Lol, Liberals Want Laws Against Global Warming Deniers.

[ClosedCaption]

Is there ANY way to address Global Warming that is acceptable to you? I mean ANY way possible.

 

[martybegan]

its called not being held to dogmatic thinking, and its called a risk assessment. To me the risk of overwhelming government control of people brought on by a response to AGW is worse than the AGW itself (if it is occurring).

What you are asking for isn't seat belt vs. roll cage, its freedom vs. a new form of serfdom based on a "maybe."

New form of what? Man look the only thing I'm talking about is a cleaner planet. You are saying that a clean planet doesnt matter because you choose your wild imaginations of serfdom. Now, There are charts showing the impacts of Global Warming...What you are saying is you dont care about the impacts...the prevention or any of that because YOU BELIEVE some conspiracy theory is afoot.

I actually work to make a "cleaner planet." What the hell do you do?

And, OOOH THERE ARE CHARTS.

What I am saying is that what is being proposed by all the watermelons out there to combat AGW is basically "moar socialism" and that dog isn't going to hunt.

 

[martybegan]

Is there ANY way to address Global Warming that is acceptable to you? I mean ANY way possible.

Making government bigger and more intrusive isn't one of them. I have not been convinced that there is even a need to address it.

Concentrate on more important stuff, like cleaner water, cleaner air, more use of nuclear power, and eventual success of fusion research.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Is there ANY way to address Global Warming that is acceptable to you? I mean ANY way possible.

Making government bigger and more intrusive isn't one of them. I have not been convinced that there is even a need to address it.

Concentrate on more important stuff, like cleaner water, cleaner air, more use of nuclear power, and eventual success of fusion research.

So, no then? See I knew we'd get to the bottom of it eventually.

So who should concentrate on clean water, clean air etc? Govt?

You dont have any crazy ideas about govt control on that do you?

 

[ClosedCaption]

its called not being held to dogmatic thinking, and its called a risk assessment. To me the risk of overwhelming government control of people brought on by a response to AGW is worse than the AGW itself (if it is occurring).

What you are asking for isn't seat belt vs. roll cage, its freedom vs. a new form of serfdom based on a "maybe."

New form of what? Man look the only thing I'm talking about is a cleaner planet. You are saying that a clean planet doesnt matter because you choose your wild imaginations of serfdom. Now, There are charts showing the impacts of Global Warming...What you are saying is you dont care about the impacts...the prevention or any of that because YOU BELIEVE some conspiracy theory is afoot.

I actually work to make a "cleaner planet." What the hell do you do?

*CC doesnt do dick measuring contest*

And, OOOH THERE ARE CHARTS.

What I am saying is that what is being proposed by all the watermelons out there to combat AGW is basically "moar socialism" and that dog isn't going to hunt.

You can call anything another name but that doesnt mean thats what it is. Thats the problem. You call concern for the planet something you already detest. You're just mislabeling it to oppose it

 

[ClosedCaption]

I oppose brussel sprouts! (socialism)

but those are actually brocolli (global warming)

I said I oppose brussel sprouts and thats that (still believes its socialism)

 

[martybegan]

its called not being held to dogmatic thinking, and its called a risk assessment. To me the risk of overwhelming government control of people brought on by a response to AGW is worse than the AGW itself (if it is occurring).

What you are asking for isn't seat belt vs. roll cage, its freedom vs. a new form of serfdom based on a "maybe."

New form of what? Man look the only thing I'm talking about is a cleaner planet. You are saying that a clean planet doesnt matter because you choose your wild imaginations of serfdom. Now, There are charts showing the impacts of Global Warming...What you are saying is you dont care about the impacts...the prevention or any of that because YOU BELIEVE some conspiracy theory is afoot.

I actually work to make a "cleaner planet." What the hell do you do?

*CC doesnt do dick measuring contest*

And, OOOH THERE ARE CHARTS.

What I am saying is that what is being proposed by all the watermelons out there to combat AGW is basically "moar socialism" and that dog isn't going to hunt.

You can call anything another name but that doesnt mean thats what it is. Thats the problem. You call concern for the planet something you already detest. You're just mislabeling it to oppose it

Are you used to losing those contests CC?? Too bad, so sad.

I'm gonna start calling you "Tiny"

I detest using concern for the planet as an excuse to increase the role of government in our lives.

 

[martybegan]

I oppose brussel sprouts! (socialism)

but those are actually brocolli (global warming)

I said I oppose brussel sprouts and thats that (still believes its socialism)

it makes sense when people like you keep advocating Brussel Sprouts as the only response to Brocolli.

 

[ClosedCaption]

So who should be concentrating on clean air and water again?

 

[ClosedCaption]

its called not being held to dogmatic thinking, and its called a risk assessment. To me the risk of overwhelming government control of people brought on by a response to AGW is worse than the AGW itself (if it is occurring).

What you are asking for isn't seat belt vs. roll cage, its freedom vs. a new form of serfdom based on a "maybe."

New form of what? Man look the only thing I'm talking about is a cleaner planet. You are saying that a clean planet doesnt matter because you choose your wild imaginations of serfdom. Now, There are charts showing the impacts of Global Warming...What you are saying is you dont care about the impacts...the prevention or any of that because YOU BELIEVE some conspiracy theory is afoot.

I actually work to make a "cleaner planet." What the hell do you do?

*CC doesnt do dick measuring contest*

And, OOOH THERE ARE CHARTS.

