Medicine: from a Spiritual perspective

[deorro 1]

Medicine used to help treat 'abnormalities' such as when a person gets a 'flu' or a 'cold' .. why is a flu or a cold abnormal? Because if it is not within 'season', then to receive something that is not in 'season' is 'abnormal'.. Just like when a potato grows when it is not supposed to or when an a certain flower blooms when it is not supposed to.. these would be considered 'abnormal'. And medicine which are used to treat certain 'abnormal' conditions upon and within human beings should be thought of as 'medicines' which try to help the body get back on their own 'normal' path; sometimes by having the 'abnormality' be removed from the body.

There is a saying...

There is the beginning. And then there is diversion. Diversion sometimes results in perversion. When perversion occurs the only way back onto the beginning path is aversion. And when aversion occurs, the person can get back onto the beginning path. So.. beginning.. diversion.. perversion.. upon perversion... aversion... back to the beginning... And so it is likewise with 'medicine'.. trying to help the patient get back onto their 'beginning path'.. that path where and when their body did not have any of these 'abnormalities'...

So to look at medicine from a spiritual perspective... means that in a natural condition, normality occurs more often than not but when an abnormality is resulted within that natural condition, a 'perversion' off the natural path occurred.. not the person's own deliberate perversion but a 'perversion' of any sort that could have happened; within the body, upon the skin, in the air of a certain building entered within.. etc... a 'perversion' occurred... and it was within this 'perversed' place/situation/condition/circumstance that the 'abnormality' was more likely to have been received from than from their original 'natural' place/situation/condition/circumstance, etc... unless the 'abnormality' entered into the natural environment... unless the abnormal place/situation/condition/circumstance entered into the 'original/natural', normal place where life was in a 'normal', non abnormally diseased, virused, illed, sick, needing medicine, place....


And if these conditions could be seen to be true.. then to arrange for the 'balance' of the surrounding/place/condition/situation/circumstance to be as 'normal' to and with the 'medicine' being used would show how the medicine, which is to help take away the abnormality or cure the body of the abnormality, if in its naturally accepting place/situation/condition/circumstance surrounding would result much better in doing what it was meant to do...

So what are some natural/normal/original/non diverted/non perverted paths of certain 'medicines'? Let us see.

Let us take a basic stapled food.. grains for example.. Grains of wheat.. a very basic staple.

If wheat grains is used in an environment where the surrounding/circumstance/environment/situation is within the wheat's natural 'path', the wheat would probably have better opportunity to remain non diverted/non perverted into an abnormal 'path' outside of its original natural normal place/surrounding/path, etc.. which would have the wheat 'perform' what it naturally would in its own original natural environment.. It's like saying fish have an easier time being fish in water than when out of water... when in their natural/normal/non diverted/nonperverted/situation/condition/circumstance environment..

And if this can be agreed upon then to arrange for the 'fish' or the 'wheat' to have a more 'natural' surrounding IF out of its original environment would probably prove much more efficient for that fish or wheat to perform what it is normally best at performing... and so the same applies with medicine..

And likewise if an abnormal 'thing' were to be added into the 'water', the natural water of the fish, the fish would have a difficult time being fish the same as if they were out of water.. because an abnormality was introduced into their natural/normal environment/situation, etc.... But if that 'abnormal' addition to the water were contained or grouped or made to 'not leak', etc... then that addition would need to find a place within a balanced environment and that original balanced environment would not need to adapt, too much, to the newly added 'abnormality'.. and so the 'fish', those that have life, would not need to 'adapt' as much either just as the surrounding environment would not need to adapt so much... an example being when an abnormality is added into the water that is NOT contained, not grouped, not made to not leak.. but is free to freely 'be' within its own unnatural environment to try to find its own 'balanced' be-ing.. and so each is needing to struggle and fight with one another until a 'balance' is found and rested within to which the 'fish', the lifes, can go on in their ordinary way; since the living creatures are dependent upon their environment. And although the 'lifes' might need to receive 'abnormalities' within/to itselfs because of their environmentally struggling, non normal/ abnormal /situaltion, the 'lifes' will still be able to survive but maybe not in their original/natural/beginning way/path/ etc... they needed to receive and they needed to adapt to their received 'abnormalities'... (the 'containment/the grouped/ the made to not leak package or condition' being to these abnormalities, their own natural environment to and within which they have less need to deal with other 'abnormalities', which could result in more ease and which could result in less necessity to struggle with their environment since there is less 'room and less substances needing to struggle with).

and to these, in medicine, it is known as 'conditions which have adapted into being a part of acceptance'. Polluted water which would get a person visiting ill, for example..

