Mathematician destroy Evolution in 5 Min

Freeman

VIP Member
Sep 30, 2009
3,080
128
85
Dr Berlinski destroy Evolution in 5 Min, by the way we should ask if evolution is right, which organ has appeared the first? "eyes, ears or Brain"? eyes need brain and brain need eyes? :confused:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rq5IolR75Ho]YouTube - Evolution destroyed in under 5 minutes[/ame]
 
Mutation:

a8922i0_stongestboy185.jpg


Genetic Drift

1234545359kr6L29.jpg


Natural selection
muscleman.gif
 
There is NO evidence that any animal has ever mutated into existence from another totally different animal. All we have is evidence that WITHIN a species changes occur.
 
There is NO evidence that any animal has ever mutated into existence from another totally different animal.


Exactly as evolutionary theory predicts should be the case.

When a dog gives birth to a whale that grows legs and becomes a human being, you will have disproven evolutionary theory.
 
☭proletarian☭;2179350 said:
There is NO evidence that any animal has ever mutated into existence from another totally different animal.


Exactly as evolutionary theory predicts should be the case.

When a dog gives birth to a whale that grows legs and becomes a human being, you will have disproven evolutionary theory.

Once again the theory claims men evolved from an ape like creature. And that other animals evolved from other totally different species. YET there is absolutely NO evidence of these claims. NOT a single one.
 
☭proletarian☭;2179350 said:
There is NO evidence that any animal has ever mutated into existence from another totally different animal.


Exactly as evolutionary theory predicts should be the case.

When a dog gives birth to a whale that grows legs and becomes a human being, you will have disproven evolutionary theory.

you genius, i asked a question;
during evolution beginning, which organ has appeared the first? "eyes, ears or Brain"? eyes need brain and brain need eyes?! :eusa_shhh:
 
There is NO evidence that any animal has ever mutated into existence from another totally different animal. All we have is evidence that WITHIN a species changes occur.

Is a horse and a donkey the same species?

A tiger and a lion?

They are all different species, but they used to be the same species, which is why they can breed. But the offspring isn't fertile because they diverged. Which means they are no longer the same species.

Now you religious freaks, don't "embarrass" yourselves by saying they are the same "kind". That's just retarded.

Gawd you guys are dumb. And you have the Internet. The information is "right there". There is simply no excuse. Shame on you.
 
sometimes jesus just wants to confuse us with wacky shit like scales, feathers and duck billed mammals that lay eggs.

:lol:

platypus.jpeg
 
Last edited:
The question depends on whether we are discussing macro or micro evolution. It also depends what we are defining as evolution in those two fields.
 
☭proletarian☭;2179350 said:
There is NO evidence that any animal has ever mutated into existence from another totally different animal.


Exactly as evolutionary theory predicts should be the case.

When a dog gives birth to a whale that grows legs and becomes a human being, you will have disproven evolutionary theory.

Once again the theory claims men evolved from an ape like creature. And that other animals evolved from other totally different species. YET there is absolutely NO evidence of these claims. NOT a single one.


Really? Watch this...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dK3O6KYPmEw&playnext_from=TL&videos=5knJ76B0s4A]YouTube - How To Shut Up Pesky Creationists[/ame]
 
The question depends on whether we are discussing macro or micro evolution. It also depends what we are defining as evolution in those two fields.

Where does "micro" end and "macro" begin?

That nonsense has been debunked along with "irreducible complexity".

Hey, Behe was hilarious at Dover. While up on the stand, he was asked, "Following the same criteria that makes ID a "science", would "astrology" and "alchemy" also qualify as science?"

Behe, under oath, said yes. If you can call ID "science", then using the same criteria, astrology and alchemy would also be considered "science". Now THAT'S a hoot.
 
☭proletarian☭;2179350 said:
There is NO evidence that any animal has ever mutated into existence from another totally different animal.


Exactly as evolutionary theory predicts should be the case.

When a dog gives birth to a whale that grows legs and becomes a human being, you will have disproven evolutionary theory.

you genius, i asked a question;
during evolution beginning, which organ has appeared the first? "eyes, ears or Brain"? eyes need brain and brain need eyes?! :eusa_shhh:
:eusa_eh:

You've never read a book, have you?
 
☭proletarian☭;2179350 said:
There is NO evidence that any animal has ever mutated into existence from another totally different animal.


Exactly as evolutionary theory predicts should be the case.

When a dog gives birth to a whale that grows legs and becomes a human being, you will have disproven evolutionary theory.

Once again the theory claims men evolved from an ape like creature. And that other animals evolved from other totally different species. YET there is absolutely NO evidence of these claims. NOT a single one.
Not a what?

Appealing to your own ignorance and stupidity doesn't disprove evolution. It's not our fault you can't read a biology textbook.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top