Maricopa is Withholding Evidence

You're more interesting 'with' the anger, profanity, and no attempts at words longer than 'macaroni'.
You know nothing about me. So your words here are meaningless.

But you’re a fucking Canuck commie Duck, so your posts are generally meaningless.

Can’t help but notice that you’re off topic, too. I guess discussing the importance of martching signatures (here the lack of match) is beyond your severely limited abilities.

Try again, troll.
 
Last edited:
I suggest you retreat to canada where all rabid animals, such as yourself, are protected.
And I suggest you try to hide that I'm effective with your level of anger.

fkn canukistan commie ck-skr, uppity prk unamerican twt gfyrself loser!
 
And I suggest you try to hide that I'm effective with your level of anger.

fkn canukistan commie ck-skr, uppity prk unamerican twt gfyrself loser!




What anger? I am far from angry. I am amused by animals such as yourself. Usually you exist in a zoo, but every now and then you types escape out into the real world.
 

Voters are notified if the sigs don't match and have 5 days after the election, to correct.
Lake will prove if that really went on. It is in serious doubt. Those votes were stolen from the voter rolls. Signatures did not matter. You think Maricopa has a record of who was called? they should.
 
Hughes has 50 years of experience in the printing industry—16 of which have been in “printing ballots for Maricopa County Elections,” according to his affidavit. He also helped “establish the auditing criteria for the printing and paper portion of the 2020 Maricopa County ballot audit and helped select and set up the equipment used during the audit to do the ballot counting.”

That is an extremely credible witness.

 
The day before the election, all of the printers tested 100% perfectly. But on the day of the election, many of the printers did not properly print the ballots, and this happened only in Republican heavy areas.


New Testimony Confirms Ballot Tampering in Maricopa’s 2022 Election

By Wendi Strauch Mahoney

April 3, 2023

New testimony from Bob Hughes confirms ballot tampering in Maricopa County’s 2022 election. Hughes states in his affidavit that “an intentional change was made to the printers affecting the DAY OF Election ballots” in the 2022 Maricopa County midterm election. Hughes’ affidavit in Exhibit K of a newly filed Motion to Reconsider in Mark Finchem’s dismissed 2022 election lawsuit confirms previous testimony from Clay Parikh. Parikh was one of several expert witnesses in the Kari Lake lawsuit.

Parikh testified there are “only two ways the printing of a 19-inch image on a 20-inch paper happened, and they are both intentional. He explained, “One way is by changing the printer adjustments. That would make the printer adjustments, and settings override the image file that was set. The other is from the application side or the operating system side.”

Hughes has 50 years of experience in the printing industry—16 of which have been in “printing ballots for Maricopa County Elections,” according to his affidavit. He also helped “establish the auditing criteria for the printing and paper portion of the 2020 Maricopa County ballot audit and helped select and set up the equipment used during the audit to do the ballot counting.”

On Mar. 6, 2023, he and his team reviewed the Logic and Accuracy reports (L&A) for the 2022 Maricopa County Election. Hughes and his team “physically inspected the ballots at MCTEC that were used in the testing of the election tabulators.” They also reviewed each of the Maricopa County Voting Center certification reports and the Tabulator reports that were “printed during their testing.” His affidavit clarifies explicitly that “[t]he most important and notable finding is that every machine and every voting center report show that every test was passed without any failures.”

Personalized ballots were required in the Maricopa County election because of various local elections, such as school district races. Therefore “ballot styles” are created for each precinct and “are prepared for each election at MCTEC,” not at the Voting Centers. When a voter arrives at a Voting Center, his identity is verified by the poll worker. The poll worker then uses the County’s e-poll book system to “verify they have not returned a mail-in ballot.” However, on election day, mail-in ballots were also turned in to the Voting Centers, and thus, the e-poll book may not be up-to-date on the status of a given voter’s mail-in ballot.

Contrary to what many want us to believe, Hughes testified that the equipment to carry out the voter verification process and the printing of ballots “need to be networked and online at the same time.”
 
