Minnesota Correctional Officers File Discrimination Lawsuit From Being Banned From Guarding Derek Chauvin

The cause of death was COVID and Fentanyl overdose.
You are an idiot if you believe that.
George Floyd was murdered by the police.


Apparently, you are unfamiliar with the idea of "autopsy"?

When someone dies of suspicious circumstances, unexpectedly, the coroner hauls the corpus into morgue and slices it and dices it, doing chemical tests, etc, examining the body for signs of abuse. Mr. Floyd was loaded to the gills on Fentanyl and was positive for COVID 19- the deadly virus.

Just the facts, BB.
 
The cause of death was COVID and Fentanyl overdose.
You are an idiot if you believe that.
George Floyd was murdered by the police.


Apparently, you are unfamiliar with the idea of "autopsy"?

When someone dies of suspicious circumstances, unexpectedly, the coroner hauls the corpus into morgue and slices it and dices it, doing chemical tests, etc, examining the body for signs of abuse. Mr. Floyd was loaded to the gills on Fentanyl and was positive for COVID 19- the deadly virus.

Just the facts, BB.
If that cop had not had his knee on George Floyds neck for 8:46 he would not be dead. FACT.
 
The cause of death was COVID and Fentanyl overdose.
You are an idiot if you believe that.
George Floyd was murdered by the police.


Apparently, you are unfamiliar with the idea of "autopsy"?

When someone dies of suspicious circumstances, unexpectedly, the coroner hauls the corpus into morgue and slices it and dices it, doing chemical tests, etc, examining the body for signs of abuse. Mr. Floyd was loaded to the gills on Fentanyl and was positive for COVID 19- the deadly virus.

Just the facts, BB.
If that cop had not had his knee on George Floyds neck for 8:46 he would not be dead. FACT.


It isn't a "FACT" until the Minnesota prosecutors prove that beyond a reasonable doubt to 12 Angry men.

And I don't see that as very likely.
 
The fact that these correctional officers are so interested in guarding this particular individual that they have brought it into court tells me that they have a particular beef with him and that's reason enough not to allow the guards near Inmate Chauvin.

Its the warden's job to protect all of the prisoners under his control and bring them to court in one piece.

The warden is doing the right thing to protect the institution from legal problems if anything were to happen to Chauvin.


As far as the other officer, he made it to court, so whoever was assigned to guard him did the right thing. It worked out.

Yes, the warden did the right thing.

The protection of the defendant should be the main concern.

In such a racially charged case, only Caucasian guards should be assigned to protect him.

The warden should be commended for his courage in making such a decision.

But I am afraid that it is going to cost him his job or at least a reassignment.
Yea, you know how those non-white officers can't be trusted to do the right thing


The warden knows his staff, as well as the community a lot better than I do. If you were a black correctional officer , would you want to go back into your community if you didn't take vengeance on the man accused of killing Black Hero George Floyd when you had a chance?
A correction officer doesn't have to take vengeance; all he has to do is look the other way, or allow himself to be distracted while racist inmates do the job. It seems from what I've read our prisons are cesspools of racism, between the Crips and Bloods, the Mexican Mafia and the White Supremacists there is little middle ground for anyone.
 

"Eight minority correctional officers at a Minnesota county jail filed a racial discrimination lawsuit claiming they were barred from guarding the former Minneapolis police officer charged in George Floyd's death. The suit, filed Tuesday in state district court, alleges that a superintendent at the Ramsey County Adult Detention Center reassigned officers of color to another floor when the former officer, Derek Chauvin, was arrested on murder charges in May. The suit says the officers — who identify as African American, Hispanic, Pacific Islander and mixed-race — were "segregated and prevented from doing their jobs by defendant solely because of the color of their skin."

This was a pretty smart move by the superintendent -- you can't trust non-white officers to do their jobs professionally; obviously this system has been historically racist with regards to how it treats white defendants in our criminal justice system. It is bad enough we even have to hire correction officers who are non-white -- but they should definitely not be guarding white offenders.

View attachment 455766
Which reminds me......that Minnesota cop who murdered Justine Damond in cold blood -- does that guy only get guarded by non-white officers or does it not work that way??
OK you got reassigned why would you sue unless you did have an ax to grind?
 
The fact that these correctional officers are so interested in guarding this particular individual that they have brought it into court tells me that they have a particular beef with him and that's reason enough not to allow the guards near Inmate Chauvin.

Its the warden's job to protect all of the prisoners under his control and bring them to court in one piece.

The warden is doing the right thing to protect the institution from legal problems if anything were to happen to Chauvin.


As far as the other officer, he made it to court, so whoever was assigned to guard him did the right thing. It worked out.t
Yup, because if the officers were not white -- he would have been killed for sure....

As was Dylan Roof, Michael Dunn, Amber Guyger, oh wait!
Dylan Roof didn't kill anyone, dumb ass.
Amber Guyger?Anyone that buys that load of bullshit is an idiot. Guyger was involved in drug dealing and procured those drugs by shaking down low hanging fruit drug dealers and Amber was afraid that Botham Jean was either stealing from her or was a narc. You really are stupid and naive.
 
There is no discrimination. The guards did not lose their jobs. They were not denied a promotion. They suffered no loss.. There is no right to guard particular prisoners. Once incarcerated the safety of the inmate is more important than the feelings of the guards.
 
There is no discrimination. The guards did not lose their jobs. They were not denied a promotion. They suffered no loss.. There is no right to guard particular prisoners. Once incarcerated the safety of the inmate is more important than the feelings of the guards.


Who the hell would want to be guarding such a high profile individual and have to take the heat if something happened to him?

Guards being excused from watching Chauvin would seem to be receiving a choice assignment.
 
There is no discrimination. The guards did not lose their jobs. They were not denied a promotion. They suffered no loss.. There is no right to guard particular prisoners. Once incarcerated the safety of the inmate is more important than the feelings of the guards.


Who the hell would want to be guarding such a high profile individual and have to take the heat if something happened to him?

Guards being excused from watching Chauvin would seem to be receiving a choice assignment.
It depends on how much the guards guarding Jeffrey Epstein got paid to fall asleep.
 

Forum List

Back
Top