McConnell now supports Trump IMPEACHMENT

[Lastamender]

Try admitting Trump will get about 100 million votes if he runs in 2024.

Do you HONESTLY believe that.

But I doubt he’ll run again. He’ll just keep teasing it to get more attention from time to time. And sadly, that will deprive the Republicans of a chance to develop their 2024 ticket. And that’s the sad thing because for 45 years I was a Republican. Id like to go back but my conscience won’t let me.

But back to your claim of 100 million votes. Just between us, do you REALLY believe that.

He would get a hundred million tomorrow.

 

[MadDog]

He wont be impeached, old lady.

By this evening, he WILL be impeached. Will you be back to admit you were wrong.

Will you go crazy if he isn't?

Check back later. If I’m wrong, I’ll admit it. Would you do the same?

Did not take long
Where is your admission of fail?

You apparently don’t know what impeachment means. If the House passes the articles of impeachment, then Trump has been impeached again, regardless of when it moves to trial.

Wrong. Plus your statement was as to Senate and MCConnel who are the entity that conveys impeachment. The house merely sends it over for a vote but we know you fact absent liberals must hang onto your feeling that a charge is the same thing as a conviction.
Plus your dishonesty over failing to concede error as you stated you would not 20 minutes ago may be a new USMB record
Word parse fail by you.

Do a little more reading. an impeachment is an indictment, not a trial. If that weren’t the case, why are Johnson, Clinton, and Trump on record as having been impeached.

the House impeached (indicts) and the Senate conducts the trial. The House today will indict.

And he willl never be convicted. Dims are wasting their time on this show trial.

It will never be tried, there is no provision in the Constitution for impeaching a former president.

.

He's not a former president. He's still president, therefore, once he leaves office, there is still unfinished business. I said he would be impeached today, and there will be a conviction in the senate after he is gone. Stay tuned.

So show me in the Constitution were an impeachment trial is provided for a former president. Once a president leaves office the accusations made by the house are moot. But hey, feel free to show me in the text where I'm wrong.

.

Impeachment trial for President Trump can happen even after he leaves office - ABC17NEWS

A Majority of the House of Representatives have now voted to impeach President Donald Trump for a second time, just days before he is set to leave office.

abc17news.com

The Constitution's Option for Impeachment After a President Leaves Office Your gotcha question has no meaning. It goes without saying, that if you commit impeachable offenses right before you leave office and be criminally charged without consequences, you would be above the law. In other words, your question makes no sense. Next?

There is no Constitutional option for impeachment of a president after he leaves office, the founder contemplated it, and rejected it. Article 2 Section 4 leaves zero wiggle room. You also note that there is no impeachment without conviction. nazi palousey and a vast majority of the talking heads obviously can't read any better than you can.

.

There is legal precedent. Ultimately, the Supreme Court will probably be involved but there definitely NOT total certainty that Trump will escape a trial.

Actually there isn't, show me where the question was addressed in the courts.

.

In the case against William Blount, the Senate made the decision not to proceed After initially commencing proceedings. In the case of William Belknap, the Senate conducted a trial and did not convict. It is uncertain where the Supreme Court will go with this, but if Trump loses his 61st case, he’ll REALLY lose big.

The fact that it didn’t make it to the courts isn’t entirely true though because a sitting justice presides over impeachment trials. And precedent can be set when the courts choose NOT act.

You should make a note to self, congressional political actions are NOT legal precedents. LMAO

.

Ah, but they are impeachment precedents. Parse the words any way you want but you can’t change the fact that neither of us can say with absolutely certainty which way this will go. I’ve considered both sides. Sadly, you just choose to parse words and let your arrogance prevail.

Poor little childish commie, you're the one that claimed "legal precedents" existed, thanks for admitting you LIED.

.

