Michigan AG Attempts Felony Intimidation of #DetroitLeaks Witness in Trump Federal Lawsuit on Mail-In Ballot Challengers

[munkle]

I'd post the #DetroitLeaks Youtube but it's just gong to disappear, so why bother. If you want here is an MP4 you can watch. This kicks it up a notch. Intimidation of witnesses. Judges really REALLY don't like that because now you are effing with THEM.

Michigan AG Attempts Felony Intimidation of #DetroitLeaks Witness in Trump Federal Lawsuit on Mail-In Ballot Challengers

Michigan AG Attempts Felony Intimidation of #DetroitLeaks Witness in Trump Federal Lawsuit on Mail-In Ballot Challengers

In an egregious attempt to silence a reporter and witness for the Trump legal team, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has sent a letter to a reporter threatening “criminal prosecution” if he did not remove an audio of a poll worker training session, in which the instructor tells workers to interfere with mail-in ballot watchers’ legal prerogatives to challenge mail-in ballots. The audio evidence, if authenticated, directly supports allegations being made in Trump’s Michigan lawsuits, of election interference.
Intimidation or attempted intimidation of a witness in a federal case is a felony. The audio has come to be known as the #DetroitLeaks.

Mail-in ballot processes and procedures have taken center stage in this election, as Trump was leading in almost all key swing states until mail-in ballots began to be counted, and in some states huge batches came out a mathematically impossible 100% for Biden..

The Trump campaign has charged, in multiple lawsuits including one filed today, that mail-in ballot challengers in Michigan were not allowed to do their jobs, by being told to stand six feet away from poll workers and ballots so that they could not discern the markings.

The Trump legal team is now asking the court to block certification of the results,

On the first lawsuit filed last Wednesday, and since dismissed, MLive reported:

​

“The lawsuit…alleges some election trainers have explicitly told workers they should keep challengers 6 feet away and to call 911 if they don’t oblige.”​

​

​

In the #DetroitLeaks audio, asked by trainees what to do if any of the observers challenge the rules or process, the instructor says more than once to call police at 911 and have them removed.

As can be heard in the audio and as reported in Big League Politics, the instructor says:

​

“9-1-1. They got standards. They got conduct standards. They make a scene, get them up out of there. Call the police on them,”​

​

In the training session audio which Attorney General Nessel seeks to squelch, the trainer can be heard warning the trainees of conservative legal challengers to mail-in ballots, and telling the trainees to keep them six feet away, even if they are wearing masks. From that distance, it would be impossible for anyone except those with the keenest eyesight to discern the ballots, which is the prerogative of ballot challengers.

As reported in Big League Politics, and as can be heard in the audio:

​

“In a response to a question, the instructor said that the Trump supporters are coming to primarily challenge absentee ballots during election day.”​

​

“They’re coming. I don’t know if they’re coming to every precinct, but they’re coming to many of them in the city, yes. We have already gotten word. The state has already said they’re coming,” the trainer said.”​

The Michigan AG, through a letter signed by an Assistant Attorney General, Danielle Hagman-Clark, demanded the reporter pull the audio down from the Internet or face criminal prosecution, image below. The letter has been authenticated by Reason Magazine.

MORE >>>

Michigan AG Attempts Felony Intimidation of #DetroitLeaks Witness in Trump Federal Lawsuit

In an egregious attempt to silence a reporter and witness for the Trump legal team, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has sent a letter to a reporter threatening “criminal prosecution&#82…

evidence2020.wordpress.com

What are ya gonna believe? Your lying ears
I thought it was already banned from YouTube

Spread it far and wide

#DETROITLEAKS: State Employees Train Poll Workers to Lie to Voters, Destroy Ballots, Stop Challenger

This is the video that has been aggressively censored by Big Tech. Twitter has repeatedly blocked it from being posted and Google had it removed from YouTube. Please share this video and become a poll challenger for election day: DefendYourBallot.co…

www.bitchute.com

Assuming recording is true---this "instructor" needs to be publically flogged and hanged.

It was already accepted as unchallenged evidence in the first Michigan lawsuit, or the AG would have been screaming fake. It's authentic.

 

[munkle]

Man this board is smoking hot today.

 

[munkle]

The #DetroitLeaks. Bitchute backup MP4-file-download

Shocking election interference.

 

[Zorro!]

The #DetroitLeaks. Bitchute backup MP4-file-download

Shocking election interference.

Trump's down by 146,000 votes in Michigan, and I don't see anything coming even close to reversing Trump's lead.

