Military Absentee Ballots Delivered One Day Late, Would Have Swung Election For Romne

[Wehrwolfen]

Military Absentee Ballots Delivered One Day Late, Would Have Swung Election For Romney​

by drew
November 7, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC – Sources confirmed today that hundreds of thousands of military absentee ballots were delivered hours after the deadline for them to be counted, with preliminary counts showing that they would have overturned the vote in several states and brought a victory for Governor Mitt Romney.

Officials say the ballots were delivered late due to problems within the military mail system. Tracking invoices show the ballots sat in a warehouse for a month, then they were accidentally labeled as ammunition and shipped to Afghanistan. At Camp Dwyer, Marine Sergeant John Davis signed for them and was surprised at the contents.

“I told Gunny we got a bunch of ballots instead of ammo,” Davis told investigators earlier today. “He told me to file a report of improper delivery and that the chain of command would take care of it. We didn’t hear anything for three weeks. While we were waiting we came under fire so we dumped a bunch of them in the Hescoes. We didn’t dig those ones back out.”

After military officials realized the initial error, the ballots were then sent back to the U.S. but suffered a series of setbacks.
.

[excerpt of SATIRE]

Read more:
Military Absentee Ballots Delivered One Day Late, Would Have Swung Election For Romney | The Duffel Blog

 

[AmyNation]

*subscribed*

 

[del]

the stupid is strong in this one

 

[BallsBrunswick]

Finally a right-wing military satire blog cracked the Obama code.

 

[Photonic]

I wonder when they realize that this is basically the Onion for the Military, will they admit to their mistake, or try to make a point out of this satire publication?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

the stupid is strong in this one

It's absolutely Ravi in it's imbecility!

 

[del]

I wonder when they realize that this is basically the Onion for the Military, will they admit to their mistake, or try to make a point out of this satire publication?

this is the third thread with this as the OP