Although the conditions of a certain resident's internal 'acceptance' would make a visitor become ill, because the visitor's inwards is not adapted to receiving the polluted drinking water for its daily naturally balanced environment, to the resident, the drinking water which would make a visitor ill is accepted as adaptable and acceptable enough for life to continue.

Their 'immune' system not needing to be part of these 'necessities' of environmental strugglings to be balanced. Why?

If a person is born into an environment where the environment has been 'diverted' off its original and is on a 'perverted' path, that newborn does not have any inward need for the non diverted original path's provisions... that new born is needing to receive, from their first breath, their first drink, from their first swallow, their first smell.. from their first 'senses', and is needing to have their 'bodies' and inwards beginning to form its dependence on what they received, which to them would be their original, beginning path but to their predecessor's, not... and it is within these diverted/perverted off paths not the original that the persons who previously were on a different 'path' are more likely than those born within these 'adapted' environments to receive ills and sicknesses, diseases and abnormalities to their natural well being, to their natural path of well being in their original path...

The predecessors are more likely than not to be the ones needing 'medicines', is what I'm trying to say..since they are still in need to 'adapt' to their changed or changing adapting environment.. with a greater struggle to find a balance within than if they were in a contained/grouped/made not to leak 'environment', etc...


And it is mostly and mainly to these that medicines are made and studied and researched for.. just like when leukemia is found in a child.. which to the majority of children, would be 'abnormal' to have received...

But since this is on the topic of medicine and its natural surrounding/environment and its probable probability of working more efficiently IF in a more 'natural' environment to their own 'natural environment', the topic of the leukemia and it probably having been received in/from some non 'normal/non original/diverted/perverted off' path or place, is another topic..


But the treatment of the leukemia/the patient with 'medicine'; whether it be quarantine, i.v lined, ingested, breathed, etc.... , if made to be environmentally more 'balanced' would probably prove more efficient to the 'goal' of treatment; whether it be quarantine, i.v lined, ingested, breathed, etc...

If the goal of the quarantine treatment is to keep contained any 'breathed' particles within its own natural accepted environment then to keep the 'possible' intrusion' and 'escaping' of 'airs', to the most minimum, would probably prove 'environmentally' adept enough to keep the environment balanced to and with its newly added medicine; which would have been the 'quarantine'.... WHILE not allowing for the 'material' used for quarantine to offset its own natural environment and also so as to not have the quarantined area be offset to its natural environment by the material, either. Hence the addition of the 'medicine', the quarantine with its goal intended and the materials, kept in as much of a balanced environment to itself and of the patient's balanced environment; inwardly and outwardly, would probably prove more efficient at getting the reason why the medicine was added, the quarantine with the material used and goal intended, to become much more valid at obtaining.

This being a real example of a balancing being applied, in medicine..

Spreading an antibiotic verses smearing an antibiotic to an area, given there are differences in distance and space with different applicable flesh 'areas' to where the antibacterial can be applied and at what amount of 'antibacterial' lotion/cream, etc is applied, is another valid example of balancing the environment.. of both the antibacterial and the flesh with its surrounding environments; the air or lack of air, being an example.

 

[deorro 1]

The lack of air/the non lack of air possibly being the wound is under pants or under bandage, etc.. or the applied to 'area' is not contained within/under material, as when and if shorts are worn to which the wound might not be under the 'fabric' of the shorts as the wound would be under the fabric of the pants to the same person being 'treated with medicine' with the medicine's intended goal.. with the differences of 'balances'; one when under fabric such as pants or bandage and the other when not under fabric such as shorts but maybe while still under bandage.

Because to this person's natural environment, whether it be with pants or shorts, the addition of antibacterial, bandage, application amount, smear verses spread, and all else are 'additions', 'medicines' so or less to 'say' that is being introduced into an environment that is out of their own natural balanced environment.. which was not upon the person from its beginning.. etc.. But upon diversion and perversion, both the person and the 'medicines' were taken out of their 'normal balanced path', or accepted to and adapted to well enough path, and introduced into, upon, to non normal, to their own, balanced environments.