Sadly, you still dont understand. Legal precedents can exist withou direct court action. The Constitution is essentially a framework That lays out two things. Things that MUST happen and things that aren’t prohibited. Basically, anything that ISN’T prohibited in the Constitution is permitted by it. However, Legislative bodies can enact legislation regarding anything else. So it can be argued that if the Constitution doesn’t PROHIBIT an impeachment of someone who has already left office, then such a trial does not go against the Constitution. If that’s the case, then rules adopted by the Senate would be legal and Constitutional.

Try focusing a little less on parsing words and a little more on concepts.

BTW your second lie was Trump lost 60 court cases, he or his campaign didn't file any where close to that many cases.

Also I prefer to focus on the Supreme Law of the Land.

Article II Section 4 The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Now with three new textualist on SCOTUS, how do you think they'll read it?

But hey keep swallowing the commie propaganda, it's what you chose to do.

.

It doesn’t prohibit a trial. And a trial can have consequences BESIDES removal from office.

and my point remains, legal experts have talked both sides of the argument. You certainly aren’t a legal expert so I’ll defer to those who are.

And here’s an itemized list of trumps cases - 60 that were lost and 1 that was won. But I won’t call you a liar because sonething isn’t a lie if you believe it to be true. But I WILL call you ignorant because you just don’t know any better.

Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

if you don’t believe the list, please tell me which you think are wrong.

 

[MadDog]

Try admitting Trump will get about 100 million votes if he runs in 2024.

Do you HONESTLY believe that.

But I doubt he’ll run again. He’ll just keep teasing it to get more attention from time to time. And sadly, that will deprive the Republicans of a chance to develop their 2024 ticket. And that’s the sad thing because for 45 years I was a Republican. Id like to go back but my conscience won’t let me.

But back to your claim of 100 million votes. Just between us, do you REALLY believe that.

He would get a hundred million tomorrow.

With a 35% approval rating (his all time low) do you really believe that?

 

[MadDog]

BTW your second lie was Trump lost 60 court cases, he or his campaign didn't file any where close to that many cases.
.

still waiting for your explanation of the number of lost lawsuits. Here’s the link again.

Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

It would be appropriate for you to admit you were mistaken and an apology would be graciously accepted. However, I doubt you would ever admits to a mistake. Hey! I know of some orange guy who won’t admit to a mistake either.

 

[Seawytch]

He wont be impeached, old lady.

By this evening, he WILL be impeached. Will you be back to admit you were wrong.

Will you go crazy if he isn't?

Check back later. If I’m wrong, I’ll admit it. Would you do the same?

Did not take long
Where is your admission of fail?

You apparently don’t know what impeachment means. If the House passes the articles of impeachment, then Trump has been impeached again, regardless of when it moves to trial.

Wrong. Plus your statement was as to Senate and MCConnel who are the entity that conveys impeachment. The house merely sends it over for a vote but we know you fact absent liberals must hang onto your feeling that a charge is the same thing as a conviction.
Plus your dishonesty over failing to concede error as you stated you would not 20 minutes ago may be a new USMB record
Word parse fail by you.

Do a little more reading. an impeachment is an indictment, not a trial. If that weren’t the case, why are Johnson, Clinton, and Trump on record as having been impeached.

the House impeached (indicts) and the Senate conducts the trial. The House today will indict.

And he willl never be convicted. Dims are wasting their time on this show trial.

It will never be tried, there is no provision in the Constitution for impeaching a former president.

.

He's not a former president. He's still president, therefore, once he leaves office, there is still unfinished business. I said he would be impeached today, and there will be a conviction in the senate after he is gone. Stay tuned.

So show me in the Constitution were an impeachment trial is provided for a former president. Once a president leaves office the accusations made by the house are moot. But hey, feel free to show me in the text where I'm wrong.

.

We don't know...but I'm ready to find out!!!

