Mass Shootings: We Have To Work Harder

A Texan who's had enough...


The repubs in Congress will not even allow gun violence to be studied. There may be a solution that would not infringe on the 2nd amendment...but the repubs don't want to even look. Guns are more important than kids in a classroom or shoppers in a mall...apparently.
 
The repubs in Congress will not even allow gun violence to be studied. There may be a solution that would not infringe on the 2nd amendment...but the repubs don't want to even look. Guns are more important than kids in a classroom or shoppers in a mall...apparently.
Yes. We just shake our heads.
 
Congress and the supreme court have stood by these laws close to 100 years. Doubt you will be able to sell your notion to either one, but you are free to try either way. Get Congress to change the law or be successful in your lawsuit against the United State government defending your asserted right to be free from weapons regulation.:auiqs.jpg:

So what you're saying then is that some rights are more equal than others.....
 
The repubs in Congress will not even allow gun violence to be studied. There may be a solution that would not infringe on the 2nd amendment...but the repubs don't want to even look. Guns are more important than kids in a classroom or shoppers in a mall...apparently.

That is an old low……gun research was never stopped you twit….the CDC was told to stop pushing a gun control agenda
 
So what you're saying then is that some rights are more equal than others.....
No. What I am saying is that all rights, implicitly include responsibilities, and congress and the Supreme Court logically set limits, as no right is absolute in all cases. Sorry, no machine guns, mini-guns, military attack helicopters, rockets or artillery are going to be sold generally to the public. Try to live with it.
 
What, you reckon the right of school kids to stay alive is not actually mentioned in the Constitution?
I bet that the term "AK47" is also not mentioned in the Constitution. I expect we would be correct in going back to muzzle loaders and ball and cap. You think Clarence or the traitor that he sleeps with would go with that?
 
A headline that tells you all you need to know about Liberals:


"Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"

According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950’s through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows





From 1994 through 2004, a federal ban on ‘assault weapons’ was in place, and it had no detectable effect on crime.



We have a unique advantage in judging calls for a ban on so-called assault weapons: We’ve done it before. From 1994 through 2004, a federal ban on “assault weapons” was in place, and it had no detectable effect on crime. The independent Task Force on Community Preventative Services found no evidence that the assault-weapon ban prevented any violence. The National Research Council’s review of the academic literature on the question found that the data “did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence.” The Justice Department’s own study suggested that any effects of the law were too small to be statistically measured. Indeed, the only statistically significant outcome that could be detected was a steep rise in prices for various firearms that weren’t banned. Political realities being what they are, it is no surprise that Smith & Wesson shares went up almost 7 percent after the Orlando murders. Against a New Assault-Weapon Ban | National Review






According to Coulter, the one thing we've learned about Gun Free Zones is that killers can't read.

1658327082156.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top