A certain antibacterial having 1 effect on one type of skin type or blood type, person, verses the same antibacterial not having the same effect on another type of skin type or blood type, person although the ingredients of the 'medicine' is the same in their own natural environment balance; which would be their 'contained container/not punctured/ sealed/ kept in a certain type climate/air/temperature, etc... So 1 tube of 1 container of a certain antibacterial kept at 65 degrees fahrenheit in a certain location used on 2 different persons living in 2 different climates would probably NOT have the same effects as when the same 1 tube of 1 container of the same certain antibacterial kept at 65 degrees fahrenheit in the same location as the previous and being used on 2 different persons living within the same climated location.. the same climated persons having more of a similar 'balance' to their natural environment seeing they probably share the same drinking water lines and sources, etc...

1 who regularly eats spicy dishes, condiments not having the same reaction as one who does not eat spicy dishes, condiments on a regular basis being another real example.. keeping in mind that these were more than not a staple part of the person's diet since their birth rather than an acquired reception to their own 'tastes' to purchase(s) and to their needing to keep stored.. etc..


(you can see how 'meat', or flesh, could be used to a person's inwardly's dependence of their normal balance environment, whether it be adapted to or birthed into, being raised with such 'meats', verses not being raised on certain meats, etc.. )

 

[BULLDOG]

Medicine used to help treat 'abnormalities' such as when a person gets a 'flu' or a 'cold' .. why is a flu or a cold abnormal? Because if it is not within 'season', then to receive something that is not in 'season' is 'abnormal'.. Just like when a potato grows when it is not supposed to or when an a certain flower blooms when it is not supposed to.. these would be considered 'abnormal'. And medicine which are used to treat certain 'abnormal' conditions upon and within human beings should be thought of as 'medicines' which try to help the body get back on their own 'normal' path; sometimes by having the 'abnormality' be removed from the body.

There is a saying...

There is the beginning. And then there is diversion. Diversion sometimes results in perversion. When perversion occurs the only way back onto the beginning path is aversion. And when aversion occurs, the person can get back onto the beginning path. So.. beginning.. diversion.. perversion.. upon perversion... aversion... back to the beginning... And so it is likewise with 'medicine'.. trying to help the patient get back onto their 'beginning path'.. that path where and when their body did not have any of these 'abnormalities'...

So to look at medicine from a spiritual perspective... means that in a natural condition, normality occurs more often than not but when an abnormality is resulted within that natural condition, a 'perversion' off the natural path occurred.. not the person's own deliberate perversion but a 'perversion' of any sort that could have happened; within the body, upon the skin, in the air of a certain building entered within.. etc... a 'perversion' occurred... and it was within this 'perversed' place/situation/condition/circumstance that the 'abnormality' was more likely to have been received from than from their original 'natural' place/situation/condition/circumstance, etc... unless the 'abnormality' entered into the natural environment... unless the abnormal place/situation/condition/circumstance entered into the 'original/natural', normal place where life was in a 'normal', non abnormally diseased, virused, illed, sick, needing medicine, place....


And if these conditions could be seen to be true.. then to arrange for the 'balance' of the surrounding/place/condition/situation/circumstance to be as 'normal' to and with the 'medicine' being used would show how the medicine, which is to help take away the abnormality or cure the body of the abnormality, if in its naturally accepting place/situation/condition/circumstance surrounding would result much better in doing what it was meant to do...

So what are some natural/normal/original/non diverted/non perverted paths of certain 'medicines'? Let us see.

Let us take a basic stapled food.. grains for example.. Grains of wheat.. a very basic staple.

If wheat grains is used in an environment where the surrounding/circumstance/environment/situation is within the wheat's natural 'path', the wheat would probably have better opportunity to remain non diverted/non perverted into an abnormal 'path' outside of its original natural normal place/surrounding/path, etc.. which would have the wheat 'perform' what it naturally would in its own original natural environment.. It's like saying fish have an easier time being fish in water than when out of water... when in their natural/normal/non diverted/nonperverted/situation/condition/circumstance environment..

And if this can be agreed upon then to arrange for the 'fish' or the 'wheat' to have a more 'natural' surrounding IF out of its original environment would probably prove much more efficient for that fish or wheat to perform what it is normally best at performing... and so the same applies with medicine..