Can President Trump be impeached after he leaves office? | Constitution Center

The expected impeachment proceedings on Wednesday against President Donald J. Trump will surface one of the Constitution’s most arcane questions: Can a federal official be removed from office if he’s already left the building?

constitutioncenter.org

Your link is very specific. From your link:

The Constitution’s Article II, Section 4 reads that “the President,

No where does it say the outgoing president or former president. It says, The President, there is only one president at a time, Trump will not be "the President", he will be the former president at the point the senate could take up the house resolution. So tell me child, what is there to be found out? The Constitution is clear.

.

We will see, won't we? I can be patient. Can you, "child"?

I can be very patient, the TRUTH is already coming out. The Sergeants of Arms of both chambers were warned by the Capitol Hill police chief well in advance, like days before the riot, that the FBI had intel from the web that an attack was being planned. Evidently they did nothing. Also the attack started before Trump even spoke to the protesters, So once again, Trump was impeached on a lie. No wonder nazi palousey was in such a hurry, she couldn't allow the facts to come out.

.

They were there because Trump 1) Lied to them about the election being "stolen" and 2 ) He told them to be there.

Trump has yet to be impeached on a lie. He really did pressure a foreign government to interfere in our elections and he is responsible for his supporters storming the capital.

 

[Nia88]

Not good enough Moscow Mitch. For the past 4 years you were an accessory to the madness. Now all of a suddeb you want to do the right thing?

 

[beautress]

Try admitting Trump will get about 100 million votes if he runs in 2024.

Do you HONESTLY believe that.

But I doubt he’ll run again. He’ll just keep teasing it to get more attention from time to time. And sadly, that will deprive the Republicans of a chance to develop their 2024 ticket. And that’s the sad thing because for 45 years I was a Republican. Id like to go back but my conscience won’t let me.

But back to your claim of 100 million votes. Just between us, do you REALLY believe that.

Socialism that prohibits free speech from any opposition that they do not eliminate by sham election time, which in a formerly government Constitutional Republic, is not loved by the common folk. And with puerile Democrats like Alexandria "Get outta my way" Ocasio-Cortez, Joe "I'm gonna raise

He wont be impeached, old lady.

By this evening, he WILL be impeached. Will you be back to admit you were wrong.

Will you go crazy if he isn't?

Check back later. If I’m wrong, I’ll admit it. Would you do the same?

Did not take long
Where is your admission of fail?

You apparently don’t know what impeachment means. If the House passes the articles of impeachment, then Trump has been impeached again, regardless of when it moves to trial.

Wrong. Plus your statement was as to Senate and MCConnel who are the entity that conveys impeachment. The house merely sends it over for a vote but we know you fact absent liberals must hang onto your feeling that a charge is the same thing as a conviction.
Plus your dishonesty over failing to concede error as you stated you would not 20 minutes ago may be a new USMB record
Word parse fail by you.

Do a little more reading. an impeachment is an indictment, not a trial. If that weren’t the case, why are Johnson, Clinton, and Trump on record as having been impeached.

the House impeached (indicts) and the Senate conducts the trial. The House today will indict.

And he willl never be convicted. Dims are wasting their time on this show trial.

It will never be tried, there is no provision in the Constitution for impeaching a former president.

.

He's not a former president. He's still president, therefore, once he leaves office, there is still unfinished business. I said he would be impeached today, and there will be a conviction in the senate after he is gone. Stay tuned.

So show me in the Constitution were an impeachment trial is provided for a former president. Once a president leaves office the accusations made by the house are moot. But hey, feel free to show me in the text where I'm wrong.

.

We don't know...but I'm ready to find out!!!

Can President Trump be impeached after he leaves office? | Constitution Center

The expected impeachment proceedings on Wednesday against President Donald J. Trump will surface one of the Constitution’s most arcane questions: Can a federal official be removed from office if he’s already left the building?

constitutioncenter.org

Your link is very specific. From your link:

The Constitution’s Article II, Section 4 reads that “the President,

No where does it say the outgoing president or former president. It says, The President, there is only one president at a time, Trump will not be "the President", he will be the former president at the point the senate could take up the house resolution. So tell me child, what is there to be found out? The Constitution is clear.

