can get away with, or think tyat you can get away with any a given point in time.


The difference is that black people don't choose to be black.

OTOH, people do choose what kind of sexual perversion they want to engage in.

Believe me, if you go to the Ghetto in your city and walk up to a group of young black guys on the corner and tell them" I don't see any difference between you guys and the Homos", it will not go over that well and you will be asking for and receiving an ugly scene.
Gay people did not choose to be gay either moron. But you apparently chose to be an ignorant bigot. Well, maybe that is unfair. You can't help it just like blacks and gays.
 
equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.

So you don't know what the actual outcomes would be. You're not cognizant of the outrageous violations of First-Amendment liberties and property rights this legislation portends, or cognizant of the judicial shitstorm that would arise if it were passed by the Senate and signed into law?

That's what I thought.

You hear the word equal and get a weepy, snot-stained hankey feeling. Hot damn, leftist politicians love useful idiots like you!

But, then, you in all likelihood are a rank narcissist or sociopath, so you wouldn't give a damn about the violation of others' natural rights anyway.

After all, you're a leftist, aren't you? You're a statist bootlick of collectivist, mobocratic rule, right?
They said the same stupid shit about civil rights for blacks. Same bullshit, different target. People who hate have to hate. It's just a mattter of what you can get away with, or think tyat you can get away with any a given point in time.
Projection. Democrats exploit every group they can get their hands on. Someone should call them on it. And your party runs on hate.
A boatload of bovine excrement You have nothing to back that up and cannot refute the point that I made
The Democratic party backs it up. They are haters of this country, the people, and the Constitution.
 
She's correct.
Now let's see the text of the Equality Act.
If it specifically protects people with particular sexual tendencies then it's a crock of shit.

It does, and it does so in violation of free-association, free speech and property rights, and, thusly, is "a crock of shit." It empowers the state and illegitimately suppresses the free exercise of people's inherent rights.
 
equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.

So you don't know what the actual outcomes would be. You're not cognizant of the outrageous violations of First-Amendment liberties and property rights this legislation portends, or cognizant of the judicial shitstorm that would arise if it were passed by the Senate and signed into law?

That's what I thought.

You hear the word equal and get a weepy, snot-stained hankey feeling. Hot damn, leftist politicians love useful idiots like you!

But, then, you in all likelihood are a rank narcissist or sociopath, so you wouldn't give a damn about the violation of others' natural rights anyway.

After all, you're a leftist, aren't you? You're a statist bootlick of collectivist, mobocratic rule, right?
They said the same stupid shit about civil rights for blacks. Same bullshit, different target. People who hate have to hate. It's just a mattter of what you can get away with, or think tyat you can get away with any a given point in time.


The difference is that black people don't choose to be black.

OTOH, people do choose what kind of sexual perversion they want to engage in.

Believe me, if you go to the Ghetto in your city and walk up to a group of young black guys on the corner and tell them" I don't see any difference between you guys and the Homos", it will not go over that well and you will be asking for and receiving an ugly scene.
Gay people did not choose to be gay either moron. But you apparently chose to be an ignorant bigot. Well, maybe that is unfair. You can't help it just like blacks and gays.
Which has what to do with the fact that the USC already has provisions to allow people to live in peace?
 
They said the same stupid shit about civil rights for blacks. Same bullshit, different target. People who hate have to hate. It's just a mattter of what you can get away with, or think tyat you can get away with any a given point in time.

Narcissist or sociopath?
 
Gay people did not choose to be gay either moron. But you apparently chose to be an ignorant bigot. Well, maybe that is unfair. You can't help it just like blacks and gays.

Even if that were true, it's irrelevant to the fact of the inalienable rights of the people and the fact of the tyrannical suppression of the expression of those rights by statist thugs..
 


This lady was elected. rightwinger try not to have your ears bleed out.

She's correct.
Now let's see the text of the Equality Act.
If it specifically protects people with particular sexual tendencies then it's a crock of shit.

