Nah, they don't want to ban and confiscate guns, just the ones they want to ban and confiscate now..

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,965
52,236
2,290
And they will come back for the other ones later.......

Arizona's 'Assault Weapon' Ban Bill Is A Doozy - The Truth About Guns

Arizona Democrats have filed yet another “assault weapon” ban bill. This one is Senate Bill 1625. At first glance, with two notable stand-outs, it’s pretty much par for the gun-grabbing course; a ban on assaulty-looking guns with grandfathering.

But the first notable item is just how inclusive this bill is. All semiautomatic rifles that take detachable magazines would become “assault weapons.” And almost all rifles with fixed magazines of greater than 10-round capacity; that includes your .22LR plinker.


That latter part is because of the second notable aspect of the bill; the ban on “large capacity” magazines and the definition of such.

3. “Large capacity magazine” means any ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than ten rounds but does not include any of the following:

(a) A feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it cannot accommodate more than ten rounds.

(b) A twenty-two caliber tube ammunition feeding device.

(c) A tubular magazine that is contained in a lever action firearm.
(emphasis added)

There’s a world of difference between .22 inches and twenty-two inches; 21.78 inches, to be precise, but Democrats appear to be incapable of precision.

Just to be clear: With the exception of lever guns, all “large capacity” — 10+ rounds — would be banned. Your semiauto or bolt-action rifle with a 10+ round magazine would have to be modified of disposed of even though it isn’t an “assault weapon.”

Whew! Your mag-fed Karl-Gerät is safe. But would a revolver cylinder count as a prohibited ammunition feeding device?
 
Well, nobody is rising up against the attack on the Second Amendment. With over 300,000 private citizens owning guns in Virginia, only 22,000, thought it was important enough to show up at the Capitol in Richmond. If 100,000, a third of the gun owners had shown up, it might have made at least a visual impact on Virginia's Marxist-Leninist Socialist party running that state.
 
Well, nobody is rising up against the attack on the Second Amendment. With over 300,000 private citizens owning guns in Virginia, only 22,000, thought it was important enough to show up at the Capitol in Richmond. If 100,000, a third of the gun owners had shown up, it might have made at least a visual impact on Virginia's Marxist-Leninist Socialist party running that state.

IIRC, that particular rally was held on a Monday. Remember, conservatives actually go to work. I suspect if it had been on a Saturday or Sunday the attendance would have been much higher. Even so, 22,000 (I heard it was more around 26,000 but I digress) is no joke. A lot of people, even prominent pro-2A folks, missed something about that rally - and that is there was a 20,000+ man army standing outside that capitol building. If they had decided to march in, seize that complex and throw every one of those traitors out on their asses, there would have been NO stopping them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top