Meta verse face criticism over suicide porn - they dont care

[Tommy Tainant]

Molly Russell: Instagram posts seen by teen were safe, Meta says

The 14-year-old girl viewed material about self-harm and suicide before she took her own life.

www.bbc.co.uk

Molly Russell was a 14 year old girl who killed herself after viewing "distreessing" images and content on instagram

Metas director of wellbeing has been on the witness stand all week .at the inquest into her death.

Basically the response is that they dont give a fuck.

These companies make billions and yet do nothing to protect vulnerable kids from the content that they host.

Movies are age rated to protect kids but they can access any old shit online. Things need to change to protect our kids.

Zuckerberg and his mates have had ample time to make the changes and now its time for govt to take a hand.

 

[Votto]

Molly Russell: Instagram posts seen by teen were safe, Meta says

The 14-year-old girl viewed material about self-harm and suicide before she took her own life.

www.bbc.co.uk

Molly Russell was a 14 year old girl who killed herself after viewing "distreessing" images and content on instagram

Metas director of wellbeing has been on the witness stand all week .at the inquest into her death.

Basically the response is that they dont give a fuck.

These companies make billions and yet do nothing to protect vulnerable kids from the content that they host.

Movies are age rated to protect kids but they can access any old shit online. Things need to change to protect our kids.

Zuckerberg and his mates have had ample time to make the changes and now its time for govt to take a hand.

All you have to do Tommy is tie this into MAGA and January 6th

Next thing you know those people will all be in jail and their web sites taken down

The government does not care about children, just democrat power.

 

[odanny]

All you have to do Tommy is tie this into MAGA and January 6th

Next thing you know those people will all be in jail and their web sites taken down

The government does not care about children, just democrat power.

Shut up, stupid.

Sad that social media is a facilitator of self harm to the most vulnerable in society.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

All you have to do Tommy is tie this into MAGA and January 6th

Next thing you know those people will all be in jail and their web sites taken down

The government does not care about children, just democrat power.

There is no link between this event and the trump conspiracy. I think you are just trolling.
I would have thought that the death of our children would concern all of us. It isnt a partisan issue.

 

[Votto]

There is no link between this event and the trump conspiracy. I think you are just trolling.
I would have thought that the death of our children would concern all of us. It isnt a partisan issue.

Death of our children?

You mean abortion on demand, even up to a viable term?

You mean Fentanyl made to look like candy pouring across the border?

You mean all the suicide rates among children that have skyrocketed after the Marxists closed down schools and made children wear masks?

That kind of concern for children?

 

[Baron Von Murderpaws]

WHERE do you find this shit?

Anybody can find anything on the internet at any time they want.

If this kid offed herself, then thats ALL on the parents for not limiting her usage of the internet or social media, much less putting parental controls on everything.

 

[Vastator]

Molly Russell: Instagram posts seen by teen were safe, Meta says

The 14-year-old girl viewed material about self-harm and suicide before she took her own life.

www.bbc.co.uk

Movies are age rated to protect kids but they can access any old shit online. Things need to change to protect our kids.

It's called parenting...

 

[Votto]

Shut up, stupid.

Sad that social media is a facilitator of self harm to the most vulnerable in society.

Why is it the government will censor anyone questioning a vaccine or election result instantly, but allow children to go on such websites to kill themselves?

Why?

Because government is all about depopulation

What other reason is there?

These are your people running this hell hole you call a country.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

There are some fucking loons on the right. All on this thread.
I am shocked that they have found omething that they dont want to censor.
But maybe i shouldnt be. They have no interest in protecting kids in school so why worry about kids being abused online.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Zuckerberg and his mates have had ample time to make the changes and now its time for govt to take a hand.

No, it's not.

It’s neither the role nor responsibility of government to dictate content to private social media – that’s the stuff of autocratic dictatorships.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Molly Russell: Instagram posts seen by teen were safe, Meta says

The 14-year-old girl viewed material about self-harm and suicide before she took her own life.

www.bbc.co.uk

Molly Russell was a 14 year old girl who killed herself after viewing "distreessing" images and content on instagram

Metas director of wellbeing has been on the witness stand all week .at the inquest into her death.

Basically the response is that they dont give a fuck.

These companies make billions and yet do nothing to protect vulnerable kids from the content that they host.

Movies are age rated to protect kids but they can access any old shit online. Things need to change to protect our kids.

Zuckerberg and his mates have had ample time to make the changes and now its time for govt to take a hand.