Happy that you asked> Get ready to feel stupid> It protects everyone including you


The Equality Act amends the 1964 Civil Rights Act to explicitly ban discrimination against people based on sexual orientation and gender identity in sectors including housing, employment, federal programs and public accommodations such as stores and even websites.
Stefanik voted yes on the Equality Act in 2019. Why does she oppo…
www.timesunion.com/news/article/Stefanik-voted-yes-on-the-Equality-Act-in-2019-15982634.php

www.timesunion.com/news/article/Stefanik-voted-yes-on-the-Equality-Act-in-201
 


This lady was elected. rightwinger try not to have your ears bleed out.

She's correct.
Now let's see the text of the Equality Act.
If it specifically protects people with particular sexual tendencies then it's a crock of shit.

Happy that you asked> Get ready to feel stupid> It protects everyone including you


The Equality Act amends the 1964 Civil Rights Act to explicitly ban discrimination against people based on sexual orientation and gender identity in sectors including housing, employment, federal programs and public accommodations such as stores and even websites.
Stefanik voted yes on the Equality Act in 2019. Why does she oppo…
View attachment 463906
www.timesunion.com/news/article/Stefanik-voted-yes-on-the-Equality-Act-in-201

You just made an ass of yourself...it states that Americans who are willing to openly display their sexuality are protected by something they are already protected by.
Why are Americans in the workforce not protected from being replaced by Business Visas?
 
Every time I turn around, another law that protects everyone is superseded by a law that has to specify race and sexuality.
People who have the emotional need to display their sexuality in public are pressuring lawmakers to make them more special than heterosexuals.
 


This lady was elected. rightwinger try not to have your ears bleed out.

She's correct.
Now let's see the text of the Equality Act.
If it specifically protects people with particular sexual tendencies then it's a crock of shit.

Happy that you asked> Get ready to feel stupid> It protects everyone including you


The Equality Act amends the 1964 Civil Rights Act to explicitly ban discrimination against people based on sexual orientation and gender identity in sectors including housing, employment, federal programs and public accommodations such as stores and even websites.
Stefanik voted yes on the Equality Act in 2019. Why does she oppo…
View attachment 463906
www.timesunion.com/news/article/Stefanik-voted-yes-on-the-Equality-Act-in-201



How do you figure that Normative folks are treated equally with sexual perverts?

Did you know that although there is a Gay History Month celebrated each year, America has never celebrated Normative History? Shouldn't kids be taught about the great achievements of straights throughout history? From Adam and Eve on through to the current era, hundreds of generations of straight arrows have had their achievements demeaned.
 
equal to is not the same as supreme.

besides she's a nutter.

So you don't know what the actual outcomes would be. You're not cognizant of the outrageous violations of First-Amendment liberties and property rights this legislation portends, or cognizant of the judicial shitstorm that would arise if it were passed by the Senate and signed into law?

That's what I thought.

You hear the word equal and get a weepy, snot-stained hankey feeling. Hot damn, leftist politicians love useful idiots like you!

But, then, you in all likelihood are a rank narcissist or sociopath, so you wouldn't give a damn about the violation of others' natural rights anyway.

After all, you're a leftist, aren't you? You're a statist bootlick of collectivist, mobocratic rule, right?

^^^

conservative-victim-card-check-one-or-more-options-below-choose-32179491.png
 


This lady was elected. rightwinger try not to have your ears bleed out.

She's correct.
Now let's see the text of the Equality Act.
If it specifically protects people with particular sexual tendencies then it's a crock of shit.

Happy that you asked> Get ready to feel stupid> It protects everyone including you


The Equality Act amends the 1964 Civil Rights Act to explicitly ban discrimination against people based on sexual orientation and gender identity in sectors including housing, employment, federal programs and public accommodations such as stores and even websites.
Stefanik voted yes on the Equality Act in 2019. Why does she oppo…
View attachment 463906
www.timesunion.com/news/article/Stefanik-voted-yes-on-the-Equality-Act-in-201

You just made an ass of yourself...it states that Americans who are willing to openly display their sexuality are protected by something they are already protected by.
Why are Americans in the workforce not protected from being replaced by Business Visas?

What the fuck are you talking about? It allows YOU to "openly display"yopur sexuality as well
 

Forum List

Back
Top