.

We will see, won't we? I can be patient. Can you, "child"?

I can be very patient, the TRUTH is already coming out. The Sergeants of Arms of both chambers were warned by the Capitol Hill police chief well in advance, like days before the riot, that the FBI had intel from the web that an attack was being planned. Evidently they did nothing. Also the attack started before Trump even spoke to the protesters, So once again, Trump was impeached on a lie. No wonder nazi palousey was in such a hurry, she couldn't allow the facts to come out.

.

They were there because Trump 1) Lied to them about the election being "stolen" and 2 ) He told them to be there.

Trump has yet to be impeached on a lie. He really did pressure a foreign government to interfere in our elections and he is responsible for his supporters storming the capital.

There are citizens of this nation who fully believe E2020 was stolen. And many of them are liberals who do not want higher taxes and big government. The final straw was the Groupthink snap impeachment.

 

[Batcat]

Surprise — McConnell is a Swamp critter and really would have been much happier had either Hillary or Jeb! won the 2016 election rather than Trump.

Many establishment Republicans are enjoying and profiting from the Swamp gravy train that Trump threatened to clean up. They are celebrating the fact he is finally gone.

In my opinion establishment Republicans need to be identified and primaried out. Conservatives need to clean up the Republican Party or set up a new Deplorable Party. Most of the people we have elected to Congress, Democrat or Republican, represent everybody with large amounts of cash and not the people who voted for them.

 

[ninja007]

mitch is part of the deep state swamp, trump is not. understand yet?

 

[Seawytch]

He wont be impeached, old lady.

By this evening, he WILL be impeached. Will you be back to admit you were wrong.

Will you go crazy if he isn't?

Check back later. If I’m wrong, I’ll admit it. Would you do the same?

Did not take long
Where is your admission of fail?

You apparently don’t know what impeachment means. If the House passes the articles of impeachment, then Trump has been impeached again, regardless of when it moves to trial.

Wrong. Plus your statement was as to Senate and MCConnel who are the entity that conveys impeachment. The house merely sends it over for a vote but we know you fact absent liberals must hang onto your feeling that a charge is the same thing as a conviction.
Plus your dishonesty over failing to concede error as you stated you would not 20 minutes ago may be a new USMB record
Word parse fail by you.

Do a little more reading. an impeachment is an indictment, not a trial. If that weren’t the case, why are Johnson, Clinton, and Trump on record as having been impeached.

the House impeached (indicts) and the Senate conducts the trial. The House today will indict.

And he willl never be convicted. Dims are wasting their time on this show trial.

It will never be tried, there is no provision in the Constitution for impeaching a former president.

.

He's not a former president. He's still president, therefore, once he leaves office, there is still unfinished business. I said he would be impeached today, and there will be a conviction in the senate after he is gone. Stay tuned.

So show me in the Constitution were an impeachment trial is provided for a former president. Once a president leaves office the accusations made by the house are moot. But hey, feel free to show me in the text where I'm wrong.

.

We don't know...but I'm ready to find out!!!

Can President Trump be impeached after he leaves office? | Constitution Center

The expected impeachment proceedings on Wednesday against President Donald J. Trump will surface one of the Constitution’s most arcane questions: Can a federal official be removed from office if he’s already left the building?

constitutioncenter.org

Your link is very specific. From your link:

The Constitution’s Article II, Section 4 reads that “the President,

No where does it say the outgoing president or former president. It says, The President, there is only one president at a time, Trump will not be "the President", he will be the former president at the point the senate could take up the house resolution. So tell me child, what is there to be found out? The Constitution is clear.

.

We will see, won't we? I can be patient. Can you, "child"?

I can be very patient, the TRUTH is already coming out. The Sergeants of Arms of both chambers were warned by the Capitol Hill police chief well in advance, like days before the riot, that the FBI had intel from the web that an attack was being planned. Evidently they did nothing. Also the attack started before Trump even spoke to the protesters, So once again, Trump was impeached on a lie. No wonder nazi palousey was in such a hurry, she couldn't allow the facts to come out.

