Miami abortion clinic owner threw live baby away, prosecutors say

[KMAN]

Miami abortion clinic owner threw live baby away, prosecutors say -- South Florida Sun-Sentinel.com

 

[CaféAuLait]

This is sick. Not only should the place lose its license and the "nurse" and doctor jailed but the mother who is SUING (of course what else) the mother who is suing named her aborted baby and was horrified to see the baby what did she expect?

Even if it were not "botched" as she claims-- she would have still seen the baby-- wouldn't she have?

This baby was treated like garbage by the nurse and its mother they both deserve jail and nothing less. The mother had a voice--- she could have stopped that nurse-- and I don't want to hear shit about age… She got herself pregnant managed to find a abortion center to perform the abortion center of some sort and fuck it fuck it all.

This is just as bad as that piece I read in the NY Times where the author ( one of their staff writers) ask me to have pity for her because she was forced to have a late term abortion at 8 months because her baby was not healthy. FUCK HER what about the pain that baby felt when the doctor killed him??????


LATE term abortions should be considered murder. You want me to convict and give the death penalty to a person for killing an unborn fetus/ baby past a certain age then the same should apply across the board-- not ony when Mom feels it is okay.

/ rant for now

 

[Missourian]

(President) Obama… “refused as an Illinois state senator to support legislation to protect babies who survived late-term abortions because he did not want to concede — as he explained in a cold-blooded speech on the Illinois Senate floor — that these babies, fully outside their mothers’ wombs, with their hearts beating and lungs heaving, were in fact “persons.” [2]

<More>

President Obama argued against protecting living babies in the Illinois Senate three times

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2060118/posts

At issue is Obama's opposition to Illinois legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that would have defined any aborted fetus that showed signs of life as a "born alive infant" entitled to legal protection, even if doctors believe it could not survive.

Obama opposed the 2001 and 2002 "born alive" bills as back door attacks on a woman's legal right to abortion, but he says he would have been "fully in support" of a similar federal bill that President Bush had signed in 2002, because it contained protections for Roe v. Wade.

We find that, as the NRLC said in a recent statement, Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committee's 2003 mark-up session.

<More>

And then lied about it during the presidential campaign.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obama_and_infanticide.html

So don't expect any 'change' in his position on throwing live babies in the garbage or allowing them to die alone and uncared for in a filthy back room at the hospital or clinic.

 

[CaféAuLait]

(President) Obama… “refused as an Illinois state senator to support legislation to protect babies who survived late-term abortions because he did not want to concede — as he explained in a cold-blooded speech on the Illinois Senate floor — that these babies, fully outside their mothers’ wombs, with their hearts beating and lungs heaving, were in fact “persons.” [2]

<More>

President Obama argued against protecting living babies in the Illinois Senate three times

What Barack Obama defended three times: Live Birth Abortion

At issue is Obama's opposition to Illinois legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that would have defined any aborted fetus that showed signs of life as a "born alive infant" entitled to legal protection, even if doctors believe it could not survive.

Obama opposed the 2001 and 2002 "born alive" bills as back door attacks on a woman's legal right to abortion, but he says he would have been "fully in support" of a similar federal bill that President Bush had signed in 2002, because it contained protections for Roe v. Wade.

We find that, as the NRLC said in a recent statement, Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committee's 2003 mark-up session.

<More>

And then lied about it during the presidential campaign.

FactCheck.org: Obama and 'Infanticide'

So don't expect any 'change' in his position on throwing live babies in the garbage or allowing them to die alone and uncared for in a filthy back room at the hospital or clinic.

The double speak is amazing!

The statement was still on Obama's Web site as of this writing, Aug. 25, long after Obama had accused his detractors of "lying." But Obama's claim is wrong. In fact, by the time the HHS Committee voted on the bill, it did contain language identical to the federal act.

 

[Alpha1]

Look at the bright side....it probably would have grown up to be a Democrat....