Adam's Apple
Senior Member
- Apr 25, 2004
- 4,092
- 452
- 48
Democrat Debauchery
By R. Emmett Tyrrell, American Spectator
October 12, 2006
WASHINGTON -- The political news from Washington has become an absolute epicurean delight. If I dine more sumptuously on the "Foley Follies," I shall be in danger of becoming crapulent. Of course, we need not dwell on the Hon. Foley. Days ago this pathetico became only a peripheral figure in this delightful story.
Revolve this in your mind. The Democratic Party, that is to say, the party of homosexual rights and homosexual marriage, is hounding the Republican Party, that is the party of family values, for extending due process to one of its own, the Hon. Foley, a homosexual Republican congressman, once a Democrat and the founder of south central Florida's Lettuce Patch Restaurant. Parents, even vegetarian parents, will want to steer their young as far away as possible from that cutely named restaurant.
Precisely what were the Republicans to do about the Hon. Foley? On this the Democrats are unclear once their indignant oaths fall silent. Apparently the dull House Speaker Dennis Hastert was supposed to have been monitoring his colleagues on the Hill and leapt to action at the first sign that one was sending dirty messages to pages -- though it is only slowly becoming known even by us readers of the vigilant American press who those pages are, how old they were, and whether they were baiting Foley for sport.
The Democrats have several other problems. They are the party that let the Hon. Gerry Studds remain in Congress for over a decade after he seduced a male page with booze. About the time he was caught, a Republican congressman from the Midwest was accused of seducing a female page. The Republican was not renominated. And then there is the Hon. Barney Frank, a beacon of virtue and intelligence in the House of Representatives to this day. It was discovered some years back that a homosexual friend of his was running a house of ill-repute out of Frank's Washington apartment. What did the Democrats do about these indiscretions?
Or for that matter, what are they going to do about the discoveries of Jeffrey Lord? Writing in Spectator.org, Lord reports on Rep. Nancy Pelosi marching in a 2001 gay pride parade in San Francisco. Today Pelosi sounds like this: "Republican leaders admitted to knowing about Mr. Foley's abhorrent behavior for six months to a year and failed to protect children in their trust." However, according to Lord, in that 2001 gay pride parade who was striding a mere three spots away from Pelosi but Harry Hay, founder of "The Mattachine Society," and a strong advocate of man/boy love. Upon Hay's death in 2002 the North American Man/Boy Love Association ran on its website several of his marmoreal declarations, one being, "Because if the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they should know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what thirteen-, fourteen-, and fifteen-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world." Frankly I would have suggested that shooting hoops is important too, but silly old me.
Now I think we can all agree that sending dirty e-mails to pages whether 16, 18, or whatever their ages might be is reprehensible and if done at taxpayers' expense still more reprehensible. I have not seen the dirty-emails but I am told that some are as dirty as Bill Clinton's phone sex, which, come to think of it, is another sex scandal that our Democratic friends patiently indulged. Yet if an election on national defense in time of war, homeland security, the prosecution of terrorists, and a healthy economy is to turn on the Republican leadership's treating Foley the way the Democratic leadership treated Studds and Frank, I think we are all being a bit frivolous.
While on the subject of the Republican leadership, may I ask why the leadership has not yet made an issue of the abovementioned instances of Democratic hypocrisy regarding sexual misbehavior? They seem pretty obvious. Speaker Hastert has been as slow to address the Democrats' abysmal failure to maintain standards on Capitol Hill as he was in acting on Foley. Actually he has been as slow to address this hypocrisy as Pelosi has been to apologize for appearing with Hay in that gay pride parade.
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_ret.asp
By R. Emmett Tyrrell, American Spectator
October 12, 2006
WASHINGTON -- The political news from Washington has become an absolute epicurean delight. If I dine more sumptuously on the "Foley Follies," I shall be in danger of becoming crapulent. Of course, we need not dwell on the Hon. Foley. Days ago this pathetico became only a peripheral figure in this delightful story.
Revolve this in your mind. The Democratic Party, that is to say, the party of homosexual rights and homosexual marriage, is hounding the Republican Party, that is the party of family values, for extending due process to one of its own, the Hon. Foley, a homosexual Republican congressman, once a Democrat and the founder of south central Florida's Lettuce Patch Restaurant. Parents, even vegetarian parents, will want to steer their young as far away as possible from that cutely named restaurant.
Precisely what were the Republicans to do about the Hon. Foley? On this the Democrats are unclear once their indignant oaths fall silent. Apparently the dull House Speaker Dennis Hastert was supposed to have been monitoring his colleagues on the Hill and leapt to action at the first sign that one was sending dirty messages to pages -- though it is only slowly becoming known even by us readers of the vigilant American press who those pages are, how old they were, and whether they were baiting Foley for sport.
The Democrats have several other problems. They are the party that let the Hon. Gerry Studds remain in Congress for over a decade after he seduced a male page with booze. About the time he was caught, a Republican congressman from the Midwest was accused of seducing a female page. The Republican was not renominated. And then there is the Hon. Barney Frank, a beacon of virtue and intelligence in the House of Representatives to this day. It was discovered some years back that a homosexual friend of his was running a house of ill-repute out of Frank's Washington apartment. What did the Democrats do about these indiscretions?
Or for that matter, what are they going to do about the discoveries of Jeffrey Lord? Writing in Spectator.org, Lord reports on Rep. Nancy Pelosi marching in a 2001 gay pride parade in San Francisco. Today Pelosi sounds like this: "Republican leaders admitted to knowing about Mr. Foley's abhorrent behavior for six months to a year and failed to protect children in their trust." However, according to Lord, in that 2001 gay pride parade who was striding a mere three spots away from Pelosi but Harry Hay, founder of "The Mattachine Society," and a strong advocate of man/boy love. Upon Hay's death in 2002 the North American Man/Boy Love Association ran on its website several of his marmoreal declarations, one being, "Because if the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they should know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what thirteen-, fourteen-, and fifteen-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world." Frankly I would have suggested that shooting hoops is important too, but silly old me.
Now I think we can all agree that sending dirty e-mails to pages whether 16, 18, or whatever their ages might be is reprehensible and if done at taxpayers' expense still more reprehensible. I have not seen the dirty-emails but I am told that some are as dirty as Bill Clinton's phone sex, which, come to think of it, is another sex scandal that our Democratic friends patiently indulged. Yet if an election on national defense in time of war, homeland security, the prosecution of terrorists, and a healthy economy is to turn on the Republican leadership's treating Foley the way the Democratic leadership treated Studds and Frank, I think we are all being a bit frivolous.
While on the subject of the Republican leadership, may I ask why the leadership has not yet made an issue of the abovementioned instances of Democratic hypocrisy regarding sexual misbehavior? They seem pretty obvious. Speaker Hastert has been as slow to address the Democrats' abysmal failure to maintain standards on Capitol Hill as he was in acting on Foley. Actually he has been as slow to address this hypocrisy as Pelosi has been to apologize for appearing with Hay in that gay pride parade.
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_ret.asp
