Nadler Misrepresents Mueller Testimony

longknife

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
42,221
Reaction score
13,040
Points
2,250
Location
Sin City


Of course he did. One doesn’t need FactCheck.org to know that. He claims Mueller didn’t indict the president because of DOJ guidelines. In other words, the president was guilty but got away with it due to rules.


That’s Nadler’s view of the exchange.


But, here’s what Mueller says when pressed:


Mueller: Now, before we go to questions, I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning. I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, “You didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.” That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.

In other words, they didn’t think he was guilty of anything!


More of the truth
@ Nadler Misrepresents Mueller Testimony - FactCheck.org
 
OP
longknife

longknife

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
42,221
Reaction score
13,040
Points
2,250
Location
Sin City
FactChecking the Mueller Hearings @ FactChecking the Mueller Hearings - FactCheck.org

A detailed listing of the hearings with some interesting findings. This deals with:

Trump’s Cooperation – claims he didn’t

‘Welcomed’ Help? - campaign didn’t coordinate or conspire with the Russians

The Dossier – did not start the investigation

FISA Application -

Cost of Investigation

Mueller and the FBI Job

Details @ FactChecking the Mueller Hearings - FactCheck.org

Mueller Testimony Prompts Falsehood About Fox News @ Mueller Testimony Prompts Falsehood About Fox News - FactCheck.org
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
64,105
Reaction score
8,320
Points
2,030


Of course he did. One doesn’t need FactCheck.org to know that. He claims Mueller didn’t indict the president because of DOJ guidelines. In other words, the president was guilty but got away with it due to rules.


That’s Nadler’s view of the exchange.


But, here’s what Mueller says when pressed:


Mueller: Now, before we go to questions, I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning. I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, “You didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.” That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.

In other words, they didn’t think he was guilty of anything!


More of the truth
@ Nadler Misrepresents Mueller Testimony - FactCheck.org
In other words, they didn’t consider whether he was guilty of anything! That says nothing about what they might think.
 
OP
longknife

longknife

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
42,221
Reaction score
13,040
Points
2,250
Location
Sin City


Of course he did. One doesn’t need FactCheck.org to know that. He claims Mueller didn’t indict the president because of DOJ guidelines. In other words, the president was guilty but got away with it due to rules.


That’s Nadler’s view of the exchange.


But, here’s what Mueller says when pressed:


Mueller: Now, before we go to questions, I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning. I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, “You didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.” That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.

In other words, they didn’t think he was guilty of anything!


More of the truth
@ Nadler Misrepresents Mueller Testimony - FactCheck.org
In other words, they didn’t consider whether he was guilty of anything! That says nothing about what they might think.
If he had been guilty of anything, is was their RESPONSIBILITY to refer that to the proper people in DOJ.
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
64,105
Reaction score
8,320
Points
2,030


Of course he did. One doesn’t need FactCheck.org to know that. He claims Mueller didn’t indict the president because of DOJ guidelines. In other words, the president was guilty but got away with it due to rules.


That’s Nadler’s view of the exchange.


But, here’s what Mueller says when pressed:


Mueller: Now, before we go to questions, I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning. I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, “You didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.” That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.

In other words, they didn’t think he was guilty of anything!


More of the truth
@ Nadler Misrepresents Mueller Testimony - FactCheck.org
In other words, they didn’t consider whether he was guilty of anything! That says nothing about what they might think.
If he had been guilty of anything, is was their RESPONSIBILITY to refer that to the proper people in DOJ.
They specifically declined to determine if Trump had any guilt. Not making that determination is not the same as determining he was innocent.
 

The Purge

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2018
Messages
16,560
Reaction score
4,799
Points
290


Of course he did. One doesn’t need FactCheck.org to know that. He claims Mueller didn’t indict the president because of DOJ guidelines. In other words, the president was guilty but got away with it due to rules.


That’s Nadler’s view of the exchange.


But, here’s what Mueller says when pressed:


Mueller: Now, before we go to questions, I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning. I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, “You didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.” That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.

In other words, they didn’t think he was guilty of anything!