.

They were there because Trump 1) Lied to them about the election being "stolen" and 2 ) He told them to be there.

Trump has yet to be impeached on a lie. He really did pressure a foreign government to interfere in our elections and he is responsible for his supporters storming the capital.

There are citizens of this nation who fully believe E2020 was stolen. And many of them are liberals who do not want higher taxes and big government. The final straw was the Groupthink snap impeachment.

They believe a big lie.

 

[Pogo]

Another fake news lie. It claims he’s “happy” that Dems are doing it, so the GOP can be rid of him.

McConnell is a moron if he thinks the majority of those 80 million voters for President Trump are going to back him or his horrid policies in any way in the future.

Yyyyyeeeaahhhh ummmmm..... those were voters for Biden, and it's 81 million. And change.

Rump LOST by roughly the population of the entire state of Arizona.

You don't win a real election with fake votes.

"Fake votes"?

You mean "newly discovered votes that sat in the Wisconsin Historical Society for 94 years"?

What a moron....

 

[Pogo]

He wont be impeached, old lady.

By this evening, he WILL be impeached. Will you be back to admit you were wrong.

Will you go crazy if he isn't?

Check back later. If I’m wrong, I’ll admit it. Would you do the same?

Did not take long
Where is your admission of fail?

You apparently don’t know what impeachment means. If the House passes the articles of impeachment, then Trump has been impeached again, regardless of when it moves to trial.

Wrong. Plus your statement was as to Senate and MCConnel who are the entity that conveys impeachment. The house merely sends it over for a vote but we know you fact absent liberals must hang onto your feeling that a charge is the same thing as a conviction.
Plus your dishonesty over failing to concede error as you stated you would not 20 minutes ago may be a new USMB record
Word parse fail by you.

Do a little more reading. an impeachment is an indictment, not a trial. If that weren’t the case, why are Johnson, Clinton, and Trump on record as having been impeached.

the House impeached (indicts) and the Senate conducts the trial. The House today will indict.

And he willl never be convicted. Dims are wasting their time on this show trial.

It will never be tried, there is no provision in the Constitution for impeaching a former president.

.

He's not a former president. He's still president, therefore, once he leaves office, there is still unfinished business. I said he would be impeached today, and there will be a conviction in the senate after he is gone. Stay tuned.

So show me in the Constitution were an impeachment trial is provided for a former president. Once a president leaves office the accusations made by the house are moot. But hey, feel free to show me in the text where I'm wrong.

.

We don't know...but I'm ready to find out!!!

Can President Trump be impeached after he leaves office? | Constitution Center

The expected impeachment proceedings on Wednesday against President Donald J. Trump will surface one of the Constitution’s most arcane questions: Can a federal official be removed from office if he’s already left the building?

constitutioncenter.org

Your link is very specific. From your link:

The Constitution’s Article II, Section 4 reads that “the President,

No where does it say the outgoing president or former president. It says, The President, there is only one president at a time, Trump will not be "the President", he will be the former president at the point the senate could take up the house resolution. So tell me child, what is there to be found out? The Constitution is clear.

.

We will see, won't we? I can be patient. Can you, "child"?

I can be very patient, the TRUTH is already coming out. The Sergeants of Arms of both chambers were warned by the Capitol Hill police chief well in advance, like days before the riot, that the FBI had intel from the web that an attack was being planned. Evidently they did nothing. Also the attack started before Trump even spoke to the protesters, So once again, Trump was impeached on a lie. No wonder nazi palousey was in such a hurry, she couldn't allow the facts to come out.

.

They were there because Trump 1) Lied to them about the election being "stolen" and 2 ) He told them to be there.

Trump has yet to be impeached on a lie. He really did pressure a foreign government to interfere in our elections and he is responsible for his supporters storming the capital.