What I am saying is that what is being proposed by all the watermelons out there to combat AGW is basically "moar socialism" and that dog isn't going to hunt.

You can call anything another name but that doesnt mean thats what it is. Thats the problem. You call concern for the planet something you already detest. You're just mislabeling it to oppose it

Are you used to losing those contests CC?? Too bad, so sad.

No because I'm straight

 

[martybegan]

So who should be concentrating on clean air and water again?

We should. when a problem with tangible effects is identified, it should be quantified for risk, and then Engineers need to figure out how to fix it.

 

[martybegan]

its called not being held to dogmatic thinking, and its called a risk assessment. To me the risk of overwhelming government control of people brought on by a response to AGW is worse than the AGW itself (if it is occurring).

What you are asking for isn't seat belt vs. roll cage, its freedom vs. a new form of serfdom based on a "maybe."

New form of what? Man look the only thing I'm talking about is a cleaner planet. You are saying that a clean planet doesnt matter because you choose your wild imaginations of serfdom. Now, There are charts showing the impacts of Global Warming...What you are saying is you dont care about the impacts...the prevention or any of that because YOU BELIEVE some conspiracy theory is afoot.

I actually work to make a "cleaner planet." What the hell do you do?

*CC doesnt do dick measuring contest*

And, OOOH THERE ARE CHARTS.

What I am saying is that what is being proposed by all the watermelons out there to combat AGW is basically "moar socialism" and that dog isn't going to hunt.

You can call anything another name but that doesnt mean thats what it is. Thats the problem. You call concern for the planet something you already detest. You're just mislabeling it to oppose it

Are you used to losing those contests CC?? Too bad, so sad.

No because I'm straight

it's all right tiny. maybe you are a "grower, not a shower"

 

[Theowl32]

its called not being held to dogmatic thinking, and its called a risk assessment. To me the risk of overwhelming government control of people brought on by a response to AGW is worse than the AGW itself (if it is occurring).

What you are asking for isn't seat belt vs. roll cage, its freedom vs. a new form of serfdom based on a "maybe."

New form of what? Man look the only thing I'm talking about is a cleaner planet. You are saying that a clean planet doesnt matter because you choose your wild imaginations of serfdom. Now, There are charts showing the impacts of Global Warming...What you are saying is you dont care about the impacts...the prevention or any of that because YOU BELIEVE some conspiracy theory is afoot.

Oh, so now you claim those charts that show global warming "effects" are 100% accurate?

 

[bendog]

Well, it is an example of the left's desire for PC. But, meanwhile citizens united aids the Kochs in funding efforts to enact financial disincentives to putting solar on roofs.

 

[ClosedCaption]

So who should be concentrating on clean air and water again?

We should. when a problem with tangible effects is identified, it should be quantified for risk, and then Engineers need to figure out how to fix it.

Govt or individual efforts?

 

[ClosedCaption]

its called not being held to dogmatic thinking, and its called a risk assessment. To me the risk of overwhelming government control of people brought on by a response to AGW is worse than the AGW itself (if it is occurring).

What you are asking for isn't seat belt vs. roll cage, its freedom vs. a new form of serfdom based on a "maybe."

New form of what? Man look the only thing I'm talking about is a cleaner planet. You are saying that a clean planet doesnt matter because you choose your wild imaginations of serfdom. Now, There are charts showing the impacts of Global Warming...What you are saying is you dont care about the impacts...the prevention or any of that because YOU BELIEVE some conspiracy theory is afoot.

Oh, so now you claim those charts that show global warming "effects" are 100% accurate?

Sure thats what I said when you translate it. But if you actually read the words it doesnt say that at all

 

[martybegan]

So who should be concentrating on clean air and water again?

We should. when a problem with tangible effects is identified, it should be quantified for risk, and then Engineers need to figure out how to fix it.

Govt or individual efforts?

The level of government appropriate to the response can provide for the solution, again, you keep thinking I am against ALL government. I am not. I am against big government, and government overreach.

 

[ClosedCaption]

So who should be concentrating on clean air and water again?

We should. when a problem with tangible effects is identified, it should be quantified for risk, and then Engineers need to figure out how to fix it.

Govt or individual efforts?

The level of government appropriate to the response can provide for the solution, again, you keep thinking I am against ALL government. I am not. I am against big government, and government overreach.

Yeah I understand that but your "level of appropriate" govt is vauge but your opposition to any govt response for clean water or air is pretty clear.

Its everything they do you think its "too big" and since theres no measurement thats your usual response to everything

 

[BluesLegend]

Large cities run by Democrats pollute our water and air with vast quantities of sewage, toxins, and garbage why don't we see liberals marching to protest that?

 

[martybegan]

So who should be concentrating on clean air and water again?

We should. when a problem with tangible effects is identified, it should be quantified for risk, and then Engineers need to figure out how to fix it.

Govt or individual efforts?

The level of government appropriate to the response can provide for the solution, again, you keep thinking I am against ALL government. I am not. I am against big government, and government overreach.

Yeah I understand that but your "level of appropriate" govt is vauge but your opposition to any govt response for clean water or air is pretty clear.

Its everything they do you think its "too big" and since theres no measurement thats your usual response to everything

My opposition is when there is over-reach, like calling CO2 a pollutant. I work in the Environmental Engineering Field, the real one, not the bugs, bunnies, and bureaucrat Environmentalism you support.