Merrick Garland is a Lunatic

[DGS49]

The search warrant was absurdly broad, and "we" absolutely need to see the affidavit that supported it. The search warrant authorized a search of every cubic inch of the residence, searching for any evidence of anything.

Note the operative wording of the Fourth Amendment: "...particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized..."[!].

Regardless of your political leanings or feelings about DJT, this raid was a Constitutional outrage, and heads need to roll.

I'll say it again: If they indict Trump based on this bullshit, there will really be an insurrection. With guns this time. January 6th will look like a block party.

 

[j-mac]

And yet, you won't be able to provide evidence of that. I've said the same thing about this case all the way through.

You guys are too sensitive.

My opinion of you is irrelevant, and I need not prove to you anything…The thread now effectively disappeared by being merged to a thread with a different OP, and possibly premise is just more proof that your lack of being able to articulate your own position beyond the grade school level of “you can’t prove that about me” is laughable…

Same goes for the mod who decided to disappear my thread. The same mods will let threads attacking Trump or supporters stand alone even when there’s 25 of them running, but choose this one?

Tipping one’s hand is not new.

 

[Indeependent]

perhaps, but Garland who is a good guy is really not on the ball.
I was at a commencement ceremony back in May [around the 28th] up in Boston and Garland told the audience that he knew and understood fascism because his family had to escape Germany to come to this country to escape the Nazi' just before world war one, everybody checked it out [on their phones] and his family did come here in the late 1800's but there was no Nazi threat until world war II.
that means he made it up

Just Like George Soros.

 

[Mac1958]

My opinion of you is irrelevant, and I need not prove to you anything…The thread now effectively disappeared by being merged to a thread with a different OP, and possibly premise is just more proof that your lack of being able to articulate your own position beyond the grade school level of “you can’t prove that about me” is laughable…

Same goes for the mod who decided to disappear my thread. The same mods will let threads attacking Trump or supporters stand alone even when there’s 25 of them running, but choose this one?

Tipping one’s hand is not new.

You poor victim, you.

 

[j-mac]

Mac1958 as I said, laughing thanks = a failure to respond knowing that you’ve lost the debate…

I accept your surrender.

 

[j-mac]

You poor victim, you.

Pointing out, or calling out a fact is not a claim of victimhood.

 

[Care4all]

This is buffoonery.

​

Let’s hope Merrick Garland’s search of Mar-a-Lago is based on more evidence than his indictment of the Louisville, Kentucky, police officers involved in the raid on Breonna Taylor’s house.​

​

That passive construction I just used — “involved in the raid on,” instead of “who raided” — is not sloppy writing: It’s the facts. The officers who actually shot Taylor have not been charged, apparently on the flimsy grounds that they were being shot at when they fired.​

​

Instead, our lunatic attorney general has indicted officers who prepared the affidavit used to obtain the warrant to search Taylor’s home. In the words of the indictment, the affidavit “contained information that was false, misleading and out-of-date … and the officers lacked probable cause for the search.”​

​

...​

​

Specifically, the feds say the following claims were false:​

​

1. Glover and Taylor had an “ongoing connection”;​

​

2. Glover used Taylor’s address as his residence;​

​

3. Glover received packages at Taylor’s address.​

​

1. Did Glover and Taylor have an “ongoing connection”?​

​

Their relationship dates back to at least 2016, when Taylor loaned Glover her rental car, only to have the police show up at her door to ask about the dead body in the trunk. The dead man turned out to be the brother of one of Glover’s criminal confederates.​

​

But that was four years before the raid! Surely, Breonna wised up after the body-in-the-trunk incident and dumped Jamarcus like a hot potato. Right?​

​

Nope! Taylor continued bonding Glover out of jail through his many arrests from 2016 to 2020. He called Taylor from jail at least 26 times during those four years — that can be proven — including on Jan. 3, 2020, three months before the raids. During that call from January 2020, the two talk about sleeping together and exchange “I love you’s.”​

​

On Jan. 2, 2020, police installed a pole camera to observe one of the crack houses in response to numerous violent assaults in the area. The very day the camera went up, Taylor’s car was seen pulling up to the house, dropping off Glover. On Feb. 13, 2020, Taylor drove him there again, and while waiting for him, got out of her car, in full view of the camera.​

​

GPS tracking showed his car driving to Taylor’s house six times in January 2020 alone.​

​

But this is a dry recitation of police evidence. Glover’s baby mama (not Breonna) is more colorful. In a recorded jailhouse phone call the day after the shooting, she told him: “This b*tch (Breonna) where she’s been with you, since you ain’t been over at my house … the same day you post a picture I guess she post a video, you knew it because she said what’s up she was in the bed with you, you kissing all over her.”​

​

Glover repeatedly assures the irate baby mama that Breonna just kept his money for him — and that thousands of dollars were still at her house.​

​

Now, where in the world would the police get the idea that Glover and Taylor had some sort of “ongoing connection”? It’s a puzzlement.​

​

...​

Read the rest at the link.

Merrick Garland is a Lunatic

www.takimag.com

To do a search, the information has to be recent, within 30 days at latest, on the search warrant request....a phone call, 3 months earlier, can not be used.

 

[Mac1958]

Mac1958 as I said, laughing thanks = a failure to respond knowing that you’ve lost the debate…

I accept your surrender.

Sure, okay.

 

[konradv]

Of all the things considered in my OP, and this is what concerns you most?

Y’all seemed real concerned with her underwear the other day! Narrative changed, huh?