There are citizens of this nation who fully believe E2020 was stolen. And many of them are liberals who do not want higher taxes and big government. The final straw was the Groupthink snap impeachment.

They believe a big lie.

It's called a Bigly Lie now. We had to dumb it down for its customer base.

 

[Mustang]

Just breaking on MSNBC. Below is The New York Times link. So, if true, will McConnell expedite Senate impeachment proceedings - or continue to drag his feet?

Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader, has told associates that he believes President Trump committed impeachable offenses and that he is pleased that Democrats are moving to impeach him, believing that it will make it easier to purge him from the party, according to people familiar with his thinking. The House is voting on Wednesday to formally charge Mr. Trump with inciting violence against the country.

Mr. McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, has indicated that he wants to see the specific article of impeachment that the House is set to approve on Wednesday, which is expected to draw support from as many as a dozen Republicans, potentially including Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming, the party’s No. 3 in the House. But he has made clear in private discussions that he believes now is the moment to move on from the weakened lame duck, whom he blames for causing Republicans to lose the Senate.

McConnell is said to be pleased about impeachment, believing it will be easier to purge Trump from the G.O.P.

Yeah, and all it took was for McConnell to lose his Majority Leader position.

 

[bripat9643]

He wont be impeached, old lady.

By this evening, he WILL be impeached. Will you be back to admit you were wrong.

Will you go crazy if he isn't?

Check back later. If I’m wrong, I’ll admit it. Would you do the same?

Did not take long
Where is your admission of fail?

You apparently don’t know what impeachment means. If the House passes the articles of impeachment, then Trump has been impeached again, regardless of when it moves to trial.

Wrong. Plus your statement was as to Senate and MCConnel who are the entity that conveys impeachment. The house merely sends it over for a vote but we know you fact absent liberals must hang onto your feeling that a charge is the same thing as a conviction.
Plus your dishonesty over failing to concede error as you stated you would not 20 minutes ago may be a new USMB record
Word parse fail by you.

Do a little more reading. an impeachment is an indictment, not a trial. If that weren’t the case, why are Johnson, Clinton, and Trump on record as having been impeached.

the House impeached (indicts) and the Senate conducts the trial. The House today will indict.

And he willl never be convicted. Dims are wasting their time on this show trial.

It will never be tried, there is no provision in the Constitution for impeaching a former president.

.

He's not a former president. He's still president, therefore, once he leaves office, there is still unfinished business. I said he would be impeached today, and there will be a conviction in the senate after he is gone. Stay tuned.

So show me in the Constitution were an impeachment trial is provided for a former president. Once a president leaves office the accusations made by the house are moot. But hey, feel free to show me in the text where I'm wrong.

.

Impeachment trial for President Trump can happen even after he leaves office - ABC17NEWS

A Majority of the House of Representatives have now voted to impeach President Donald Trump for a second time, just days before he is set to leave office.

abc17news.com

The Constitution's Option for Impeachment After a President Leaves Office Your gotcha question has no meaning. It goes without saying, that if you commit impeachable offenses right before you leave office and be criminally charged without consequences, you would be above the law. In other words, your question makes no sense. Next?

There is no Constitutional option for impeachment of a president after he leaves office, the founder contemplated it, and rejected it. Article 2 Section 4 leaves zero wiggle room. You also note that there is no impeachment without conviction. nazi palousey and a vast majority of the talking heads obviously can't read any better than you can.

.

There is legal precedent. Ultimately, the Supreme Court will probably be involved but there definitely NOT total certainty that Trump will escape a trial.

Actually there isn't, show me where the question was addressed in the courts.

.

In the case against William Blount, the Senate made the decision not to proceed After initially commencing proceedings. In the case of William Belknap, the Senate conducted a trial and did not convict. It is uncertain where the Supreme Court will go with this, but if Trump loses his 61st case, he’ll REALLY lose big.

The fact that it didn’t make it to the courts isn’t entirely true though because a sitting justice presides over impeachment trials. And precedent can be set when the courts choose NOT act.