And likewise if an abnormal 'thing' were to be added into the 'water', the natural water of the fish, the fish would have a difficult time being fish the same as if they were out of water.. because an abnormality was introduced into their natural/normal environment/situation, etc.... But if that 'abnormal' addition to the water were contained or grouped or made to 'not leak', etc... then that addition would need to find a place within a balanced environment and that original balanced environment would not need to adapt, too much, to the newly added 'abnormality'.. and so the 'fish', those that have life, would not need to 'adapt' as much either just as the surrounding environment would not need to adapt so much... an example being when an abnormality is added into the water that is NOT contained, not grouped, not made to not leak.. but is free to freely 'be' within its own unnatural environment to try to find its own 'balanced' be-ing.. and so each is needing to struggle and fight with one another until a 'balance' is found and rested within to which the 'fish', the lifes, can go on in their ordinary way; since the living creatures are dependent upon their environment. And although the 'lifes' might need to receive 'abnormalities' within/to itselfs because of their environmentally struggling, non normal/ abnormal /situaltion, the 'lifes' will still be able to survive but maybe not in their original/natural/beginning way/path/ etc... they needed to receive and they needed to adapt to their received 'abnormalities'... (the 'containment/the grouped/ the made to not leak package or condition' being to these abnormalities, their own natural environment to and within which they have less need to deal with other 'abnormalities', which could result in more ease and which could result in less necessity to struggle with their environment since there is less 'room and less substances needing to struggle with).

and to these, in medicine, it is known as 'conditions which have adapted into being a part of acceptance'. Polluted water which would get a person visiting ill, for example..

Although the conditions of a certain resident's internal 'acceptance' would make a visitor become ill, because the visitor's inwards is not adapted to receiving the polluted drinking water for its daily naturally balanced environment, to the resident, the drinking water which would make a visitor ill is accepted as adaptable and acceptable enough for life to continue.

Their 'immune' system not needing to be part of these 'necessities' of environmental strugglings to be balanced. Why?

If a person is born into an environment where the environment has been 'diverted' off its original and is on a 'perverted' path, that newborn does not have any inward need for the non diverted original path's provisions... that new born is needing to receive, from their first breath, their first drink, from their first swallow, their first smell.. from their first 'senses', and is needing to have their 'bodies' and inwards beginning to form its dependence on what they received, which to them would be their original, beginning path but to their predecessor's, not... and it is within these diverted/perverted off paths not the original that the persons who previously were on a different 'path' are more likely than those born within these 'adapted' environments to receive ills and sicknesses, diseases and abnormalities to their natural well being, to their natural path of well being in their original path...

The predecessors are more likely than not to be the ones needing 'medicines', is what I'm trying to say..since they are still in need to 'adapt' to their changed or changing adapting environment.. with a greater struggle to find a balance within than if they were in a contained/grouped/made not to leak 'environment', etc...


And it is mostly and mainly to these that medicines are made and studied and researched for.. just like when leukemia is found in a child.. which to the majority of children, would be 'abnormal' to have received...

But since this is on the topic of medicine and its natural surrounding/environment and its probable probability of working more efficiently IF in a more 'natural' environment to their own 'natural environment', the topic of the leukemia and it probably having been received in/from some non 'normal/non original/diverted/perverted off' path or place, is another topic..


But the treatment of the leukemia/the patient with 'medicine'; whether it be quarantine, i.v lined, ingested, breathed, etc.... , if made to be environmentally more 'balanced' would probably prove more efficient to the 'goal' of treatment; whether it be quarantine, i.v lined, ingested, breathed, etc...

If the goal of the quarantine treatment is to keep contained any 'breathed' particles within its own natural accepted environment then to keep the 'possible' intrusion' and 'escaping' of 'airs', to the most minimum, would probably prove 'environmentally' adept enough to keep the environment balanced to and with its newly added medicine; which would have been the 'quarantine'.... WHILE not allowing for the 'material' used for quarantine to offset its own natural environment and also so as to not have the quarantined area be offset to its natural environment by the material, either. Hence the addition of the 'medicine', the quarantine with its goal intended and the materials, kept in as much of a balanced environment to itself and of the patient's balanced environment; inwardly and outwardly, would probably prove more efficient at getting the reason why the medicine was added, the quarantine with the material used and goal intended, to become much more valid at obtaining.