Meh. At least those movies didn't support Trump or Conservatives

 

[Votto]

There are some fucking loons on the right. All on this thread.
I am shocked that they have found omething that they dont want to censor.
But maybe i shouldnt be. They have no interest in protecting kids in school so why worry about kids being abused online.

What you want is to censor the entire web for your Left wing political goons.

Well guess what, they already do. That is my point

And guess what, they don't care about children.

They do whatever the hell they want, and then some

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Molly Russell: Instagram posts seen by teen were safe, Meta says

The 14-year-old girl viewed material about self-harm and suicide before she took her own life.

www.bbc.co.uk

Molly Russell was a 14 year old girl who killed herself after viewing "distreessing" images and content on instagram

Metas director of wellbeing has been on the witness stand all week .at the inquest into her death.

Basically the response is that they dont give a fuck.

These companies make billions and yet do nothing to protect vulnerable kids from the content that they host.

Movies are age rated to protect kids but they can access any old shit online. Things need to change to protect our kids.

Zuckerberg and his mates have had ample time to make the changes and now its time for govt to take a hand.

Everyone hates social media.

Conservatives hate social media because social media refuse to accommodate rightwing racism, bigotry, lies, misinformation, and hate speech.

Liberals hate social media because social media aren’t doing enough to address rightwing racism, bigotry, lies, misinformation, and hate speech.

Both want government to ‘do something’ – both are wrong.

It’s as if the Framers ratified the First Amendment in anticipation of social media.

 

[Votto]

Everyone hates social media.

Conservatives hate social media because social media refuse to accommodate rightwing racism, bigotry, lies, misinformation, and hate speech.

Liberals hate social media because social media aren’t doing enough to address rightwing racism, bigotry, lies, misinformation, and hate speech.

Both want government to ‘do something’ – both are wrong.

It’s as if the Framers ratified the First Amendment in anticipation of social media.

But it is only the Left who controls social media

Funny that.

What exactly does the right want again?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

No, it's not.

It’s neither the role nor responsibility of government to dictate content to private social media – that’s the stuff of autocratic dictatorships.

It absolutely is the job of govt.Why have any safety legislation at all if that is the case ?
Let them pollute everything and kill us all. I would say that is the primary role of govt.
These companies have no safeguards at all.

I am not about banning stuff, just protecting kids . Like we do with movies. That is not a controversial opinion.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

What you want is to censor the entire web for your Left wing political goons.

Well guess what, they already do. That is my point

And guess what, they don't care about children.

They do whatever the hell they want, and then some

Where have I said that ? I want to make the net safer for kids. That could be done very easily without harming free speech.

 

[Votto]

It absolutely is the job of govt.Why have any safety legislation at all if that is the case ?
Let them pollute everything and kill us all. I would say that is the primary role of govt.
These companies have no safeguards at all.

I am not about banning stuff, just protecting kids . Like we do with movies. That is not a controversial opinion.

Once Facebook, Twitter, and the rest of social media starting censoring for Joe Biden and the democrat party, it was explained to me that they could because they were a private organization

But rest assured, if they were censoring for Trump government would never go along with it Just look at a private entity that is a baker that must bake a cake for gay weddings. Funny how being a private entity no longer allows you to discriminate against people all of a sudden.

So long as corporate American sells their souls to the Marxists, they will be allowed to do as they please

No one cares.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

But it is only the Left who controls social media

Funny that.

What exactly does the right want again?

The First Amendment reflects the wisdom of the Framers.

The Framers knew that there would be private speech and speakers so unpopular and despised that many would seek to subject unpopular speech to government regulation or even government preemption.

Clearly social media are universally unpopular and despised; but however unpopular and despised they might be, they remain at liberty to edit their content as they see fit, safeguarded from unwarranted and unlawful government interference by the First Amendment.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I am not about banning stuff, just protecting kids

Clearly it is.

The only way to ‘protect’ kids is to preempt and ban content on social media through authoritarian government excess and overreach at the expense of a free press.

No one is saying nothing should be done; certainly solutions need to be explored to address the problem – but government interference isn’t a viable solution.

 

[Darkwind]

Everyone hates social media.

Conservatives hate social media because social media refuse to accommodate rightwing racism, bigotry, lies, misinformation, and hate speech.

Liberals hate social media because social media aren’t doing enough to address rightwing racism, bigotry, lies, misinformation, and hate speech.

Both want government to ‘do something’ – both are wrong.

It’s as if the Framers ratified the First Amendment in anticipation of social media.

Racism, bigotry, lies, misinformation, and hate speech come from the left. Just own it.