P@triot

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2011
60,919
11,385
2,060
United States
This is who they are. They have absolutely no intention of serving as representatives. There intent is to lie, deceive, manipulate, and, con their way into office. And once there, they intend to abuse the powers of that public office for their own twisted, oppressive agenda.

Any decent person who intends to serve as an actual representative of the people would be completely forthright and transparent about their views, allow the people to decide, and then respect that the people have spoken.



RED STATE BLUES: O'Keefe Strikes in Missouri - McCaskill and Clan Exposed as Fakes and Frauds in Guns, Lies and Videotape
 
This is just about as absolutely disgusting as it gets...
Nicolas Starost, another individual who works on Senator McCaskill’s campaign, explains how President Obama won’t campaign for Senator McCaskill in Missouri despite their similar views on politics. Starost says this is because Senator McCaskill needs to distance herself from the Democratic party to appeal to more voters
Wait...what? You need to “distance” yourself from your own party and your own beliefs? Why? Because you realize the American people overwhelmingly reject your bat-shit crazy ideology? But it gets even worse:
STAROST: “Because of how like, cause he’s a very liberal candidate. And like… Claire distancing herself from the party is gonna help her win more votes than it will saying like: “Oh here’s Obama, the former President of the United States, to now speak on my behalf.” Which is unfortunate because I love Obama to pieces, and I’d love to see him come here.”

JOURNALIST: “And they essentially have the same views on everything?”

STAROST: “Yeah. People just can’t know that.”
Absolutely appalling. They don’t want the voters to know Claire McCaskill’s actual position on issues and her real views. The left has always been - and remains - the greatest threat to our republic.

RED STATE BLUES: O'Keefe Strikes in Missouri - McCaskill and Clan Exposed as Fakes and Frauds in Guns, Lies and Videotape
 
'The violent intolerance, the abandonment of Civility, the physical attacks, the attempt to assassinate Republicans, the public harassment of conservatives and Republican politicians, the attempt to destroy US citizens by 'Herman Cain'ing them with lies and false accusations, destruction of GOP property, and more calls for violence from the left will continue ...

...until the Democrats get what they want, which is to regain power, to impeach Bill Clinton, to impeach judge Cavanaugh, and to have the American people once again under their control / rule, dependent upon social programs such as welfare, food stamps, and unemployment...dependent on the Democratic Party again."

Signed,

Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party
 
This is just about as absolutely disgusting as it gets...
Nicolas Starost, another individual who works on Senator McCaskill’s campaign, explains how President Obama won’t campaign for Senator McCaskill in Missouri despite their similar views on politics. Starost says this is because Senator McCaskill needs to distance herself from the Democratic party to appeal to more voters
Wait...what? You need to “distance” yourself from your own party and your own beliefs? Why? Because you realize the American people overwhelmingly reject your bat-shit crazy ideology? But it gets even worse:
STAROST: “Because of how like, cause he’s a very liberal candidate. And like… Claire distancing herself from the party is gonna help her win more votes than it will saying like: “Oh here’s Obama, the former President of the United States, to now speak on my behalf.” Which is unfortunate because I love Obama to pieces, and I’d love to see him come here.”

JOURNALIST: “And they essentially have the same views on everything?”

STAROST: “Yeah. People just can’t know that.”
Absolutely appalling. They don’t want the voters to know Claire McCaskill’s actual position on issues and her real views. The left has always been - and remains - the greatest threat to our republic.

RED STATE BLUES: O'Keefe Strikes in Missouri - McCaskill and Clan Exposed as Fakes and Frauds in Guns, Lies and Videotape

This is how the left won the House in 2008, Democrats pretending to be conservatives. After the election they voted in lock step with liberals, then voters fired their ass in 2010, the worst Dem loss in nearly 100 years.
 
Americans have short-term memory problems, for getting thus is the same party that illegally spied on US citizens, reporters, the media, US Senators, USSC Justices, Anand a political opponent / President ... and illegally targeted Americans with a weaponized IRS...who ran a felon as their 2016 election...who rigged primaries, cheated in debates, engaged in election fraud, broke Election laws, and illegally colluded with and paid foreign spies and Russians for their help in trying to win the WH ... Only 2 years ago...
 
Pushing more gun control laws, especially those that effect common use firearms like semi auto rifles is political suicide.
 

In order for the social contract of Constitutional rule by law between the American government and her people to continue functioning, there must be no further gun control whatsoever. The American people must be trusted by their government with the responsibility to own nearly any firearm without regulation. Freedom hurts, freedom rocks, freedom must prevail.
 

In order for the social contract of Constitutional rule by law between the American government and her people to continue functioning, there must be no further gun control whatsoever. The American people must be trusted by their government with the responsibility to own nearly any firearm without regulation. Freedom hurts, freedom rocks, freedom must prevail.

There should be less gun laws. It's as if when Reagan got shot, they had that "Brady Bill" drafted beforehand. :eek:
 

In order for the social contract of Constitutional rule by law between the American government and her people to continue functioning, there must be no further gun control whatsoever. The American people must be trusted by their government with the responsibility to own nearly any firearm without regulation. Freedom hurts, freedom rocks, freedom must prevail.

There should be less gun laws. It's as if when Reagan got shot, they had that "Brady Bill" drafted beforehand. :eek:
If gun bans work so well, how did James Brady get shot in the head with a handgun during the 1981 assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan, in a city that had banned handguns in 1976?
 
If gun bans work so well, how did James Brady get shot in the head with a handgun during the 1981 assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan, in a city that had banned handguns in 1976?

The intent, and goal of more gun control laws is not to reduce violent crime, or murder. As only the law abiding follow these laws, the goal is to restrict the law abiding citizens, and eventually disarm them so they are more dependent on government, and more easily controlled.
 

Forum List

Back
Top