Bull Ring nat4900: on obstructing justice being as bad as "attempting and failing" to obstruct justice

[emilynghiem]

In nat4900 's thread with the subject entitled:
"64% think attempting and failing to obstruct justice is as bad as obstructing justice"

nat4900 posted in the OP:
This latest survey (post the redacted Mueller report,) is a bit of "bad news" for Trump.....not only in his attempts to obstruct justice, but ALSO of his incompetence in such attempts.

As a reminder to the simple math challenged, Trump sycophants, 64% is almost 2 out of 3 voters.
SEE link to article included in OP at:
64% think attempting and failing to obstruct justice is as bad as obstructing justice
===================
My CHALLENGE to nat4900:
If YOU were in Trump's position facing accusations
that YOU "attempted and failed" to obstruct justice
would you ACCEPT those charges and punishment for "obstructing justice"
based on "64%" of polled people agreeing it's just as bad as obstructing justice"

Or would you CONTEST the charges and punishment,
and argue as Trump and his supporters are doing
that "attempting and failing" is NOT the same as
"obstructing justice".

My challenge to nat4900 is if you
TRULY believe these are "just as bad" as ACTUAL OBSTRUCTION
would YOU accept to face charges and punishment
for "Attempting and Failing" or would you contest
it, arguing it SHOULDN'T be treated the same?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

This latest survey (post the redacted Mueller report,) is a bit of "bad news" for Trump.....not only in his attempts to obstruct justice, but ALSO of his incompetence in such attempts.

lol...that is an admission that trump did not obstruct justice and if that is the case then muellers investigation went on unhindered and found nothing which means trump would have no reason to attempt obstruction and if he did not attempt obstruction the result would be exactly what we have now, egg faced liberals with yet another factless accusation to cover for previous factless allegations...btw
...when only 64% of liberals believe trump obstructed justice you know trump is safe

 

[emilynghiem]

This latest survey (post the redacted Mueller report,) is a bit of "bad news" for Trump.....not only in his attempts to obstruct justice, but ALSO of his incompetence in such attempts.

lol...that is an admission that trump did not obstruct justice and if that is the case then muellers investigation went on unhindered and found nothing which means trump would have no reason to attempt obstruction and if he did not attempt obstruction the result would be exactly what we have now, egg faced liberals with yet another factless accusation to cover for previous factless allegations...btw
...when only 64% of liberals believe trump obstructed justice you know trump is safe

Regardless of what Trump did or did not do,
my question to nat4900 is since Nat supports this 64% who polled
as supporting treating "attempts at obstruction or failed attempts"
the same as actual "obstruction of justice" (claiming they are "equally bad or wrong")
WOULD nat4900 AGREE TO FACE the same penalties
as "obstruction of justice" if the accusation was merely
"attempts or failed attempts at obstruction."

In other words nat4900 would you hold yourself to the same
standards you are demanding? Does this interpretation of law
you seek to apply to Trump's case also apply to YOU if you were in that situation?

OR are you only proposing such an interpretation in TRUMP'S CASE
but you would not apply to yourself. What kind of law is that, if it
only applies to other people, but you would not enforce it for yourself?

???

 

[Justin Richardson]

nat4900

All you are doing is repeating the same old crap over and over...without any substance. It's almost like you are just "running your mouth" faster than you are even typing your comments/remarks.
After reading your response, it just goes to show ....you will not stop at anything to engage in any perspicacious conversation. But you keep yakking away...Lol

 

[Oddball]

He'll show up as soon as C_Foghorn_Legorn shows for a one-on-one colloquy/debate.