The city of Detroit has responded to allegations of mishandling by explaining that the complainants don’t understand election law or procedures. This hasn’t been settled by the judge yet, but the responses to allegations of fraud make the complaints look pretty threadbare:

The City of Detroit filed a response in a related state case. It discusses some of the issues the Republican poll watchers observed, and basically says the things they thought were suspicious were the process working as it was supposed to, which they didn't understand.

For example, the city says there was nothing fishy about using 1/1/1900 birthdates in pollbook entries because the system required the use of a birthdate and that's their standard placeholder.

Basically, Detroit says the things Republican poll watchers thought were evidence of fraud were actually things they just misunderstood.

Actually, that's exactly what Detroit is saying: "Most of the objections raised in the submitted affidavits are grounded in an extraordinary failure to understand how elections function."

Another Michigan lawsuit last Thursday … and it didn’t work out well for Team Trump:

The transcript of this discussion in court, has the Trump team trying to argue that it wasn’t hearsay when their witness had never personally seen any illegal activity but had been told about it:

STEPHENS: I absolutely understand what the affiant says she heard someone say to her. But the truth of the matter … that you’re going for was that there was an illegal act occurring. Because other than that I don’t know what its relevancy is.

HEARNE: Right. I would say, Your Honor, in terms of the hearsay point, this is a firsthand factual statement made by Ms. Connarn, and she has made that statement based on her own firsthand physical evidence and knowledge —

STEPHENS: “I heard somebody else say something.” Tell me why that’s not hearsay. Come on, now.

HEARNE: Well it’s a firsthand statement of her physical –

STEPHENS: It’s an out-of-court statement offered where the truth of the matter is [at-issue], right?

After Stephens dismissed the case, Trump’s legal team moved for reconsideration. Unfortunately, their submission was “defective,” as it didn’t include the necessary supporting evidence:

Oof.

So far, Team Trump isn’t finding much evidence of widespread mishandling of the voting process, let alone fraud on the scale that would lead to a victory in MI.

There is still time to find and fight fraud on that level before states have to certify their election results. Perhaps filings in the next couple of days will offer more promising challenges.

 

[Zorro!]

Vile Scum Left Wing Michigan Nazi AG Calls For Criminal Charges Against GOP Certifiers Who Won't 'Fall In Line'

Jonathan Turley,

We have been discussing the campaign of The Lincoln Project and others to harass and abuse lawyers who represent the Trump campaign or other parties bringing election challenges. Similar campaigns have targeted election officials who object to counting irregularities. Now, the Michigan Attorney General and others are suggesting that Republicans who oppose certification or even meet with President Donald Trump on the issue could be criminally investigated or charged. Once again, the complicit fake news Nazi media is silent on this clearly abusive use of the criminal code target members of the opposing party in their raising objections under state law.

Fascist Leftwing Nazi Scum

On Friday afternoon, leaders of Michigan’s Republican-controlled state legislature merely met with Trump in the White House at his invitation. There is virtually no path for him to trigger an electoral college fight. However, the objections from legislators could focus on an host of sworn complaints from voters or irregularities in voting counts. Healthy skepticism of the sweeping claims made by some Trump lawyers is in order as is criticism of Rudy Giuliani’s global communist conspiracy claim at the press conference this week. It also goes without saying that State legislators have every right to raise electoral objections and seek resolution in the legislative branch.

According to the Fake News Nazi Propagandist Washington Post, Dana Nessel “is conferring with election law "experts" on whether officials may have violated any state laws prohibiting them from engaging in bribery, perjury and conspiracy.” It is same weaponization of the criminal code for political purposes that we have seen in the last four years against Trump. Notably, the focus is the same discredited interpretation used against Trump and notably not adopted by the impeachment-eager House Judiciary Committee: bribery.

In Politico, Nazi Scum Richard Primus wrote that these legislators should not attend a meeting with Trump because “it threatens the two Michigan legislators, personally, with the risk of criminal investigation.”

This ridiculous legal claims is based on the lying Nazi bribery theory:

The danger for Shirkey and Chatfield, then, is that they are being visibly invited to a meeting where the likely agenda involves the felony of attempting to bribe a public official.

This Left Wing Nazi asshole is mind-reading and then declaring crimes based on nothing more than this fact free mindreading.

Under Michigan law, any member of the Legislature who “corruptly” accepts a promise of some beneficial act in return for exercising his authority in a certain way is “forever disqualified to hold any public office” and “shall be guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison not more than 10 years[.]”

This Left Wing Nazi Asshole wants to put State Legislators in prison for meeting with the President, because he doesn't "approve" of the president.