More of the truth
@ Nadler Misrepresents Mueller Testimony - FactCheck.org
In other words, they didn’t consider whether he was guilty of anything! That says nothing about what they might think.
If he had been guilty of anything, is was their RESPONSIBILITY to refer that to the proper people in DOJ.
They specifically declined to determine if Trump had any guilt. Not making that determination is not the same as determining he was innocent.
Yes it is IDIOT. If you can't prove a crime the PRESUMPTION UNDER OUR LAW IS THAT YOU ARE INNOCENT....know nothing subversive, communist, Anti-American shill!!!#
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
64,105
Reaction score
8,320
Points
2,030


Of course he did. One doesn’t need FactCheck.org to know that. He claims Mueller didn’t indict the president because of DOJ guidelines. In other words, the president was guilty but got away with it due to rules.


That’s Nadler’s view of the exchange.


But, here’s what Mueller says when pressed:


Mueller: Now, before we go to questions, I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning. I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, “You didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.” That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.

In other words, they didn’t think he was guilty of anything!


More of the truth
@ Nadler Misrepresents Mueller Testimony - FactCheck.org
In other words, they didn’t consider whether he was guilty of anything! That says nothing about what they might think.
If he had been guilty of anything, is was their RESPONSIBILITY to refer that to the proper people in DOJ.
They specifically declined to determine if Trump had any guilt. Not making that determination is not the same as determining he was innocent.
Yes it is IDIOT. If you can't prove a crime the PRESUMPTION UNDER OUR LAW IS THAT YOU ARE INNOCENT....know nothing subversive, communist, Anti-American shill!!!#
Nope. They specifically said they didn't make that determination.
 

The Purge

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2018
Messages
16,560
Reaction score
4,799
Points
290


Of course he did. One doesn’t need FactCheck.org to know that. He claims Mueller didn’t indict the president because of DOJ guidelines. In other words, the president was guilty but got away with it due to rules.


That’s Nadler’s view of the exchange.


But, here’s what Mueller says when pressed:


Mueller: Now, before we go to questions, I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning. I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said, and I quote, “You didn’t charge the president because of the OLC opinion.” That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime.

In other words, they didn’t think he was guilty of anything!


More of the truth
@ Nadler Misrepresents Mueller Testimony - FactCheck.org
In other words, they didn’t consider whether he was guilty of anything! That says nothing about what they might think.
If he had been guilty of anything, is was their RESPONSIBILITY to refer that to the proper people in DOJ.
They specifically declined to determine if Trump had any guilt. Not making that determination is not the same as determining he was innocent.
Yes it is IDIOT. If you can't prove a crime the PRESUMPTION UNDER OUR LAW IS THAT YOU ARE INNOCENT....know nothing subversive, communist, Anti-American shill!!!#
Nope. They specifically said they didn't make that determination.
And BY LAW THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO MAKE THAT DETERMINATION IF NO CRIME IS SPELLED OUT...WHICH IT WAS ...YOU keep getting dumber!
 

wamose

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
4,014
Reaction score
1,650
Points
350
Location
Pennsylvania
Nadler can't be trusted. He lies and exaggerates about everything. I doubt if his own family believes anything he says. If I didn't know better I would have thought his last name was Clinton. But the Democrats obviously feel he's leadership material. Over here we call a guy like that a peckerhead. Viva Trump
 

Zorro!

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2019
Messages
7,221
Reaction score
997
Points
245

BREAKING… Rep. Devin Nunes: We May Need to Call Dirty Bob Robert Mueller Back in to Testify on Ukraine

DNC collusion with the former Ukrainian regime.

Rep. Devin Nunes: This is the sequel, the Ukrainian hoax and I don’t think it’s going to be any better than the Russian hoax… We’ve always been interested in the origins of the Russian hoax. And if you go back to the Steele dossier it originated in Ukraine. If you believe their sources it originated in Ukraine… Now remember, we may have to bring Bob Mueller out of retirement here. Because Bob Mueller looked at all of this. He knew that the Clinton Campaign, Christopher Steele, Fusion GPS, other DNC contractors like Chalupa. Those are all Democrats. Those are all Americans except for one Brit.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Top