This being a real example of a balancing being applied, in medicine..

Spreading an antibiotic verses smearing an antibiotic to an area, given there are differences in distance and space with different applicable flesh 'areas' to where the antibacterial can be applied and at what amount of 'antibacterial' lotion/cream, etc is applied, is another valid example of balancing the environment.. of both the antibacterial and the flesh with its surrounding environments; the air or lack of air, being an example.

When I was younger, I used to get high and write what I thought were profound diatribes like yours, and the next morning, I would be sober when I reread them only to realize they were nothing but bullshit. Fortunately, there was no internet back then, and I didn't post my silly chain of consiousness rants for all to laugh at. It's a shame that there is an internet now, and you were able to expose your silly crap to the world before you had a chance to sober up and read it.

 

[deorro 1]

So to expect parent aged persons or grandparent aged persons to consume more meat than they are acquired to, used to, could prove that a needing of 'an' addition of 'medicines' would be feasible. Whereas asking a child or younger one to consume less meat than they are acquired to, used to, could prove to NOT be as needing of an addition of medicines be applied. Since it is NOT within the 'aversion' back onto the original/beginning path that one usually receives 'additions' but rather on the 'diversion'/perversions off the original/beginning path where one usually receives the 'additions'. Their own predecessors having been more on that original/beginning path than they when they started out/off/were birthed with/within.. etc.. which to divert/pervert off their own biological predecessor's provisioned upbringings with the foods and staples provided proves as an anomaly/abnormality itself seeing the difficulty of diverting/perverting off original/beginning paths.

(acquaintanceships and friendships, etc, love romances, etc... all fit within this category of additions applied to the original/beginning provided for path, etc.. to the predecessor's own provisioned providing for; even for foods and meats and drinks, etc... 1 who never grew up with 'milk' usually never acquires 'milk' drinking at a later age than 1 who continues to 'drink' milk because of their upbringing with milk.)

to which if a person deviates and perverts off could mean that the person preferred the newly added/acquired addition more/above than his or her provided for provisions by his or her natural providers; biological parents often being the legal guardians/providers up to a certain age for the majority of youths.

And if these newly acquired additions are preferred than these become as the staple, adapted to, balanced environment, accepted and adapted to which could result in having the original staples, already having been provided for be and/or become as the 'newly' added, or the diverted/perveted/non balanced/non adapted to/non accepted to, 'agents'.. and it is usually within these that 'free will' is exercised to the mind's intellect and knowledge of the realities of choices and decisions; sometimes to finality and closures.. mostly NOT from those who have not diverted/perverted off the original/beginning path but mostly from those who have .. * those kidnapped or sold into slavery usually have easier times going back to their predecessor's ways than not seeing that they did not choose/prefer their new situation over their original/beginning ...

 

[deorro 1]

And so medicine.. seen from the Spiritual perspective.. from the 'balanced' perspective..


It's difficult to deny you have flesh; seeing you live with it daily.. And it is when the outlook becomes balanced that realization that a spirit is also a part of the daily life, occurs.

*the easiest, quickest way to get to this 'balanced' outlook? Believe upon The One Who sent and/or upon The One Whom Was sent.

*even a quicker way? Have knowledge that His Name is NOT (J)esus. (J)esus is a name that does not exist in The Hebrew Language just as (J)esus was NOT the name the angel Gabriel gave to the mother of Christ Messiah to call the 'babe' with. it just says it was in the current misprints and bad journalism(s).


Why do add 'religion/faith' in with this topic of medicine balanced?

Some use Them/some need Them, as 'medicine'.

The most difficult part of receiving this 'medicine' in my opinion? Learning how to deal with other non True Name/how to deal with other false name believing persons..

Christ Messiah IS at Right Hand of God.

One says, 'there is none who understands, there is non who seeks for god, all have turned aside, together they have become useless, there is none who does good, there is not even one'...


The LORD and Holy God and Christ Messiah warns that if such a 'prophet' comes in and tries to subvert the hearts into serving other gods to cast them out. They do not preserve unnecessary 'junk'.



1The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

2The LORD looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God.

(the fools says):

3They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one.


6Ye have shamed the counsel of the poor, because the LORD is his refuge.

Psalm 14