You should make a note to self, congressional political actions are NOT legal precedents. LMAO

.

Ah, but they are impeachment precedents. Parse the words any way you want but you can’t change the fact that neither of us can say with absolutely certainty which way this will go. I’ve considered both sides. Sadly, you just choose to parse words and let your arrogance prevail.

Poor little childish commie, you're the one that claimed "legal precedents" existed, thanks for admitting you LIED.

.

Sadly, you still dont understand. Legal precedents can exist withou direct court action. The Constitution is essentially a framework That lays out two things. Things that MUST happen and things that aren’t prohibited. Basically, anything that ISN’T prohibited in the Constitution is permitted by it. However, Legislative bodies can enact legislation regarding anything else. So it can be argued that if the Constitution doesn’t PROHIBIT an impeachment of someone who has already left office, then such a trial does not go against the Constitution. If that’s the case, then rules adopted by the Senate would be legal and Constitutional.

Try focusing a little less on parsing words and a little more on concepts.

" Sadly, you still dont understand. Legal precedents can exist withou direct court action. "

No they can't, NAZI.

 

[bripat9643]

He wont be impeached, old lady.

By this evening, he WILL be impeached. Will you be back to admit you were wrong.

Will you go crazy if he isn't?

Check back later. If I’m wrong, I’ll admit it. Would you do the same?

Did not take long
Where is your admission of fail?

You apparently don’t know what impeachment means. If the House passes the articles of impeachment, then Trump has been impeached again, regardless of when it moves to trial.

Wrong. Plus your statement was as to Senate and MCConnel who are the entity that conveys impeachment. The house merely sends it over for a vote but we know you fact absent liberals must hang onto your feeling that a charge is the same thing as a conviction.
Plus your dishonesty over failing to concede error as you stated you would not 20 minutes ago may be a new USMB record
Word parse fail by you.

Do a little more reading. an impeachment is an indictment, not a trial. If that weren’t the case, why are Johnson, Clinton, and Trump on record as having been impeached.

the House impeached (indicts) and the Senate conducts the trial. The House today will indict.

And he willl never be convicted. Dims are wasting their time on this show trial.

It will never be tried, there is no provision in the Constitution for impeaching a former president.

.

He's not a former president. He's still president, therefore, once he leaves office, there is still unfinished business. I said he would be impeached today, and there will be a conviction in the senate after he is gone. Stay tuned.

So show me in the Constitution were an impeachment trial is provided for a former president. Once a president leaves office the accusations made by the house are moot. But hey, feel free to show me in the text where I'm wrong.

.

Impeachment trial for President Trump can happen even after he leaves office - ABC17NEWS

A Majority of the House of Representatives have now voted to impeach President Donald Trump for a second time, just days before he is set to leave office.

abc17news.com

The Constitution's Option for Impeachment After a President Leaves Office Your gotcha question has no meaning. It goes without saying, that if you commit impeachable offenses right before you leave office and be criminally charged without consequences, you would be above the law. In other words, your question makes no sense. Next?

There is no Constitutional option for impeachment of a president after he leaves office, the founder contemplated it, and rejected it. Article 2 Section 4 leaves zero wiggle room. You also note that there is no impeachment without conviction. nazi palousey and a vast majority of the talking heads obviously can't read any better than you can.

.

There is legal precedent. Ultimately, the Supreme Court will probably be involved but there definitely NOT total certainty that Trump will escape a trial.

Actually there isn't, show me where the question was addressed in the courts.

.

In the case against William Blount, the Senate made the decision not to proceed After initially commencing proceedings. In the case of William Belknap, the Senate conducted a trial and did not convict. It is uncertain where the Supreme Court will go with this, but if Trump loses his 61st case, he’ll REALLY lose big.

The fact that it didn’t make it to the courts isn’t entirely true though because a sitting justice presides over impeachment trials. And precedent can be set when the courts choose NOT act.