This is the same Nazi Leftwing Propaganda spewed during the Trump presidency. A leading Left Wing Nazi proponent has been former prosecutor and Fake News Washington Post columnist Randall D. Eliason, who insisted he could criminize view point differences: that “allegations of a wrongful quid pro quo are really just another way of saying that there was a bribe … it’s bribery if a quid pro quo is sought with corrupt intent, if the president is not pursuing legitimate U.S. policy but instead is wrongfully demanding actions by Ukraine that would benefit him personally.” Left Wing Nazi Scum Eliason further endorsed the House report and assured that “The legal and factual analysis of bribery and honest services fraud in the House report is exactly right” and “outlines compelling evidence of federal criminal violations.” How does a vile left wing Nazi Asshole like this ever obtain the authority to be a Federal Prosecutor?

Thos Leftwing Nazi asshole's theory was never “exactly” or even remotely right, as evidenced by the decision not to use it as a basis for impeachment. And yet, it’s back. Indeed, the greatest danger of the theory was not that it would ever pass muster in the federal court system but that it would be used (as here) in the political system to criminalize policy and legal disagreements. (Leftwing Nazi Asshole Eliason recently defended the attacks on fellow lawyers who are represented those challenging election results or practices, even though he lives in a legal system so dedicated to the principle that all deserve legal representation, that top level US Criminal Lawyers represented Gitmo terrorists for free, and our first Vice president and second President defended British soldiers against murder charges, not because he sympathized with them, or even agreed with them, but on the principle that effective legal representation was a basic human right that he recognized even for our enemies. That's the difference between our system and Left wing Nazi Assholes.

IThis Left wing Nazi asshole of a former federal prosecutors theory was never credible. While it was gleefully presented by papers like the Fake News Nazi Propagandist Washington Post, it ignored case law that rejected precisely this type of limitless definition of the offense. The Supreme Court has repeatedly narrowed the scope of the statutory definition of bribery, including distinctions with direct relevance to the current controversy in cases like McDonnell v. United States, where the Court overturned the conviction of former Virginia governor Robert McDonnell. Chief Justice John Roberts eviscerated the “boundless interpretation of the federal bribery statute.” The Court explained the such “boundless interpretations” are inimical to constitutional rights because they deny citizens the notice of what acts are presumptively criminal: “Under the Government’s interpretation, the term ‘official act’ is not defined ‘with sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited,’ or ‘in a manner that does not encourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement.’” In other words, these Left Wing Nazi Assholes are proponents of tyranny.

The shear volume of cases rejecting this type of broad interpretation did not matter then and it does not matter now to these Left wing Nazi assholes who believe that the criminal code is endlessly flexible to meet the evil political agenda of criminalizing disagreement.

It doesn’t even matter that the Supreme Court reaffirmed prior rejections of such broad interpretations in a recent unanimous ruling written by Justice Elena Kagan. In Kelly v. United States, the Supreme Court threw out the convictions in the “Bridgegate” case involving the controversial closing of lanes on the George Washington Bridge to create traffic problems for the mayor of Fort Lee, N.J., who refused to endorse then-Gov. Chris Christie. The Court observed:

“That requirement, this Court has made clear, prevents these statutes from criminalizing all acts of dishonesty by state and local officials. Some decades ago, courts of appeals often construed the federal fraud laws to “proscribe schemes to defraud citizens of their intangible rights to honest and impartial government.” McNally, 483 U. S., at 355. This Court declined to go along. The fraud statutes, we held in McNally, were “limited in scope to the protection of property rights.” Id., at 360. They did not authorize federal prosecutors to “set standards of disclosure and good government for local and state officials.”

What is most disturbing is that, if there was an objection to voting irregularities or fraud, these legislators would be acting under their state constitutional authority. They would be investigated for carrying out their official duties under state law. Many of us can disagree with such objections. However, when Democrats like Sen. Barbara Boxer (D., Cal.) challenged the certification of Ohio’s electoral votes in 2004, no one suggested criminal investigations. Left wing Nazi Scum Asshole Nessel is threatening state legislators that, if they meet to discuss such objections, they may be targets of criminal investigations. This is an effort to use the criminal code for the purposes of intimidation or coercion. Imagine if this was U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr threatening Democratic legislators with possible criminal investigation for challenging Trump votes. The media would be apoplectic. Yet, when used against Republicans, major publications and politicians are celebrated for the use of the criminal code for such politically motivated threats.

As with the attacks on Republican lawyers, the threats against Republican legislators has been met with utter silence in the Fake News Nazi media. Just the familiar sound of crickets.