Marriage is one man and one woman for life

Mortimer

Gold Member
Sep 29, 2010
10,619
3,724
260
I live somewhere in rural Austria European Union
279226204_131454769473766_778843287014442771_n.jpg
 
Marriage did mean that. Why the definition had to change is debatable. Controlling words is controlling thought. That probably had a lot to do with it. Equal rights do not necessarily entail identical verbiage.
 
Marriage did mean that. Why the definition had to change is debatable. Controlling words is controlling thought. That probably had a lot to do with it. Equal rights do not necessarily entail identical verbiage.
Marriage has always been a contract. For religious people it may also be a sacrament. But, it's between consenting parties as the state is not party to the contract.
 
Marriage has always been a contract. For religious people it may also be a sacrament. But, it's between consenting parties as the state is not party to the contract.
A contract between a man and a woman (with their families intertwined).
 
Children don't inherit?
Has NOTHING to do with children inheriting. Marriage is a contract between consenting parties. The state is not involved unless there's a dispute in a disolution. The state doesn't want to raise our children.
 
Has NOTHING to do with children inheriting. Marriage is a contract between consenting parties. The state is not involved unless there's a dispute in a disolution. The state doesn't want to raise our children.
Your understanding is demonstrably insufficient.
 
Most marriages end in divorce. Look at our leaders. Many have divorced and alot of people worship them.
 
Marriage has always been a contract. For religious people it may also be a sacrament. But, it's between consenting parties as the state is not party to the contract.
The marriage and the "contract" were between a man and a woman, as has been discussed. Rights and contracts can be equal between parties without changing the traditional meaning of marriage. That was a social movement effort.
 
The marriage and the "contract" were between a man and a woman, as has been discussed. Rights and contracts can be equal between parties without changing the traditional meaning of marriage. That was a social movement effort.
Yes, and the contract is first and foremost between consenting adults. Civil rights take precedence.
 
Yes, and the contract is first and foremost between consenting adults. Civil rights take precedence.
Your arguments in sum amount to maintaining that nouns mean nothing. That appears to be an increasingly common view.
 
So tell me any other primate that is monogamous?
Hint, there are none.
So then it unless humans did not evolve from other primates, likely humans also are not monogamous.
 

Forum List

Back
Top