You should make a note to self, congressional political actions are NOT legal precedents. LMAO

.

Ah, but they are impeachment precedents. Parse the words any way you want but you can’t change the fact that neither of us can say with absolutely certainty which way this will go. I’ve considered both sides. Sadly, you just choose to parse words and let your arrogance prevail.

Poor little childish commie, you're the one that claimed "legal precedents" existed, thanks for admitting you LIED.

.

Sadly, you still dont understand. Legal precedents can exist withou direct court action. The Constitution is essentially a framework That lays out two things. Things that MUST happen and things that aren’t prohibited. Basically, anything that ISN’T prohibited in the Constitution is permitted by it. However, Legislative bodies can enact legislation regarding anything else. So it can be argued that if the Constitution doesn’t PROHIBIT an impeachment of someone who has already left office, then such a trial does not go against the Constitution. If that’s the case, then rules adopted by the Senate would be legal and Constitutional.

Try focusing a little less on parsing words and a little more on concepts.

BTW your second lie was Trump lost 60 court cases, he or his campaign didn't file any where close to that many cases.

Also I prefer to focus on the Supreme Law of the Land.

Article II Section 4 The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Now with three new textualist on SCOTUS, how do you think they'll read it?

But hey keep swallowing the commie propaganda, it's what you chose to do.

.

It doesn’t prohibit a trial. And a trial can have consequences BESIDES removal from office.

and my point remains, legal experts have talked both sides of the argument. You certainly aren’t a legal expert so I’ll defer to those who are.

And here’s an itemized list of trumps cases - 60 that were lost and 1 that was won. But I won’t call you a liar because sonething isn’t a lie if you believe it to be true. But I WILL call you ignorant because you just don’t know any better.

Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

if you don’t believe the list, please tell me which you think are wrong.

Yeah, it does prohibit a trial that isn't a complete farce. It doesn't prevent Piglosi frim pretending to be the Sugarplum fairy.

 

[bripat9643]

Fourteenth Amendment

• Section 3
  No Person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Fourteenth Amendment Section 3 | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

constitution.congress.gov

It doesn't look good for Trump.

You NAZIs will have to indict him and convict him of insurrection first, dumbass.

Good luck with that!

 

[bripat9643]

There is no reality to that myth, your Nazi asshole

You're the Nazi Brian, you brain dead rube

It has been established irrefutably that you're the NAZI. You are the one defending abolishing censoring half the people in this country. You're the ones who wants to persecute people you disagree with.

I love the way you fucking NAZI's don't even know what a NAZI is.

 

[bripat9643]

Another fake news lie. It claims he’s “happy” that Dems are doing it, so the GOP can be rid of him.

McConnell is a moron if he thinks the majority of those 80 million voters for President Trump are going to back him or his horrid policies in any way in the future.

Yyyyyeeeaahhhh ummmmm..... those were voters for Biden, and it's 81 million. And change.

Rump LOST by roughly the population of the entire state of Arizona.

You don't win a real election with fake votes.

"Fake votes"?

You mean "newly discovered votes that sat in the Wisconsin Historical Society for 94 years"?

What a moron....

No, I mean fake votes. Dims manufactured them

 

[MadDog]

BTW your second lie was Trump lost 60 court cases, he or his campaign didn't file any where close to that many cases.

Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[BWK]

Another fake news lie. It claims he’s “happy” that Dems are doing it, so the GOP can be rid of him.

McConnell is a moron if he thinks the majority of those 80 million voters for President Trump are going to back him or his horrid policies in any way in the future.

Yyyyyeeeaahhhh ummmmm..... those were voters for Biden, and it's 81 million. And change.

Rump LOST by roughly the population of the entire state of Arizona.

You don't win a real election with fake votes.

"Fake votes"?

You mean "newly discovered votes that sat in the Wisconsin Historical Society for 94 years"?

What a moron....

No, I mean fake votes. Dims manufactured them

No evidence = you are a liar. You lose as always.