What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NBC Drops Damning Info About Hunter and China That Blows up Joe's Lie

struth

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2021
Messages
21,150
Reaction score
13,105
Points
1,288
That's with our allies, retard, not our adversaries.

I know, that's the problem AG's are supposed to be independent, not the president's lawyer.


It wasn't a hoax, numbnuts.

A meeting took place at Trump Tower in New York City on June 9, 2016, between three senior members of the 2016 Trump campaignDonald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort – and at least five other people, including Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya.

The meeting was first disclosed to U.S. government officials in April 2017, when Kushner filed a revised version of his security clearance form.

Donald Trump Jr. made several misleading statements about the meeting.
He initially told the press that the meeting was held to discuss adoptions of Russian children by Americans. On July 8, 2017, after news reports stated that Trump Jr. knew the meeting was political, he admitted in a tweet that he had agreed to the meeting with the understanding that he would receive information damaging to Hillary Clinton, and that he was conducting opposition research.
When The New York Times was about to report on email exchanges between Goldstone and Trump Jr., Trump Jr. himself published the emails.
In early July 2017, it was reported that President Donald Trump himself drafted Trump Jr.'s initial misleading statement.
The report was later confirmed by the president's attorneys. In July 2018, the president denied knowledge of the meeting.

So, why did everyone lie about it?


Then what did they really say?

The missile defense shield wasn't a contract nor a treaty.

You didn't notice or just ignored the date of your link?

September 17 2009?
That was Obama's FIRST term.





As you believe Pompeo?
Trump/Russian stooge/useless idiot?
1) they weren’t an adversary…in fact they were a partner in the war o terror
2) no they aren’t, they work directly for the president..
3) yes it was. see the clinton campaign on trial They clinton campaign lied about it because they created the hoax
4) the discussed clinton’s wife’s criminal probe
5) NATO is a treaty….obama. pulled out of the organizations plans for eastern european missle defense at russia request….yes in his first term.

6) yes i believe him, and nATO…,,clearly you believe putin,
 

Smokin' OP

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2021
Messages
8,778
Reaction score
3,988
Points
938
Location
Florida
1) they weren’t an adversary…in fact they were a partner in the war o terror
WTF?
2) no they aren’t, they work directly for the president..
NO, they don't, retard.
The work for the people of the US.
3) yes it was. see the clinton campaign on trial They clinton campaign lied about it because they created the hoax
There was any hoax to create Trump tower meeting took care of that.
4) the discussed clinton’s wife’s criminal probe
Hannity's accusations AREN'T "proof".
5) NATO is a treaty….obama. pulled out of the organizations plans for eastern european missle defense at russia request….yes in his first term.
NATO didn't have any missile defense plans for Poland until 2015.

Obama wasn't referring to them anyway.

6) yes i believe him, and nATO…,,clearly you believe putin,
WTF? Weren't they our "partners"?
 

struth

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2021
Messages
21,150
Reaction score
13,105
Points
1,288
WTF?

NO, they don't, retard.
The work for the people of the US.

There was any hoax to create Trump tower meeting took care of that.

Hannity's accusations AREN'T "proof".

NATO didn't have any missile defense plans for Poland until 2015.

Obama wasn't referring to them anyway.


WTF? Weren't they our "partners"?
1) you didn’t know they were part of the war against terror?
2) no they serve at the pleasure of the president, it’s literally a cabinet position
3) not sure what you are trying to say. Yes it was a hoax, hence the trial and why they clinton campaigner lied

4) hannity? he has nothing to do with the meeting
5) no they had plans, well before 2015, that obama canceled
6) obama killed NAtO plans, weaking NAtO as part of his russian reset
7) who NATO countries? yes
 

Smokin' OP

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2021
Messages
8,778
Reaction score
3,988
Points
938
Location
Florida
1) you didn’t know they were part of the war against terror?
Really?
When did they ever send a bomb, missile or even a drone to a country , that we considered terrorist?
2) no they serve at the pleasure of the president, it’s literally a cabinet position
Correct................they don't work for the president, they advise him on US legal matters, not the president's personal, legal matters.
Like Barr did.
3) not sure what you are trying to say. Yes it was a hoax, hence the trial and why they clinton campaigner lied
Yes, they did, I can 'feel" it.
4) hannity? he has nothing to do with the meeting
He was the lying moron, who regurgitated it almost every night.
5) no they had plans, well before 2015, that obama canceled
You're FOS.............as usual.
6) obama killed NAtO plans, weaking NAtO as part of his russian reset
7) who NATO countries? yes
Again..............FOS.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$240.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top