Hughes has 50 years of experience in the printing industry—16 of which have been in “printing ballots for Maricopa County Elections,” according to his affidavit. He also helped “establish the auditing criteria for the printing and paper portion of the 2020 Maricopa County ballot audit and helped select and set up the equipment used during the audit to do the ballot counting.”

That is an extremely credible witness.


Oh. You posted it first. Good for you!
 
I hope those guilty of tampering with the elections in 2020 and 2022 in Arizona get a fair trial, convicted then given 20-year prison sentences for their crimes with no time off for good behavior.
 
Lake will prove if that really went on. It is in serious doubt. Those votes were stolen from the voter rolls. Signatures did not matter. You think Maricopa has a record of who was called? they should.
Where did these mail in ballots come from LastA?

You say names from voter lists....

But you have to individually, as a voter in these swing states, request a mail in ballot be mailed to you...

Where were these alleged +/- 30000, individually requested absentee ballots mailed to, for these alleged thieves to get any ballot at all, let alone thousands?

And how would these alleged thieves know who voted and who hadn't, before mailing in these thousands of stolen ballots? Surely thousands out of the tens of thousands stolen ballots that you claim were stolen from the voter rolls, actually came in and voted or also requested an absentee ballot...and WE WOULD KNOW that someone had stolen their vote...the voters would notify law enforcement or the election crew... that someone voted in their place.

NONE OF THAT HAPPENED.
 
The day before the election, all of the printers tested 100% perfectly. But on the day of the election, many of the printers did not properly print the ballots, and this happened only in Republican heavy areas.


New Testimony Confirms Ballot Tampering in Maricopa’s 2022 Election

By Wendi Strauch Mahoney

April 3, 2023

New testimony from Bob Hughes confirms ballot tampering in Maricopa County’s 2022 election. Hughes states in his affidavit that “an intentional change was made to the printers affecting the DAY OF Election ballots” in the 2022 Maricopa County midterm election. Hughes’ affidavit in Exhibit K of a newly filed Motion to Reconsider in Mark Finchem’s dismissed 2022 election lawsuit confirms previous testimony from Clay Parikh. Parikh was one of several expert witnesses in the Kari Lake lawsuit.

Parikh testified there are “only two ways the printing of a 19-inch image on a 20-inch paper happened, and they are both intentional. He explained, “One way is by changing the printer adjustments. That would make the printer adjustments, and settings override the image file that was set. The other is from the application side or the operating system side.”

Hughes has 50 years of experience in the printing industry—16 of which have been in “printing ballots for Maricopa County Elections,” according to his affidavit. He also helped “establish the auditing criteria for the printing and paper portion of the 2020 Maricopa County ballot audit and helped select and set up the equipment used during the audit to do the ballot counting.”

On Mar. 6, 2023, he and his team reviewed the Logic and Accuracy reports (L&A) for the 2022 Maricopa County Election. Hughes and his team “physically inspected the ballots at MCTEC that were used in the testing of the election tabulators.” They also reviewed each of the Maricopa County Voting Center certification reports and the Tabulator reports that were “printed during their testing.” His affidavit clarifies explicitly that “[t]he most important and notable finding is that every machine and every voting center report show that every test was passed without any failures.”

Personalized ballots were required in the Maricopa County election because of various local elections, such as school district races. Therefore “ballot styles” are created for each precinct and “are prepared for each election at MCTEC,” not at the Voting Centers. When a voter arrives at a Voting Center, his identity is verified by the poll worker. The poll worker then uses the County’s e-poll book system to “verify they have not returned a mail-in ballot.” However, on election day, mail-in ballots were also turned in to the Voting Centers, and thus, the e-poll book may not be up-to-date on the status of a given voter’s mail-in ballot.

Contrary to what many want us to believe, Hughes testified that the equipment to carry out the voter verification process and the printing of ballots “need to be networked and online at the same time.”
Why was his testimony in court rejected, and not believed by the court?
 

Forum List

Back
Top